Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Udie on May 11, 2004, 12:22:40 PM

Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Udie on May 11, 2004, 12:22:40 PM
No how no way! (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040511/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_american_beheaded&cid=540&ncid=1480)

it's just plain rediculus
Title: Re: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 12:24:44 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Udie
No how no way! (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040511/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_american_beheaded&cid=540&ncid=1480)

it's just plain rediculus


Al queda is there now, because we are. Easy targets for them. Saddam had no wmds or ties to terrorists before that. That is why it had nothing to do with the war on terror.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: vorticon on May 11, 2004, 12:26:23 PM
when was "war on terror" given as an excuse for iraq?
Title: Re: Re: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Udie on May 11, 2004, 12:28:04 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
Saddam had no wmds or ties to terrorists before that.



 Dude did you not watch the news before a year ago?  I'm still waiting to see what happened to the wmd we cataloged years ago.  Also he sure as hell did have ties to terrorists.  How many Isreali's were killed by terrorist paid by SH?    He had plane fuselages that terrorist used to train in. THere was an Al Queda group in north western Iraq, known about well before the war.  Get your head out of the dirt man.
Title: Re: Re: Re: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 12:30:39 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Udie
Dude did you not watch the news before a year ago?  I'm still waiting to see what happened to the wmd we cataloged years ago.  Also he sure as hell did have ties to terrorists.  How many Isreali's were killed by terrorist paid by SH?    He had plane fuselages that terrorist used to train in. THere was an Al Queda group in north western Iraq, known about well before the war.  Get your head out of the dirt man.


oh, you still think there are wmd's huh? And what about the pentagon declaring that there was no proof of ties to al queda and saddam.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Mickey1992 on May 11, 2004, 12:32:25 PM
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=11&u=/ap/20040511/ap_on_re_mi_ea/egypt_iraq_american_beheaded

And so the mass exodus of private contractors begins.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: muckmaw on May 11, 2004, 12:36:49 PM
Personally, I'm starting to think we should just leave and let these people just live in 12th century chaos as they seem so fond of.

It's days like this that make me want to be an isolationist.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 12:40:25 PM
Quote
Originally posted by muckmaw
Personally, I'm starting to think we should just leave and let these people just live in 12th century chaos as they seem so fond of.

It's days like this that make me want to be an isolationist.


Do you really think we have a real exit strategy for iraq? Hell the military is argueing within itself because rumsfeld thought we didnt need anymore then 150k troops on the ground while generals that were forced to resign said we needed 300k+.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Gunslinger on May 11, 2004, 12:41:42 PM
reguardless of past ties it is closley related to the war on terror now.  

Terrorists who commit acts of "ATROCITY at whim "EXECUTE" an American "HOSTAGE" for "Abuse" of detainees while in US custody.

Kidnapping.....hostages....te rrorism....execution

Compared to:

Prisoner abuse



Hmmmmm both being bad things to do....but who's side should I take on this issue.....hmmmm.....these decisions are tough
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Yeager on May 11, 2004, 12:43:47 PM
while generals that were forced to resign said we needed 300k+.
====
where did you get this from?

Are you saying hussein has never had or ever wielded a weapon of mass destruction?  Are you saying he had them once upon a time but got rid of them?  If so where did they (WMDs) go?

wtf are you saying?
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 12:45:30 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
reguardless of past ties it is closley related to the war on terror now.  

Terrorists who commit acts of "ATROCITY at whim "EXECUTE" an American "HOSTAGE" for "Abuse" of detainees while in US custody.

Kidnapping.....hostages....te rrorism....execution

Compared to:

Prisoner abuse



Hmmmmm both being bad things to do....but who's side should I take on this issue.....hmmmm.....these decisions are tough


Quagmire all the way. Way to get us into another vietnam bush.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 12:46:23 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
while generals that were forced to resign said we needed 300k+.
====
where did you get this from?

Are you saying hussein has never had or ever wielded a weapon of mass destruction?  Are you saying he had them once upon a time but got rid of them?  If so where did they (WMDs) go?

wtf are you saying?


He had them back in the 80's, and they were destoryed by us in the gulf war. I am saying that he didnt have them at the time of our invasion last year.
Title: Re: Re: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Ripsnort on May 11, 2004, 12:46:33 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
Al queda is there now, because we are. Easy targets for them. Saddam had no wmds or ties to terrorists before that. That is why it had nothing to do with the war on terror.


Have you had your head stuck in the sand for the last 10 years?

