Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Pongo on December 22, 2004, 10:34:01 AM
-
There is was on my satelite package right above headline news. Full time feed from germany of casualties being unloaded with banter in the back ground.
Now I know the terror alert level is
<<>>
and that President Bushes unwavering belief in Iraqi democrocy is what will defeat the insurgency.
There was a bit of commical dismay at the way the insurgents disapeared from faluja and appeard in strength in Mosul.
Does Fox make its comentators look up words in the dictionary befor they broadcast...think they even looked up "insurgency"?
-
Originally posted by Pongo
There is was on my satelite package right above headline news. Full time feed from germany of casualties being unloaded with banter in the back ground.
Now I know the terror alert level is
<<>>
and that President Bushes unwavering belief in Iraqi democrocy is what will defeat the insurgency.
There was a bit of commical dismay at the way the insurgents disapeared from faluja and appeard in strength in Mosul.
Does Fox make its comentators look up words in the dictionary befor they broadcast...think they even looked up "insurgency"?
the Insurgents in Mosull are in now way anywheres near the strength they were in Falluja. It aint even close
the Falluja operation was probably the most advertised operation in military history.
Common sence would tell you that some would leave before hand and take up residence someplace else.
In fact I remember the very news source you refer to predicting it.
The Military knew it also.
They also predicted a rise in attacks leading up to the election.
So none of this is exactly shocking.
Unless you werent paying attention
-
Drediock,
Why did you have to respond to that silly troll? It was just about to goto page 2 :confused:
-
Your just as guilty otto.
Big deal dridlock. the guy this morning was shocked by the concept.
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
the Insurgents in Mosull are in now way anywheres near the strength they were in Falluja. It aint even close
the Falluja operation was probably the most advertised operation in military history.
Common sence would tell you that some would leave before hand and take up residence someplace else.
In fact I remember the very news source you refer to predicting it.
The Military knew it also.
They also predicted a rise in attacks leading up to the election.
So none of this is exactly shocking.
Unless you werent paying attention
seriously don't feed him
If we hadn't let the civilians out of Fallujah there would have been a hell of a lot more civ. casualties than there were, and Pongo would be here blasting at the US for that instead of this mosul thing.
-
I never blasted anyone for anything. Except for that reporter being suprised that insurgents move arround...
you boys are getting quite touchy.
-
Originally posted by Pongo
I never blasted anyone for anything. Except for that reporter being suprised that insurgents move arround...
you boys are getting quite touchy.
Sorry then,
There was a bit of commical dismay at the way the insurgents disapeared from faluja and appeard in strength in Mosul.
I didn't realize you were talking about the reporters then.
-
gscmoltz is a putz!
-
hmm.. I too am surprised since I recall watching fox during the faluja battle and hearing several of the talking heads at Fox all agreeing that a lot of the insurgents had probably allready moved before the fight but that it was still worth doing. They seemed to have a decent grasp of the situation back then.
maybe they use the B team for canada?
lazs
-
Originally posted by GScholz
I think it was obvious.
not really. If he was talking about fox news people that sentence would have been in the same paragraph. In this case you have two different sentences not in the same paragraph so one who reads English would assume they were referring to two different subjects.
There was a bit of commical dismay at the way the insurgents disapeared from faluja and appeard in strength in Mosul.
Does Fox make its comentators look up words in the dictionary befor they broadcast...think they even looked up "insurgency"?
that and the 3 previous subjects discussed previously in the short post.
-
Originally posted by GScholz
Umm ... his entire post was about FOX News and their reporting.
and were does it say Fox News here?
There is was on my satelite package right above headline news. Full time feed from germany of casualties being unloaded with banter in the back ground.
Now I know the terror alert level is
<<>>
and that President Bushes unwavering belief in Iraqi democrocy is what will defeat the insurgency.
There was a bit of commical dismay at the way the insurgents disapeared from faluja and appeard in strength in Mosul.
Oh that's right.....not until the last sentence.....quit being a tard!
-
and were does it say Fox News here?
Check the thread heading :rolleyes:
-
Originally posted by Glas
Check the thread heading :rolleyes:
fox news for free could mean a multitude of things. He alos meantions headline news in there as well.
also.....in the english language when we quote somone we put these things at the begining and end of the quote ""
so if I was told this:
There was a bit of commical dismay at the way the insurgents disapeared from faluja and appeard in strength in Mosul.
and then a new paragraph talking about fox news reporters I would summize that the writer is making a statement.
if I saw this:
"There was a bit of commical dismay at the way the insurgents disapeared from faluja and appeard in strength in Mosul. "
Does Fox make its comentators look up words in the dictionary befor they broadcast...think they even looked up "insurgency"?
then i was assume he is in fact quoting Fox News
-
Someone pointed out his entire post was about Fox News, you replied asking where did it say Fox News, I replied that it was in the very heading of the thread you were replying to.
Is that simple enough?
-
Originally posted by Glas
Someone pointed out his entire post was about Fox News, you replied asking where did it say Fox News, I replied that it was in the very heading of the thread you were replying to.
Is that simple enough?
Umm ... his entire post was about FOX News and their reporting.
There is was on my satelite package right above headline news. Full time feed from germany of casualties being unloaded with banter in the back ground.
Now I know the terror alert level is
<<>>
and that President Bushes unwavering belief in Iraqi democrocy is what will defeat the insurgency.
There was a bit of commical dismay at the way the insurgents disapeared from faluja and appeard in strength in Mosul.
Does Fox make its comentators look up words in the dictionary befor they broadcast...think they even looked up "insurgency"?
either way I don't have time for stupid arguments my point was mad and GS was being a tard
-
Originally posted by Pongo
There was a bit of commical dismay ...
strange to find humor in the death of at least 21 ppl and the injury of many more
keep hating, tis the season
-
Nice twist, laughing at fox news is now laughing at US war dead.
You apperenlty think it is supprising that the insurgents attacked somewhere other then Faluja.
Maybe every one brainwashed by Fox finds that supprising.
Maybe none of them know what an "insugency" is.
Maybe they are supprised when the quarterback throws a football.
-
So much for this thread heading to page two LMAO
-
@ Gunslinger: As Gscholz said, it was obvious to most imo. I dont think your that thick that it wasnt obvious to you either, I just think you dont want to back down. If thats the case though, your just making yourself look more foolish imo.
@ Eagler: For a start, no one found it funny. But it's great to see that you guys find it funny when a maniac runs around London armed with a knife killing and maiming people.
Yeah, what a laugh...
-
Originally posted by GScholz
Gunslinger, it was, and still is obvious. That you don't have the mental fortitude to see the obvious does not change that fact. I'm not the one being a tard.
Pongos post looks like it was typed by a two year old. There is no sentence or paragraph structure at all. Think what you will with your personal attacks I really don't care. I admitted I was wrong quit being a tard.
-
Originally posted by GScholz
*lol* You admitted you were wrong? Where?
Perhaps this is your idea of a graceful concede?
Wake up and smell the BS you're shovelling.
get your glasses fixed......7th post in the thread.
Sorry then,
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a bit of commical dismay at the way the insurgents disapeared from faluja and appeard in strength in Mosul.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't realize you were talking about the reporters then.
AND i've explained my reason for thinking this.