Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: txmx on May 16, 2004, 04:11:55 AM
-
I find It funny to see people posting about how there are NO WMD'S in Iraq!
Well unless you got blissters on your hands from working that shovel over there in the desert I would say you really dont know squat!
Very safe to assume that Iraq is one big cat litter box.
And you can burry alot of terds there and never find them.
Also old saddumb aint such a dumbarse afterall now is he.
I mean If you where in his shoes and you had all the advanced warning he did that the big bad Americans where coming
Dont you think he might have moved them out of the country?
People its just like aliens!
Just cause you aint never seen one dont mean they aint out there!
So stop trying convince everyone who smart you are and think ! Just think about it for a minute or two.
-
Since you thought this was worthy enough to drag out of another post, I'm cuttin'/pastin' my reply to it. You couldn't really deal with it there, so here's hopin' you have better luck with it here.
Lookit.
WMD doesn't hide WMD. PEOPLE hide WMD.
When there is a murder investigation, do the cops go digging through the entire state with spades looking for the murder weapon? No, because it wouldn't work.
They find the murder weapon because someone tells them where it is.
Now a WMD program... you do the math. Umpteen Iraqis involved. The US has prolly stacked 3/4 of them in a perverted nekkid sex pyramid that SOB and I could only envy, yet still none of these folks has managed to tell you where these things are.
You think the Iraqis are made of more stuff than you and I? I don't. They aint talkin' cuz there aint anything to talk about.
-
People its just like aliens! Just cause you aint never seen one dont mean they aint out there!
(http://www.astrosurf.com/setiteam/Images/aliens.jpg)
not the best argument there txmx
-
LOL It's not funnnie to seee why aneeone can averag 22 posts a day!Just reehash and spamm the O'club with useless garbage! LOL
I own so many geetars, LOL, yu like Lorna, worsip me. LOL ! You pry have a right hand that is soft from jerkins LOL!
-
Your leaders lied to your citizens, get over it or do something about it...
-
Just a detail, but the only world leader that said, prior to invasion, Iraq didn't have WMD's was Saddam.
I believe it is important to keep in mind that the debate at the time the decision was made was whether to delay military action and allow sanctions to continue.
20/20 hindsight is a wonderful but a very common thing.
-
Originally posted by txmx
I mean If you where in his shoes and you had all the advanced warning he did that the big bad Americans where coming
Dont you think he might have moved them out of the country?
And what about pentagons statement on TV, that if US soldiers cross redline, they have realiable sources that SH will use WMD, whitch can be deployed in 45 mins
It were last word about WMD, before they become so very well hidden.
:rofl
i realy belive that WMD have own legs and they are roaming 2 miles behind soldiers :D
-
I think it's important to note that this has been discussed to death, and it ought to be let go, at least until the next CNN update. Maybe not at all till something relevant is found out.
The O'Club is what it is, but gaddamn people, it's becoming, even when the latest news can't be cut and pasted, a tard-tank for reasons to, just POST. And old crap at that.
I mean, the news is fine to discuss, but doesn’t anyone here do anything outside of politics that is in the least interest of the AH community? When I go have beers with my friends, we don’t argue and talk politics, we talk about stuff we did that week or want to do in the future. Sometimes sports, sometimes hobbies, etc.
Certainly everyone here is into computers, has families, and does other things than watch CNN and get excited about politicians and their pitiful fake stances.
I’m not asking for a Political Forum, because some restraint and common sense would make it unnecessary. I just don’t get what drives people to argue politics on a flightsim BBS. Your audience is limited to about 20 people. I think it’s the small crowd where you can garner expected responses, so you can go round and rounds and be able to post.
Give the couple hundred more a break that don’t care.
-
Originally posted by txmx
Also old saddumb aint such a dumbarse afterall now is he.
I mean If you where in his shoes and you had all the advanced warning he did that the big bad Americans where coming
Dont you think he might have moved them out of the country?
If saddam moved WMD's out of Iraq wouldn't that mean there would be no WMD's in Iraq? Do you see what i'm trying to get at here?
-
If Iraq had WMDs, they would have been used on U.S. troops as we attacked Baghdad.
There are no WMDs in Iraq. At most, there may have been a WMD program in place in the mid 90s.
-
Ohhh....sure they must have hidden WMD, otherwise what the f**k they need all that sand there??
-
Originally posted by stegor
Ohhh....sure they must have hidden WMD, otherwise what the f**k they need all that sand there??
