Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Duedel on January 09, 2004, 03:08:57 AM

Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: Duedel on January 09, 2004, 03:08:57 AM
WTG Ford. At least it seams that some of ur designers know whats cool. After the GREAT Ford GT now this monster. I only hope they will sell it in Germany too  :cool:
(http://www.spiegel.de/img/0,1020,319745,00.jpg)
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 04:10:37 AM
How bout some specs? Looks nice, but what is under the hood and what does it offer :)
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: Duedel on January 09, 2004, 04:16:52 AM
Take a look here: http://www.fordvehicles.com/2005mustang/home.asp (http://www.fordvehicles.com/2005mustang/home.asp)
I couldnt find any specs. I guess they'll release more informations soon.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 04:24:27 AM
(http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/141241/0.jpg)

I like this baby, the mustang is great to.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 04:29:14 AM
It says on the website you can lease a "2004" stang for 5 dollars a day 150 a month. I'm assuming the GT will be close.. (bursts into laughter, echoing through this thread):D
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 04:33:32 AM
Here are specs for the GT

    
Wheel Base (in):    106.7
Overall Length (in):    182.8
Overall Height at curb (in):    44.3
Overall Width (in):    76.9
Front Track (in):    63
Rear Track (in):    63.7
Weight Distribution (ft/rear):    43/57
Overall Shadow (sq ft):    96.8
Approach Angle (deg):    9.2
Departure Angle (deg):    14.0



Seating Capacity:    2
Leg Room (in):    44.6
Head Room (in):    35.4
Shoulder Room (in):    57.7
Hip Room:    57.8
Passenger Volume (cu ft):    52.8
Interior Volume Index(cu ft):    53.2



Engine Type:    DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder, supercharged V-8
Engine Displacement (L):    5.4
Bore/Stroke (mm):    90.2x105.8
Displacement (cu in/cc):    330/5409
Compression Ratio (in/mm):    8.4:1
Material:    All Aluminum
Horsepower @ RPM:    500@6,000
Torque @ RPM (lb ft):    500@4,500
Horsepower Specific Output (hp/liter):    92.6
Torque Specific Output (lb ft/liter):    92.6
Recommended Fuel:    91 octane (premium)
Fuel System:    Sequential multi-port electronic fuel injection -(SEFI) with dual injectors per cylinder
Oil Capacity with Filter (quarts):    10
Usable Fuel Capacity (gal):    18



Type    6-speed manual
Gear Ratios    1 - 2.61
2 - 1.71
3 - 1.23
4 - 0.94
5 - 0.77
6 - 0.63
Final Drive Ratio    3.36:1
Gear Synchronization    1 - Triple
2 - Triple
3 - Triple
4 - Triple
5 - Double
6 - Double
Chassis/Steering/Brakes    
Drivetrain Layout    Rear-wheel drive
Front Suspension    Double Wishbone
Rear Suspension    Double Wishbone
Steering Type    Rack-and-Pinion
Steering Ratio    17:1
Turns Lock-to-Lock    2.7
Turning Circle (Curb-to-Curb)    40 ft.
Brake System    Vacuum Power Assist
Front Brakes (in)    14.0
Rear Brakes (in)    13.2
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: Ripsnort on January 09, 2004, 07:57:08 AM
I'm hoping that they change the interior dimensions.  I test drove a Cobra SVT (A Mustang on steroids) and their was no head room, my head actually rested on the roof window frame, if you were ever T-boned while driving like that you'd be dead instantly.  Also, being 6' 1", when I put the seat in a position where I could comfortably shift the car, the back of the seat touched the seat in back...in other words, no leg room whatsoever for more than 2 passengers.  They may have just as well made it a two-seater.:rolleyes:
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: mason22 on January 09, 2004, 09:53:07 AM
Anybody see the new Shelby Cobra they prototyped for this years car shows? IT was on that new show "Rides" with Jason Preistly a few nights ago.

pretty sweet car.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: moose on January 09, 2004, 10:27:26 AM
basically what ripsnort meant to say was 'its not a bmw'
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: Ripsnort on January 09, 2004, 10:37:02 AM
Quote
Originally posted by moose
basically what ripsnort meant to say was 'its not a bmw'


The Cobra was my first choice, I posted this many times.  I had down money on one before I went and test drove a 3-series.... Unfortuantely the Cobra didn't accomodate the following:
Gas milege
backseat requirement
Interior that was comfortable.

Now, if they address #2 and #3, I would trade my reliable transportation in for some real fun.  I'm not concerned about #1 anymore, as I only go into work 3 days a week now.

However, you're statement is partially true...Ford will never meet, or beat BMW quality and craftsmanship, but I'd be willing to sacrifice the aforementioned for alittle extra HP at less expense.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: GtoRA2 on January 09, 2004, 10:44:38 AM
XtrmeJ
 Your specs are wrong.

 That may be a cobra or something.

 Hotrod had the specs listed this month I can post them later.

 The motor was a new all aluminum 4.8 liter with 3 valves per and it was mated to the same 5 speed as before. No super charger or turbo.

 The Chasis is all new. this is not based on the old Fox chasis.

 Hotrod implied the GT would only be a little more then the current.  So for the GT somewhere between 24k to 30k.

Link to another web board with pics of the artical.  (http://www.tripleplate.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=7981)
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: GtoRA2 on January 09, 2004, 10:46:37 AM
Awsome car BTW.

