Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Axis vs Allies => Topic started by: Soulyss on July 15, 2004, 09:05:33 PM

Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Soulyss on July 15, 2004, 09:05:33 PM
Sorry I didn't get this posted yesterday but I thought we could head back to the PTO next week.  '41-42

Allied:
F4F-4
P40
SBD
TBM
M vehicles

Axis:
A6m2
Val
Kate
M-vehicles

Terrain will either be Ndisles again or Midanao.  

I think I have the ack setting figured out so I'll reduce the ack damage .7 of the MA standard should make things a little better around the fleets.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Dennis on July 15, 2004, 10:15:28 PM
ooooooohhh maaaaaannnnnn.

My fave setup and I'm outa town for the whole damn week.
Thanks Soulyss.


Splash1
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Soulyss on July 15, 2004, 10:29:44 PM
I'll see if I can tape it for you.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: B17Skull12 on July 15, 2004, 11:28:05 PM
<---packs his bags.


Be back in a week.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 15, 2004, 11:40:01 PM
P40 vs. Zero (http://www.chuckhawks.com/p-40_vs_zero.htm)
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 15, 2004, 11:52:42 PM
(http://www.model-news.com/air/p40n72/p40_box.jpg)
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 15, 2004, 11:55:03 PM
(http://www.planepix.com/resources/photos/P40.Warhawk.2ship_01_JMD958.lg.jpg)
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Rafe35 on July 15, 2004, 11:55:54 PM
Setup = GOOD!
Map = NO GOOD!

Look like I have to miss CT for little while til the historical map come around :)
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 16, 2004, 12:00:51 AM
(http://www.matthewmodine.com/pictures/ermy_yelling.jpg)

Shut your disgusting pie hole, whiner!







:D  :D  :D
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 16, 2004, 12:09:05 AM
.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 16, 2004, 12:16:04 AM
.
Title: Re: Tomorrow
Post by: Oleg on July 16, 2004, 12:16:27 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Soulyss
Sorry I didn't get this posted yesterday but I thought we could head back to the PTO next week.  '41-42

Allied:
F4F-4
P40
SBD
TBM
M vehicles

Axis:
A6m2
Val
Kate
M-vehicles


Always glad to see early-war setup :aok (even PTO :D )
P-40B I guess?
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Rafe35 on July 16, 2004, 12:17:58 AM
Good grief, Deej!  You better deleted that ugly gay poster and we seem have hijack this thread.  Let's sign a peace treaty, whatcha say?  Peace? :p :) :D
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 16, 2004, 12:19:27 AM
Yay, P40s!
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Rafe35 on July 16, 2004, 12:21:08 AM
Alright, knock those picture off, let get back the real deal.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 16, 2004, 12:22:44 AM
Done, but I'm not gittin rid of The Gunny.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Slash27 on July 16, 2004, 02:05:17 AM
P-40B I guess?

I hope both the Warhawk and Tomahawk.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Soulyss on July 16, 2004, 08:54:36 AM
Sorry Rafe, can't do much about the terrains yet.  Rumor is that both BoB and the solomons are early on the list.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Telstar on July 16, 2004, 08:54:55 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Slash27
P-40B I guess?

I hope both the Warhawk and Tomahawk.


oooooooook....

let me see if i got this straight, p40 v zeke..... Hells Angels flew p40's!

hey, we can have a squad night in the CT !!!:D
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Soulyss on July 16, 2004, 09:21:46 AM
Ok things should be running in the CT

I left the P40 off at the moment, gonna check service dates with some of my sources here, will add it soon as I get back from work which should be around 5:30 PST hope that doesn't ruin anyones plans.  I can leave a note with the CT staff during the day to add it if need be.  Will try really hard to have it in there by prime time tonight.

Have to run to work now (already late) will post a MOTD when I get back.. usual, pre historic terrain rules apply... don't mess with the rooks please.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 16, 2004, 10:02:57 AM
P40B - March 13 1941


Think thats right... :confused:
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Soulyss on July 16, 2004, 10:22:50 AM
Well it will be at least a B... I'm actually looking for service dates in the south pacific for the E model.  I'm actually going through the hundred thousand right now to see I can find any reference to the E model being present in the pacific in fall of '42.  The E was in production at that time but the only reference I can find is to a delivery to the Philippines.. but most if not all seem to be lost when the japanese invade.  

