Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Ripsnort on November 01, 2004, 10:03:32 AM

Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: Ripsnort on November 01, 2004, 10:03:32 AM
:aok Gotta love it!

 

THE DEATH OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | OCTOBER 28, 2004 | BARBARA STOCK

The Death of the Democratic Party Written by Barbara Stock Thursday, October 28, 2004

The Democrat Party of my father is dead. It started to die with Lyndon Johnson and the ''Great Society.'' Jimmy Carter crippled it, but it could have been saved. Bill Clinton put a stake in its heart and John Kerry has let his party bleed to death. There is no hope now. The Democrat Party is almost devoid of morals, honesty, or integrity. Its members have thrown it all away in their rush for power and in their headlong plunge towards socialism. The liberals don’t even try to keep it secret anymore. They don’t care who knows. They just keep lying.

To win the election in 1991, the Clinton camp put out their ''October Surprise.'' Lawrence Walsh handed down a last-minute indictment of Casper Weinberger and that tipped the scale in Clinton’s favor. Interestingly, if one checks, he will find that the Senate Committee Report on Drugs, Law Enforcement and Foreign Policy was chaired by none other than Senator John F. Kerry. Perhaps Bill Clinton climbed out of his sick bed to repay a favor.

In 2000, a Democrat operative leaked the news of a George Bush drunk driving arrest that was 25 years old. It nearly cost Bush the election.

This year the Democrat lie-machine has been moving at warp speed. The truly horrifying thing is that Democrats have openly been joined by their ultra-liberal friends in the media. The New York Times has totally sold its soul to the Kerry campaign. CBS has sacrificed 50 years of credibility to assist John Kerry. Can anyone now believe anything either of these once irrefutable sources of news puts forth? Not only has the Democrat Party committed suicide, it has taken many great American icons with it. It was all done in the name of power and the need to regain it.

The Democrat Party never recovered from loosing the Congress in 1994. Democrats have been bitter and angry ever since. When Al Gore lost in 2000, the rage turned into blind hatred. Democrats perpetuate the lie that the Supreme Court ''gave'' the election to Bush. They did not. Democrats continue to insist that a million African Americans were ''disenfranchised'' in the last election in Florida. They were not. Now they circulate a disgusting pamphlet that tells minorities if they try to vote, evil Republicans will hit them with fire hoses ''like they did in the 1960’s.'' Pay no mind to the fact that most of those using fire hoses were following the orders of southern Democratic governors.

For the 2000 election, Democrats put out ads that showed a man being dragged to death behind a truck while saying Bush was against severe penalties for ''hate crimes.'' This ad ran while the men responsible for that very crime were on death row. Is there a more severe penalty than death for such a crime? Are not most murders ''hate crimes?'' Then the liberals have the gall to accuse Bush of executing more people than any other governor--which was another false statement.

Can today’s Democrats say anything that is not a lie? Is it possible anymore? Do they care? If they can’t win an election honestly, then they will just lie and cheat.

Ohio's Republican Governor Bob Taft has reported that four counties have now been found to have more people registered than actually live in the counties and are eligible to vote according to the last census. The old Democrat saying ''vote early and often'' is alive and well. Be sure to drag dead or senile grandma with you so you can vote for her as well.

Now we have this year's ''October Surprise.'' The Democrats, in concert with the New York Times and CBS, are trying to convince Americans that Bush allowed 350 tons of high explosives to fall into the hands of the enemy. The way the story was written, it sounded as though the explosives were stolen last week or yesterday. As it turned out, they probably were not stolen at all.

The plan of the editors was a good one, but they forgot about those pesky reporters who were embedded with the troops. The reporter embedded for NBC, Dana Lewis, now with Fox News, states that he saw no weapons with the IAEA’s seal on them as he walked the complex when the troops arrived on April 10, 2003. Mohamed El Baradei, head of the United Nations nuclear watch-dog group, had reported in February 2003, that some of the high explosives had already been moved. The IAEA also reported huge explosions at that site during the opening days of the war. One has to ask, since these weapons were illegal under the United Nations agreement with Saddam, why were they not removed and destroyed when they were found by the IAEA?

