Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: midnight Target on September 21, 2004, 03:18:34 PM
-
Well my wife called me. She had terrible news. She listened to Bush's speech at the UN, and while she still disagrees with him on many issues, she said it was dam good. Maybe the best he ever gave.
The bastage!
-
actaully it was sad watching him tryin to justify it.....
-
it was and is justified and will continue to be justified regardless of what any democratic traitor/muslim terrorist sympathizer thinks.
-
No BLOOD for OIL for FOOD for BLOOD for OIL!
-
It was not justified to lie.
-
Transcript?
-
Originally posted by midnight Target
Well my wife called me. She had terrible news. She listened to Bush's speech at the UN, and while she still disagrees with him on many issues, she said it was dam good. Maybe the best he ever gave.
The bastage!
:)
This war on terror is justificable!
-
Originally posted by midnight Target
Well my wife called me. She had terrible news. She listened to Bush's speech at the UN, and while she still disagrees with him on many issues, she said it was dam good. Maybe the best he ever gave.
The bastage!
By the way...
The best speach he ever gave?
Like he evAr gave a good speach!!!???
LoL!
-
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
:)
This war on terror is justificable!
your war on IRAQ is not....
-
Human history is ripe with examples of leaders lying to protect the masses from danger. Having said that, I can find no proof outside the mouths of ignorant liberals that GWB has intentionally lied about Iraq. He was wrong about WMDs, he has obviously spun the facts (we all spin in the direction of our benifit) post WMD in his favour to protect his decision but I have not seen the lie supported by any proof whatsoever.
-
The war in Iraq is legal, moral and necessary.
-
Originally posted by Yeager
it was and is justified and will continue to be justified regardless of what any democratic traitor/muslim terrorist sympathizer thinks.
stop your childish reasoning, IMMINENT THREAT, TIES TO AQ....those where the justification to invade IRAQ, well chump you missed out by 1 letter, replace your Q with an N then you would of been justified.....
-
Originally posted by Yeager
The war in Iraq is legal, moral and necessary.
Is lying moral?
-
Originally posted by Yeager
The war in Iraq is legal, moral and necessary.
Wake up and smell the Kofi. :D
-
Originally posted by SLO
stop your childish reasoning, IMMINENT THREAT, TIES TO AQ....those where the justification to invade IRAQ, well chump you missed out by 1 letter, replace your Q with an N then you would of been justified.....
So you would support a war with Iran?
-
I'd support a war with Iran, 'cause they *are* bastards.
I'd have supported a *reasonable* war with Iraq, just to oust Mr. Hussein, not under false pretenses.
Yeah, his "speech" was a joke. Well, he's a joke anyway, so it wasn't surprising.
-
Originally posted by SLO
your war on IRAQ is not....
Oh yeah? Whatcha gonna do about it? That's what I thought..now go fetch me a sandwich.
:D
-
Originally posted by SLO
stop your childish reasoning, IMMINENT THREAT, TIES TO AQ....those where the justification to invade IRAQ, well chump you missed out by 1 letter, replace your Q with an N then you would of been justified.....
the only people that said "IMMINENT THREAT" were the liberals trying to missquote bush.
-
Originally posted by john9001
the only people that said "IMMINENT THREAT" were the liberals trying to missquote bush.
don't think so, cause even BLAIR said it.
-
Originally posted by john9001
the only people that said "IMMINENT THREAT" were the liberals trying to missquote bush.
45 minutes :rolleyes:
Keep on rewriting history guys.
Ignorance is indeed bliss.
-
Originally posted by Scootter
So you would support a war with Iran?
WMD's(Nukes).....
known ties with AQ.....
Imminent threat, hmm, future threat yup.....
losts of religious extremism in Iran....
Yup I would support it.
-
Originally posted by SLO
WMD's(Nukes).....
known ties with AQ.....
Imminent threat, hmm, future threat yup.....
losts of religious extremism in Iran....