LOLOL
:rofl
-
here is very funny link regarding terrorist
"KABUL: The US military is building a new airbase in south-eastern Afghanistan, in a remote desert area near the border with Pakistan, BBC reported on Monday. US commanders say the airstrip, in Paktika province, will be capable of taking large transport aircraft. The move is aimed at improving security in the region. It should also allow US forces to move in more ground troops to combat remnants of the Taliban and Al Qaeda."
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_27-4-2004_pg1_5
new airport coz of security
:rofl
-
Originally posted by Creamo
I think it's important to note that this has been discussed to death, and it ought to be let go, at least until the next CNN update. Maybe not at all till something relevant is found out.
The O'Club is what it is, but gaddamn people, it's becoming, even when the latest news can't be cut and pasted, a tard-tank for reasons to, just POST. And old crap at that.
I mean, the news is fine to discuss, but doesn’t anyone here do anything outside of politics that is in the least interest of the AH community? When I go have beers with my friends, we don’t argue and talk politics, we talk about stuff we did that week or want to do in the future. Sometimes sports, sometimes hobbies, etc.
Certainly everyone here is into computers, has families, and does other things than watch CNN and get excited about politicians and their pitiful fake stances.
I’m not asking for a Political Forum, because some restraint and common sense would make it unnecessary. I just don’t get what drives people to argue politics on a flightsim BBS. Your audience is limited to about 20 people. I think it’s the small crowd where you can garner expected responses, so you can go round and rounds and be able to post.
Give the couple hundred more a break that don’t care.
Ditto.
MiniD
-
Originally posted by Creamo
I think it's important to note that this has been discussed to death, and it ought to be let go, at least until the next CNN update. Maybe not at all till something relevant is found out.
The O'Club is what it is, but gaddamn people, it's becoming, even when the latest news can't be cut and pasted, a tard-tank for reasons to, just POST. And old crap at that.
I mean, the news is fine to discuss, but doesn’t anyone here do anything outside of politics that is in the least interest of the AH community? When I go have beers with my friends, we don’t argue and talk politics, we talk about stuff we did that week or want to do in the future. Sometimes sports, sometimes hobbies, etc.
Certainly everyone here is into computers, has families, and does other things than watch CNN and get excited about politicians and their pitiful fake stances.
I’m not asking for a Political Forum, because some restraint and common sense would make it unnecessary. I just don’t get what drives people to argue politics on a flightsim BBS. Your audience is limited to about 20 people. I think it’s the small crowd where you can garner expected responses, so you can go round and rounds and be able to post.
Give the couple hundred more a break that don’t care.
double ditto
-
Saddam and his buddies had several million bullets available, and in theory...if every bullet hit someone in the nugget then maybe they could be classified as wmd's.....dunno :p
-
damn! I hate politics!
ok here,s a little logic for ya kiddies
A) Iraq was DEFINATLY engaged with either the procurment, development, or manufacture of WMD IE. nuclear, biologic, or chemical.....FACT
B) Iraq was activly engaged in the procurement, development and or manufacture of a delivery system for WMD's...FACT
C) Iraq that they would use WMD's {remember a few years ago him waving detonators for a nuclear weapon?}....FACT
At the TIME there was nothing to lead us to believe that he didnt have them or at least soon would.
SO, givin these facts at the TIME what should we have done when openly threatened by the Iraqi leadership?
In other words..so they didn't find any should we have taken the chance that he never would AND that if he did have em OR get em that he wouldn't use them?
Logic would say NO
Also it would be both strategically and tactically inept NOT to act on the above info at the time!
-
WilldCrd... was it wrong to not do a first strike against cccp too then?.. i mean they had them, and could very well have chosen to fire first :D
You cant slap people/countries around just cause they may or may not do something to you in the future.
blah.....nevermind, these topics gets me very sleepy ..carry on without me
-
I gotta say that even though I am a supporter of the current administration I may have to conceed that we were possibly deceived about the WMDs.
I think that it is perfectly plausible that Iraqi personnel working on the developement of subject WMD's may have lied in order to keep their heads securely upon their shoulders.
Perhaps the administration could be a little more forthcoming with regard to this issue.
I wish we could openly say psssst it's about the oil dummy!
Then we could just move on. I would not want us garrisoning Iraq for the next 100 years.
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
WilldCrd... was it wrong to not do a first strike against cccp too then?.. i mean they had them, and could very well have chosen to fire first :D
You cant slap people/countries around just cause they may or may not do something to you in the future.
blah.....nevermind, these topics gets me very sleepy ..carry on without me
ditto on the topic making ya sleepy!
the cccp didnt run around threatening to use them like sadahm did. and he also went 10 yrs or so constantly looking for ways to violate the UN santctions and treatys. Iraq had plenty of chances to comply. and they knew what the consequences or their actions were.