The last visit from the United Nations organization was in January of that year. Sometime between January and April, Saddam probably moved many of those explosives. A complete inspection of the site was done on May 27, 2003, and nothing with an IAEA seal was present. There were several deep craters. How does one get 40 semi-truck loads of high explosives out past roads teaming with American soldiers and the sky full of spy planes without being seen? Who would have organized such an operation? The Saddam government was in chaos and there was no insurgency at that early date.

Why then did the Mohamed El Baradei, chastised by Bush for not know about Libya’s weapons of mass destruction program and being weak in its dealings with Iran, leak this story to the media? Remember, El Baradei knew these explosives were missing in May 2003, when it was reported to him that our inspectors had found no such weapons at that complex. Why did he wait until one week before the American election to reveal this ''news?'' Could it be that the mighty and corrupt United Nations feels its world supremacy is threatened by President Bush? Is it possible that it would feel much more comfortable with John Kerry who has already pledged his allegiance to the United Nations and stated that dying under the U.N. flag is honorable, but dying under the American flag is not? John Kerry voted against the Gulf War because he felt the war should have been carried out by United Nations commanders, not American generals. Kerry wanted to do the unthinkable--put American troops under foreign command.

This election year has been like no other. Outside interference from Europe in the form of mass e-mail messages pleading with Ohioans to vote for Kerry and British newspapers printing columns with statements like ''Where is a Lee Harvey Oswald when you need him?'' Terrorists like Yassar Arafat endorse John Kerry. Forged documents and blatant lies abound. Democrats have sold their souls to the devil in an attempt to regain their power, and the devil wants his due.

Hopefully, Americans will bury this rotting and decaying Democratic Party on November 2, 2004 without allowing it to totally corrupt our democratic system beyond repair. If we are lucky, Bush will win in such a decisive manner that Kerry’s army of 10,000 lawyers, poised to make the election a living hell, will be sent home. A new Democratic Party may rise from ashes and if it does, I hope that there will be at least a few honest people among them. But at this point, I’m not going to place any bets on it.

About the Writer: Barbara is a registered nurse who enjoys writing about politics and current events. She has a website at http://www.republicanandproud.com/. Barbara receives e-mail at dickens502003@yahoo.com.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: ASTAC on November 01, 2004, 10:29:13 AM
Great story! I see most everyone here hasn't commented yet. Looks like the truth to me.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: midnight Target on November 01, 2004, 10:46:06 AM
Hold up on the obit there for a minute.

I seem to remember a certain party that couldn't get a majority in either house for 30+ years.... they still seem to be alive and screwing up the country.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: Ripsnort on November 01, 2004, 10:55:36 AM
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Hold up on the obit there for a minute.

I seem to remember a certain party that couldn't get a majority in either house for 30+ years.... they still seem to be alive and screwing up the country.


When Bill Clinton ran for re-election in 1996:

unemployment was 5.2 percent,

inflation 3 percent,

economic growth 2.2 percent.

 

Economic conditions are similar today:

unemployment is 5.4 percent,

inflation 2.7 percent,

forecast for economic growth this quarter is 3.7 percent.

 

The national media reports:

Clinton economy (85 percent positive)

Bush economy (77 percent negative)
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: midnight Target on November 01, 2004, 11:10:56 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
When Bill Clinton ran for re-election in 1996:

unemployment was 5.2 percent,

inflation 3 percent,

economic growth 2.2 percent.

 

Economic conditions are similar today:

unemployment is 5.4 percent,

inflation 2.7 percent,

forecast for economic growth this quarter is 3.7 percent.

 

The national media reports:

Clinton economy (85 percent positive)

Bush economy (77 percent negative)


You do realize that your post has NOTHING to do with this thread.. right?
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: Ripsnort on November 01, 2004, 11:21:18 AM
It was based on your reply:
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
.... they still seem to be alive and screwing up the country.
Title: Re: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: capt. apathy on November 01, 2004, 11:43:45 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
:aok Gotta love it!

 


To win the election in 1991, the Clinton camp put out their ''October Surprise.'' Lawrence Walsh handed down a last-minute indictment of Casper Weinberger and that tipped the scale in Clinton’s favor. Interestingly, if one checks, he will find that the Senate Committee Report on Drugs, Law Enforcement and Foreign Policy was chaired by none other than Senator John F. Kerry. Perhaps Bill Clinton climbed out of his sick bed to repay a favor.



too bad you didn't post this yesterday.  we could have sent an e-mail to give the author another "October Surprise", and let her know that there wasn't even an election in 1991.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: Karnak on November 01, 2004, 11:52:14 AM
Still trolling Ripsnort?

The National level GOP has gone so far off into looney land that the demise of the GOP as it exists today is only a matter of time.  The Conservatives NEED to take back the GOP from the wacky fundies.  It is essential for the good of the USA.

California has started the process with Gov. Swartznegger, and if Kerry wins the disarray that the neo-Cons and religious wackos will be in will be a great oportunity for the real Conservatives to retake the party.

Here's hoping.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: rpm on November 01, 2004, 12:54:46 PM
Quote
Ohio's Republican Governor Bob Taft has reported that four counties have now been found to have more people registered than actually live in the counties and are eligible to vote according to the last census. The old Democrat saying ''vote early and often'' is alive and well. Be sure to drag dead or senile grandma with you so you can vote for her as well.
The census tracks people that move into or out of a state 4 years after it's been taken?
Quote
For the 2000 election, Democrats put out ads that showed a man being dragged to death behind a truck while saying Bush was against severe penalties for ''hate crimes.'' This ad ran while the men responsible for that very crime were on death row. Is there a more severe penalty than death for such a crime? Are not most murders ''hate crimes?'' Then the liberals have the gall to accuse Bush of executing more people than any other governor--which was another false statement.
Anyone remember Willie Horton? While we are playing memory games, which Governor has executed more prisoners than Bush?
Quote
The plan of the editors was a good one, but they forgot about those pesky reporters who were embedded with the troops. The reporter embedded for NBC, Dana Lewis, now with Fox News, states that he saw no weapons with the IAEA’s seal on them as he walked the complex when the troops arrived on April 10, 2003. Mohamed El Baradei, head of the United Nations nuclear watch-dog group, had reported in February 2003, that some of the high explosives had already been moved. The IAEA also reported huge explosions at that site during the opening days of the war. One has to ask, since these weapons were illegal under the United Nations agreement with Saddam, why were they not removed and destroyed when they were found by the IAEA?
Seemes you forgot the other embedded reporters that DID see the explosives. Remember the "All it took was bolt cutters" discussion we had in here a few days ago? The reason they were still there is they were not illegal. They had been declared dual purpose by the IAEA.

C'mon Rip. Do you have any original thoughts of your own or must you constantly rely on the spin and damage control you get in your e-mail just to keep your post count up in here? It's sad you are letting that education you worked so hard to get go to waste.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: TweetyBird on November 01, 2004, 01:35:49 PM
>>The Democrat Party is almost devoid of morals, honesty, or integrity. Its members have thrown it all away in their rush for power and in their headlong plunge towards socialism. The liberals don’t even try to keep it secret anymore. They don’t care who knows. They just keep lying.
<<

Blah blah, "they're the anti Christ, they're the red menace, and God forbid, they support ART (and i dont mean Art Bell)!"

One thing the GOP will NEVER be accused of is creativity.
Villify and conquer, its a one trick pony.

>>Barbara is a registered nurse who enjoys writing about politics and current events. She has a website at http://www.republicanandproud.com/. Barbara receives e-mail at dickens502003@yahoo.com.
<<

Oh, well thats different....
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: JB73 on November 01, 2004, 01:51:42 PM
good read ripsnort ty.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: AKS\/\/ulfe on November 01, 2004, 01:56:08 PM
Yes, let's all thank Ripsnort for posting partisan drivel.

It's like reading about how air pollution isn't real by a company leading the world in smog output.
-SW
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: FUNKED1 on November 01, 2004, 01:57:35 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Still trolling Ripsnort?

The National level GOP has gone so far off into looney land that the demise of the GOP as it exists today is only a matter of time.  The Conservatives NEED to take back the GOP from the wacky fundies.  It is essential for the good of the USA.