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our war on terror begins with al Qaida, but it does not end there. . . . we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime. . . President George W. Bush, Joint Session of Congress, September 20, 2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

 


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saddam Hussein is paying $25,000 to the relatives of Palestinian suicide bombers -- a $15,000 raise much welcomed by the bombers' families. In Tulkarm, one of the poorest towns on the West Bank, a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council handed out the checks from Saddam. The payments have been made for at least two years, but the amount has suddenly jumped up by $15,000 -- a bonus for the families of 'martyrs', to reward those taking part in the escalating war against Israel. . . . Fox News, March 26, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

 

 


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This general served Saddam Hussein for decades. Along with another Iraqi defector, Sabah Khodada (see below), the general tells of terrorists training in a Boeing 707 resting next to railroad tracks on the edge of Salman Pak, an area south of Baghdad. The existence of the plane has been confirmed by U.N. inspectors. The general describes the men who trained there, the camp's security, and his "gut feeling" that the camp was in some way tied to the Sept. 11 attacks. Iraqi Lt. General, PBS and New York Times Interview, November 6, 2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

 


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A captain in the Iraqi army from 1982 to 1992, he worked at what he describes as a highly secret terrorist training camp at Salman Pak, an area south of Baghdad. In this translated interview Khodada describes what went on at Salman Pak, including details on training hijackers. He emigrated to the U.S. in May 2001. Sabah Kodada, Iraqi Army Captain, PBS and New York Times Interview, October 14, 2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

 

 


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An investigation by Frontline confirmed that Iraqi intelligence had trained at least forty Islamic terrorists between 1995 and 2000 in how to hijacking airliners using a Boeing-747 that was originally Kuwaiti property. Frontline, PBS, November 14, 2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

 

 


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of American citizens. . . . Congressional Resolution Authorizing Force Against Iraq, October 15, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

 

 


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shortly before the Sept. 11 attacks, a group of al-Qaida fighters left Afghanistan and set up shop in Iraq as a backup base, according to a report in today‘s Los Angeles Times. Osama bin Laden‘s jihadists established such a base in town of Al Biyara and nearby mountain villages where Kurdish militants had begun imposing the strict Islamic rule much like Afghanistan‘s ousted Taliban regime, according to the Times report. While this base is further evidence of Saddam Hussein‘s recent support of al-Qaida, documented by many intelligence sources over the last 10 years, Iraq is attempting to maintain plausible deniability with regard to the bases – suggesting they are outside the control of the government in Baghdad. Intelmessages.com and Los Angeles Times, December 9, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

 

 


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The British also released a dossier on Iraq which claimed that at least two key Al-Qaeda lieutenants underwent training inIraq. The dossier also confirmed that Iraq was paying Al-Qaeda to use its Ansar forces based in northern Iraq to attack the Kurdish forces. Reuters, September 14, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

 

Simply no basis for action
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Gunslinger on May 11, 2004, 12:46:57 PM
Complain complain complain.  That's all I've heard out of stabby.  Lets bash the administration and offer no solution.  Typical libral tactic.
Title: Re: Re: Re: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Gunslinger on May 11, 2004, 12:48:23 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort

 
Simply no basis for action


Nope  none.....i saw it on TV so it must be true.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 12:51:31 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
Complain complain complain.  That's all I've heard out of stabby.  Lets bash the administration and offer no solution.  Typical libral tactic.


I was against the war from the begining, that was my solution. It is to late to just pull out now. Is there a simple solution for the quagmire bush got us into. No. We will be losing men and women in iraq for the next 20 years or so. What i do know is that there is a serious lack of ground troops in that country. We forsaked our allies in nato thinking we could go in alone and take care of buisness. Well that was poor planning. How long before blair is out and those few british troops that are there pull out?
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Gunslinger on May 11, 2004, 12:53:48 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
I was against the war from the begining, that was my solution. It is to late to just pull out now. Is there a simple solution for the quagmire bush got us into. No. We will be losing men and women in iraq for the next 20 years or so. What i do know is that there is a serious lack of ground troops in that country. We forsaked our allies in nato thinking we could go in alone and take care of buisness. Well that was poor planning. How long before blair is out and those few british troops that are there pull out?


AGAIN Blaim BUSH but offer no solution???????
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 12:55:13 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
AGAIN Blaim BUSH but offer no solution???????


Do you offer a solution other then killemall? My solution, appologize to our allies for being dicks then bring in 200k more troops.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Udie on May 11, 2004, 12:56:45 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=11&u=/ap/20040511/ap_on_re_mi_ea/egypt_iraq_american_beheaded

And so the mass exodus of private contractors begins.


