Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Hristo on January 07, 2000, 03:33:00 PM
-
the name of the topic should be: "Look what they've done to my 109". I guess I was so mad I did not even check that.
The damn propeller graphics are just iritating !!!!! (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/frown.gif)
Do I have to watch that for whole sortie ?
2700 RPM and it's like watching the car wheel at 60 kph (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/frown.gif)
Not to mention climb was not touched.
[This message has been edited by Hristo (edited 01-07-2000).]
-
lol, even C.205 outclimbs 109G10..
Weren't 109G6 and C.205 more comparable, with the exception that C.205 didnt outclimb it either?
-
Hum, the C.205 should be comparable to the 109G2 and early G6, as far max speed and climb rates are concerned.
-
Hristo:
What about propeller? I tested 109 offline along with C.205, Spitfire IX and La-5FN. Propeller spin are all alike. I don't notice anything distracting (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/confused.gif)
------------------
leonid, aka grisha
129 IAP VVS RKKA
-
Hristo / Fishu;
Check out new screenshots on the HTC webpage. That ought to help you out with some "109 Shine". (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
I wonder if the ICON will reflect what the variant is.
Mino
-
To Fishu:
In RL the Mc205 climbed to 6000m in 5'30" (full fuel & ammo).
v-twin
-
V-twin,
Shoulnd't C.205 be comparable to 109G-6, not to G-10, which should climb alot better..
-
Yes Fishu, your right. As I posted, IMHO the "Veltro" should climb like a 109G2 and/or early G6. Not like a 109G-10. The time for the C.205 is almost right, it is the G-10 that needs more climbpower.