Yup I would support it.
Sounds familiar. Can't say where I've heard this kind of thing before.
-
Originally posted by SLO
your war on IRAQ is not....
Since no one else has said it, I will.
The "War on Terror" doesnt mean "War on Afghanistan."
It means "War on Terror."
Saddam's regime proactively supported terrorism against the United States and Israel.
So there is no difference.
-
klolol
yes slowhand..soddom is a kind and gentle person..and those checks you see the PLO holding up that say.."Iraq National Bank" were actually fromn the Bush family
coming from the guy who Backed Vossatron ...you have nothing to stand on..well mayeb an f16
14 resolutions..and the panty waists UN does nothing..way to go..
France germany russia..ya..they had a truly "human" interests in iraqs oil..err people...lololololollolllo
USA is the beacon of freedom for the world..its tuff being #1....all you player hatn potatos out there ..keep on hatn..
Love
BiGB
xoxo
yes a bunch of Hanois out there
lolo Kofi "oil 4 food" Ahnnan
-
Originally posted by Yeager
...regardless of what any democratic traitor/muslim terrorist sympathizer thinks.
Do you know this makes you look like a fool and post anyway, or are you really oblivious to the fact?
-
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Since no one else has said it, I will.
Saddam's regime proactively supported terrorism against the United States and Israel.
sure, now please show me and alot of others WHERE THE FUGGIN PROOF IS......:aok
-
and big gay boy, please OH please stop hurtin my eyes with that hooked on phonics posting.....
and why always the references to Voss, I see you still have a hard on for him, my my big gay boy, you should stop that now:D
-
slovoss..you are judged by who you hang out with..and by backing such a scumbag liar thief loser...welll...?
so when i see you bash the good that USA spreads across thsi world.....
do you ever say anything good about Your Step daddy south of you?
seems to me you are always saying how bad we are..we are so cruel against the world...and so you stand up for Voss and Soddom...WAY TO GO!!!
-
slovoss...THERE ARE PICTURES OF PLO FAMILY memebers with checks from IRaq Natinal bank..I dont post pics so someone else can of it.
dam u are slow warent u?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,48822,00.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1139655/posts
Powell Urges Mideast Leaders to Focus on Saddam
http://www.worthynews.com/news-features/inside-mid-east-peace-205.htmlPowell Urges Mideast Leaders to Focus on Saddam
Iraq pays suicide bonus to entice new bombers
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/25/1017004765039.html?oneclick=true
do you need more links?,....if i could i would post pic of PLO slut holding up a 25k check
-
you sure you want to get into this stuff BGB.....
we have a very diff. perception of this world, and your perception of me is not totally correct (insert all kinds of dumbprettythang comments here)
we call it an online persona.
so your derogatory comments are mostly based on bad information.....
lets just say I like playing Devils advocate against pumpous dweebs like you.....
and again you mention Voss, now thats real fixation there, not healthy I tell ya.....
oh and your links that you posted show links between Saddam and the PLO, well doh!!! Homer. pretty much nothing new there.
its all in how you perceive the PLO, right BGB
show me links OBL and Saddam, then maybe we can keep talking about it.
But I can show you links between Iran and AQ, everyone knows that right BGB....
-
It was really funny how many times he waved the word 'freedom' in front of that crowd of Marxist pygmy ********.
-
Is lying moral?
well, what SPECIFICALLY did Bush lie about?
-
:D
[size=20]landslide bush!![/size]
-
Slov
yes Saddam and his sons ran a great country
I feel it a shame you didnt go over as a human shield
They never helped any terror organzatiosn against Isreal or United States...
dam ..what a fonzanoon
yes...and Koffi annnnanan..is a POS...slamming bush saying the WAr was illegal...WHICH ITS NOT...rigth before President Bush's speech...what a scumbag...Way to Show your Class
-
Originally posted by midnight Target
Well my wife called me. She had terrible news. She listened to Bush's speech at the UN, and while she still disagrees with him on many issues, she said it was dam good. Maybe the best he ever gave.
