Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Muckmaw1 on December 30, 2004, 01:33:47 PM

Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Muckmaw1 on December 30, 2004, 01:33:47 PM
I know what the first answer will be....Muckmaw.

OK, aside from me.

I was watching Seconds from Disaster on National Geographic the other night.

It was about Oklahoma City Bombing.

Remember that deal?

And Tim McVeigh is still alive.

Here's a guy who, in my opinion deserves to star in a beheading video.

Why is this animal still alive?
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: dogsnot on December 30, 2004, 01:35:57 PM
Uhhhh muck......................he is taking a dirt nap now.  Lethal injection couple years back if I remember correctly


snot
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: SunKing on December 30, 2004, 01:36:18 PM
(http://www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants/images/cartoons/char_bear_trap.gif)
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Nash on December 30, 2004, 01:39:42 PM
Gotta love them MAWs.

:D
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Muckmaw1 on December 30, 2004, 01:44:01 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
Gotta love them MAWs.

:D


Shoot, I'm retired.

Though I've been getting the urge to start playing AH again lately.

With the newborn in the house, though, I just do not have the time.

I acutally meant the other guy who was convicted...Terry Nichols.

Sorry for the oversight.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Curval on December 30, 2004, 01:48:47 PM
My vote goes to:

Osama Bin Laden
or
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

Take your pick.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Furball on December 30, 2004, 01:52:59 PM
Those terrorists they captured alive, who bombed the school in Beslan.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Phaser11 on December 30, 2004, 02:12:09 PM
My Dog!!!!!!!!!!!!

(http://hoehn.homedns.org/images/LADY1.JPG)

The evil one.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: BlueJ1 on December 30, 2004, 02:14:21 PM
-All terrorists
-arafat is dead (DOH!)
-saddam
-leaders in China
-N. Korean leaders
-bin laden ( Let loose in Times square on New Years Eve, let the crowd have their revenge)
-michael moore (As of now I am not for or aganst any political party, I believe moore exploits other peoples pain and loss for his own benefit, and he does it well, he likes to stir up the mud at the bottom of the pail sit back and watch the mayhem that insues.)
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Nilsen on December 30, 2004, 02:21:17 PM
Nobody.

Bad people should rot in jail, and when they die they should be brought back to rot som more.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: wombatt on December 30, 2004, 02:22:38 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Phaser11
My Dog!!!!!!!!!!!!

(http://hoehn.homedns.org/images/LADY1.JPG)

The evil one.




LOL
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: BlueJ1 on December 30, 2004, 02:30:29 PM
Nilsen, you talking about a jail in a 1st world country or a 3rd world country?
Because most inmates in our prisons have a better life then quite a few out in the public minus the guy named bubba breathing down your neck.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: hawker238 on December 30, 2004, 02:54:41 PM
Quote
Originally posted by BlueJ1
[B-michael moore (As of now I am not for or aganst any political party, I believe moore exploits other peoples pain and loss for his own benefit, and he does it well, he likes to stir up the mud at the bottom of the pail sit back and watch the mayhem that insues.) [/B]


Please, that "exploitation" could apply to any business that mass produces for cheap in Asian countries.  And as for stirring up mud, that's a necessary element in society; its how things change.  Sure he might not be good at it, or the things he stirs up might conflict with your non-partisan beliefs, but it happens.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Muckmaw1 on December 30, 2004, 03:00:42 PM
Gotta disagree with Michael Moore.

As much as I disagree with him, he does not deserve a slow painful death.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: hawker238 on December 30, 2004, 03:13:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Muckmaw1
Gotta disagree with Michael Moore.

As much as I disagree with him, he does not deserve a slow painful death.


Maybe if he just went away to a place where he could not be seen or heard but would be mildly happy, that would be best for all.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Nilsen on December 30, 2004, 03:21:29 PM
Quote
Originally posted by BlueJ1
Nilsen, you talking about a jail in a 1st world country or a 3rd world country?
Because most inmates in our prisons have a better life then quite a few out in the public minus the guy named bubba breathing down your neck.


Depends on the crime. People like Osama should end up in a real dump. Maybe they can recycle the hole they found saddam in and put them both in there to keep eachother company while the guards use it as a toilet.

Just a thought
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: BlueJ1 on December 30, 2004, 03:22:42 PM
I agree that its a part of a society that some people stir the mud to create contraversy and possible change. Hard to explain, but I am aganst him using deceased and family of deceased to create a movie, instead of helping those he hurts more.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: StarOfAfrica2 on December 30, 2004, 03:32:06 PM
I am against slow, painful, torturous deaths.  Simply because, if they deserve to die (and I'm not touching the subject of who gets to decide that and if its right or not), then they need to die fast and be certain of the outcome.  The longer you take to kill them the more time you give them to wriggle out of it.  