OK looks like E model planes were present in numbers in China by this time, as well as 25 based at Midway in Oct. '42... P40's didn't arrive at Guadalcanal till Dec 8.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 16, 2004, 10:25:33 AM
Good, hooray p40s!

(http://www.ctrl-c.liu.se/ftp/images/aviation/military/warbirds/p40-warhawk-5.jpg)
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: CurtissP-6EHawk on July 16, 2004, 07:27:02 PM
P-40Es to Port Moresby March 19th 42' ????

How about enable 1941 planes at foword bases and 1942 planes at more rear bases. Reset map for tuesday and thursday squad nights. If axis capture bases, suffer rear base fighters. If allies base pork, suffer the loss of rear base fighters i.e. having to fly 1,000 miles to the fight in a P-40E. :D
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Squire on July 17, 2004, 01:26:36 AM
Baptism of fire for Solomons based P-40Es was with the Guadalcanal based 347th FG which deployed there in November 1942. Source "Osprey P-40 Aces of the Pacific".

The P-40Es before then in Java and the Phillipines as well from January 1942 untill the withdrawal of USAAF forces from those positions.

P-40Es in Australia from January 42 (49th FG), New Guinea from March 42, RAAF and USAAF units.

...the P-40Bs combat use in the PTO was limited to the Pearl Harbor attack on December 7th, and the few they had in the Phillipines. Im not counting the AVG units in that (CBI Theater). They were more widely used by the RAF in the Desert and the AVG than the US forces ever used them in the Pacific, where the E model almost immediately replaced it.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Soulyss on July 17, 2004, 02:08:43 AM
Interesting squire... Americas Hundred thousand mentions somthign about Dec 8th 1942 as the first P40E arriving at Cactus... which I can't double check now since I was a dip and left it at work today.
:(


Right now my thinking is I will add the P40E at rear allied bases but possibly stage Ki-67's at rear axis bases, I know the Peggy is a little advanced for the time period but I think the P40's should be able to intercept if the axis try and deep strikes.  I'm kinda waiting to see how base capture is in this new map build, the original slot terrain was notoriously hard to capture fields in and I kinda wanna see what the case is here before I unleash bombers on the arena.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Squire on July 17, 2004, 02:35:51 AM
Cactus, as in Guadalcanal? not sure where Cactus is supposed to be. The US didnt invade Guad untill 1942. "Cactus Air Force" was the slang for the Guad air component of the USAAF, USN, USMC units there, at Henderson field. Do you mean Clark Air Base in the Phillipines? that sounds right.

Cripes we need a G4M Betty bad. Ki-67 is just too freaking fast. Oh well, maybe down the road.

Im just yakking about intro dates again, the setup has to be fair of course, I just like talking about the time period.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Grits on July 17, 2004, 08:50:26 AM
I think Soulyss means they got to Guadalcanal in Dec 8th '42, not '41.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Soulyss on July 17, 2004, 10:08:16 AM
Squire,

I looked around in the best reference book I have which is americas hundred thousand,  The only references I could find to the P40E placed some in the philipines but it also seemed to indicated that most of these were lost or withdrawn before/during the japanese invasion there.  They were flying in numbers in China and had some more stationed at Midway apparently all by the fall of 42' which since we got the terrain up in the CT kinda what I was shooting for.  The only reference I could find in there was a statement which I don't have in front of me at the moment for Dec 8 where the first E's touched down at guadalcanal, ie CACTUS.  

Now sounds like you may have access to some information that I don't so you could very well be right,  I initially chose to use the B as a balance issue.  But I'm going to go look at the performance of the  B/E vs. the A6m2 and I may switch it up depending on what I can find.  If the E is fast enough I may includethe Ki-67 but only if the allies have a fast enough interceptor in the form of the P40E.   Hope this clears up any confusion.

Edit, I by no means take offense at someone posting info that may contradict my understanding of things.  The two biggiest issues I take into consideration when making these decisions is

1:  Historical accuracy
and
2:  I ask myself "would I enjoy flying this setup from either side?"  this is the often maligned game balance issue.  And if I have to answer with "no" then the reason probably isn't going to make the finally cut.  