 I was actually thinking strongly about taking a job in Bagdad for Haliburton. They're hiring Autocad techs. I had my family behind me and everything.  Not now! :eek:

 And stabby,  just when did you get the idea that the war on terror was only a war on al queda?
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: gofaster on May 11, 2004, 12:59:00 PM
Updates with more information (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=540&e=1&u=/ap/20040511/ap_on_re_mi_ea/egypt_iraq_american_beheaded)

Gruesome story.  What I can't figure out is why he would go to Iraq without a contract in place beforehand.  Maybe he underestimated the level of violence in that place.  26 years old - young enough to feel invincible, old enough to start planning for the future.

Quote

The video showed five men wearing headscarves and black ski masks, standing over a bound man in an orange jumpsuit — similar to a prisoner's uniform — who identified himself as Nick Berg, a U.S. contractor whose body was found on a highway overpass in Baghdad on Saturday.


"My name is Nick Berg, my father's name is Michael, my mother's name is Susan," the man said on the video. "I have a brother and sister, David and Sarah. I live in ... Philadelphia."


After reading a statement, the men were seen pulling the man to his side and putting a large knife to his neck. A scream sounded as the men cut his head off, shouting "Allahu Akbar!" — "God is great." They then held the head out before the camera.


Quote
Berg's mother, Suzanne Berg, said her son was in Iraq as an independent businessman to help rebuild communication antennas. He had been missing since April 9, she said.


"He had this idea that he could help rebuild the infrastructure," she said.


Quote
Berg, who was in Baghdad from late December to Feb. 1, returned to Iraq in March. He didn't find any work and planned again to return home on March 30, but his daily communications home stopped on March 24. He later told his parents he was jailed by Iraqi officials at a checkpoint in Mosul.

...

On April 5, the Bergs filed suit in federal court in Philadelphia, contending that their son was being held illegally by the U.S. military. The next day Berg was released. He told his parents he hadn't been mistreated.

The Bergs last heard from their son April 9, when he said he would come home by way of Jordan, Turkey or Kuwait. But by then, hostilities in Iraq had escalated.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Gunslinger on May 11, 2004, 12:59:35 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
Do you offer a solution other then killemall? My solution, appologize to our allies for being dicks then bring in 200k more troops.


WOW an actual solution.....libral as it may be.....but an actual attempt at productivity.  Congrats you have leaped out of your libral shell just long enough for you to go back to saying America needs to appologize.

Well its a start but I seriously doubt US allies or the UN for that matter would do that much better of a job.  I think we should wait till the change over in june and elections after that.  It has still been a relativly short time since the invasion that I think its too soon to tell.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 12:59:47 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Udie
I was actually thinking strongly about taking a job in Bagdad for Haliburton. They're hiring Autocad techs. I had my family behind me and everything.  Not now! :eek:

 And stabby,  just when did you get the idea that the war on terror was only a war on al queda?


Because terrorism is such a vauge word. It is easy to label a group. Now would you call the insurgants in iraq terrorists or partisans. I would say partisans.

If you have a family do not go to iraq.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Gunslinger on May 11, 2004, 01:02:09 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
Because terrorism is such a vauge word. It is easy to label a group. Now would you call the insurgants in iraq terrorists or partisans. I would say partisans.

If you have a family do not go to iraq.


If they are forigners that specifically entered Iraq for the chance to kill US troops are they still partisins or are they terrorits


Since when do partisins kill their own w/mass bombs during religious pilgramiges?

Sounds like terrorism to me
Title: Outrage!!! Prisoner Abuse!!!
Post by: Saurdaukar on May 11, 2004, 01:09:19 PM
US media hasnt reported it yet - this is from the BBC.

Quote
They then pulled the man to the side and put a knife to his neck.  The man screamed as he was executed.  His killers shouted "Allah is great" before holding what appeared to be a head up to the camera.


US Contract Worker Executed (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3705409.stm)

The parents of this kid have been on the local stations for a week - their son had been 'missing' for a month.

Perhaps the media would be quicker to report this 'abuse' if they had stripped him and took a picture instead.

Praise Allah.  :rolleyes:
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 01:10:14 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
If they are forigners that specifically entered Iraq for the chance to kill US troops are they still partisins or are they terrorits


Since when do partisins kill their own w/mass bombs during religious pilgramiges?

Sounds like terrorism to me


British and US citizens helped the french during WW2. Their methods were far more civilized, but the end goal is and was the same, the defeat of the enemy. I am not makeing excuses for them, but i would not label them terrorists.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: gofaster on May 11, 2004, 01:10:29 PM
Already posted.

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=116339
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nilsen on May 11, 2004, 01:11:04 PM
(http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/images/smilies/yawn.gif)
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Saurdaukar on May 11, 2004, 01:11:27 PM
My bad.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nilsen on May 11, 2004, 01:14:21 PM
nice bate tho saur.... just make sure you are first next time :D
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Saurdaukar on May 11, 2004, 01:17:38 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
Now would you call the insurgants in iraq terrorists or partisans. I would say partisans.  


