Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: SELECTOR on November 15, 2004, 02:36:07 PM
-
Did'nt the russians build dc3s under licence from about 1937? and didn't they have top gun turrets?
if so can we get one for ah2..
-
Something of the sort I think.
They would be an option.
So would the Ju52. Slow but versatile, also with a top gun.
So would the Curtiss Commando. Higher speed and payload.
-
Yep, they called it Lisunov Li-2 and in addition it was used as bomber. The Russians used the M-62 on these planes.
gripen
-
The Soviets manufactured almost three thousand DC-3 variants under license. They were built under the direction of Boris Lisunov, who had acquired his education in putting together the aircraft at the Douglas Santa Monica plant during a stint there from 1936 through 1939. The type went into production as the "PS-84", meaning "Passenger Aircraft from State Factory (GAZ) 84", and was in principle to be used as a civilian airliner by Aeroflot. After the Nazi invasion of June 1941, GAZ-84 relocated to Tashkent in Central Asia, and the aircraft acquired the military designation "Li-2".
Li-2 variants included:
Li-2G: Basic civil cargo hauler, with reinforced floor and tie-downs, plus cargo doors on the left.
Li-2T: Militarized Li-2G, with a capacity of 20 troops or 15 stretchers along with the crew of four. Some were fitted with a dorsal turret with either a ShKAS 7.62 millimeter (0.30 caliber) or UBT 12.7 millimeter (0.50 caliber) machine gun, and a ShKAS machine gun could be fitted to a flexible mount on each side of the aircraft. Bomb racks could be fitted under the fuselage, with typical carriage consisting of four FAB-250 250 kilogram (550 pound) bombs, and six RS-82 82 millimeter (3.2 inch) unguided rockets could be carried under each outer wing.
edit: link (http://www.dc3history.org/russia.htm) added.
-
We DEFINATELY need the Li-2t in Aces High. With C47s maneuverability and slow speed, it could mow down troops and light gvs all day long.
-
A question...
What powerplant did it have?
-
Here's a pic of one:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/611140/M (http://www.airliners.net/open.file/611140/M)
-
And the Japanese had their licence built version called the Tess by the Allies.
Dan/Slack
-
Originally posted by Angus
A question...
What powerplant did it have?
They used several different engines (?), but mostly the Shvetsov ASh-62 (or M-62), a 9 cylinder radial with 746 kW (1,000 HP).
-
Wasn't it considerably slower than the C47?
-
Originally posted by mora
Wasn't it considerably slower than the C47?
I don't think that's possible. They'd be flying backwards! ;)
-
Originally posted by Guppy35
And the Japanese had their licence built version called the Tess by the Allies.
Dan/Slack
Tabby, IIRC.