-
Originally posted by storch
I gotta say that even though I am a supporter of the current administration I may have to conced that we were possibly deceived about the WMDs.
I think that it is perfectly plausible that Iraqi personnel working on the developement of subject WMD's may have lied in order to keep their heads securely upon their shoulders.
Perhaps the administration could be a little more forthcoming with regard to this issue.
I wish we could openly say psssst it's about the oil dummy!
Then we could just move on. I would not want us garrisoning Iraq for the next 100 years.
I agree it's a very complex issue.
If there was jungle there one would almost think this was about vietnam
-
That is my exact concern, that and that this Bush seems to be leaning towards micromanagement from washington. That would be a dreadful mistake.
-
Originally posted by stegor
Ohhh....sure they must have hidden WMD, otherwise what the f**k they need all that sand there??
Just read that. sadly that has become my opinion as well. very funny though. I give it a 9.96 on the laughometer.
-
Storch, not to single you out, but you seem to focus on politics.
On a bet, can you just post something interesting? Anything. What's going on in your life?
Something we might enjoy.
-
Originally posted by Creamo
Storch, not to single you out, but you seem to focus on politics.
On a bet, can you just post something interesting? Anything. What's going on in your life?
Something we might enjoy.
just had to have rectal surgery. they had to remove my wife's shoe from my arse. she is angry about the time I spend in front of the computer.
-
Originally posted by Creamo
Storch, not to single you out, but you seem to focus on politics.
Something we might enjoy.
...ummm .. any daughter ? :D
-
Originally posted by lada
...ummm .. any daughter ? :D
Two but they only like men :rofl
-
Originally posted by GScholz
OMG ROFL!!!!
:rofl :rofl :rofl
on the serface you might find that funny but the soviet union was not a dictatorship and they didnt jump to the nuclear option at every turn otherwise we would all be dead now. guess you totallly missed my point.....some folks can't see the forest despite the trees
-
Originally posted by storch
Two but they only like men :rofl
Are they hotties? single?
-
read previous post
-
Originally posted by WilldCrd
damn! I hate politics!
ok here,s a little logic for ya kiddies
A) Iraq was DEFINATLY engaged with either the procurment, development, or manufacture of WMD IE. nuclear, biologic, or chemical.....FACT
B) Iraq was activly engaged in the procurement, development and or manufacture of a delivery system for WMD's...FACT
C) Iraq that they would use WMD's {remember a few years ago him waving detonators for a nuclear weapon?}....FACT
At the TIME there was nothing to lead us to believe that he didnt have them or at least soon would.
SO, givin these facts at the TIME what should we have done when openly threatened by the Iraqi leadership?
In other words..so they didn't find any should we have taken the chance that he never would AND that if he did have em OR get em that he wouldn't use them?
Logic would say NO
Also it would be both strategically and tactically inept NOT to act on the above info at the time!
here ill help you
-
GS
Shouldnt you be getting drunk right about now GS? ..after all its May 16th and all the hot little "russejenter" are running wild with their panties aorund their ankles :D
.....i am. Mia & mom are in Oslo at "svigers" so im free to chase them :aok
-
Originally posted by storch
just had to have rectal surgery. they had to remove my wife's shoe from my arse. she is angry about the time I spend in front of the computer.
Har har?
Dolt.
I give.
-
Originally posted by storch
Two but they only like men :rofl
chmm age ? :)
-
Originally posted by GScholz
So YOU just decided to act AGAINST the UN? What possible threat was Iraq to the US of A? None, nothing, nada.
your not serious are you?
and um no I /WE didnt go against the UN
-
Originally posted by Creamo
Har har?
Dolt.
I give.
jeez you are hard to please.
-
Originally posted by GScholz
Yes I am. Iraq was no threat to the US. The US does not have the right to enforce UN resolutions without a UN mandate. The UN did not mandate the invasion. The invasion was a direct violation of the UN charter. The Invasion was illegal.
no threat? at all? you sure about that?
The UN does not make US foreighn policy.
Iraq violated vurtually all of the conditions of the treaty
BTW the United States is a soveighn Nation we are not governed by the UN nor is any other Nation for that matter
Violation of the UN charter? Illegal? i guess everything Iraq had been doing was okey-dokey right?
-
Originally posted by lada
chmm age ? :)
24 and 20 if I knew how to post photos I would. they are very fine young ladies.
-
Originally posted by storch
24 and 20 if I knew how to post photos I would. they are very fine young ladies.
go to photobucket. com
register upload your pics there then copy the the link then when posting click on the IMG tab past the link click submit
viola your done!
-
Here we go again.