Why would you say that?
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: rpm on May 11, 2004, 01:25:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by muckmaw
Personally, I'm starting to think we should just leave and let these people just live in 12th century chaos as they seem so fond of.

It's days like this that make me want to be an isolationist.
Welcome Brotha, have a seat over here! Turning Iraq over to UN control does'nt sound bad to me. Let them see that it's not just Americans that want them to live free and maybe (yeah, it's a longshot), just maybe they will get their country under control.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: muckmaw on May 11, 2004, 01:29:26 PM
Quote
Originally posted by rpm371
Welcome Brotha, have a seat over here! Turning Iraq over to UN control does'nt sound bad to me. Let them see that it's not just Americans that want them to live free and maybe (yeah, it's a longshot), just maybe they will get their country under control.


I don't think the UN wants any part of this mess, do they?
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Mickey1992 on May 11, 2004, 01:38:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by gofaster
Already posted.

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=116339


You realize that you posted a link to the current thread, right?
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Saurdaukar on May 11, 2004, 01:41:08 PM
Whoa - two threads combined into one - didnt know you could do that.  Super-Skuzzy is on the loose.  ;)
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Ripsnort on May 11, 2004, 01:44:54 PM
Quote
Originally posted by muckmaw
Personally, I'm starting to think we should just leave and let these people just live in 12th century chaos as they seem so fond of.

It's days like this that make me want to be an isolationist.


Quote
Originally posted by rpm371
Welcome Brotha, have a seat over here! Turning Iraq over to UN control does'nt sound bad to me. Let them see that it's not just Americans that want them to live free and maybe (yeah, it's a longshot), just maybe they will get their country under control.


We tried this, and we got 9/11.  Next time it'll be a nuke.  No, we NEED to be in their backyard.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Gunslinger on May 11, 2004, 01:45:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
British and US citizens helped the french during WW2. Their methods were far more civilized, but the end goal is and was the same, the defeat of the enemy. I am not makeing excuses for them, but i would not label them terrorists.


So you are comparing the french resistance during WWII to terrorists that blew up a car bomb at a religious pilgramage killing THERE OWN FELLOW civilians for no other reason than to provide terror?
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Gunslinger on May 11, 2004, 01:47:19 PM
The UN did wonders in somalia.   Isnt Bosnia area thriving now without further violence?  Isnt Korea still considered a war zone?  OH YEA the UN has a great track record.
Title: Beheading of American Citizen in Iraq
Post by: Red Tail 444 on May 11, 2004, 01:53:19 PM
This is an article, not a video...still very disturbing...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=11&u=/ap/20040511/ap_on_re_mi_ea/egypt_iraq_american_beheaded
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Saurdaukar on May 11, 2004, 01:54:24 PM
Already reposted by me once.

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=116339
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 02:05:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
The UN did wonders in somalia.   Isnt Bosnia area thriving now without further violence?  Isnt Korea still considered a war zone?  OH YEA the UN has a great track record.


Did i say UN?
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Eagler on May 11, 2004, 02:06:32 PM
and they think this will IMPROVE the way a one of their prisoners is treated or thought of by joe six pack?
Title: Re: Re: Re: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Sandman on May 11, 2004, 02:06:39 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Udie
THere was an Al Queda group in north western Iraq, known about well before the war.  Get your head out of the dirt man.


Ahem... I don't believe that Hussein had control of the north at that time. That's Kurd territory, IIRC.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: txmx on May 11, 2004, 02:12:46 PM
Pull out the troops and drop some NUKES Im sick of this chit.
****ing savages need to pay a HUGE price for this beheading thing.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 02:17:38 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
and they think this will IMPROVE the way a one of their prisoners is treated or thought of by joe six pack?


They do not care about how the prisoners are treated. They are just trying to point out our hypocracy. My guess is that they are trying to flame more prison abuse. They are the benefactors from those actions. It just spawns more recruits for the insurgents. We need 200k more troops on the ground there asap.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 02:21:42 PM
I'm having doubts if even a face saving pull-out is even possible at this point. Some ugly ****.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: StabbyTheIcePic on May 11, 2004, 02:28:23 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
I'm having doubts if even a face saving pull-out is even possible at this point. Some ugly ****.


What i think is hilarious that people think all the sudden iraq will be an ally of iseral when it(if ever) becomes a democracy. The majority of iraqis still hate jews, and i bet the first guy they vote in will have a hard stance on iseral and the west in general.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: stegor on May 11, 2004, 02:34:27 PM
Quote
Pull out the troops and drop some NUKES Im sick of this chit.


and


Quote
Jesus saves



a little bit controversial , don't you think??
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: txmx on May 11, 2004, 02:37:46 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
What i think is hilarious that people think all the sudden iraq will be an ally of iseral when it(if ever) becomes a democracy. The majority of iraqis still hate jews, and i bet the first guy they vote in will have a hard stance on iseral and the west in general.


