Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Scootter on October 07, 2004, 02:13:12 PM
-
Canada has been branded a "favoured destination for terrorists and international criminals" by the research arm of the U.S. Congress.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/000919.php
"As a Canadian, I can attest first-hand to the laxity of the Canadian immigration system. Refugee claimants are immediately accorded full Charter of Rights protections, which include unlimited appeal rights of Immigration and Refugee Board decisions (up to and including representation before the Canadian Supreme Court- all at taxpayers' expense). Refugee claims are routinely accepted from Mexico, Ghana, even the Czech Republic (no, I'm not making this up!)"
Hey you guys up north, can you tighten it up a bit?
-
Sure thing, just as soon as you guys tighten up a bit on all the firearms that smuggled from the US for our criminals.
-
were do you think we caught the arab that had bombs and plans to blow up LAX on new years.....THE CANADIAN BORDER
Times have changed,
Our kids are getting worse
They won't obey their parents,
They just want to fart and curse. Should we blame the government, or blame society, or should we blame the images on tv No!
Blame Canada! Blame Canada
With all their beady little eyes,
their flapping heads so full of lies
Blame Canada!
Blame Canada!
We need to form a full assault, it's Canada's fault! Don't blame me, for my son Stan, He saw the darn cartoon, and now he's off to
join the klan!> And my boy eric once, had my picture on his shelf, but now when I see him, he tells me to fruk myself>
Well, Blame Canada!
It seems that everything's gone wrong since
Canada came along
Blame Canada!
Blame Canada! They're not even a real country anyway. My son could of been a doctor or a lawyer, it's a true, Instead he burned up like a piggie on a barbecue> Should we blame the matches? Should we blame the fire, or the doctor who allowed him to expire. Heck no!
Blame Canada!
Blame Canada!
With all their hockey hubaloo and that ***** Anne Murray too. Blame Canada!
Shame on Canada!
The smut we must stop
The trash we must smash
Laughter and fun
must all be undone
We must blame them and cause a fuss
Before somebody thinks of blaming us!
-
"We must blame them and cause a fuss
Before somebody thinks of blaming us!"
We're just jeeelious cuz you have the unique honor of being the only ones in the world who have been condemned by the World Court for international terrorism.
Btw i hear Orlando Bosch luvs those Florida sunsets.;)
-
I dont think there is anything that the US hasnt branded Canada.
But the story is worth reading. Its not very flattering to Canadian intelligence services. Hopefully people have woken up.
Imagine if the people that searched the 911 terrorists had been as on the ball as the border guards were that day.
I took that ferry to go see the Seahawks/49rs game 2 weeks ago. It was kind of strange.
The whole story (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/nation-world/terroristwithin/chapter1.html)
-
Jeeeze Guys, lighten up,
I ran into this while looking for something else, I found it interesting because a Canadian posted it on another board. I read many other posts on the http://www.jihadwatch.com board and found them to have many points of view (same as here) but many a bit disturbing.
What is the end game of the fundamentalist Islamic radical?
When do they declare victory?
What nations will they allow to not convert to Islam in total?
Will they ever stop or will they get more power or in control of nuclear weapons in our or our children’s life time.
Will a nuclear explosion in Detroit or New York or Toronto change the life of a 12 year old Canadian?
Think about these things while you raise your children, and sleep tonight, are you safe because you are Canadian, French?
These questions are what trouble me, not what Kerry says 30 years ago or what Bush said in a debate.
-
Thanks for the fear mongering, but I don't think it's going to take. ;)
-
Originally posted by Thrawn
Thanks for the fear mongering, but I don't think it's going to take. ;)
It seemed to work well for your southern neighbor. ;)
-
I saw a list just recently released by the State Department that had the name of every country with active Al-Q cells.
This list was a mile long, and everyone from the US, Britain, Australia right down to Botswana was on it.
Canada was not on it.
-
Originally posted by Nash
I saw a list just recently released by the State Department that had the name of every country with active Al-Q cells.
This list was a mile long, and everyone from the US, Britain, Australia right down to Botswana was on it.
Canada was not on it.
ok so now in this case we say everything from us govt report is 100% accurate. cool. or maybe theres no al qaeda cells in canada because they dont have to organize as cells there. no fear of ci or ct penetration they can just walk the street chatting with all the other america haters.
-
Anony, you're babbling.
-
Originally posted by Nash
I saw a list just recently released by the State Department that had the name of every country with active Al-Q cells.
This list was a mile long, and everyone from the US, Britain, Australia right down to Botswana was on it.
