Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Dago on October 07, 2000, 10:09:00 AM

Title: Vehicle fields in the canyons - why take them both?
Post by: Dago on October 07, 2000, 10:09:00 AM
One of the most fun fights I have ever had in Aces High was a canyon vehicle fight right after we got this new terrain.  Two differant countries held the 2 vehicle fields in one canyon, and a bunch of us went at it for quite a while.

Now that kind of fight is hard to find, because some guys cant wait to capture both vehicle fields and own the canyon.  I guess I dont see what is the big point of that?  You take them both, you eliminate the fight and eliminate the fun, and I dont think you really need them both for spawning purposes.

Why eliminate the fight?  Isnt that why we play the game? To get in some fights???

I would like to suggest that in the future, when you see your country owns one vehicle field in a canyon, and another country owns the other, jump in for a fight, but dont be in a race to capture the others field.  Enjoy the FIGHT.

Dago

[This message has been edited by Dago (edited 10-07-2000).]
Title: Vehicle fields in the canyons - why take them both?
Post by: Sunchaser on October 07, 2000, 10:32:00 AM
Because we are mainly Aces High and need both v fields to keep you from wasting our airports.

Tanking is cool but these fields allow you to spawn 5 min from airfields, sign a contract to not shoot our airplanes and we let you play tanks.

------------------
When did they put this thing in here and WTF is it for?
Title: Vehicle fields in the canyons - why take them both?
Post by: 2Cool on October 08, 2000, 11:35:00 AM
Also, some of us prefer to surprise, ambush, bounce, backshoot, gangbang instead of a "fair" fight.  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)
So letting dangerous v-fields operate too close is in direct violation of this principle.

2Cool

------------------
"It isn't allways bein' fast or even accurate that counts; it's bein' willing."