Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Sundiver on November 20, 2003, 07:36:27 PM
-
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031120/ap_on_bi_ge/gun_lawsuits_5
-
Obviously we have waited too long for California to fall off into the ocean, time to push it.
dago
-
9th Circuit Court of Appeals = Alien Invaders.
-
this is one of the stupidist things ever. if the gun malfunctions then it would be reasonable, not if someone misuses it though.
it's like suing craftsman because the machanic used their wrenches to do a bad job on your car.
or suing ford because someone drove drunk in a ford.
-
Proof that logic has nothing to do with lawsuits and california.
-
I doubt that lawsuits have much to do with logic anywhere.
the law seems to get more and more confused the more you know about it. IMO it's intentionally made screwed-up and twisted so you have to hire 'one of the club' to even have a fighting chance.
-
Originally posted by capt. apathy
IMO it's intentionally made screwed-up and twisted so you have to hire 'one of the club' to even have a fighting chance.
Ding Ding! A winner!
-
Well I burned my head with the blow dryer!
So im going to sue the maker because it was there fault:rolleyes:
Good Gawd dang where does this crap end.
To cuase injury or death with a firearm you need several things.
1) firearm
2) ammunition
3)a human with intent
Now of the above three only one of those is controled by human
emotions.
The intent.
The gun by itseft can't hurt anyone can it?
The ammunition by it's self can't hurt anyone can it?
The gun loaded with ammunition can't hurt anyone by it's self can it?
You must bring in the human equation.
And thats where it get messy.
Now seeing as we as a society can't seem to take responsability for our own actions these days we have to point our little fingers at the big bad GUN.
I in my many years of firearms training and ownership have never seen a gun shoot someone by It's self.
Rather odd how that works huh.
But as long as there are watermelon house lawyers out there there will be these silly law suites.
We can only pray that in the near future common sense will prevail:aok
-
Need to sue the companies producing knives, since those too are lethal.
Since we cannot sue god for creating violent human beings, couldn't we then sue the church, since they sort of work as the representors of god?
-
Originally posted by Fishu
Need to sue the companies producing knives, since those too are lethal.
Since we cannot sue god for creating violent human beings, couldn't we then sue the church, since they sort of work as the representors of god?
Indeed you have a point there:D
We are suing Catholic preist in this country for molesting kids.
Does that count LOL.
-
suing them sounds like a good start.
-
hopefully... the immunity bill will pass without too much trouble.
like I said... the gun control guys are all about a ban... they do it incrimentaly. better hope that once guns are outlawed they don't come after a freedom that you hold dear pongo.
The other part is that the lawyers are running out of big pocket victims... they will allways ruin out of big pocket victims tho and simply feed on us forever if we don't stop em.
Those who feel that voting for democrats and giving them a majority is not such a bad thing should take a long look at the 9th circuit.
lazs
-
This is such a joke.
This is more like sueing a car maker for producing a running cars. Guns are meant to kill, and these jokers are suing the gun makers cause they where used for killing?
A gun is a tool, it is that simple. You want to sue someone sue the parents and the assshole that did the shooting.
-
They should just chain the doors at Remington, Ruger, Colt etc etc.
-
more people die in the USA per year from the flu ( 31,000) than die from guns.
-
Pongo,
Throw Ford, GM, honda, ETC in their to. Their products kill FAR more people every year then guns.
There is no reason for any car to go faster then 70 MPH, it's just plain unsafe!!
-
Seems totally stupid to me but then again, after Napster got sued, why not sue gun manufacturers? It's exactly the same principle.
-
pongo... what a self rightious little twerp you are.
worse... you are self rightious about a subject that you don't know anything about.
lazs
-
capt. apathy: it's like suing craftsman because the machanic used their wrenches to do a bad job on your car.
Or like taking your money because some stupid bi#ch could not keep her legs together and now has to be paid welfare. Nevertheless it's considered OK by most.
Anyway, the law banning the state courts from considering any cases they deem necessary is clearly unconstitutional.
As much as I sympathise with gun manufacturers, it must be up to the states what cases to try.
Congress can dictate what cases the federal courts may consider.
miko