Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: SOB on October 29, 2004, 01:14:09 AM
-
I guess now there's no way to know for sure, but this sure makes it look like O'Reilly had something to hide.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=Z2YIA2PRDA3DMCRBAEKSFFA?type=entertainmentNews&storyID=6653322
O'Reilly Harassment Case Settled Out of Court
Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:54 PM ET
By Claudia Parsons
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Fox News Channel host Bill O'Reilly and the female co-worker who accused him of sexual harassment settled their dispute out of court on Thursday, agreeing there was no wrongdoing by either side in a scandal that O'Reilly called a "brutal ordeal."
The agreement brought an abrupt end to a sensational case that had turned the media spotlight on America's top-rated cable television news host, a darling of political conservatives and an outspoken proponent of personal morality.
Both sides agreed to drop all allegations against each other, but details of the settlement were kept confidential.
"All litigation has ceased in that case that has made me the object of media scorn from coast to coast," O'Reilly said in a brief statement to his viewers on Thursday's broadcast.
The 55-year-old commentator, who is married and the father of two, added: "this matter has caused enormous pain, but I had to protect my family and I did. Some of the media hammered me relentlessly because ... I am a huge target, as is Fox News. All I can say to you is please do not believe everything you hear and read."
He concluded by saying, "This brutal ordeal is now officially over, and I will never speak of it again."
The settlement came a day before O'Reilly's accuser and her lawyer were due in court to divulge whether she had recordings of her telephone conversations with the commentator.
Andrea Mackris, 33, an associate producer for "The O'Reilly Factor," had sued the talk show host earlier this month, claiming he had repeatedly pressured her to engage in sexually explicit conversations over the phone, talking about vibrators, masturbation and pleasuring himself at times as he spoke.
ANTICIPATING THE COMPLAINT
She claimed O'Reilly and Fox News had threatened retaliation if she came forward with her allegations.
Anticipating the complaint, O'Reilly and Fox News filed their own suit earlier the same day. The suit accused Mackris and her lawyer, Benedict Morelli, of trying to extort $60 million in "hush money" from him by threatening to go public with false allegations of sexual harassment.
In a statement on Thursday, legal firm Becker & Green, which represented O'Reilly, said all parties had agreed to settle the dispute out of court, withdrawing both the harassment suit and the extortion case.
"All parties have agreed that there was no wrongdoing whatsoever by Mr. O'Reilly, Ms. Mackris, or Ms. Mackris' counsel," the statement said. It did not say whether a financial settlement was involved.
While O'Reilly and his attorney, Ronald Green, have both denied he did anything wrong, neither has denied publicly that O'Reilly ever made sexually explicit remarks to Mackris, like those attributed to him in her lawsuit. Green instead has suggested that Mackris secretly recorded her phone conversations with O'Reilly to entrap him.
Referring to the statement issued by his lawyers, O'Reilly told viewers on Thursday: "Obviously, the words 'no wrongdoing' are the key."
Mackris' lawyers could not immediately be reached for comment.
Despite the lurid nature of the case, publicity surrounding the dispute did not seem to hurt O'Reilly's following. His show has drawn consistently higher ratings since the scandal broke. Monday night's telecast was watched by 3.7 million viewers, one of the program's biggest audiences ever, according to Nielsen Media Research.
O'Reilly, however, did recently cancel a series of TV interviews planned for the promotion of his new children's book, "The O'Reilly Factor for Kids."
His lawyers had sought access to tapes they believed Mackris had made of her phone conversations with O'Reilly as part of what they said was a plan to extort money from the commentator.
Mackris began working as an associate producer on O'Reilly's program in April 2000. Earlier this year, she left her job at Fox for a few months to work for rival network CNN, but returned to Fox in July. Fox said she had been placed on paid leave since just before the exchange of lawsuits.
Asked whether Mackris remained employed by the network, a Fox News spokeswoman said only, "The statement (from O'Reilly's lawyers) speaks for itself."
Fox News Channel is part of the Fox Entertainment Group, which is controlled by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp.
-
Big surprise.
I guess OReilly isnt the moral upstanding married man he portrays himself as.
:lol
-
Or...maybe SHE did?
I dunno, he's big quick to hound folks like Michael Jackson and others for hiding behind lawyers and "spinning" rather than answering. Looks like this is a question he'll dodge and not answer, eh?
-
Originally posted by LePaul
Or...maybe SHE did?
I dunno, he's big quick to hound folks like Michael Jackson and others for hiding behind lawyers and "spinning" rather than answering. Looks like this is a question he'll dodge and not answer, eh?
He was all tough guy when his lawyers demanded tapes if any existed.
Guess there were tapes and she got a bundle to never write a book or say a word.
Im guessing between 10 and 25 million.
-
Taped convos of O'Reilly sticking his vibrator up his bellybutton and yelling "four more inches!".
Hard to sell children's books with that over your head.
-
In that line of work, bad press is good for ratings.
I read on one of the news sites that his audience grew 30% since the story hit.
-
Originally posted by LePaul
In that line of work, bad press is good for ratings.
I read on one of the news sites that his audience grew 30% since the story hit.
When you are on top of your game you make a bigger target. His numbers ratings consistantly beat out almost all of his major competators.
You guys that want to lable him as a right wing nutball don't have any clue as to what you are talking about. He generally leans to the right but has been brutally fare w/ Kerry this whole election and neither Kerry nor his any of his people would do an interview with him.
He gets just as much hate mail from the right saying he's too liberal as he does from the left saying he's to conservative.
-
Originally posted by Silat
He was all tough guy when his lawyers demanded tapes if any existed.
Guess there were tapes and she got a bundle to never write a book or say a word.
Im guessing between 10 and 25 million.
I'd bet she didn't have crap. She was scared by his lawsuit so she settled.
-
Originally posted by Silat
Big surprise.
I guess OReilly isnt the moral upstanding married man he portrays himself as.
:lol
If you had watched his show you would know the details instead of looking like a fool http://www.foxnews.com see for yourselves.
-
O'Reilley was toast and knew it otherwise he would have fought this to the highest court in the land.
Originally posted by Torque:
"four more inches!"
:rofl
-
Originally posted by rpm
O'Reilley was toast and knew it otherwise he would have fought this to the highest court in the land.:rofl
Read the first paragraph of the Reuters story. "no wrong doing by either party" It should be pretty simple to understand, even for you. Some slimey underbeefinjected staffer looking for publicity becomes a tool of the pinheads by making a false accusation and you simpletons are all over it like white on rice. funny really. :D or would you "Rather" drop it? :D
-
Better read futher than the first paragraph. Try the third.
-
Originally posted by storch
or would you "Rather" drop it? :D
:rofl
-
If she had nothing on him, he would have buried her. rest assured, the tapes will come out eventually.
"protect his family," LOL....the language used in the statement is contingent of both parties agreeing to the settlement.
Someone gives me 25 million, I'll say "no hard feelings" either...
-
So is o Reilly taking advantage of pre brainwashed bush supports or is Bush taking advantage of pre brainwashed O reilly supporters.
O Reilly is a moderate!
Ya if you mean moderalty devient..lol
-
Originally posted by Pongo
O Reilly is a moderate!
Ya if you mean moderalty devient..lol
Exactly. Moderate would mean closer to the center, which is further to the left, and we all know that the left never views extra-marital affairs as shameful even in the white house.
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Exactly. Moderate would mean closer to the center, which is further to the left, and we all know that the left never views extra-marital affairs as shameful even in the white house.
Or even in the NYC mayors office, or the Speaker of the Houses place, or a Senator... oops those are Republicans... my bad.
When you point a finger there are 3 pointing back.
-
lol, he has more in common with Clinton than he thought, eh?
-
Originally posted by Pongo
So is o Reilly taking advantage of pre brainwashed bush supports or is Bush taking advantage of pre brainwashed O reilly supporters.
O Reilly is a moderate!
Ya if you mean moderalty devient..lol
Considering Canada doesn't get Fox news and you've probably never even seen this show I'd say it's Highly unlikely that you know what you are talking about.
-
I watched him in the hotel room in Seattle three weeks ago..
honest...