It's Israel. LOL.
And yes I bet your right.
We do need 200K more troops and we need to go thrue them like watermelon thrue a goose. leave nothing standing NOTHING.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: txmx on May 11, 2004, 02:38:20 PM
Quote
Originally posted by stegor
and


 


a little bit controversial , don't you think??


Even Jesus had his limits.
Title: US civilian beheaded on tape in Iraq
Post by: rabbidrabbit on May 11, 2004, 03:09:56 PM
Here is the link...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=1&u=/nm/20040511/ts_nm/iraq_usa_beheading_dc
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Red Tail 444 on May 11, 2004, 03:13:09 PM
Thanks...

I posted the same thing, but it got removed...I guess someone up there doesnt like me...:(
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 03:23:59 PM
Quote
Originally posted by vorticon
when was "war on terror" given as an excuse for iraq?


When it were clear that WMD are so very well hidden all around world
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 03:35:25 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=11&u=/ap/20040511/ap_on_re_mi_ea/egypt_iraq_american_beheaded

And so the mass exodus of private contractors begins.



Let me be  a bit historical now....

WOW people in occupied country kill army man and other people whitch cooperate with occupants..... What a surprise.


Its clear for long time, that US Army have no clue, how to secure Iraq, since their presence  only rise sutch incidents.

Its more that clear that US army have no credit over there, nor US goverment.

Im only wondering that civilist are still messing around.


Look, last week were most famous Polish reporter killed on the street and nobody gave a raw over here. Why should this incident get bigger attention?

Post sutch links is not nesessery untill its part of some interesting speach.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: gofaster on May 11, 2004, 03:59:49 PM
Yahoo has part of the video up on their news section.  They "fade to black" as the terrorist pulls out the knife and steps towards Berg.

Two strikes against him - he was an American and he was Jewish.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: muckmaw on May 11, 2004, 04:15:16 PM
I have no need to see that, nor do I have any intention of viewing it.

Would you describe posting the video as sensationalism, or do you think it is germaine to the story?

"The Cod-Damn Germans got nothing to do with it!!"

Seriously, all this video (and I've not seen it but read the description) is going to do is incite more hate an anger on both sides. Kinda like what some other photos are doing right now.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Red Tail 444 on May 11, 2004, 04:25:41 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
and they think this will IMPROVE the way a one of their prisoners is treated or thought of by joe six pack?


Well, it's not exactly like our treatment of their EPoWs can get any worse, these are desperate men who are going to try anything to break our will. Add to that the thought of these Muslims being forced to pose in homosexual positions, they'd rather die than be taken prisoner. Who wouldn't?

But even worse, what will happen to our soldiers now, if any get captured? Sad to think this but maybe beheading will be the least of all transgressions.

Shock and awe...hearts and minds....whatever...
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Red Tail 444 on May 11, 2004, 04:28:31 PM
Quote
Originally posted by gofaster
Two strikes against him - he was an American and he was Jewish.


Took a job in Iraq...Strike three...
Title: Where's the uproar from the Arab/Islamic world?
Post by: Sabre on May 11, 2004, 04:34:56 PM
The prisoner abuse by a few US soldiers of Iraqi military prisoners was a sorrority prank compared with this.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,119615,00.html

Where was the cries for justice when those four contractors where tortured, killed, burned, then hung up on display?  Where was the outrage over the abuses of Iraqi's by Saddam's regime, for that matter?  Of course, there are those who will say this is perfectly understandable, as we've offended Arabs/Muslims.  Make no mistake...that's pure BS.  The abuse of those prisoners in Abu Ghraib was criminal (and those responsible will be brought to justice).  However, this type of behavior (beheading a person who's only crime was being an American trying to help Iraqis rebuild their country) is plain evil.  By no strech of the imagination is the prisoner abuse on the same moral plain as this these animals that beheaded this man?