Canada was not on it.
Sorry Nash with your wisdom you have long ago convinced me this administration lies, so the report you speak of must be a lie.
Canada has cells of Al-Q based on Nash logic
:rolleyes:
-
Originally posted by SOB
Anony, you're babbling.
the shame. heaven knows nobody else posts factless inflammatory drivel here. where do i get my babbling cap and what corner do i sit in? :) here i thought i was being witty. everyone falling all over themselves pointing out how faulty and untrustworthy us govt reports and investigations are, but when they say canada is al qaeda-free well that one report must be spot on!
-
Just head through that corridor, past the LOLOLOLOLOLers, and then hang a quick left at the Bad Speelers. You'll find the Babblers right next to the C-n-P'ers. Have a seat and your sponsor will be along shortly.
-
Originally posted by Scootter
Sorry Nash with your wisdom you have long ago convinced me this administration lies, so the report you speak of must be a lie.
Canada has cells of Al-Q based on Nash logic
:rolleyes:
Good one Scoot.
-
According to the State Departmen'ts 2001 list, there were no Al-Q in Iraq - prior to the invasion.
No. I don't think the State Department is in the habit of lying...
Those guys are lifers, and it shows from time to time. Especially when it stands in stark contrast to the current President.
Or....
Maybe you can think of a reason, some... reason..... for the State Department to misleadingly not include Canada on that list?
-
Originally posted by Nash
According to the State Departmen'ts 2001 list, there were no Al-Q in Iraq - prior to the invasion.
No. I don't think the State Department is in the habit of lying...
Those guys are lifers, and it shows from time to time. Especially when it stands in stark contrast to the current President.
Or....
Maybe you can think of a reason, some... reason..... for the State Department to misleadingly not include Canada on that list?
yeah state dept are lifers. just like cia dia nsa and high level military and dod.
-
hjhje?!
hja, cga...... TNJ... wbdheter.... bdhfhrt.
shabn.
-
Canada is a great place...love the people.
whacky politics though.
-
Originally posted by Nash
I saw a list just recently released by the State Department that had the name of every country with active Al-Q cells.
This list was a mile long, and everyone from the US, Britain, Australia right down to Botswana was on it.
Canada was not on it.
They only use Canada to gain access to the US..other than that there is no reason to have active cells in Canada. So of course Canada would not be on the list.
-
If Canada were so ammenable to terrorists, and if Canada were such a "terrorist haven"....
Why aren't there any terrorists here?
Why is the Canadian haven industry going belly up?
-
I'd be more concerned with South America.
Putting it mildly with all the shenanigans Reagan pulled off down there, i'm sure Al Qaeda isn't finding it hard to come across groups that are sympathetic to their cause.
-
Originally posted by Nash
If Canada were so ammenable to terrorists, and if Canada were such a "terrorist haven"....
Why aren't there any terrorists here?
Why is the Canadian haven industry going belly up?
Perhaps you should ask the Canadian that wrote entry, You did read the post Nash?
-
Originally posted by Scootter
You did read the post Nash?
I gave it a look...
(http://www.jihadwatch.org/images/jihadwatch-title.gif)
I was not impressed.
-
Originally posted by Torque
I'd be more concerned with South America.
Putting it mildly with all the shenanigans Reagan pulled off down there, i'm sure Al Qaeda isn't finding it hard to come across groups that are sympathetic to their cause.
Be funny to hear your opinions if Canada were placed in the Middle East, right in the mess. I'd bet you would have a different view on dealing with threats.
You're lucky to be located where you are. I'd bet you would have a very different perspective if you had to actually worry about defending your nation for it's very survival.
-
Nuke - I could probably throw a coke can at you right now.
We're not that far apart.
-
Nash?
I was pointing out that Canada does not have to worry much about defending itself. The US protects Canada and we take most of the burdon, most of the risk and most of the damage in doing what is needed to protect our existance.
-
You wouldn't have to "protect your existance" if.... ah nevermind.
-
Say it Nash. I want to hear your logic on the issue.
The US is a blessing for the world's peace.
-
Originally posted by NUKE
The US is a blessing for the world's peace.
Hmmm... we certainly have been a boon to Europe... the jury is still out on the middle-east.
-
Originally posted by Sandman
Hmmm... we certainly have been a boon to Europe... the jury is still out on the middle-east.
hey Sandy
Picture a Middle East without a US influence. What do you see? I see Israel whiped out, Iraq and others with WMD and disaster.
The US has been kept even the Middle East in (relative) peace.
-
The Cold War is over, maybe the US should go back to being an isolationist nation... Let the French, Canadians, whoever fend for themselves. Britain, Japan, Australia, Isreal, and a few other nations still have a military to defend themselves, which they do. Maybe France wouldn't have such great healthcare if they had to pay to protect themselves...
-
Okay... well...
First I want you to take, like, twenty deep breaths.... Clear your mind...
Sit back, and relax....
Then look at http://costofwar.com/.
Then take a minute to consider the conditions, pre-war.
Now, imagine those same billions... at that rate, that fast, POURING into your enemy's educational, irrigation, and health systems...
Go back and watch those numbers in that context. Pick any country. Anywhere. Any of your enemies.
While you watch those numbers flash by, imagine every one of those dollars streaming into that country in, say, 1999.
The potential for good.... of good-will, of.... like, HERO status is unmistakeable. They would KISS YOUR FEET. They'd LOVE you!
Instead, you dump those exact same numbers of dollars into killing them.
For this cost, you coulda HAD em!
It's all twisted....
-
Originally posted by NUKE
hey Sandy
Picture a Middle East without a US influence. What do you see? I see Israel whiped out, Iraq and others with WMD and disaster.
The US has been kept even the Middle East in (relative) peace.
Oh ****... what was I thinking... the middlle east is paradise compared to Canada.
oh... and ;)
-
Originally posted by Sandman
Oh ****... what was I thinking... the middlle east is paradise compared to Canada.
ummmm.... what?
If the US did not exist, do you think the Middle East ( or Canada) would be better off?
-
Originally posted by Nash
Okay... well...
First I want you to take, like, twenty deep breaths.... Clear your mind...
Sit back, and relax....
Then look at http://costofwar.com/.
Then take a minute to consider the conditions, pre-war.
Now, imagine those same billions... at that rate, that fast, POURING into your enemy's educational, irrigation, and health systems...
Go back and watch those numbers in that context. Pick any country. Anywhere. Any of your enemies.
While you watch those numbers flash by, imagine every one of those dollars streaming into that country in, say, 1999.
The potential for good.... of good-will, of.... like, HERO status is unmistakeable. They would KISS YOUR FEET. They'd LOVE you!
Instead, you dump those exact same numbers of dollars into killing them.
For this cost, you coulda HAD em!
It's all twisted....
at the risk of sounding to liberal (heaven help us)
What if we did what you said but instead of spending it "over there" we stop spending any (you must admit we send a lot, not in bombs) and spent it all here for our people and let you guys and the EU do it for awhile?
Would that be ok? You know we take care of our own for say 10 years not a dime overseas unless it's to buy something.
-
The middle east is a **** storm. It was before there was a U.S. and it always will be.
Until these knuckle draggin' neanderthals stop worshipping a non-existent god and fighting over a piece of dirt as if it were somehow magically more special than some other piece of dirt, there will be no end.
-
Originally posted by Sandman
The middle east is a **** storm. It was before there was a U.S. and it always will be.
Until these knuckle draggin' neanderthals stop worshipping a non-existent god and fighting over a piece of dirt as if it were somehow magically more special than some other piece of dirt, there will be no end.
In my best "Larry the cable guy voice"
There is sig material right there.
I think you are right sadly
-
Originally posted by NUKE
Nash?
I was pointing out that Canada does not have to worry much about defending itself. The US protects Canada and we take most of the burdon, most of the risk and most of the damage in doing what is needed to protect our existance.
The last time i can recall Canada in need of being defended was back in '39.
A war in which there was an obvious clear and present danger. A war in which the US for half of the duration of, turned a blind eye to people like Prescott Bush (your current prez grandpa) and a few other wealthy Americans financing Hitler's war machine, in essence facilitating in the deaths of my relatives as of many other commonwealth soldiers and civillians.
Howdy neighbour!:aok
-
Originally posted by Torque
The last time i can recall Canada in need of being defended was back in '39.
So we agree, Canada is lucky to be located where it is.
-
Originally posted by NUKE
So we agree, Canada is lucky to be located where it is.
One could argue that geographically, Canada is every bit as vulnerable as the U.S.
...and yet, the Canadian citizens don't seem to tremble in fear.
Why is that?
-
Originally posted by NUKE
So we agree, Canada is lucky to be located where it is.
You're lucky to be where you are.
-
Originally posted by Sandman
One could argue that geographically, Canada is every bit as vulnerable as the U.S.
...and yet, the Canadian citizens don't seem to tremble in fear.
Why is that?
The only thing middle-eastern terrorists fear more than Allah, is snow.
-
Originally posted by Nash
You're lucky to be where you are.
Really? It's the other way around Nash.
The US is the most powerful nation on earth. Since we are so bad, why don't you worry for the safety of Canada? We are right on your border..the most powerful nation in the history of man.
I'm thinking that Canada is lucky to be located where it is.
-
Originally posted by NUKE
We are right on your border..the most powerful nation in the history of man. I'm thinking that Canada is lucky to be located where it is.
No man... You got it wrong...
You are at our border, and it doesn't make me feel safe in the least.
It makes me nervous, frankly.
-
If the US, as it exists now, were located anywhere else in the world, with we would survive.
Canada would have nothing to ensure it's existance.
-
Originally posted by NUKE
Really? It's the other way around Nash.
The US is the most powerful nation on earth. Since we are so bad, why don't you worry for the safety of Canada? We are right on your border..the most powerful nation in the history of man.
I'm thinking that Canada is lucky to be located where it is.
Nuke all due respects,
But this "most powerful nation on earth" thing is getting kind of old even to me and my ex servicemen, diehard American, Rep. self.
Reminds me of the old saw about my old man can beat up your old man or my car is faster then yours. Just a bit juvenile, the world is well aware of our military.
I just seems inflammatory to keep hearing it here so often, no offence intended
-
Originally posted by Nash
No man... You got it wrong...
You are at our border, and it doesn't make me feel safe in the least.
It makes me nervous, frankly.
you cant be serious.
-
Okay.... maybe I'm not being so serious...
I am not "nervous"...
But I'm certainly not thrilled about having you gangster mo fo's on our border.
Back the shreck OFF! Homeys.
-
Originally posted by Nash
Okay.... maybe I'm not being so serious...
I am not "nervous"...
But I'm certainly not thrilled about having you gangster mo fo's on our border.
Back the shreck OFF! Homeys.
lol! :)
-
Originally posted by Torque
I'd be more concerned with South America.
Putting it mildly with all the shenanigans Reagan pulled off down there, i'm sure Al Qaeda isn't finding it hard to come across groups that are sympathetic to their cause.
spoken like a true commie indoc hack. so us support of contra bad but commie backing of sandis is somehow ok. and what about commie boy ortega who lost his first non commie controlled election. the lefties never had an answer for that. the possibilty that the people didnt want a commie backed govt was more than they could handle. canadians seem to be such experts on every single hotspot us involved with in past fifty years its a wonder they dont rule the world. not. :lol
-
Nash you keep avoiding his point. If the US were not located by Canada, there wouldnt be a deterrent for a country to invade Canada. What would Canada do if it were invaded? Grant them citizenship?
-
being honest if someone besides us next to canada that didnt have same history of being buddies canada would think different and have different military most likely.
-
Originally posted by Nash
Okay.... maybe I'm not being so serious...
I am not "nervous"...
But I'm certainly not thrilled about having you gangster mo fo's on our border.
Back the shreck OFF! Homeys.
OK but were taking our Satalites with us, no MTV for you!
Oh can we stock up on some fine Canadian lager before we go, I'm not a big fan of the swill we have here that we call beer.
Night guys, been good
Regards,
Scoot
-
Hey - take yer MTV... Fine. Keep it...
In fact... Keep it away from me.
Y'all are caught up in a state of unreality.
I of course, know reality. If everyone listened to me, there would be.... love, and flowers... and peace and all that bullchit.
-
Originally posted by Nash
Hey - take yer MTV... Fine. Keep it...
In fact... Keep it away from me.
Y'all are caught up in a state of unreality.
I of course, know reality. If everyone listened to me, there would be.... love, and flowers... and peace and all that bullchit.
I guess Eagler, Martlet and Grun would call me a big "studmuffin", but this kind of answer is one example of why I like Nash.
-
MTV is nothing but reality TV and celebrity gossip. Thought it was suppose to be about Music... I guess that is what MTV2 is for.
Anyway, Nash, I want to see your answer to Nuke's original point. Stop trying to be like John Kerry and answer it;)
Would Canada so easily allow immigrants into the country if they had a possibility of being invaded?
Would Canada actually put money towards a military?
-
Originally posted by NUKE
I guess Eagler, Martlet and Grun would call me a big "studmuffin", but this kind of answer is one example of why I like Nash.
Agreed :) he is an artiest
Hey if you guys are going to be gay, can I?
Do you have special classes I can go to catch up?
The MTV thing was a joke I never watch it, I was serious about the beer though.
