Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: SunTracker on December 15, 2004, 09:17:17 PM

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: SunTracker on December 15, 2004, 09:17:17 PM

All the armor in the world isnt going to protect our troops.  I offer as evidence:

http://home.insightbb.com/~k4emq/no-usa.ram
M1 tank being destroyed

http://home.insightbb.com/~k4emq/www.UNIT731MEDIA.com_nraoh.wmv


Feel free to take these videos off if they are too graphic.  I think they are somewhat educational though.

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: rpm on December 16, 2004, 02:52:09 AM

Then why waste money on it? Heck, we could send them in with t-shirts, shorts and flip-flops instead of body armor. A pointy stick works as a nice replacement for m-16's, too.

Rummy is an ultra melon, period. If he had to spend a day riding around Baghdad in an unarmored humvee instead of his fully armored limo, he would be singing a different tune.

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: SunTracker on December 16, 2004, 02:59:28 AM

My idea all along has been to convert Bradleys, Humvees, and M1s to remotely controlled vehicles.  It would not be that hard at all.

One of the definitions of insanity is to continue to do the same thing and expect different results.

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: Holden McGroin on December 16, 2004, 03:45:25 AM

Quote

Originally posted by SunTracker
One of the definitions of insanity is to continue to do the same thing and expect different results.

Another is to believe warfighting can be made safe.

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: SunTracker on December 16, 2004, 03:47:27 AM

It certainly can be made safe.

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: Holden McGroin on December 16, 2004, 03:48:44 AM

So future wars are gonna be sans killin'?

How will we know who wins?

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: SunTracker on December 16, 2004, 03:53:20 AM

Safe for the U.S., not 3rd world militants.

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: Holden McGroin on December 16, 2004, 05:05:37 AM

if the other side posesses lethal force, there will be casualties.

A Molotov cocktail is lethal force.

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: TheDudeDVant on December 16, 2004, 07:41:10 AM

How about there are different level of safety that can be achieved..  Strange you would argue this point Holden..

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: wombatt on December 16, 2004, 02:07:24 PM

With our technology there is no need for boots on the ground.
I am so dammed sick and tierd of hearing another American has died in the chithole of a country I just wish they would bomb the
turds back into the stone age.

Title: Rumsfeld was right
Post by: lasersailor184 on December 16, 2004, 02:17:48 PM

Yes, strange indeed.

This is the most rational I've ever seen Holden be.