Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Yeager on October 27, 2004, 08:44:39 AM
-
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20041027-121030-7792r.htm
-
" "They say there are 1,100 dead soldiers. That means 1,100 families hold grudges against Bush and hate him. There are 6,000 families whose sons were injured who hate Bush and will not re-elect him."
After her son's death, Walters became an outspoken critic of what she considered President Bush's poor planning for the war. But it's not enough to sway her vote.
"Don was willing to do this, he thought it had to be done, so I had to support him," said Walters, 67, who voted for Bush in 2000 and plans to do so again. "I have to support it because he gave his life for it."
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041027/D85VQA100.html
-
(http://home.online.no/~raygd/images/tp01.jpg)
(http://home.online.no/~raygd/images/velsigne.jpg)
-
Keep drinking the Kool Aid boys.
-
a Vote for Bush is a Vote for the death of all mankind.
-
Why does a newspaper undermine it's credibility with adds like this?
(http://a248.e.akamai.net/6/800/1133/1098819218/oasc02.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Creatives/washtimes/Newsmax_box_11_.2004/KerryFilm_250x250.gif)
I'm not saying that the claims in there aren't true... I'm just amazed that they publish that kind of stuff.
-
Originally posted by mora
Why does a newspaper undermine it's credibility with adds like this?
(http://a248.e.akamai.net/6/800/1133/1098819218/oasc02.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Creatives/washtimes/Newsmax_box_11_.2004/KerryFilm_250x250.gif)
Well why don't you tell us ahead of time what sources you like the information to come from ahead of time?
Maybe the NYT? I'm sure (and I know for a fact) they've made up better stories than this!
And for whats its worth, advertisement money is still money.
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Well why don't you tell us ahead of time what sources you like the information to come from ahead of time?
Maybe the NYT? I'm sure (and I know for a fact) they've made up better stories than this!
And for whats its worth, advertisement money is still money.
I don't support Kerry any more than Bush, and I also have nothing against Washington times. In my view a credible news source shouldn't publish political adds like this.
-
" Mowafaq Al-Tai, a London-educated architect and intellectual, said different types of resistance fighters have different views of the U.S. election.
The most pro-Kerry, he said, are the former Saddam Hussein loyalists — Ba'ath Party members and others who think Washington might scale back its ambitions for Iraq if Mr. Kerry wins, allowing them to re-enter civic life.
The most pro-Bush, he said, are the foreign extremists. "They prefer Bush, because he's a provocative figure, and the more they can push people to the extreme, the better for their case." "
If you took the time to read your own freaking article that you claim is so black and white by the title above, you would see its alot more grey then your would be propaganda post has claimed..
No bias with that add blaring either..
:rolleyes:
Are you shure WP is not owned by news.corp (I know they are not but with bias like that, might as well post Cursor.org smirking chimp and mypetgoat.com articles for counter balance..)
on a side note anyone with 16639 posts who's Circling Uranus holds infinite wisdom imo...**
:p
DoctorYo
**Ps: DoctorYo's sledgehammer 1; bad guy propaganda engine 0
-
Saying voting for Kerry will cause terroism, is terrorism in it's worst form..
-
Fear mongers unite...
-
there is no terrorist threat.......there is no terrorist threat.....there is no terrorist threat.....there is no (Bang)
Give it up, a vote for Kerry is a vote in support of islamic terror.
-
just thinking that if the increased attacks in Iraq is to sway the election to skerry, a vote for skerry is nothing more than a victory to the terrorist ...
a long-distance mini Spain .....
not to mention the fact skerry doesn't have the stomach to win in Iraq, the polls will sway him otherwise
-
There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD... There is WMD...
**** there weren't any WMDs...
Or maybe...
Mission Accomplished... Mission Accomplished... Mission Accomplished... Mission Accomplished...
Ooops...
-
A vote for Bush is a vote for babies and bunnies sponstaneously combusting.
-
Or how about "bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... " ?
Any better?
-
Yeager
you hit a nerve .. truth hurts
LOL
-
Ok staga you get three points to start.
Havent found any mass produced WMD factories or giant stockpiles as such, yet. Have found lots of proof of intent to maintain capacity and proof of small one and two man science labs working to develope means of delivery for chem and bio weapons, so....at this time I will call it a draw on this one but will deduct one point from you because, well...........your european. Bottom line, good move in Iraq.
Major combat Operations against the Iraqi military were accomplished at that time, so you lose. One point deducted on that too.
And yes, bring them on. Your third point deducted, you lose
:rofl
-
I don't hold anything against the guys on this BB who claim they will be voting for kerrie.... I know that they have wifes or girlfriends or canadian boyfriends who are screeching at them and watching this board...
I have every confidence tho that they will do the right thing and man up and vote for Bush when they are on their own in the polling booth.
lazs
-
Originally posted by Montezuma
(http://home.online.no/~raygd/images/tp01.jpg)
Are they celebrating a visit to Burger King with those hats?
-
Originally posted by RightF00T
Are they celebrating a visit to Burger King with those hats?
