Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: NUKE on April 06, 2004, 10:37:46 PM
-
Fox and Friends = total morons in the morning
O'Reilly = complete tool, smug, no clue
Cal Thomas = totally stupid arse show..."Cal Toons" an insult to my intelligence.
News coverage = very little.... to many "shows" but seems offer at least another view other than from the left.
"Hannity and Combs" = great show, both sides get equal time. I like both Allan and Sean and get a feel for them as real people with different opinions, yet each comes across as honest in thier views.
-
My parents always have that network on. It lowers my IQ 5-10 points every time I go over there.
-
fox is head and shoulders above ANY of the othe cable "news" channels
-
Originally posted by FUNKED1
My parents always have that network on. It lowers my IQ 5-10 points every time I go over there.
Is that a cumulative loss or do you regain what you lost after you leave?
-
My response (http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=113347)
-
Originally posted by Eagler
fox is head and shoulders above ANY of the othe cable "news" channels
I agree Eagler, where do you get your "news" Nuke?
-
Originally posted by AKIron
....where do you get your "news" Nuke?
Tin Foil Hat News Channel?
ack-ack
-
Everytime i put on fox for some bizzare reason they are going on about what hollywood celebraty is dateing who. Fox spends more time reporting on the tabloids then any other TV station.
It gets rateings.
-
Anyone who claims Fox News is the best news station in his country is no different than the Russian who thinks the same of Pravda.
-
Originally posted by Capt. Pork
Is that a cumulative loss or do you regain what you lost after you leave?
It comes back after about a week. If I go over there three or four days in a row then it's possible to have permanent damage. When I recuperated from oral surgery there I think this happened.
-
some good looking babes on fox. Thats all that matters imo.
media news is just a tool.
-
Originally posted by Yeager
some good looking babes on fox. Thats all that matters imo.
media news is just a tool.
Anybody can read a teleprompter. The talking head might as well be showing us something while she's reading it.
This is the best thing (http://www.nakednews.com) to come to news since the invention of the television camera.
-
Personally, whoever that weather guy is on Fox & Friends is hilarious.
-
We get Fox here in NZ after midnight, luckly BBC World Service is also on after midnight.
Fox n Friends has to be the most embarassing display of one eyed broadcasting trash I've ever seen
...-Gixer
-
Originally posted by AKIron
I agree Eagler, where do you get your "news" Nuke?
Did people not read my post? I said Fox has too many shows and little news. I like FOX news, but whenever I turn it on I seem to see a stupid arse show instead of news.
I hate most of the shows, like their news.
I turn on the station to try to get news and I more often than not am greeted with: "Fox and Friends" morons, "Day Side with Linda Vetter", "On the Record" with Greta Van Susteren, Neil Cavuto on Business, O'Reilly Factor, "Beltway Boys", "War Stories" with Oliver North, "Bulls and Bears", After Hours with Cal "cornball" Thomas".....and many more.
Normally I channel surf news , but I prefer FOX news. That's what annoys me about calling FOX NEWS channel a news channel.....alll the damn "shows", mostly garbage.....and they re-run some of them later at night too!
I do like Hannitty and Colms though.
FOX News reports things that most of the liberal networks wont touch or even report or comment on.....like Clinton's audio, where Clinton explains why he didn't take Bin Ladden from Suddan.
Am I wrong, or does FOX news channel have more "shows" than actual news? You people that watch it know what I mean. It's like when MTV basically stopped playing videos and started a variety show format.
-
IMO All broadcast news sucks unless it just coverage of the latest breaking story. Fox is biased, CNN and CNBC are full of meaningless, speculative watermelon chat 95 percent of the time and the networks can't cover a story if it takes longer than 1.5 minutes.
If you want depth and some accuracy, read newspapers and carefully selected non-fiction history.
Charon