:rofl
-
Originally posted by GScholz
LOL! You bastard! I'm 30, if I go chasing russe panties I'd be locked up! No I'll just have to get drunk and sob in a corner. ;)
well... i turned 29 on may 11th so im not that much younger :D
come to my place and ill get you drunk and into a russedress :D
-
Originally posted by GScholz
You are a signature nation to the UN Charter. The UN Charter prohibits any military action not taken in self-defence, or specifically mandated by the UN. Iraq was no military threat to the USA. How many UN resolutions Iraq had violated is irrelevant, only the UN can decide what to do about nations violating UN resolution. The US did not have a treaty with Iraq, the UN did. GW1 was a UN operation ... it was a UN coalition.
GS is right. that's why many of us who are to the right advocate our exit from the United Nations. I fail to see how that body benefits very much. The return that we get for our investment is very very poor indeed.
-
Nilsen, your a BBS post dork. You don't get it. When someone points it out, lay low.
Just saying.
-
Originally posted by GScholz
You are a signature nation to the UN Charter. The UN Charter prohibits any military action not taken in self-defence, or specifically mandated by the UN. Iraq was no military threat to the USA. How many UN resolutions Iraq had violated is irrelevant, only the UN can decide what to do about nations violating UN resolution. The US did not have a treaty with Iraq, the UN did. GW1 was a UN operation ... it was a UN coalition.
truth be told the UN is an inefectual
and corrupt outfit that can't even decide what hand to wipe with when on the crapper.
and by your resoning Then how many resolutions any other country has violated is irrelevent as well. If Iraq isnt held accountalbe why should the US be ?
It's got to work the same for everybody or it doesn't work at all
-
Originally posted by Creamo
Nilsen, your a BBS post dork. You don't get it. When someone points it out, lay low.
Just saying.
ouch!
-
Why do you hate America so much?
-
Originally posted by GScholz
LOL! Thank you for conceding the argument. :lol
I didn't concede anything i merely asked you a question. Due to the fact that with such obvious hatred your aurguement is unsound
maybe i was expecting to much
-
Originally posted by WilldCrd
I didn't concede anything i merely asked you a question. Due to the fact that with such obvious hatred your aurguement is unsound
maybe i was expecting to much
You see, if you critique the Bush international or domestic policy, any of America's policys, you hate America. Damn America hater.
-
Have a good one GS....dont worr, i wont get caught cause they will be gone until the 18th :cool:
-
Originally posted by GScholz
Whatever, this thread is just a rehash anyways. Search this forum for your answers, they have all been answered before.
>>>
Nilsen, I'm going to get drunk now. You have a very good 16th of May party ... and don't get caught with russe panties when Mia and mom comes home. ;) :D
If it's not important enough to you then i really don't care either just wanted to know if i was correct or not.
Yawn, i need another beer
-
(http://www.alpinsiden.com/erik/F1000028.jpg)
-
I dont belive there are WMD in the bottle that guy hold, nor under his butt
:D
-
heeeey..that "guy" is me
i insert a pic of me that will without a doubt fuel the stereotype image that so many have of us norwegians ...fishing hat and all
(http://www.alpinsiden.com/erik/F1000007.jpg)
-
i trough white sweater is for gays :D
-
Originally posted by lada
i trough white sweater is for gays :D
guess you have to be one to see one :D
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
guess you have to be one to see one :D
chmmmm ..... chmmmm ... hash hash ...
-
Originally posted by Creamo
LOL It's not funnnie to seee why aneeone can averag 22 posts a day!Just reehash and spamm the O'club with useless garbage! LOL
I own so many geetars, LOL, yu like Lorna, worsip me. LOL ! You pry have a right hand that is soft from jerkins LOL!
Thx for your contribution:aok
-
Originally posted by txmx
Just cause you aint never seen one dont mean they aint out there! So stop trying convince everyone who smart you are and think ! Just think about it for a minute or two.
Thinking....
I got it....I know what you're saying, and I'm a believer...
BIGFOOT LIVES! :lol
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
heeeey..that "guy" is me
i insert a pic of me that will without a doubt fuel the stereotype image that so many have of us norwegians ...fishing hat and all
(http://www.alpinsiden.com/erik/F1000007.jpg)
Kinda tough to fish when youre moored alogside a hghway, eh? :)
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
heeeey..that "guy" is me
i insert a pic of me that will without a doubt fuel the stereotype image that so many have of us norwegians ...fishing hat and all
(http://www.alpinsiden.com/erik/F1000007.jpg)
Hey i got a sweater just like that....never wear it though LOL:aok
-
tsss tsss this is a real viking :
(http://membres.lycos.fr/hagar/images/hagar_c3.gif)
stereotype ?
naaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh :D