Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: tonyki61 on October 16, 2004, 09:23:12 PM
-
The B-25 mitchell and it's variants would cool!
-
how about a german bomber how about the HE-111 or the JU-52 we have to many allied bombers as it is and yet they made the B-24
-
They made the B-24 to fill a gap in the upcoming ToD scenario.
My guess is that the next bomber is Russian. There isnt a single Russian bomber other than the Il2, and its not much good for bombing static objects.
I'd bet the B-25 is very low on the priority list.
-
This should be the order for bomber manufacture (after the B-24):
Russian bomber
Italian bomber
German bomber
British bomber
.....
.....
.....
American bomber
-
i want to see the He111 and the G4m betty
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
This should be the order for bomber manufacture (after the B-24):
Russian bomber
Italian bomber
German bomber
British bomber
.....
.....
.....
American bomber
i would say british then german above italian.
Afterall the brits do only have the lancaster. The boston is another american bomber just in RAF markings. Its like having a B-26 in RAF markings and calling it a british bomber.
At least the germans have the stuka and ju88 which are useful bombers. A Wellington, Halifax BIII, Stirling or B. Mossie would be very nice.
I know the italians dont have any bombers.... but do we really need one?
-
Hope you are not upset with me Furby for not agreeing with you.
-
Type: Long Range Bomber or Reconnaissance aircraft.
Origin: Junkers Flugzeug und Motorenwerke AG
Models: V1 to V3 and A-1
Crew: N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine:
Model: BMW 801E
Type: 18-Cylinder two-row radial
Number: Six Horsepower: 1,970 hp
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimensions:
Wing span: 165 ft. 1 in. (50.30m)
Length: 112 ft. 2.5 in. (34.20m)
Height: 22 ft. 7 in. (6.89m)
Wing Surface Area: N/A
Weights:
Empty: 81,350 lb. (36,900 kg)
Loaded: 166,448 lb. (75,500 kg)
Performance:
Maximum Speed:
Clean: 314 mph (505 kph)
With Max. Eternal Weapons: 267 mph (430 kph)
Initial Climb: N/A
Service Ceiling (Typical): N/A
Range in Recce configuration:
6,027 miles (9700 km)
Endurance in Recce configuration: 32 Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Armament:
Eight 20mm MG 151.
Eight 13mm MG 131.
Payload:
Transport (V1): 22,046 lb. (10,000 kg)
Bomber (V3): 3,968 lb. (1800 kg)
Avionics:
FuG 200 Hohentwiel Radar.
(http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/images/ju390.jpg)
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
This should be the order for bomber manufacture (after the B-24):
Russian bomber
Italian bomber
German bomber
British bomber
.....
.....
.....
American bomber
Does this include dutch bombers too? :D
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
Hope you are not upset with me Furby for not agreeing with you.
HOW DARE YOU NOT AGREE WITH ME!!! YOU MUST DIE!!!
:D
what would a discussion be without differing opinions? :)
-
Originally posted by Furball
HOW DARE YOU NOT AGREE WITH ME!!! YOU MUST DIE!!!
:D
what would a discussion be without differing opinions? :)
pheuu.. was worried there for a min. :D
But you do know that you are wrong right?
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
pheuu.. was worried there for a min. :D
But you do know that you are wrong right?
about what? needing a brit bomber? or not needing an italian one? First thing we definately need is a russian bomber.
shouldnt you be asking for a new boat rather than bombers? ;) :D
-
Originally posted by Furball
about what? needing a brit bomber? or not needing an italian one?
shouldnt you be asking for a new boat rather than bombers? ;) :D
Yes we need a new boat before a bomber, but we also need more fighters before bombers.
back on topic.... You are wrong about most things most of the time when you are not in agreement with me.. does that cover it? :D
good.
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
back on topic.... You are wrong about most things most of the time when you are not in agreement with me.. does that cover it? :D
what am i wrong about this time because i am not in agreement with you? maybe you are wrong, when you say i am wrong, about being wrong and not being in agreement with you - because i dont know what you are telling me i am wrong about?
-
Originally posted by Furball
what am i wrong about this time because i am not in agreement with you? maybe you are wrong, when you say i am wrong, about being wrong and not being in agreement with you - because i dont know what you are telling me i am wrong about?
no no... this is real easy. pay attention:
you are always wrong when you dont agree with me. thats simple enough aint it? :cool:
situation 1) i say A and you say A then you are aok
situation 2) I say A and you say B then you are not ok...aok?
:p
-
A!
-
Originally posted by Furball
A!
Outstanding... think you got it !
test: B!
-
umm... this is a tough one...
can we make this multiple choice please?
C!
-
We could have the B-25 as a russian bomber i mean they did use them right?
-
i think the "cheap, easy stuff" should come... after 2.1
Junk '87 tank buster (hunpods should be easy to make)
P-38G and J
Panzerblitz rockets and a 1800kg bomb for 190F-8
A6M3 (A6M2 with clipped wings! More cannon ammo btw - 200)
spitfire Ib (similar to spit IA, but with 2x 20mm hispanos and 4 7.7mm, 1,566 built)
sea herr 2c (just add a tailhook!!!)
spitfire IX LF (clipped wings, mid-late war standards)
109E-7
Il-2 single seat, First series
N1K1-J
P-47N
:)
-
Originally posted by Furball
umm... this is a tough one...
can we make this multiple choice please?
C!
I thought i was one down and the rest of the community to go, but it seems i have lost you too.
Oh well.. i have a few more years in me yet and I will win the BBS!!
:aok
-
dont give up yet!!!
D!!!!!!!
-
Ok..
Now you are just moving further away. At this point I feel like there is no longer anything we have to say to eachother and we should prolly just go our separate ways. :(
I really thought we had something going there, but again I am let down.
-
lmao :D