Osama?  Bullet to the head, take a picture, bury him and forget him.  Best thing you can do.  

Saddam?  Same thing.  

You put either one of them in prison, anywhere, you only prolong the chance that someone can "rescue" them.  Nightmare starts all over again.

Every second you let a true monster stay alive, no matter how good security is, you increase the chance he can say or do something to hurt someone else before he is gone.  Get it over with and move on.
Title: Re: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Red Tail 444 on December 30, 2004, 03:39:46 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Muckmaw1
I know what the first answer will be....Muckmaw.

OK, aside from me.

I was watching Seconds from Disaster on National Geographic the other night.

It was about Oklahoma City Bombing.

Remember that deal?

And Tim McVeigh is still alive.

Here's a guy who, in my opinion deserves to star in a beheading video.

Why is this animal still alive?


Huh?:confused:

Quote
Originally posted by Muckmaw1
And Tim McVeigh is still alive.
Why is this animal still alive?


What?:eek:

Quote
Originally posted by Muckmaw1
And Tim McVeigh is still alive.
Why is this animal still alive?


:rofl
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Red Tail 444 on December 30, 2004, 03:45:28 PM
Quote
Originally posted by BlueJ1
Nilsen, you talking about a jail in a 1st world country or a 3rd world country?
Because most inmates in our prisons have a better life then quite a few out in the public minus the guy named bubba breathing down your neck.


Unless you've spent time in prison, I don't think you can make that claim...even Club Fed denies people their freedom, and rightly so.

As per your comment, I think the guy raping you is a VERY big issue, and not something I would casually negate, IMO. Furthermore,  the guards kicking the watermelon outta you, with your inabilty to fight back, wondering who's gonna shank you at every turn...pretty much makes prison the absolute WORST place on earth

I say put them in the hole for life, execution is too good for these people. Its the easy way out
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: spitfiremkv on December 30, 2004, 04:56:31 PM
Quote
Originally posted by hawker238
Maybe if he just went away to a place where he could not be seen or heard but would be mildly happy, that would be best for all.


I totally agree: freedom and speech and democracy have no place in America.

Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: FUNKED1 on December 30, 2004, 05:41:12 PM
Hitlar!
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Suave on December 30, 2004, 07:40:03 PM
Babies and the elderly.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: CAVY on December 30, 2004, 08:09:11 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Muckmaw1
Gotta disagree with Michael Moore.

As much as I disagree with him, he does not deserve a slow painful death.


yeah he does!!!..the anti-american S*****G
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: CAVY on December 30, 2004, 08:10:56 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Suave
Babies and the elderly.



Ya know.... You think your funny...However your not..your an A*****E!!
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: Suave on December 30, 2004, 09:07:43 PM
Who's funny? Babies are stupid and ugly. And I hate the elderly. Ever wait behind one of them trying to operate a soda fountain? Push-buttons confound them. They should be institutionalized and studied, so that we may learn what valuable minerals may be extracted from them. At least babies can possibly turn into something usefull, like buger flippers, or teenage girls who seek attention from men to compensate for lack of paternal attention.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: CAVY on December 30, 2004, 09:09:17 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Suave
Who's funny? Babies are stupid and ugly. And I hate the elderly. Ever wait behind one of them trying to operate a soda fountain? Push-buttons confound them. They should be institutionalized and studied, so that we may learn what valuable minerals may be extracted from them. At least babies can possibly turn into something usefull, like buger flippers, or teenage girls who seek attention from men to compensate for lack of paternal attention.



HAHAHA...good reply:aok :lol :lol
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: DiabloTX on December 30, 2004, 09:15:05 PM
Paris Hilton.

The UGLIEST American.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: DREDIOCK on December 30, 2004, 09:25:10 PM
Bill Gates

I think in this case we can all say

" Fatal exeption has occured"
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: BlueJ1 on December 30, 2004, 09:28:45 PM
Isnt it Bill Gates can give out 2.5 grand to every person in the U.S. and still be a millionare (sp) ? He should fork over the dough for Tsunami AID.
Title: Who deserves a slow, painful toturous death?
Post by: DREDIOCK on December 30, 2004, 10:28:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by BlueJ1
Isnt it Bill Gates can give out 2.5 grand to every person in the U.S. and still be a millionare (sp) ? He should fork over the dough for Tsunami AID.


Yea there ya go.

He can always just up the price for his operating system to make up the loss.

What are people going to do?
Not buy it?