Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: slimm50 on September 16, 2004, 03:29:45 PM
-
Looks like a potential carreer oportunity for the lazy, perhaps? Story Here (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=817&e=1&u=/ap/pricey_handbags)
-
The average British woman's handbag is worth about $1,037, according to a survey published Wednesday that examined both the cost of the bag and its contents.
Damn.
-
Laz as a purse snatcher?
Hardly...
-
Originally posted by Torque
Laz as a purse snatcher?
Hardly...
Oh, yeah. I did say "lazy", didn't I.;)
-
Doh, sorry i must of misread that.:(
-
Dowding had his purse snatched?
-
Those women need .45's to stop this travesty.
-
Then thier purses would be worth $1500.
-
5500...
number of women in Tennesee getting concealled carry permits this year..... Up 20% from 2003
seems some women don't like being victims.
lazs
-
Originally posted by lazs2
5500...
number of women in Tennesee getting concealled carry permits this year..... Up 20% from 2003
seems some women don't like being victims.
lazs
So like, what if the carry it in their purse?.
-
if they do then they will have been trained on how to do so. most ccw women don't carry in the purse tho... but... if you lose a gun... you go buy another one. Like ra said... now you are out even more money. Like not buying a car cause it might get damaged or stolen.
lazs
-
Heh, bring back the days when it was fashionable for men to wear side-arms, and women could wear derringers or something similar strapped to their leg (if the wear skirt/dress).:D
-
concealed is more efficient.
lazs
-
Originally posted by Stringer
Dowding had his purse snatched?
Actually, I think he stole one that matched his pumps.
-
Originally posted by lazs2
concealed is more efficient.
lazs
concisely stated:aok