But I do need all the help I can get on #1 so keep that info coming.  :)
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Oleg on July 17, 2004, 11:08:54 AM
No P-40E or/and Ki67 please :rolleyes:
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Grits on July 17, 2004, 12:26:46 PM
P-40E was operational in '41 it should be included, but leave the large buffs out. It worked great last '42 slot with only the Val, Kate, SBD and TBM.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: B17Skull12 on July 17, 2004, 03:32:57 PM
give them the p40e and they have an ubber monster that really isn't needed.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: simshell on July 17, 2004, 07:14:11 PM
il fly if there is more then 5 people in the CT

iv been wanting to fly in the CT but there is never anybody on only the prime time there is life in there
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: DJ111 on July 17, 2004, 07:22:00 PM
The new map in there is horrible for my FR

Might have to fly MA for a week :(
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Soulyss on July 17, 2004, 08:42:25 PM
I was having some stutters earlier today, try checking the "store textures is system mem" or whatever it is in the video setup screen that loads as soon as you run the .exe that eliminated some of it for me.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Oldman731 on July 18, 2004, 09:08:56 AM
Quote
Originally posted by B17Skull12
give them the p40e and they have an ubber monster that really isn't needed.

Haven't flown Allied because the numbers, oddly, weren't running that way, but it's pretty clear that the P40B and F4F are way outclassed by the A6M2.  Why not try the P40E?

- oldman
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Slash27 on July 21, 2004, 04:28:33 PM
an ubber monster

P-40E is a decent and fun ride if flown right, but she's far from "ubber".  IJN forces need more pilots. Both times Ive been on Ive had to fly a zeke when Id rather being shooting one. I would love to fly the E vs the Zeke, but if people dont even the numbers, it will just lead to frustrated Axis guys who will seek fun in the MA.

 

P-40E was operational in '41 it should be included, but leave the large buffs out. It worked great last '42 slot with only the Val, Kate, SBD and TBM.

The Betty and P-39 are needed sorley for this set up IMO.
Title: Tomorrow
Post by: B17Skull12 on July 21, 2004, 06:45:49 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Slash27
an ubber monster

P-40E is a decent and fun ride if flown right, but she's far from "ubber".
P40E
(http://www.flyaceshigh.com/ahhelp/models/charts/p40espeed.gif)
 (http://www.flyaceshigh.com/ahhelp/models/charts/p40eclimb.gif)

A6M2
(http://www.flyaceshigh.com/ahhelp/models/charts/a6m2speed.gif)

(http://www.flyaceshigh.com/ahhelp/models/charts/a6m2climb.gif)
 
Quote
IJN forces need more pilots. Both times Ive been on Ive had to fly a zeke when Id rather being shooting one. I would love to fly the E vs the Zeke, but if people dont even the numbers, it will just lead to frustrated Axis guys who will seek fun in the MA.
 one of the reason's it is not needed.  i gave up on pac  last time we had a pac setup.  im sick and tired of the "Blue Boys" having twice as much numbers and only 1 fight to fly.  The only fighter i like to fly if we had a 1 german fight vs. usaaf/raf is the 109G2.  You get sick of flight zeke's ya know?  You feel like you just had enough AH and you burned out.

Title: Tomorrow
Post by: Slash27 on July 21, 2004, 11:39:04 PM
"Blue Boys" having twice as much numbers



VF 27 "Blue Boys" been in zekes a hell of alot.




You get sick of flight zeke's ya know? You feel like you just had enough AH and you burned out.

PAC set ups like this can get real old real fast. They also can be a hell of alot of fun.  For the "fun" to happen CTers need to reconize the current situations (numbers, CV battles, etc,) and change to meet the needs of the arena. If its getting old Skull go blow off some steam in the MA in an uberassed late war ride and pop into the CT on busy nights like Tues and Thurs and find someone trying to do something organized. Thats the only way we're gonna be able to get away from the mini-MA that the CT is 99% of the time.  What ever you do dont let it burn you out. Its supposed to be fun not work.