Another couple of questions: Do you think the major media will show this video over and over (or even once) like the pictures of Abu Ghraib?  Will certain US lawmakers who have been using the prisoner abuse scandal as a political club against the Adminstration demand this video be shown on TV, or even watch it themselves?  Where is their outrage?  Hiding behind their hipocracy, I suppose.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Eagler on May 11, 2004, 04:52:57 PM
sabre

no Arab outcry as it was against US - you know, the most evil empire in the word

 just like they will not condem the latest beheading, nor the previous one but do you think they would when they didnt even speak out against 9/11?

and yes, the iraqi prisoners are j the latest dummycrat political football they are tryin to throw for a td to skerry kerry .. you think they really give a rats arse?
Title: Re: Where's the uproar from the Arab/Islamic world?
Post by: -MZ- on May 11, 2004, 04:58:38 PM
Spin it all you want, this is a serious blunder that isn't going away quickly.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: VOR on May 11, 2004, 05:21:52 PM
It's difficult for me to decide whether I'm more disgusted by the act itself or the fact that people on this BBS and elsewhere appear to be attempting to justifying it.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: RedTop on May 11, 2004, 05:27:57 PM
Quote
Originally posted by VOR
It's difficult for me to decide whether I'm more disgusted by the act itself or the fact that people on this BBS and elsewhere appear to be attempting to justifying it.


agreed:(
Title: Re: Where's the uproar from the Arab/Islamic world?
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 05:46:07 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Sabre
The prisoner abuse by a few US soldiers of Iraqi military prisoners was a sorrority prank compared with this.



im sorry about it but i have to stop on this one.

We already know that British soldiers did some of those things as well. ONLY few of them.... not many... realy minority....

So today it went official that untill now it is about 100 British soldiers.

Im wondering what will be that lill number in US army
.... may be few .... hundreds
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: VOR on May 11, 2004, 05:49:44 PM
Lada, why don't you say what you're really thinking?

Are American soldiers (in your opinion) more predisposed to abusive behavior, or am I misunderstanding?
Title: Or Maybe.....LaDa
Post by: RedTop on May 11, 2004, 05:53:42 PM
Quote
Originally posted by VOR
Lada, why don't you say what you're really thinking?

Are American soldiers (in your opinion) more predisposed to abusive behavior, or am I misunderstanding?


   you really hope that it is a huge number so it will make it easier to justify your dislike of Amercans or America in general. I mean if you don't like this country..just say so.
Title: Regarding Iraqi Prisoner Torture
Post by: Vulcan on May 11, 2004, 05:59:07 PM
Well they brutally beheaded an innocent civilian today (among other shootings of civilian contractors)...

At first I was dismayed with the US military, but now the Iraqi's get no sympathy from me and I've come to the conclusion that your guys over there are probably reacting to a situation we don't comprehend from this distance.

So you can wrap em in bacon and push them out the side of Blackhawks as far as I'm concerned.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 06:02:11 PM
Quote
Originally posted by VOR
Lada, why don't you say what you're really thinking?

Are American soldiers (in your opinion) more predisposed to abusive behavior, or am I misunderstanding?


My point was.

We are hearing statement that only few of US soldiers have something to do with this probem. And we also hear that *some* of British soldiers too.

So by today we already know that *British some* is number around 100. Since it is supposed to be only smaller part of problem, im wnodering how many of US soldiers were/are in this thing.

I expect few hundreds of them, whitch is not failure of one man.
Its failure of system in my opinion.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 06:05:29 PM
No! Westy!

This excuse that 'they are more primitive than us, so it's acceptable to behead a prisoner' just does not wash with me. It was cruel and brutal. Believe you me, there are many Arabs who are very sophisticated, where are their voices apart from occasional blogs?

The Arabs are intelligent enough to see that this is a cycle of violence which is just errupting (us losing the propoganda war again).

Now...here's what I think. It's a bit extreme but in the long run it may save many lives. People who commit crimes in other countries ought to subject to the punishment of those countries. So, as an exception (and yes a publicity stunt) try the prison guards under Shariah law and punish them under Shariah law. As for the people who beheaded that poor bloke, try them under Shariah law too - once they are captured. As I understand it, the families of the victim will have a choice of having the perpetrators beheaded or accepting 'blood money'. Whatever the choice, it will show the Arabs that we can abide by their rules.

....or are we too civilised for that?

[edit] guess Westy deleted that post [edit]

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: VOR on May 11, 2004, 06:07:21 PM
Lada, ok guess I *did* misunderstand your meaning. Thanks for setting me straight.

I think you have a legitimate concern, but I also think the answer to your question is no: the system is not broken down or failing.

IMO, of course.

Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 06:08:38 PM
What is your solution, lada?

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Westy on May 11, 2004, 06:12:20 PM
Ravells.  I agree.

 My original post which I edited to make smaller before posting also mentioned many of your points.  About how the much of the ME is amazingly civilized and many there were shocked and dismayed at the execution of the reporter in Pakistan as well as the 4 civilians who were killed and burned by a mob in Iraq last month.  But I ended up deleting my post because like Udie I'm tired of arguing on these boards.  I just didn't delete it fast enough ;)
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: VOR on May 11, 2004, 06:13:00 PM
Ravells, interesting idea. I know of many instances were American "offenders" were turned over to local authorities in Germany and Korea over the past few years for trial under local law.

