Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: AKIron on November 28, 2003, 04:01:29 PM
-
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,104322,00.html
"Robbins portrays journalists as Pentagon puppets, U.S. soldiers as thieves and killers of innocent women and children, and the Bush cabinet as war mongers willing to start a war to escape the negative publicity of the Enron scandal."
-
And a moron.
"It is not propaganda. It is a voice of dissent, which is different than propaganda," said audience member Kadina Dayal-Halday.
-
Isn't embedded a synonymous of encapsulated ?
I f*ed my prose ... => bed time ..
-
Originally posted by straffo
embedded a synonymous of encapsulated
Similar but not necessarily the same. Encapsulated would mean completely surrounded while embedded means part of but not necessarily unexposed. But what does that have to do with the play?
-
Yea I saw this on the news today and the worst part about it is people are thinking this is based on "actual events/accounts" The reporter and Marine that went to the play were THEIR and said that it was nothing even remotly close to the truth. Than the Marine Major in dress blues was called a "nazi" by one of the audience members. His reply was somthing like "I'm glad I have the oportunity to defend your right to say that to me"
I don't think I could sit through this play without walking out
-
Originally posted by AKIron
Similar but not necessarily the same. Encapsulated would mean completely surrounded while embedded means part of but not necessarily unexposed. But what does that have to do with the play?
Untill we can make a definite limit between this 2 words it can be interpreteted both way, isn't a film a form of interpretation ?
it look ugly in english ....:eek:
-
Originally posted by straffo
Untill we can make a definite limit between this 2 words it can be interpreteted both way, isn't a film a form of interpretation ?
it look ugly in english ....:eek:
"Embedded" is the title of the play and named for the reporters that were embedded with our troops in Iraq. That means that the reporters accompanied the troops not as combatants but as observers.
Yes, Tim Robbins "interpreted" the events of the Iraq invasion to suit his anti-Republican agenda. However, as pointed out in the article, he was never a journalist or embedded with the troops and has fabricated a very anti-government, anti-troops, and anti-reporter play that slanders them all imo.
He will never get another dime of mine.
-
Originally posted by AKIron
He will never get another dime of mine.
Ditto