Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Bodhi on June 23, 2004, 11:03:24 AM
-
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=536&ncid=536&e=6&u=/ap/20040623/ap_on_el_pr/nader_8
Guess they really don't like the idea of democracy in action....
:rolleyes:
Makes me believe they'd really don't have too much faith in Kerry if they are that concerned about the votes Nader will get....
:D
-
Maybe the Dems should ask the Supreme Court to not let Nader play? Well, didn't work for them the last time did it?
-
Don't know what their beef is. Politically, Nader is a broken reed.
-
hehe the conservatives are probably sending volunteers to aid the Nader campaign...
-
Nader draw off about 4-6% of the votes from Kerry. In all polls taken when he is not considered then Kerry vs. Bush are even. When Nader is mixed in then Kerry drops by 4-10% (poll dependent) but Bush stays the same.
Thats why Dems want him out.
The most recent IBD/TIPP poll was conducted June 14-19.
Too Close To Call
It shows the presidential race still close and within the poll's margin of error. Among 802 registered voters, President Bush leads Sen. John Kerry 44% to 41%, with independent Ralph Nader getting 6%. In a two-way race, Bush and Kerry are tied at 44%.
The previous IBD/TIPP poll, taken June 8-13, also had Bush up by three points (43%-40%), with Nader pulling 5%. In a two-way race, Bush led by one.
Results in other national polls vary widely.
Over the weekend, Harris Interactive said its June 8-15 poll of likely voters showed Bush opening up a 10-point lead (51%-41%) over Kerry, with Nader at 6%. Among all Americans, Harris had Bush up by six.
But Monday, a Washington Post-ABC News poll of registered voters taken June 17-20 had Kerry at 48%, Bush at 44% and Nader at 6%.
A Pew Research survey done June 3-13 had Bush up by four (46%-42%) and Nader at 6%.
-
Originally posted by JBA
Nader draw off about 4-6% of the votes from Kerry. In all polls taken when he is not considered then Kerry vs. Bush are even. When Nader is mixed in then Kerry drops by 4-10% (poll dependent) but Bush stays the same.
Thats why Dems want him out.
Just because the Democrats want him "out" is not a valid reason. Too bad so sad, but Nader earned his right to be their by being a citizen and collecting the votes. I say more power to him.
-
Didn't notice the left complaining when Ross Perot ran back in '92.
-
The Democrats can doing nothing to Nader other than badger him. They do seem to be good at that though. I'm hoping that only strengthens his resolve to run.
-
I can see Nader getting 4-6% in California and New York, but not nationwide. He will have no impact. By November, Bush will be in full meltdown mode, just like Daddy did.
-
Originally posted by rpm371
I can see Nader getting 4-6% in California and New York, but not nationwide. He will have no impact. By November, Bush will be in full meltdown mode, just like Daddy did.
lol, wanna bet?
-
Bush will win in November...but Hillary will rout any GOPinhead in 2008
__________________
"If you ever go to prison for anything.... expect to be EVERYONE'S b1tch. " -eskimo
"A Jesus eating dead cat is just fu***** wrong" -Slash27
http://www.redtail.org
I got the drag set WAY low on this one :rofl
-
I'd vote for Nader.
-
Originally posted by Shuckins
Didn't notice the left complaining when Ross Perot ran back in '92.
Paging Dr. Leviathn. Dr. Leviathn, please report to the O'Club.
-Sik
-
Too bad loony Judge "10 Commandments" Moore decided not to run.
-
Originally posted by -MZ-
Too bad loony Judge "10 Commandments" Moore decided not to run.
??? so he could be embarassed?
-
Originally posted by Bodhi
??? so he could be embarassed?
No, same reason Republicans are cheering Nader.
-
I'd pay a Canadian nickle to see Bush endure his worst nightmare which of course would be debating Nader on live television.
-
I'd pay a Canadian nickle to see Bush endure his worst nightmare which of course would be debating Nader on live television.
LOL. I think that would be the television audience's worst nightmare :)
Charon
-
Originally posted by rpm371
I can see Nader getting 4-6% in California and New York, but not nationwide. He will have no impact. By November, Bush will be in full meltdown mode, just like Daddy did.
California and New York are 20% of the nation. If Nader were to get 4 to 6% of just those to states, then by definition he makes a nationwide impact.
-
WAAAAAHHHHHAAAAHHHHH they're going to "steal" the election WAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH we'll do anything to beat bush
-
California and newyork are dominated by women and womenly men.. they will go to the biggest wuss running by more than 6% so there will be no impact.
lazs