No, that is the Washington Times owner commanding his minions to write stupid anti-Kerry articles.
-
Originally posted by RightF00T
Are they celebrating a visit to Burger King with those hats?
LMFAO!
-
Originally posted by -MZ-
No, that is the Washington Times owner commanding his minions to write stupid anti-Kerry articles.
No different than CBS, NYT, Washington Post, (NPR radio, etc.) commanding its minions to write stupid anti-Bush articles. Also, please note the quotes from Mohammad Amin Bashar. Last I checked the Washington Times wasn't asking him to comment on Bush. ;)
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
No different than CBS, NYT, Washington Post, (NPR radio, etc.)
You mean they are also owned by a bizzare cult leader who thinks he is the Second Coming of Christ? I had no idea.
-
a Vote for Kerry is a Vote for terror and another lost war
i doubt even Kerry can turn the next 8 years into something positive.
See, only 4 years are enough to lead a nation into something,
where people today think about how to finish all this is:"Probably not in my life".
-
Originally posted by -MZ-
You mean they are also owned by a bizzare cult leader who thinks he is the Second Coming of Christ? I had no idea.
Oh, so now we get to the point of your problem with this circulation. I hear psychologists can work out those problems for you.
Care to comment on the paper quoting the source of their news story? Didn't think so. Facts suck don't they?
-
Originally posted by RightF00T
Are they celebrating a visit to Burger King with those hats?
:rofl :rofl :rofl
Got a kick outta that. :)
I think it's very unfair to directly corolate a vote for Kerry as support for terrorism. It could be true that the terrorists are hoping that Kerry wins, but never the less, this comparison is unfair. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and shouldn't be unfairly labeled as a result of their opinion. Who knows, maybe Kerry might handle things better than Bush. My opinion is that he won't, but no one knows for sure.
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
No different than CBS, NYT, Washington Post, (NPR radio, etc.) commanding its minions to write stupid anti-Bush articles. Also, please note the quotes from Mohammad Amin Bashar. Last I checked the Washington Times wasn't asking him to comment on Bush. ;)
Yeah, thats only the America media too... I think the BBC considers Michael Moore as fair and balanced... :rofl
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Facts suck don't they?
Well you would definately be the one to know. :)
-
Here you go. Another post in the vein of BS. It seems to be what you all like.
:D
Mowafaq Al-Tai, a London-educated architect and intellectual, said different types of resistance fighters have different views of the U.S. election.
The most pro-Kerry, he said, are the former Saddam Hussein loyalists — Ba'ath Party members and others who think Washington might scale back its ambitions for Iraq if Mr. Kerry wins, allowing them to re-enter civic life.
The most pro-Bush, he said, are the foreign extremists. "They prefer Bush, because he's a provocative figure, and the more they can push people to the extreme, the better for their case."
-
Originally posted by Eagler
just thinking that if the increased attacks in Iraq is to sway the election to skerry, a vote for skerry is nothing more than a victory to the terrorist ...
a long-distance mini Spain .....
not to mention the fact skerry doesn't have the stomach to win in Iraq, the polls will sway him otherwise
attacks are not increasing in Iraq. Except that US attacks on insurgents are inceasing. Is that what you meant? October has been a quiet month. So does that mean that the terrorists are slowing down in support of Bush?
-
US attacks on insurgents are increasing.... the terrorists are slowing down...
Hmmmm
-
Originally posted by Pongo
October has been a quiet month. So does that mean that the terrorists are slowing down in support of Bush?
The rate of DoD casualty notices are sort of disagreeing with the 'october slow down'
You can find better 'slow down' moments from couple of other months in the past.
-
Originally posted by Pongo
attacks are not increasing in Iraq. Except that US attacks on insurgents are inceasing. Is that what you meant? October has been a quiet month. So does that mean that the terrorists are slowing down in support of Bush?
wow
tell it to the families of these men ...
Zarqawi Group Claims Killing of 50 Iraqis (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=1&u=/ap/20041024/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq)
-
Less then 2 coalition members have died per day. That is a low month.
You cant make it a bigger month to serve some misguided need to feel good about voteing for Bush.
using these numbers. (http://icasualties.org/oif/)
I dont know what numbers Fishu is talking about. But certainly its not an active month by the average of the occupation of iraq.
-
Originally posted by Yeager
Ok staga you get three points to start.
Havent found any mass produced WMD factories or giant stockpiles as such, yet. Have found lots of proof of intent to maintain capacity and proof of small one and two man science labs working to develope means of delivery for chem and bio weapons, so....at this time I will call it a draw on this one but will deduct one point from you because, well...........your european. Bottom line, good move in Iraq.
Major combat Operations against the Iraqi military were accomplished at that time, so you lose. One point deducted on that too.
And yes, bring them on. Your third point deducted, you lose
:rofl
So US went into Iraq on "Intent"? Funny I can never remember that as being one of the points for action taken up with the UN.
"Intent" Is hardly justification for invading another country. What happend to the imminent danger of WMD's from Iraq? LOL
...-Gixer