Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: strk on April 27, 2004, 07:55:48 PM
-
http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/quiz/neoconQuiz.html
take the test and find out.
It said I was a liberal. Well I'll be damned.
-
repost
-
Realist
Realists…
Are guided more by practical considerations than ideological vision
Believe US power is crucial to successful diplomacy - and vice versa
Don't want US policy options unduly limited by world opinion or ethical considerations
Believe strong alliances are important to US interests
Weigh the political costs of foreign action
Believe foreign intervention must be dictated by compelling national interest
Historical realist: President Dwight D. Eisenhower
Modern realist: Secretary of State Colin Powell
-
If I go to the con in a neon, am I a neocon?
-
(http://208.56.219.94/kerry.JPG)
-
What am I if I couldn't even get past the first selection in the first question before getting bored and leaving? (yes, go ahead, I left that question so open for a reason...)
-
YOU ARE A NO TALENT A55 CLOWN
-
Originally posted by Nash
YOU ARE A NO TALENT A55 CLOWN
who?
-
Not to worry my friend... Your drawings are high art.
I was talking about SOB. I thought that woulda been obvious.
-
I am a neoconservative, nuke'm all I say, let God sort them out. We need more parking space for our SUV's anyway. BTW I didn't need to take your silly test to know.
-
I thought it was kind of a cool test, myself.
It was looking like it was asking you one thing, but it was determining another thing about ya. Very crafty. You may think yer answering "YEA!" to "Nuke Iran" when in actual fact yer admitting to smoking pot and driving a VW bus.
It's faking left, going right.
Lotsa grey (too much?) for some folks...
Not bad... as far as these stoopid retardnet (or whatever) tests go.
-
I dont like some of those answers. Especially with numbers 6 and 7... it needs some more options.
-
my wife saw your avatar again :rofl
-
Yeah this test sucks. It called me a liberal, yet I wasn't able to choose an answer on several questions that fit me best. Too narrow.
storch, mine or nash? (thats really me btw, love it or leave it! :D)
-
Originally posted by NUKE
(http://208.56.219.94/kerry.JPG)
Is he poping a boner?
Troubling.... :lol
-
Originally posted by SOB
What am I if I couldn't even get past the first selection in the first question before getting bored and leaving?
Smart.
Those questions take too long read for one of these silly internet questinaires...
They could give you the same result by having you pick between a picture of bush and one of kerry...
-
NUKE, you nedd to sell those on ebay.. :)
-
Are you an instardnet Neo-Lib?
Take the test and find out here:
Are you an instardnet Neo-Lib? (http://www.luhemaucampos.blogger.com.br/loser.jpg)
-
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Is he poping a boner?
Troubling.... :lol
It is interesting what some people will key on. Popping a boner? are you in third grade?
-
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Are you an instardnet Neo-Lib?
Take the test and find out here:
Are you an instardnet Neo-Lib? (http://www.luhemaucampos.blogger.com.br/loser.jpg)
I took the test - the result said "Saurdaker is in third grade"
go figure
-
Sorry, Nash's. she finds us all "disturbing".
-
Nuke, is that the new "Piano Computer" ?
-
Originally posted by Maniac
Nuke, is that the new "Piano Computer" ?
That is what I noticed too. Funny how Saurdaker focused on my dick. I guess people see only what they want to see sometimes, huh?
-
Realist.
Agree with Octavius, some of the questions didn't have answers that I was 100% compatible with, but I think the shoe still fits.
I'm about as fed up with the far right as I am with the far left.
-
Realist
-
strk... seriously man... you needed a test to learn that you were a liberal? Just shout out "mom, am I a liberal?"
lazs
-
Originally posted by NUKE
(http://208.56.219.94/kerry.JPG)
Careful w/ that "No Bush" sign. the goverment might come after you...so might Greenpeace, for that matter...
-
lol gainsey
-
I'm an Isolasionist..but of course I'm a kid and don't fully understand everything going on around the world..
-
Originally posted by lazs2
strk... seriously man... you needed a test to learn that you were a liberal? Just shout out "mom, am I a liberal?"
lazs
BWAHAHAHHAHAHAH!!!!
That's a Classic Lazs kill...
:rofl
-
Originally posted by lazs2
strk... seriously man... you needed a test to learn that you were a liberal? Just shout out "mom, am I a liberal?"
lazs
A quick look at his sig resolves all doubts. I did not know that Eisenhower said that, but it is just complete rubbish. A liberal demagogery at its finest.
-
Originally posted by strk
I took the test - the result said "Saurdaker is in third grade"
go figure
Originally posted by strk
I took the test - the result said "Saurdaker is in third grade"
go figure
Originally posted by strk
That is what I noticed too. Funny how Saurdaker focused on my dick. I guess people see only what they want to see sometimes, huh?
