Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: DmdNexus on November 19, 2003, 09:37:36 AM

Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: DmdNexus on November 19, 2003, 09:37:36 AM
Bush is staying at Buckingham palace with his wife Laura....

Here's a poll:

If you were the President and your wife was with you at the "Palace" would you get it on?

And do you think, the royal staff would leave a packet of condoms in the night stand for your convenience?.... after all, being president you can't just run down to the 7/11 at 11 pm.
Title: Re: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Ripsnort on November 19, 2003, 09:41:04 AM
Quote
Originally posted by DmdNexus
Bush is staying at Buckingham palace with his wife Laura....

Here's a poll:

If you were the President and your wife was with you at the "Palace" would you get it on?

And do you think, the royal staff would leave a packet of condoms in the night stand for your convenience?.... after all, being president you can't just run down to the 7/11 at 11 pm.


What makes you think they'd need condoms? Most responsible parents, once finished with having children, take more effective measures to prevent over-populating the world (Please remove Catholics, Mormens, and Islamics from this equation)
Title: Re: Re: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: DmdNexus on November 19, 2003, 09:44:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
What makes you think they'd need condoms? Most responsible parents, once finished with having children, take more effective measures to prevent over-populating the world (Please remove Catholics, Mormens, and Islamics from this equation)


That's their choice to use them or not... being married they might not need them... she may even be passed being able to get pregnant.

The question is would the staff leave them a packet.

I'm sure if it was Clinton... they would live the box... never know what he's poking.
Title: Re: Re: Re: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Ripsnort on November 19, 2003, 09:48:04 AM
Quote
Originally posted by DmdNexus
That's their choice to use them or not... being married they might not need them... she may even be passed being able to get pregnant.

The question is would the staff leave them a packet.

I'm sure if it was Clinton... they would live the box... never know what he's poking.


Bush probably would make water balloons out of them and lob them at the protesters from the window. :D
Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: DmdNexus on November 19, 2003, 09:52:44 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Bush probably would make water balloons out of them and lob them at the protesters from the window. :D


And scribbles on them  "with luv from America" as he tosses them over the balcony.
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Westy on November 19, 2003, 09:56:20 AM
"Most responsible parents, once finished with having children, take more effective measures to prevent over-populating the world (Please remove Catholics, Mormens, and Islamics from this equation)"

 This reminds me of the Protestant couple discussing "sex" in the MP movie "The Meaning of Life."
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: ravells on November 19, 2003, 09:56:37 AM
I saw Laura Bush on TV last night...she was attractive, witty and intelligent.

What on earth did she see in her husband?

Ravs
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Swager on November 19, 2003, 09:56:38 AM
Im sure the condoms would be there.  The Brits do not want  to take the chance of a Bush offspring being conceived and cause the world problems in 2048.
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: JB73 on November 19, 2003, 10:25:10 AM
as long as we are talking about condoms...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/031116/photos_hl_afp/031116222059_p3tqx6uf_photo0&e=7&ncid=1756

LMFAO
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Wanker on November 19, 2003, 10:25:21 AM
You know, the Queen was pretty hot when she was young. She had nice gams, as they say in England. ;)
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Swoop on November 19, 2003, 10:37:03 AM
We do?  Since when?  And what's a gam?

(http://image1ex.villagephotos.com/extern/640697.jpg)
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Wanker on November 19, 2003, 10:45:16 AM
Breasts, man, breasts.

Sheesh, must I tell you everything about English culture?! :D
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Swoop on November 19, 2003, 11:07:06 AM
Nah you mean tits, boobs, bazoomers, mams, jugs, jubblies or knockers.  Never heard em called 'gams' before.


Did you learn English from a Frenchman or something?

(http://image1ex.villagephotos.com/extern/640697.jpg)
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: DmdNexus on November 19, 2003, 11:09:45 AM
Gams are legs... specifically CALVES - NOT BREASTS...

Sheesh Read a Sam Malone novel!
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Octavius on November 19, 2003, 11:16:26 AM
 the Mrs Bush is arse ugly.

Her face looks like one of those freaky looking clown bobble-head thingamajigs.  

And I don't see any tits, boobs, bazoomers, mams, jugs, jubblies or knockers on her either.

Even if I had the chance, a paper bag on her head wouldn't do the job.

:D
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Wanker on November 19, 2003, 11:18:11 AM
Quote
Originally posted by DmdNexus
Gams are legs... specifically CALVES - NOT BREASTS...

Sheesh Read a Sam Malone novel!


Doh! I sit corrected!


Jubblies? :lol :lol


:rofl

Jubblies....

:aok
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: DmdNexus on November 19, 2003, 11:18:53 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Octavius
[BEven if I had the chance, a paper bag on her head wouldn't do the job.:D [/B]


She's definately a double bagger.

Any one can ride a horse... it takes a true aristocrat to look like one.
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: midnight Target on November 19, 2003, 11:23:57 AM
Next time you call Gams breasts, yer gettin a gat to the melon wit yer java.... ya moke.
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: Octavius on November 19, 2003, 11:41:20 AM
Jolly good show man.  I'm terribly sorry but do inspect these translators (http://www.whoohoo.co.uk/main.asp) .  It will convert your everydeay speech intoh some propah bullshit! wooht!

Yer fools! oi invented slang. de Oirish prefer any sort av diddies, jugees, bazoomers, mams, jugs, an' jubblies. aye swoop?

Guid day, scottsmen loch them too.

Or 'a abaht a lil' cockney rhymin'? many loike threepenny bits, boobs, bazoomers, mams, jugs, jubblies or knockers.

Yorksha? wha' t' 'ell is dis? 'eh, these translators rock. 'a close atteur?
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: ravells on November 19, 2003, 11:51:52 AM
me main geeza octavius,

what an bangin wes'ite. fank yous so much fe introducin me to hit. I as bookmarked hit fe future uses.

ravs - Is it coz I iz black?
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: miko2d on November 19, 2003, 12:39:52 PM
Getting Laura pregnant may be a good touch for the upcoming elections. He may have little else by then...

 miko
Title: Re: Re: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: SOB on November 19, 2003, 01:20:41 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
What makes you think they'd need condoms? Most responsible parents, once finished with having children, take more effective measures to prevent over-populating the world (Please remove Catholics, Mormens, and Islamics from this equation)

Sorry to interrupt your subtle bashing with facts, but the LDS church doesn't forbid birth control.  (LDS AKA Mormons)
Title: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: aztec on November 19, 2003, 03:51:09 PM
SOB when you are as attention starved as Rip then facts are just trivial little things that get in the way.
Title: Re: Re: Re: Royal accomodations... would you?
Post by: AKIron on November 19, 2003, 04:59:48 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SOB
Sorry to interrupt your subtle bashing with facts, but the LDS church doesn't forbid birth control.  (LDS AKA Mormons)


They certainly don't encourage it either.