Actually the GOP (as an organization) is as strong as it has ever been.  Even during Reagan's years, they didn't have as much power in Congress as the GOP currently has.  
If anything, going off into looney land has helped them.  They pay lip service to the fundies and to "traditional values" and make minor tax reductions, but if you look through all that, they are big spender liberals.  The federal government is bigger and more intrusive than ever, and the GOP is not reversing the trend - they're causing it.  Even the foreign policy is run by people who are basically hawkish liberals (neoconservatives).
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: Eagler on November 01, 2004, 02:06:05 PM
when the handsomehunkcrats allow michael moore-on hot-air spew to become their election ads -  their end is near

strange how it seemed OBL saw/quoted F911 - must make the moore-on crowd proud!
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: FUNKED1 on November 01, 2004, 02:17:03 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
when the handsomehunkcrats allow michael moore-on hot-air spew to become their election ads -  their end is near

strange how it seemed OBL saw/quoted F911 - must make the moore-on crowd proud!


Eagler you DID see Team America right?
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: Eagler on November 01, 2004, 04:04:24 PM
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1
Eagler you DID see Team America right?


no not yet, probably wait for cable - what did I miss?
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: midnight Target on November 01, 2004, 04:18:34 PM
Quote
Democrats continue to insist that a million African Americans were ''disenfranchised'' in the last election in Florida. They were not.


Florida's felony identification policy disenfranchised about 50,000 from what I've read.

Quote
In 2000, a Democrat operative leaked the news of a George Bush drunk driving arrest that was 25 years old. It nearly cost Bush the election.


Two words... Swift Boats.

Quote
Now they circulate a disgusting pamphlet that tells minorities if they try to vote, evil Republicans will hit them with fire hoses ''like they did in the 1960’s.''


Reps sent a pamphlet to minority communities telling them to make sure all traffic tickets were paid before they voted, and that the election was to be held the day after the actual date.



Quote
For the 2000 election, Democrats put out ads that showed a man being dragged to death behind a truck while saying Bush was against severe penalties for ''hate crimes.''


McCain lost his mind in Hanoi Hilton, Had illegitimate child etc. etc.
(Willie Horton ad already mentioned I think)

nuff said... hello pot this is stupid atricle by mindless sycophant kettle... are you there pot.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: TweetyBird on November 01, 2004, 04:33:55 PM
I find it amusing (sardonic), that Rip posts the meanderings of a nurse who has an interest in "current events" forecasting the demise of a 200 year old political party.

When did the GOP become the remedial party?
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: Red Tail 444 on November 01, 2004, 04:53:20 PM
I wonder how much spooge ripsnort got on his screen as he was typing this garbage up?:confused:
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: FUNKED1 on November 01, 2004, 08:36:44 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
no not yet, probably wait for cable - what did I miss?


Just the most intense Hollyweird liberal bashing you will ever see...
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: Nash on November 01, 2004, 08:41:55 PM
It goes w/o saying that I can't ever be arsed to read a rip-'n-paste.... but I can work with the title.

My take..... Wednesday morning there will be complete civil war within the GOP. Conservatives vs Neos. I pray the conservatives win their party back. I'm betting they will.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: Airhead on November 01, 2004, 08:49:15 PM
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1
Just the most intense Hollyweird liberal bashing you will ever see...


And I'll bet you rushed out of the theatre, sobbing uncontrollably at how mean the nasty ol' Liberals are... Sheeesh Funked, I thought it was the Liberals who were sensitive little girly men, not big macho guys like you. That Subaru is making you liberal, Funky- you need to trade it in for something with a V-8 and you need to go shooting with Lazs before you send Barbera Boxer a love letter.

I've seen bigger men than you eat quiche.
Title: Death of the Democratic Party
Post by: GRUNHERZ on November 01, 2004, 09:03:53 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Airhead
And I'll bet you rushed out of the theatre, sobbing uncontrollably at how mean the nasty ol' Liberals are... Sheeesh Funked, I thought it was the Liberals who were sensitive little girly men, not big macho guys like you. That Subaru is making you liberal, Funky- you need to trade it in for something with a V-8 and you need to go shooting with Lazs before you send Barbera Boxer a love letter.

I've seen bigger men than you eat quiche.


:rofl

I'm hoping this a troll of some sort.. Otherwise you completly missed the mark with that statement..