Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Ripsnort on May 31, 2001, 09:59:00 AM
-
JAPAN
A6M5b
Ki-61-I-KAIc
N1K2-J
TOTALS:3
0 BOMBERS
GERMANY
Ar 234B
Bf 109F-4
Bf 109G-10
Bf 109G-2
Bf 109G-6
Fw 190A-5
Fw 190A-8
Fw 190D-9
Fw 190F-8
Ju 88A-4
Ta 152H
Ostwind
Panzer IV Type H
TOTALS: 13
2 BOMBERS
UNITED STATES
B-17G
B-26B
F4U-1C
F4U-1D
F6F-5
C-47A
P-38L
P-47D-11
P-47D-25
P-47D-30
P-51B
P51D Mustang
TBM-3
LVT(A)2
LVT(A)4
M-3
M-16
Elco 80' PT Boat
TOTALS: 18
2 BOMBERS
ITALY
C.202
C.205
TOTALS: 2
0 BOMBERS
RUSSIA
Il-2 Type 3
La-5FN
La-7
Yak-9T
Yak-9U
TOTALS:5
1 BOMBER
UNITED KINGDOM
Lancaster III
Seafire IIC
Spitfire MkIX
Spitfire V
Tempest V
Typhoon
TOTALS: 6
1 BOMBER
Its my opinion we need more bombers!
[This message has been edited by Ripsnort (edited 05-31-2001).]
-
Dammit, thought I was in Aircraft forum, my apologies...
Pyro: move this if you will, please.
-
Punt! (Note: lack of bombers, early war stuff!, and no P61 Black Widow!)
-
yep need more bomders and the p61 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
------------------
DRILL
-
P61 has my vote from the very begining (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif) Gimme that black ugly plane! I love it! And about the bombers? Golly-geened Right!!!
------------------
MBirdCZ
CO of Sudden Death Squadron
-
Agreed, esp Japanese bombers, flying boats, etc.
Also more Italian, russian, & Japanese fighters.
-
Good grief yes, we need more Japanese planes.
Ki61 is very nice, but the Japanese also need naval bombers, level bombers, the Ki84, and the Emily.
Not much point in a PTO HA without more IJ aircraft.
-
Thanks Rip (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
(http://null.dk/~ssl/483/dg.gif)
-
P-P-Punt!
-
We need a broader distribution of aircraft across all countries period, but I think HTC are already on that anyway (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
We just got a new 'bomber' (the IL2), so I think it's unfair to beat on them for this right now =)
I have to admit curiosity to knowing what sort of schedule they've got on adding aircraft, not on the nitty-gritty detail but, say, do they intend to add early-war aircraft yet, or do they plan to pad the aircraft backwards and build up to a situation that enables a variety of HA scenarios.
Personally I'd love to see lots of early-war aircraft being added in and later-war aircraft having perk value placed on them.
He111, Ju87, Blenheim, Wellington or Shackleton. Some more tanks, the Betty, the Hurricane... You can't add the Mosquito without adding the Me110 and the fighter-version of the Ju88.
=)
-
No "beatings" here KF, just as the title says..."Visibility". (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
-
Canada
Goose Egg
Ok, so we had none. (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
The Spitfire XIV would be the closest thing, though.
Throw us Canucks a bone here!
-
In a very recent interview with Pyro:
http://www.simhq.com/simhq3/sims/interviews/aceshigh/pyro/ (http://www.simhq.com/simhq3/sims/interviews/aceshigh/pyro/)
To be blunt, what other kinds of aircraft do you anticipate adding (a Stuka maybe?).
The Stuka is something we’ll definitely do. Our goal is to do all the planes you would expect and quite a few that you wouldn’t.
and
Where do you see Aces High in one year? ...
In another year, the game will be fairly matured. We should have the whole war covered in terms of planes with just individual holes left to fill.
It's going to be a fun and exciting year imo.
-Westy
[This message has been edited by Westy MOL (edited 06-01-2001).]
-
oops! How'd this get back up here? Subliminal?