I am trying to convince the GF that we need one... lol.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: moot on January 09, 2004, 10:48:16 AM
yeah, 500-500 is a bit much for just a GT
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: Saurdaukar on January 09, 2004, 10:52:33 AM
Hes quoting specs for the Ford GT not the Mustang GT.

I believe the Mustang GT will use a normally aspirated 4.7L pumping out around 300 HP.  The SVT version will probably be supercharged.

I may be off by a litre or two and the BHP, but for the most part thats what youre looking at.

Definately a big improvement over the fox.  If straightline speed is your thing the current SVT Mustang is where its at.
Title: the pics
Post by: GtoRA2 on January 09, 2004, 10:52:42 AM
(http://www.factoryfast.com/images/05GT_1.jpg)

(http://www.factoryfast.com/images/05GT_2.jpg)

(http://www.factoryfast.com/images/05GT_3.jpg)

(http://www.factoryfast.com/images/05GT_4.jpg)

(http://www.factoryfast.com/images/05GT_5.jpg)

(http://www.factoryfast.com/images/05GT_6.jpg)

(http://www.factoryfast.com/images/05GT_7.jpg)
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: LePaul on January 09, 2004, 11:04:14 AM
Well GTO just saved me $5.95  lol

Might be some copyright issues there...
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: GtoRA2 on January 09, 2004, 11:05:15 AM
Lepaul
 I stole it from another site... so.....

Hmmm

I do own a copy though.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: Animal on January 09, 2004, 11:13:14 AM
It looks badass. Hopefully the interiors wont be crap like the current ones. Man those mustangs have crappy interiors. Worse than the worse rice.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: Saurdaukar on January 09, 2004, 11:15:54 AM
You mean you dont like throwing cogs with a 2 liter bottle of coke?
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: GRUNHERZ on January 09, 2004, 11:23:39 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Animal
It looks badass. Hopefully the interiors wont be crap like the current ones. Man those mustangs have crappy interiors. Worse than the worse rice.


http://mustangworld.com/ourpics/News/05_mustang/05mustang.htm

This is apparently the production interior, real alluminum trim.  :)

(http://mustangworld.com/ourpics/News/05_mustang/images/mustangworld37_jpg.jpg)
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: mrblack on January 09, 2004, 12:26:39 PM
I had a 67 mustang that thing is bringing back memories.
Might have to look at one when they hit the streets.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 02:58:54 PM
Quote
Originally posted by GtoRA2
XtrmeJ
 Your specs are wrong.

 That may be a cobra or something.

 Hotrod had the specs listed this month I can post them later.

 The motor was a new all aluminum 4.8 liter with 3 valves per and it was mated to the same 5 speed as before. No super charger or turbo.

 The Chasis is all new. this is not based on the old Fox chasis.

 Hotrod implied the GT would only be a little more then the current.  So for the GT somewhere between 24k to 30k.

Link to another web board with pics of the artical.  (http://www.tripleplate.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=7981)


Ummmm.. Buddy I copy and pasted from the ford website here
So unless this is a lie im right.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 03:00:33 PM
grr here  GT Specs (http://www.fordvehicles.com/fordgt/specs.asp)

Directly from the ford website.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 03:08:39 PM
And just to not create any more confusion im not talking about the mustang. It is a completly different car here is the pic.

Ford GT Pic (http://www.fordvehicles.com/fordgt/home.asp?bhcp=1)

All this is directly from their website. The confusion came around because this is NOT  a "Ford GT Mustang". It is just a "Ford GT". Check it out:p
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: Duedel on January 09, 2004, 03:10:32 PM
Would someone be so kind and send me one of these Mustang to Germany? I assure I'll pay as soon as the car arrives. Trust me ;)
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: GtoRA2 on January 09, 2004, 03:16:52 PM
LOL

GTORA2 is never wrong....

Keep that in mind in the future or your Xterra may tip over..


It may anyway, but might not be me.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 03:19:56 PM
LOL I'm just saying unless Ford is lieing to its customers, which could be who knows, this website is right hehe. And if my math is right, my tires are wid enough so it wont tip, althought possible hehe.  But anyone that was bright enough to figure out that when you have a car that high, you dont drive very fast. But you prob knew that...right? :lol :rofl
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: Mickey1992 on January 09, 2004, 04:15:33 PM
Now that the Camaro/Firebird is discontinued, I bet Ford will sell a lot to prior Chevy owners.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: SaburoS on January 09, 2004, 04:18:25 PM
This new Mustang is the best looking of all. My previous favorite were the 65-70 fastback types. The new one overall similar looking, but better. Better handling (it better be, lol), probably faster in the 1/4 mi.
Would be interesting to see an '05 SVT/GT/Mach1 compared to a '69 428SQJ (fitted with modern tires) in a drag race. No comparo to a road race though (35 year tech diff).
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: SaburoS on January 09, 2004, 04:20:35 PM
I wonder if they'll have the retro paint option of blue racing stripes on white, like on the early-mid GT350's. That would be cool looking :)
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: mason22 on January 09, 2004, 05:41:40 PM
btw, (http://tlc.discovery.com/fansites/rides/photo/gallery/season1/shelby_hzoom02.jpg)

yum.
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 05:43:55 PM
what car is that? New viper?
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: mason22 on January 09, 2004, 05:56:24 PM
nope...shelby cobra
Title: Ford Mustang
Post by: XtrmeJ on January 09, 2004, 06:16:35 PM
Beautiful:eek: