Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Airhead on January 04, 2005, 09:44:44 AM
-
What a ho- she bones the guy down on their first encounter (wasn't even a date) and NOW she's on Good Morning America taking about how she was responsible for breaking the case.
I can't believe her Dad was "proud" of her for "cooperating" with the cops- what a crock of BS. The police gave her a very clear choice- either cooperate or get indicted for conspiracy to commit murder.
This case continues to show the worst in people- first Scott Peterson, now Amber Fry....I hobe nobody buys the stupid *****'s book, and she ends up back waitressing at the truck stop.
-
Yup. It's pathetic how she wants people to sympathize with her. What a media ho.
-
You mean to say you guys aren't going to run out and buy her book? Which I am SURE is a literary masterpiece?
They should give her the chair right along with Peterson. They can hold hands....
-
Originally posted by Airhead
What a ho- she bones the guy down on their first encounter (wasn't even a date) and NOW she's on Good Morning America taking about how she was responsible for breaking the case.
I can't believe her Dad was "proud" of her for "cooperating" with the cops- what a crock of BS. The police gave her a very clear choice- either cooperate or get indicted for conspiracy to commit murder.
This case continues to show the worst in people- first Scott Peterson, now Amber Fry....I hobe nobody buys the stupid *****'s book, and she ends up back waitressing at the truck stop.
When was she given that choice?
Though admittedly I didn't follow the case all that closely
That's the first time I've heard that the cops threatened to charge her with anything.
I'd heard she was the one that contacted the cops.
-
But you would hit it given the chance to do so as would most of the other men on this board.
-
Originally posted by Airhead
What a ho- she bones the guy down on their first encounter (wasn't even a date)
Oh now you're insinuating she's a Democrat supporter?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
:p :p :p :D
Sorry just couldn't resist.....:p
-
Originally posted by Airhead
What a ho- she bones the guy down on their first encounter (wasn't even a date) and NOW she's on Good Morning America taking about how she was responsible for breaking the case.
I can't believe her Dad was "proud" of her for "cooperating" with the cops- what a crock of BS. The police gave her a very clear choice- either cooperate or get indicted for conspiracy to commit murder.
This case continues to show the worst in people- first Scott Peterson, now Amber Fry....I hobe nobody buys the stupid *****'s book, and she ends up back waitressing at the truck stop.
Yep, nothing but a ho, trying to profit from a tragedy.
-
Originally posted by Reschke
But you would hit it given the chance to do so as would most of the other men on this board.
Damn...not even with your dick.
-
Originally posted by Airhead
What a ho- she bones the guy down on their first encounter (wasn't even a date) and NOW she's on Good Morning America taking about how she was responsible for breaking the case.
One of the talking head shows had a primer for an interview with her that went something like this.
"Whats started out as an innocent affair"
LOL
-
Originally posted by SOB
Damn...not even with your dick.
SOB you know that you and Funked along with 99% of the other FDB's and non-FDB's on here would be watching and pushing you guys on.
-
I think I'd rather do Funked . . . with the rest of the FDBs cheering on the sidelines. After all, Funked does have a purty mouth and a come-hither pucker to his pooper.
-
Well, she didn't really doanythig wrong, she banged a dude who told her he was single, but whats BS is that shes cashing in on nothing but being a bimbo, and a damn homely one at that...
Well at least gloria Allred, with her co-authorship, will have enough money to purxhase a lifetime supply of rodents to munch on...
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
When was she given that choice?
Though admittedly I didn't follow the case all that closely
That's the first time I've heard that the cops threatened to charge her with anything.
I'd heard she was the one that contacted the cops.
She contacted the cops after she found out her "boyfriend" was the prime suspect in his wife's murder, all right- but she didn't call the cops to volunteer to bring Scott to justice. The conversation was more like "Help! I've been boning Scott Peterson, and now that I've found out who he is I'm afraid to go home!"
There was nothing good, or noble, in any of this- including that skank. The whole thing is an example of the Machavellian times we live in....and how morality, and morals, have been abandoned in favor of instant gratification.
If her book doesn't sell she could always do a Playboy spread- they could make even Maverick look pretty. ;)
-
wanna see her tits?
go to http://www.robbecelebs.co.uk
she's hot!
-
Unfortunately, it does not matter if the book sells or not. She more than likely got a big fat advance check. I agree she's a skank for selling out. If she had only done the right thing and not tried to profit from it, it would be different. Same goes for the OJ jurors, ect... that profit from other peoples misery by writing books or movie deals and such. There ought to be a law like there is for the criminals that commit the crime preventing them from profiting from it.
-
Saw a few seconds of this when I was flipping channels last night. Went something like;
It was so terrible...
It was so horrible...
I'm so forever emotionally scarred...
...by the way, buy my book for...
I used to be surprised at the depths people would sink to for a buck. I have since become a wiser person.
-
Originally posted by Airhead
She contacted the cops after she found out her "boyfriend" was the prime suspect in his wife's murder, all right- but she didn't call the cops to volunteer to bring Scott to justice. The conversation was more like "Help! I've been boning Scott Peterson, and now that I've found out who he is I'm afraid to go home!"
There was nothing good, or noble, in any of this- including that skank. The whole thing is an example of the Machavellian times we live in....and how morality, and morals, have been abandoned in favor of instant gratification.
If her book doesn't sell she could always do a Playboy spread- they could make even Maverick look pretty. ;)
I'm not saying it didnt happen that way and Im certainly not defending her.
But was she really given that choice or is that the way your assuming it happened?
-
Originally posted by Airhead
If her book doesn't sell she could always do a Playboy spread- they could make even Maverick look pretty. ;)
:D There are reportedly 27 nude pictures that Hustler magazine is trying to buy the publishing rights to.
-
She wrote a book? Were there lots of pretty rainbows in it?
Honestly, I thought the only publications she'd be in would be the onces with a saucy centerfold.
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
I'm not saying it didnt happen that way and Im certainly not defending her.
But was she really given that choice or is that the way your assuming it happened?
Assuming, actually, based upon her statement that she was afraid to go home once she found out Scott's nasty little secret. Can't blame her for being scared, but all along her father has made references to how "brave" she is and how she "did the right thing" by testifying, and I don't buy it- she did, and has continued to do, all the wrong things for all the wrong reasons.
This whole sordid little story has shown the ugliness of people, from Scott to Amber to Laci's parents for demanding the death penalty.
-
If Scott had of left a $20 on her dresser this all could have been avoided.
-
Originally posted by Jackal1
:D There are reportedly 27 nude pictures that Hustler magazine is trying to buy the publishing rights to.
go to the site I posted, jughead :P
-
I want to see her boobs but that link doenst work. And I waited till I was home from work and everything.
-
Ya mis-spelled it
robbscelebs.co.uk
Google, Pongo :)
-
Originally posted by spitfiremkv
go to the site I posted, jughead :P
I got your jughead swinging.
Learn to post it before you get all antsy pantsy. lol::D
-
What I'm really suprised about is how everyone is suprised and upset to hear this stuff. At least for all the Americans, we should be used to this, and just let it blow over.
"In the course of a lifetime, what does it matter"
-
Originally posted by LePaul
Ya mis-spelled it
robbscelebs.co.uk
Google, Pongo :)
LOL... Boobies and braces (http://www.robbscelebs.co.uk/noops206_18/noops_amber_frey.html)
-
sorry...
'e' is next to 's'. DiagonAlley :)
-
Originally posted by Sandman
LOL... Boobies and braces (http://www.robbscelebs.co.uk/noops206_18/noops_amber_frey.html)
Poor thing aint got much going for her, HUh?
I`ve seen more meat on chicken bones at Church`s in the trash bin. :rofl
-
Definetely not a true blonde but she is still one that if I wasn't married I'd probably try to get into a compromising position with. Braces on chicks turns me on...you never know what might happen once she opens wide!
-
Airhead you sick bastage. You and the rest of the DNC stay the **** on the other side of the room from me!:eek: :eek:
:p
-
The media spotlight is a commodity and she's mining it - so what?
The same folks defending WalMart for selling America to China 78 cents at a time are griping about Fry cashing in on her 15 minutes of fame? Go figure.
-
I watched the interview with my wife last night and have a better opinion of her. The photos were taken before the incident (single, no skills, daughter to raise), she clearly didn't know he was married (he actually officially comes out to her on that on one of the police tapes) she didn't let him lead her on once she started to get wise, and once her police friend did the background check for her and found out he was "the scott peterson" she immediately contacted the police and offered to help. [edit: She was suspicious for other reasons and asked him to check out her boyfriend -- she didn't know about the case at the time] Also, I had sex on the first meeting with I girl I ended up dating for 5 years, and It was far less of a play then Scott put on her to get it so I can cut her some slack there too :).