The bastage!
Well, there may yet be hope for your offspring.
-
Originally posted by Yeager
Human history is ripe with examples of leaders lying to protect the masses from danger. Having said that, I can find no proof outside the mouths of ignorant liberals that GWB has intentionally lied about Iraq. He was wrong about WMDs, he has obviously spun the facts (we all spin in the direction of our benifit) post WMD in his favour to protect his decision but I have not seen the lie supported by any proof whatsoever.
Many times he stated probabilities about WMD as definates. The US intelligence services qualified their analysis of Iraq as such.
Bush took that info and said Iraq had WMD, not Iraq probably had WMD. That's misleading and a lie. He also said that two possible mobile WMD labs were WMD. No only would those labs have not been WMD, but they turned out not to be WMD labs at all.
Yeager, if you told me that you probably were going to the con, and I then told someone else that you definately were going to the con, would you consider that to be the truth, or a lie?
-
Originally posted by midnight Target
Well my wife called me. She had terrible news. She listened to Bush's speech at the UN, and while she still disagrees with him on many issues, she said it was dam good. Maybe the best he ever gave.
The bastage!
come to the dark side MT konobee
-
Originally posted by SLO
sure, now please show me and alot of others WHERE THE FUGGIN PROOF IS......:aok
You missed the daily Scud missile shelling's back in 1991?
Karaya
-
Did he actually get any response at all when he finished? Other then looks of disbelief?
...-Gixer
-
Originally posted by GreenCloud
Slov
yes Saddam and his sons ran a great country
I feel it a shame you didnt go over as a human shield
They never helped any terror organzatiosn against Isreal or United States...
dam ..what a fonzanoon
yes...and Koffi annnnanan..is a POS...slamming bush saying the WAr was illegal...WHICH ITS NOT...rigth before President Bush's speech...what a scumbag...Way to Show your Class
I took 2 Advils from the headache I got just reading this, you are a very cruel man Big Gay Boymaw
-
Originally posted by Maniac
Is lying moral?
who lied?
the world? and you blame Bush? I see ... :rolleyes:
-
Originally posted by SLO
WMD's(Nukes).....
known ties with AQ.....
Imminent threat, hmm, future threat yup.....
losts of religious extremism in Iran....
Yup I would support it.
Well good then stop whining about Iraq.
why? because with full access to Iraq and Afghanistan we now have full access to two if Irans borders from which we can launch an invasion whihc would be much more difficult otherwise.
What we should do is let the UN decide something needs to be done (yea like they will ever do something decisive without the US prodding them along)
Then refuse to let em use Iraq and Afghanistan to launch an attack.
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Well good then stop whining about Iraq.
why? because with full access to Iraq and Afghanistan we now have full access to two if Irans borders from which we can launch an invasion whihc would be much more difficult otherwise.
What we should do is let the UN decide something needs to be done (yea like they will ever do something decisive without the US prodding them along)
Then refuse to let em use Iraq and Afghanistan to launch an attack.
then ye shall reap what ye sow.....
more suicide's, more beheadings so on and so forth......
For christ sake's, hasn't the Isreal & Pal. conflict teach you anything.....
Seek Powell for help, Strong views with compassion, oh please get him in Office.....then I promise too never say anything bad about the U.S.
-
Originally posted by Masherbrum
You missed the daily Scud missile shelling's back in 1991?
Karaya
Lets not forget the gassing of the Kurds.
Thing is everyone wants to see shells filled with all sorts of bad stuff and they dont realise how the Iraqi program worked.
Seems Saddam didnt quite trust all of his people with em either as
Most of this stuff was the responacabily of only a handfull of people and was assembed on site just prior to launch.
With alot of this stuff the ingrdiants themselves areent WMDs but mixing them together creates one.