The message to the locals is quite clear and obvious.

The message to our boys is equally clear: behave yourself.

The circumstances are drastically different than in Iraq, of course, so I'm not sure if an idea like this would fly...but it's still good food for thought.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 06:17:29 PM
Thank you, both :)
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: FUNKED1 on May 11, 2004, 06:28:58 PM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM BACON!
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: SavedSaint on May 11, 2004, 06:32:41 PM
first.

the prisoners are not at fault for what the others in their country have done.

just as many americans are not at fault for what the sum of a few have done..
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 06:33:18 PM
??? my posts are getting moved to other threads?

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 06:59:29 PM
Quote
Originally posted by ravells
What is your solution, lada?

Ravs


Strictly public enquiry, and not things like " What you have seen untill today is nothing compare to stuff on my table" .. something like this said Minister of Defense if im not wrong.

Courts should be public and shoud be hold in Iraq, only to show people, what doest justice mean, instead of promising blah blah blah on TV.
Thats all from my trough on your question Ravs.


We are public, politics are here for us, they are here to server us. They are not our smarter parents whitch will chose what we should and what we shouldnt know. Sutch ways has been used by communist, nazi`s and many other authoritative regimes.

Politics, whitch wants to appear as smart parents are nothing more that useless POS.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 07:14:44 PM
You must forgive some of our American cousins...who are naturally a bit defensive about this. Nevertheless (and I find this a comforting thought) all of the Americans on this BBS are repelled by the prisoner abuses.

The Americans have already said that the first trial will be public. (not a show trial, ho! ho! ho!) but of course it has to be a show trial. My guess is that the guy will plead guilty and there'll be lots of mumbo jumbo procedure and he'll be chucked into prison for awhile.  Anyone who believes that 'due procedure' is being followed in this after those pictures broke is being naive.

Nobody is saying that the Americans are our 'smarter parents' although I agree, from time to time there are some arrogant Americans on this BBS. But they are not representative of most of the Americans who I have met who are really decent people.

Every country has its fair share of problems (I believe in yours it's corruption on vast scale) but we have to deal with them.

But let me ask you this. If America was not the military superpower in the world.....who would you choose as the alternative?

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 07:16:44 PM
There was this guy on CNN last night. Psych Professor at Stanford. Wish I could remember his name.

Amazing story...

In '73 he set up a test of what happens to people in prison. He had a mock one built, and got a bunch of test subjects signed up. He says he did extensive background checks and personality tests on all of them to make sure they were all pretty much decent people.

He divided half into prisoners, the other half into guards. The test was to last 14 days.

He had to pull the plug after 6. "It just got out of hand."

Then he goes on to talk about the deterioration, and it's mindblowing how much it mirrors the acts that took place in Iraq. I mean, amazing simularities. Bags on heads, making the prisoners simulate ghey sex, and on.... the parallels were remarkable. Act for act.

In the post-study debrief, he found that the guards quickly began to see the prisoners as no better than animals. Something you hear from the guards in Iraq.

If I remembered the guy's name I could maybe find the 'zact study on the net. It could shine some light on the episode in Iraq.

I was never of the opinion that this was a "US is evil" situation. More like "the few bad apples"". Now I'm thinking even good apples, given the proper circumstance.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Westy on May 11, 2004, 07:21:25 PM
here you go Nash...

http://www.prisonexp.org/
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 07:21:47 PM
I think that's pretty accurate Nash. We are all really adaptable and peer group pressure is a strong thing (q.v. Men in Groups by Lionel Tiger) But people are not going to remember his study. They are going to remember the pictures.

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 07:33:30 PM
You rule Westy thanks! :aok
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 07:35:46 PM
Just watched it...you do rule, Westy :)

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 07:43:39 PM
Quote
Originally posted by ravells


Nobody is saying that the Americans are our 'smarter parents' although I agree, from time to time there are some arrogant Americans on this BBS. But they are not representative of most of the Americans who I have met who are really decent people.


But let me ask you this. If America was not the military superpower in the world.....who would you choose as the alternative?

Ravs


smart parents were related to Politics, not to people on BBS

And to your send question.
I would pick someone who can be neutral.
So we have few hardcore army here.
US, China, Russian  ... all crappy options, all are somehow rivals

so i would vote for aliance from their raws and other can join.
It will give Force more credibility and chance that it will not be turned into private diseaster of 1 corrupted subject. They will watch each other and they will find way how to stay in balance.

I guess we have sutch organization
There were some corruption as well few weeks ago. But as we could see, there were no problem with fixing things, coz rivals pushed on fixing in raws of the others..

got my point ?
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 07:46:18 PM
sorry, I don't understand 'raws' ... mistranslation?