As for the cashing in... sadly there will be many people who do, and would have whether she does or not. As a single mother, with no real job skills and with money tight, I can cut her some slack for going along with the program and perhaps providing for her daughters education. Not the classy move, but then I don't walk in her shoes or live in her glass house.
Charon
-
Well yea, sorta have to agree with ya there.
I mean this POS calling himself a man murders his wife and his unborn child and all of a sudden the stupid chick that got lured in this can of worms is the ultimate evil. Go figure.
I mean look at the chick. she has absolutely nothing going for her. I`d cash in too.
-
Originally posted by Airhead
This whole sordid little story has shown the ugliness of people, from Scott to Amber to Laci's parents for demanding the death penalty.
Might I ask just what the hell is so wrong about parents demanding the death penalty of the person who mudered their child??
IF anyone should have that right it should be the parents.
There request or demand as you put it I call reasonable
In fact I beleive is should be the parents or closest next of kin that determines the penalty and not a jury in such cases.
God forbid it were my kid I wouldnt give him death. I would want him placed in my custody to do with as I please.
I wouldnt kill him. Kill'ns too good for him.
But I would make him wish he were dead.
No no no. No comfy 6X9 cell for him.
He would suffer and I mean truely suffer
A death of 1,000 screams would seem most merciful at my hands.
I would make Caligula look like an arch angel
-
I find it somewhat scary that the jury managed to convict the guy with nothing but circumstantial evidence.
Maybe it's just me, but it seems that they are going to execute the guy for being a liar (and a poor one at that).
-
Originally posted by Sandman
I find it somewhat scary that the jury managed to convict the guy with nothing but circumstantial evidence.
Maybe it's just me, but it seems that they are going to execute the guy for being a liar (and a poor one at that).
My wife followed this case VERY closely
Almost religiously throughout the entire case.
I had the same concerns but
From what she was telling me it wasnt just that there was SOME circumstantial evidence along the way that pointed to Scott
It was more like there was circumstantial evidence EVERY step of the way that pointed to Scott to the point where it was overwhelming.
The only real question I have is how he managed to get her out of the boat by himself without flipping it.
I know my mom passed out some years back and I tried moving her and I remember the tough time I had witrh that.
Dead weight is'nt the easiest thing in the world to move. Let alone roll off the side of a boat with weights attached
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
My wife followed this case VERY closely
Almost religiously throughout the entire case.
I had the same concerns but
From what she was telling me it wasnt just that there was SOME circumstantial evidence along the way that pointed to Scott
It was more like there was circumstantial evidence EVERY step of the way that pointed to Scott to the point where it was overwhelming.
OH you mean like OJ?:rolleyes:
-
No weapon.
No evidence.
No witnesses.
No cause of death.
Maybe Peterson did do it. Hell, he probably did, but if we as a society are going to put him to death, i think that we should KNOW that he did indeed commit the crime.
Tip for all... if your wife turns up missing and then dead, you better show some grief even if you hated her guts.
-
Originally posted by Sandman
No weapon.
No evidence.
No witnesses.
No cause of death.
Maybe Peterson did do it. Hell, he probably did, but if we as a society are going to put him to death, i think that we should KNOW that he did indeed commit the crime.
Tip for all... if your wife turns up missing and then dead, you better show some grief even if you hated her guts.
Better yet head for the hills.
-
Originally posted by wombatt
OH you mean like OJ?:rolleyes:
not even close.
THAT case I followed closely.
In as much as I was home undergoing medical treatment for the entire time there
wasnt much better to do.
In the case of OJ there was alot of plausible alternatives to the evidence.
The glove that didnt fit.
The Furman credibility issue and others.
In that case although I whole heartedly beleive he did it. according to the law I also would have had to find him not guilty
In the Peterson case.
The defence wasn't able to successfully debunk a single piece of evidence.
Even their expert fell apart on the stand under cross examination.
and somehow I dont think that she was possibly "kidnapped by a cult" is a very plausible alternative
2 cases both men guilty only 1 man found guilty.
1 case that was fubared almost from the start by law enforcement and poorly prosecuted in trial
1 case where law enforcement did everything right and brilliantly built and prosecuted their case
-
Originally posted by wombatt
Better yet head for the hills.
Better yet
Either dont kill your wife to begin with or come upwith a better plan.
Shoulda taken her out farther and chummed for shark
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Better yet
Either dont kill your wife to begin with or come upwith a better plan.
Shoulda taken her out farther and chummed for shark
Nah, just weight her down better to give the crabs and other aquatic life more time to feast. :D
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
not even close.
THAT case I followed closely.