Awwww... is strk sore? :rofl
Youre.... youre... YOURE IN THIRD GRADE!!!! HAH!!!
Come on, you cant see the strange tubular shape in the general vacinity of your illustrated crotch?
-
Realist
Realists…
Are guided more by practical considerations than ideological vision
Believe US power is crucial to successful diplomacy - and vice versa
Don't want US policy options unduly limited by world opinion or ethical considerations
Believe strong alliances are important to US interests
Weigh the political costs of foreign action
Believe foreign intervention must be dictated by compelling national interest
Historical realist: President Dwight D. Eisenhower
Modern realist: Secretary of State Colin Powell
-
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Are you an instardnet Neo-Lib?
Take the test and find out here:
Are you an instardnet Neo-Lib? (http://www.luhemaucampos.blogger.com.br/loser.jpg)
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
-
mietla... I believe that all Ike was saying is that war wastes resources and that we had better have a pretty good cause when we go to war to outweigh the inevitable suffering...
most people would agree with that. I think tho that by taking it out of context that strk is trying to make a point that has nothing to do with what Ike said.
lazs
-
Hmmm.......
Neoconservative
Neoconservatives…
Want the US to be the world's unchallenged superpower
Share unwavering support for Israel
Support American unilateral action
Support preemptive strikes to remove perceived threats to US security
Promote the development of an American empire
Equate American power with the potential for world peace
Seek to democratize the Arab world
Push regime change in states deemed threats to the US or its allies
Historical neoconservative: President Teddy Roosevelt
Modern neoconservative: President Ronald Reagan
-
What kind of estogen bag would dissagree with Teddy or Ronald?
lazs
-
Originally posted by Monk
Hmmm.......
Neoconservative
Neoconservatives…
Want the US to be the world's unchallenged superpower
Share unwavering support for Israel
Support American unilateral action
Support preemptive strikes to remove perceived threats to US security
Promote the development of an American empire
Equate American power with the potential for world peace
Seek to democratize the Arab world
Push regime change in states deemed threats to the US or its allies
Historical neoconservative: President Teddy Roosevelt
Modern neoconservative: President Ronald Reagan
Sign me up.
-
Originally posted by lazs2
strk... seriously man... you needed a test to learn that you were a liberal? Just shout out "mom, am I a liberal?"
lazs
damn that was funny Lazs I got to hand it to you. I won't even respond to show my respect for your wit.
-
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Awwww... is strk sore? :rofl
Youre.... youre... YOURE IN THIRD GRADE!!!! HAH!!!
Come on, you cant see the strange tubular shape in the general vacinity of your illustrated crotch?
yes of course but I have to give you a hard time
er, so to speak
-
Originally posted by lazs2
mietla... I believe that all Ike was saying is that war wastes resources and that we had better have a pretty good cause when we go to war to outweigh the inevitable suffering...
most people would agree with that. I think tho that by taking it out of context that strk is trying to make a point that has nothing to do with what Ike said.
lazs
no, I think you stated exactly what it says. It kinds of puts the perspective on efforts that are beyond the money that is spent.
-
perhaps we all agree here... war costs in more than money and it should not be entered into lightly.. but... human rights and freedom are worth any cost. Ike was beyond angry seeing the German concentration camps.. There is no way that any expense would have been spared... no war to great.. to put an end to that.
I belive Ike might have felt in a similar way about the regiem of the sadman and his sons too.
lazs
-
Originally posted by lazs2
perhaps we all agree here... war costs in more than money and it should not be entered into lightly.. but... human rights and freedom are worth any cost. Ike was beyond angry seeing the German concentration camps.. There is no way that any expense would have been spared... no war to great.. to put an end to that.
I belive Ike might have felt in a similar way about the regiem of the sadman and his sons too.
lazs
I know I did. but that isn't the reason we went there.
-
Neoconservative .........but I knew that....
-
Isolationist...I say we eliminate the entire legislative branch and give the legislative power directly to the people. Let the rest of the world deal with their own problems, unless those problems affect us in the HERE and NOW - not in the FUTURE or MAYBE.
-
Originally posted by lazs2
mietla... I believe that all Ike was saying is that war wastes resources and that we had better have a pretty good cause when we go to war to outweigh the inevitable suffering...
most people would agree with that. I think tho that by taking it out of context that strk is trying to make a point that has nothing to do with what Ike said.
lazs
[/B]
Originally posted by strk
no, I think you stated exactly what it says. It kinds of puts the perspective on efforts that are beyond the money that is spent.
As I said, I do not know the original context, so I have no foundation to question anything. but the way it is presented in your sig, the quote seems seriously mangled. Typical emotions over facts and reason. I have a really hard time to believe that a real person could actually say anything like that. Only a serious demagog and ideolog could come up with such a statement. It is clearly manufactured, not reasoned.
-
cool... a label maker.
MiniD