Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: SunKing on September 17, 2004, 01:33:44 PM
-
Just reading what Pyro posted earlier.
I'm looking forward to the 190 gunnery correction.
-
Ki-84 Paaaatch! or Patch Ki-84!
-
In 2 weeks
-
What did pyro post?
-
I don't know.
But I think he meant this post.
http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=130327
>New shots of the bomber should be appearing soon.
-
Would definitely settle for a screenshot of the bomber, ready or not.
-
Whats this 190 gunnery stuff, where did pyro talk about that?
-
pyro said he wanted to redo the flight model of the whole line of 190s
-
Originally posted by simshell
pyro said he wanted to redo the flight model of the whole line of 190s
That was quite some time ago and, IIRC, was in the context of all aircraft getting their FMs redone. There was nothing that indicated it would happen in v2.01. I got the impression that it would happen as the 3D models got updated.
-
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Whats this 190 gunnery stuff, where did pyro talk about that?
"Mand: Wake up, im agreeing with what you are seeing, the picture is after I made a change today for the next patch.
HiTech"
Thread (http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=128950&referrerid=3787)
-
Just did a search and learned that Superfly hasn't posted a screenshot since 11-27-2002. Holy cats.
-
Hmm......Why is it every time some one says to weeks it becomes a more 2 weeks then again 1 more two weeks lol stop saying two weeks your jinxing it.:(
-
Originally posted by oboe
Just did a search and learned that Superfly hasn't posted a screenshot since 11-27-2002. Holy cats.
Yep, I've noticed that too.
OK, I'm sleepy, stop checking BB and going to bed...g'nite.
-
Very cool
-
Originally posted by AaronM2
Hmm......Why is it every time some one says to weeks it becomes a more 2 weeks then again 1 more two weeks lol stop saying two weeks your jinxing it.:(
Its a BBs joke, not to be taken seriously.
I'm anxious for that bomber screenshot to be shown. Getting a little impatient actually. :D
-
190 guns are not currently aiming where the gunsite is pointing. This was brought up in a post a week or 2 ago. HT did some tests and found he was using the wrong variable for something, and said it would be fixed in the next patch.
Right now 190s are aiming I believe below and to the left of the gunsite.
It doesn't have anything to do with the reworked flight models.
-
one week i bet ... the'll turn the new rides loose on evil con nite like ussual :D
-
Originally posted by Roscoroo
one week i bet ... the'll turn the new rides loose on evil con nite like ussual :D
Yup should have realized that before I opened my mouth.
-
Originally posted by Starbird
Right now 190s are aiming I believe below and to the left of the gunsite.
Wholly carp!, Oh My Cod!, I knew something was fishy!! ...and to think I changed from liquer to beer for nothing...:mad:
-
Originally posted by Starbird
190 guns are not currently aiming where the gunsite is pointing. This was brought up in a post a week or 2 ago. HT did some tests and found he was using the wrong variable for something, and said it would be fixed in the next patch.
Right now 190s are aiming I believe below and to the left of the gunsite.
It doesn't have anything to do with the reworked flight models.
i hope they dont fix it, because im good with them when they are broken!! LOL
-
Originally posted by airbumba
Wholly carp!, Oh My Cod!, I knew something was fishy!! ...and to think I changed from liquer to beer for nothing...:mad:
By a whole whopping foot.:rolleyes:
-
Originally posted by Karnak
By a whole whopping foot.:rolleyes:
With the new hit model a foot might as well be a mile if you are shooting in a poor manouvering Fw190...
-
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
With the new hit model a foot might as well be a mile if you are shooting in a poor manouvering Fw190...
It might, but it very well might not. And generally you are leading by estimating and not even using the gunsight. In addition the dispersion covers more than a foot.
I'm not saying it wasn't worth fixing. I certainly think it was and am glad HiTech did so. I am say that it had only a slight effect, very slight effect, on accuracy. I simply don't think getting mad about something that minor makes sense.
The nose down, guns forward flight that the Fw190 had is much more significant and I hope to see that fixed. That will get my attention.
-
Im thinkin B-24 or Betty..
and dont tell me we dont need the '24 cause we have the B-17,
thats just plain funny
T-34 seems to be most likely , though I'd love some kind of quad 20mm ack-wagon
-
Originally posted by Cooley
and dont tell me we dont need the '24 cause we have the B-17,
thats just plain funny
But it is accurate for the time being.
There are many bombers that I'd like to see. I won't be unhappy, precisely, if it were a B-24, Halifax or He111, but I do think all of those would be redundant in the current AH planeset.
I'd like to see one of the following:
Pe-2FT
Tu-2S
S.M.79-II
Z.1007
He177A-5
Ju188A-2
B-25C
G4M2 "Betty"
Wellington Mk III
Any of those would help close a big gap in the current planeset. The B-24 holds the same place as the B-17. The Halifax holds the same place as the Lancaster and the He111 holds the same place as the Ju88A-4.
I don't really care. I'm getting the fighter I've wanted for a long time.
-
Blenheim!
-
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Blenheim!
Knew you'd say that.:D
-
whats the point of adding a bomber? no one flys them the way they are ment to. and anyone that does has no chance against these uber fighters
-
I fly bombers only the way their supposed to. And yes I get owned on occasion by the uber fighters. But the most deadly thing ive found are the 20k la7s, 205s, and spits.