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 07:46:57 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
.

I was never of the opinion that this was a "US is evil" situation. More like "the few bad apples"". Now I'm thinking even good apples, given the proper circumstance.


Apple is history, PC@x86 rule the world.... just accept it :D
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 07:48:20 PM
Quote
Originally posted by ravells
sorry, I don't understand 'raws' ... mistranslation?

Ravs


its more likely brain malfunction on my side..... man 2:50 A.M here... im pretty porked, i dont control fingers that well anymore.....
will try to fix it.. probably tomorow
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 07:49:07 PM
best to bed then!

take care, lada.

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 07:49:11 PM
That's what I was thinking, ravells.

Dunno what it is but it sounds cool, especially his earlier use of it: "and nobody gave a raw over here."

Gonna try and incorporate it into my vocab... just to keep people on their toes.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 07:50:08 PM
Guys you are doomed you have no phantasy :D

raw were supposed to be row :D
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 07:50:20 PM
You just raw me Nash....no...that sounds kinky....

edit...I've heard of japlish but czechlish? ...edit

Ravs :)
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: lada on May 11, 2004, 07:52:12 PM
yeah yeah yeah ... mails are passed to antivirus system in Raw format, hell yeah ... so here we write in rows and not raws :D

... already naked ..
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 07:53:24 PM
The polls are open!

Aerosmith: Raw or Rawk?
Janes Addiction: Raw or Rawk?

Vote now and we'll air the video!
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 07:53:58 PM
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh!

so you think that lots of bickering people would give a better solution?

Ummmmmmmm I don't think so.

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 07:55:39 PM
Nash....I'm old. the last Aerosmith song I know the words to is 'love in an elevator'

Your metaphors on me are lost , Luke.

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 07:55:44 PM
Quote
Originally posted by lada
... already naked ..


Definitely raw.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 07:56:30 PM
eek!
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 07:57:05 PM
Quote
Originally posted by ravells
The last Aerosmith song I know the words to is 'love in an elevator'


Hmm.... yeah me too. I remember the vids with those two chicks though.
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 08:00:46 PM
how could we evah forget!!!!

Going.......................d own?????

tee hee

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 08:01:08 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
Gonna try and incorporate it into my vocab... just to keep people on their toes.


"Your metaphors on me are lost , Luke."

"eek!"

Success! Er, succexy! Turns out it works. Thanks Lada!  :aok
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 08:05:04 PM
enjoy it for the next raw 10 minutes, Nash! ;)

Then this new lovely wordplay will die and our vocab will be the worse off without it :)

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 08:06:45 PM
I already think the readers of this BBS are the worse of because of it.

My apologies.

Rawk on.

:)
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: VOR on May 11, 2004, 08:13:03 PM
Goofballs   :D
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 08:14:51 PM


i think we just broke this thread. :D
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 08:17:16 PM
You just RAW man...........you just really RAW!

Raws
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 08:17:54 PM
:cool:
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 08:18:36 PM
:aok
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 08:20:05 PM
lemme see if I can fix it...

THE HORROR!!!

carry on....
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 08:21:39 PM
ummm...no..can't think of anything.

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 08:23:33 PM


sorry Udie.

:confused:
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 08:29:05 PM
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/258_1084325313_kangaroo.jpg)
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: ravells on May 11, 2004, 08:30:10 PM
This is sillly. I'm going to bed.

Night Nash.


RAW!

Ravs
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 08:40:15 PM
(http://www.joelcooner.com/Asian/japanese/open-lion-3469.JPE)

'night!
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Yeager on May 11, 2004, 09:10:22 PM
Gentlemen, Start your noodleIS!!!
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Nash on May 11, 2004, 09:15:34 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StabbyTheIcePic
Al queda is there now, because we are. Easy targets for them. Saddam had no wmds or ties to terrorists before that. That is why it had nothing to do with the war on terror.


Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
Gentlemen, Start your noodleIS!!!


Yup... it's pretty much done for. :D
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Gunslinger on May 11, 2004, 09:16:04 PM
WOW talk about a Hijack
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: Yeager on May 11, 2004, 09:27:24 PM
peeps talk about and adore the art of talk smacking.  I say smack talking is not an art, its a reflex of the socially impaired and sexually deprived/humiliated.

Thread HiJacking is a true art form if ever there was one!

Yeh jack teh trehd!
Title: Iraq is not part of the war on terror!
Post by: txmx on May 11, 2004, 10:31:20 PM
Quote
Originally posted by VOR
It's difficult for me to decide whether I'm more disgusted by the act itself or the fact that people on this BBS and elsewhere appear to be attempting to justifying it.


Very well put.