Ok I dont know.. But he featured prominently in Lies and the Lieing Liers who tell them.
-
Originally posted by Pongo
I watched him in the hotel room in Seattle three weeks ago..
honest...
Ok I dont know.. But he featured prominently in Lies and the Lieing Liers who tell them.
I watch him every night....every show he says something most republicans disagree with. He's also very fair to the guests and doesn't just let them sit there and recite talking points.
If he was on CNN he'd probably be lauded as a great host if not opinionated.
Liberals probably think alan colmbs is a conservative just cause he's on Fox News!
-
O' Reilley came from tabloid TV, Inside Edition. He's Maury Povich without the hair.
-
Originally posted by rpm
O' Reilley came from tabloid TV, Inside Edition. He's Maury Povich without the hair.
He "came from" alot more than just that:
After receiving his Master's degree, O'Reilly began his television news career in Scranton, Pennsylvania, followed by stops in Dallas, Denver, Portland, Oregon, Hartford, and Boston. He received an Emmy Award for his report on sky-jacking at KMGH-TV in Denver. In 1980, he anchored his own program on WCBS-TV in New York and received an Emmy Award during his tenure there. Later he became a CBS News correspondent covering the wars in El Salvador and the Falkland Islands, among other assignments.
In 1986, Bill O'Reilly joined ABC News as a correspondent on The World News Tonight. During his three year tenure, he appeared on the show more than one hundred times and two National Headliner Awards for excellence in reporting.
O'Reilly's career changed in 1989 when he joined the nationally syndicated Inside Edition as senior correspondent and backup anchor. Within three weeks, he took over the anchor chair from David Frost. During his six years at Inside Edition, the show was one of the highest-rated "infotainment" programs in America.
In 1995, O'Reilly left to enroll in the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University where he received a Master's Degree in Public Administration. Upon leaving Harvard, Roger Ailes, chairman and CEO of the then startup FOX News Channel, hired O'Reilly to anchor The O'Reilly Factor.
Speaking of wich....its almost on...time to go.
-
Originally posted by Silat
Big surprise.
I guess OReilly isnt the moral upstanding married man he portrays himself as.
:lol
did ya laugh it up when Clinton paid Paula Jones off?
naaa didn't think so
-
Originally posted by Krusher
did ya laugh it up when Clinton paid Paula Jones off?
naaa didn't think so
Actually what Clinton did was more aggregious because he was a public servant- Bill O'Reilly is an entertainer, and as such shouldn't be held in "moral violation" any more than if it was Howard Stern who was so accused.
This story will be forgotten in a month, as it should be.
-
What did O Reilly have to say about the whole paula jones thing at the time?
-
Originally posted by storch
If you had watched his show you would know the details instead of looking like a fool http://www.foxnews.com see for yourselves.
OK as if Fox is a news source :lol
2nd whats with the name calling? If he wasnt guilty and she had nothing then they wouldnt settle.
Try getting your info from more than the RIGHT WING MEDIA.
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Exactly. Moderate would mean closer to the center, which is further to the left, and we all know that the left never views extra-marital affairs as shameful even in the white house.
Rip do I have to pull out the list of righties who have had extramarital affairs? :D
-
Originally posted by Krusher
did ya laugh it up when Clinton paid Paula Jones off?
naaa didn't think so
Krusher get a grip. You arent channeling my thoughts.
Yes I laughed. Who could have hair that bad.
Im fair and balanced. Try it you might like it. :)
-
I will say it right now, I watch fox news (from time to time) for the CNN style news updates on the top and bottom of the hour. I have never liked o'really? and neil cavuto is dumber than I am. What I do like is that brown honey with the beautiful eyes and some of those other bimbos......
Once thats all said and done its just more of the same really, only different...in a similar way.
-
Originally posted by Silat
OK as if Fox is a news source :lol
2nd whats with the name calling? If he wasnt guilty and she had nothing then they wouldnt settle.
Try getting your info from more than the RIGHT WING MEDIA.
I'm pretty sure a self proclaimed religious zealot, who quotes a confessed adulterer in his sig, called you a fool.:lol
-
It should be pretty simple to understand, even for you.
Wasting your breath on this crowd.