-
Read my seattle post link. There was indeed an alquida cell in Canada..that man came from one.
Just because the war on Iraq is a stupid brutal diversion from the war on terror doenst mean that all countries shoudnt try to focus on Muslim terrorists. Canada must do better. Period.
Muslim terrorists..even ones drawing welfare here could care less about this country or some distinction we see between ourselves and our idiot neibors to the south. They would kill us all. dont doubt it.
No reason to be terrrified but every reason to realize who the real enemy is and what it at stake for all of us.
-
You guys are awesome.
-
Pongo
I hear and understand your point.
-
Originally posted by Pongo
Read my seattle post link. There was indeed an alquida cell in Canada..that man came from one.
Just because the war on Iraq is a stupid brutal diversion from the war on terror doenst mean that all countries shoudnt try to focus on Muslim terrorists. Canada must do better. Period.
Muslim terrorists..even ones drawing welfare here could care less about this country or some distinction we see between ourselves and our idiot neibors to the south. They would kill us all. dont doubt it.
No reason to be terrrified but every reason to realize who the real enemy is and what it at stake for all of us.
in no way is it diversion from war on terror.
-
Originally posted by anonymous
in no way is it diversion from war on terror.
Well that settles it.
Skuzzy... you can lock this thread now.. thanx.
-
Originally posted by Sandman
Well that settles it.
Skuzzy... you can lock this thread now.. thanx.
Sandy, you evil liberal you!
Why lock this thread?
Fugg me.
-
Originally posted by Sandman
Well that settles it.
Skuzzy... you can lock this thread now.. thanx.
explain to me why you think its a diversion?
-
Originally posted by anonymous
explain to me why you think its a diversion?
(http://www.mahopa.de/bilder/dokumente/osama-bin-laden.jpg)
-
I was just thinking about Skuzzy right now - fo real.
Pictured him throwing his arms up in the air...
-
War on Terrorism...
Osama Bin Laden is not the only terrorist in the world. There may be no links of Saddam and 9/11, but there were links with Al-Queda and Saddam. "We will go for all terrorist networks and any nation that harbors terrorist"
-
Originally posted by Nash
I was just thinking about Skuzzy right now - fo real.
Pictured him throwing his arms up in the air...
did you have pants on?
-
The middle east is a **** storm. It was before there was a U.S. and it always will be. Until these knuckle draggin' neanderthals stop worshipping a non-existent god and fighting over a piece of dirt as if it were somehow magically more special than some other piece of dirt, there will be no end.
Ye Gods. This needs to be said, over and over and over... til people finally understand it.
-
Originally posted by Raptor01
"...but there were links with Al-Queda and Saddam.
"Hello.... is this Saddam?"
"Speaking".
"Hi, my name is Bin Laden...."
"click"
There's yer connection.
-
Originally posted by Sandman
(http://www.mahopa.de/bilder/dokumente/osama-bin-laden.jpg)
youre supposed to be smarter than that dude. the same badasses looking for him and his high ranking buddies kept right on looking they didnt leave what they were doing to go to iraq. and im pretty sure youre aware of his importance to al qaeda. its not in planning organization or generating support anymore. hes a figurehead and whats commonly ignored by the lefties is that his top planners are mostly dead or captured. al qaeda has been getting raped for three years straight even during operations in iraq. weve got guys sneaking around and getting into fights all over area near afghani-paki border and not one of them is needed in iraq theres plenty of spec ops operator to go around. and no use for mech infantry or marine infantry in the bumpy parts of afghanistan when you consider the work thats being done. they are two different fights and two different kinds of fight. the current living #2 guy in al qaeda would trade bin laden being dead or captured if he could get back any three of the top guys weve killed or captured in the past year alone. guranteed.
-
Originally posted by Nash
"Hello.... is this Saddam?"
"Speaking".
"Hi, my name is Bin Laden...."
"click"
There's yer connection.
:rofl :rofl :rofl
-
Originally posted by NUKE
If the US, as it exists now, were located anywhere else in the world, with we would survive.
Canada would have nothing to ensure it's existance.
There are very few threats in the world that need a US level of protection to deter. We would have a 300,000 person army and spend less on dental floss. 300 fighters instead of 150. 20 frigates instead of what ever we have.
How many nations on earth can cross an ocean that is defended by 300 harpoon armed F18s?
So your talking out your ass...We could defend ourselves just fine against anyone but the US. And no military we built could keep you out along a border that covers the whole north amercan land mass plus the back door troops in alaska..
Trying to defend a country bigger then yours with a population less then california is pretty interesting.