As an example
Im not going to go into which ingrdiants as I dont want to give any kiddies any idea's
But most people have all the ingrediants they have in their house to make poison gas.
Now while you may posses the ingrdiants needed that doesnt mean you intend to use them in that way.
Saddams case is different inasmuch as he already HAS used them in that manner.
It would be both silluy and foolish to assume that all of a sudden he decided to become a good boy and never use them again
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Lets not forget the gassing of the Kurds.
Thing is everyone wants to see shells filled with all sorts of bad stuff and they dont realise how the Iraqi program worked.
Seems Saddam didnt quite trust all of his people with em either as
Most of this stuff was the responacabily of only a handfull of people and was assembed on site just prior to launch.
With alot of this stuff the ingrdiants themselves areent WMDs but mixing them together creates one.
As an example
Im not going to go into which ingrdiants as I dont want to give any kiddies any idea's
But most people have all the ingrediants they have in their house to make poison gas.
Now while you may posses the ingrdiants needed that doesnt mean you intend to use them in that way.
Saddams case is different inasmuch as he already HAS used them in that manner.
It would be both silluy and foolish to assume that all of a sudden he decided to become a good boy and never use them again
Forgot about that one. Good call Dred. Hello, SlowHand?
Karaya
-
Lemme settle this once and for all. Saddam had WMDs and did not comply with UN resolutions requiring him to destroy and account for them. Oh, and Bush didn't lie. There, that oughta put an end to all the Bush and America bashing.
-
i know..slovoss is a bit hard headed...remeebr his best friend awhile back?
and sorry to dissapoint you..im not gay...but i will pound u balls deep if i get paid enuff....
and im not bald..Im a very handsome man
my pic is posted on our sqiud site feel free to touch your self slov
Love
BiGB
xoxo
-
Originally posted by SLO
then ye shall reap what ye sow.....
more suicide's, more beheadings so on and so forth......
For christ sake's, hasn't the Isreal & Pal. conflict teach you anything.....
Seek Powell for help, Strong views with compassion, oh please get him in Office.....then I promise too never say anything bad about the U.S.
LMAO I had a buddy of mine make the the same type silly arguement only he said he was against it because "it would only breed a new generation that would hate us"
Like these people were somehow on the verge of loving us?
The next generation was/is going to hate us every bit as much as the last.
Either way there is/was going to be more beheadings & suicides
This has only been going on since the middle ages.
These people do not understand compassion.
they view our idea of compassion as a weakness.
That is why they film and broadcast the beheadings. To play on our sence of "compassion" for the victims.
While the rest of the world has moved to what our view of compassion is.
These people are stull stuck in the mindset of 1,000 years ago.
And have absolutely no desire whatsoever to go along with our view of progresss
The Isreal Pal situation is another matter. And I see wrong commited on both sides. I can also see and agreee with the arguements of both sides if not their methods
-
Originally posted by Eagler
who lied?
the world? and you blame Bush? I see ... :rolleyes:
Many times he stated probabilities about WMD as definates. The US intelligence services qualified their analysis of Iraq as such.
Bush took that info and said Iraq had WMD, not Iraq probably had WMD. That's misleading and a lie. He also said that two possible mobile WMD labs were WMD. No only would those labs have not been WMD, but they turned out not to be WMD labs at all.
Eagler, if you told me that you probably were going to the con, and I then told someone else that you definately were going to the con, would you consider that to be the truth, or a lie?
-
#1: the UN and Kofi can kiss my arse!!!
#2: The war with Iraq was legal and necessary, period.
#3: The war with Iran was...er will be legal and necessary.
#4: The war with seria will be legal and necessary.
#5: Who's next? I say france or canada!
-
wait a minute... we need to be accurate here. It is an undenaible fact that the sadman did have WMD's and was working on nukes... what was in question was if he STILL had em at the time of the invasion.
lazs