In as much as I was home undergoing medical treatment for the entire time there
wasnt much better to do.
In the case of OJ there was alot of plausible alternatives to the evidence.
The glove that didnt fit.
The Furman credibility issue and others.
In that case although I whole heartedly beleive he did it. according to the law I also would have had to find him not guilty
In the Peterson case.
The defence wasn't able to successfully debunk a single piece of evidence.
Even their expert fell apart on the stand under cross examination.
and somehow I dont think that she was possibly "kidnapped by a cult" is a very plausible alternative
2 cases both men guilty only 1 man found guilty.
1 case that was fubared almost from the start by law enforcement and poorly prosecuted in trial
1 case where law enforcement did everything right and brilliantly built and prosecuted their case
Naw the dang glove fit!
He just made it look like he could not get his hand in it but flexing his fingers outward.
Watch the tape.
Plus i think they said the gloves may have shrunk.
As far as fuman goes that really should have no bearing on weather he did it or not.
The Low speed chase motive ect ect ect:
-
Originally posted by wombatt
Naw the dang glove fit!
He just made it look like he could not get his hand in it but flexing his fingers outward.
Watch the tape.
Plus i think they said the gloves may have shrunk.
As far as fuman goes that really should have no bearing on weather he did it or not.
The Low speed chase motive ect ect ect:
I saw it live.
The gloves didn't fit.
the funny part to me was how surprised OJ seemed to be at the time
but I do agree they shrunk.
There was alot more to it then that.
and like I said I believe he did it, I believe he is guilty as hell
Its just that according to the law I would have had to make the same verdict.
The defense made enough of holes in the prosecutions case to warrant that verdict. Even if it was the wrong one.
In the case of Peterson. the defense didn't even come close
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Might I ask just what the hell is so wrong about parents demanding the death penalty of the person who mudered their child??
IF anyone should have that right it should be the parents.
There request or demand as you put it I call reasonable
In fact I beleive is should be the parents or closest next of kin that determines the penalty and not a jury in such cases.
Oh, so you believe a well rehearsed speech, complete with theatrics like gasping for breath and a total breakdown, should be allowed to influence a jury in detrement to the actual facts of a case??? That's crazy (not you, you're OK, just that concept.)
Now they're saying her life was in danger- what a crock of PR crap. From the time she started recording phone calls until Scott Peterson's arrest she was under police survellience and, in fact, Scott Peterson was never within twenty miles of her.
This whole thing has been ugly, all the way PAST the penalty phase of the trial to the book deals and Oprah appearance.
-
Originally posted by Airhead
Oh, so you believe a well rehearsed speech, complete with theatrics like gasping for breath and a total breakdown, should be allowed to influence a jury in detrement to the actual facts of a case??? That's crazy (not you, you're OK, just that concept.)
Now they're saying her life was in danger- what a crock of PR crap. From the time she started recording phone calls until Scott Peterson's arrest she was under police survellience and, in fact, Scott Peterson was never within twenty miles of her.
This whole thing has been ugly, all the way PAST the penalty phase of the trial to the book deals and Oprah appearance.
In my responce I was talking about Lacies parants. Not Amber Fry
But just out of curiousity.
What exactly and specifically are you referring to as being "in detrement to the actual facts"?
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
What exactly and specifically are you referring to as being "in detrement to the actual facts"?
I think when you allow emotion filled pleas one way or the other it detracts from the actual task assigned a jury- to determine the proper sentance for the crime convicted of. If you agree that the "feelings" of the family should be the paramount consideration of a jury in sentacing then what happens if the victim's family has forgiven the perp? Does that mean he should get less punishment for the same crime?
It's this type of thinking that results in African Americans getting sentanced to longer prison terms for the exact same crimes white people get away with, or serve a minimal sentance. I'm against victim impact statements to the Jury because it impacts equal justice.
-
Hmm, she's doing a live interview on the Today Show tomorrow. You can e-mail questions for her HERE. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6787219/) My question is: "Why are you trying to cash in on Laci Peterson's murder and her family's misery?". Feel free to send in your own questions to the skank.
-
when did she get a boob-job?
saw her on TV today-definitely bigger funbags than what I saw on Robbs site.
-
She is kinda hot though.. or atleast she was on Oprah..
-
Originally posted by Hawklore
She is kinda hot though.. or atleast she was on Oprah..
Hot???? Geeeeez, I think not. Not unless she happens to be standing next to a blast furnace.
I-20 between Dallas and El Paso has more curves than that poster child for anorexia.