Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: rpm on January 10, 2005, 11:38:48 PM
-
U.S. indicts Schrenko
Former top school official accused of skimming $500,000, including $9,300 for face-lift
(http://img.coxnewsweb.com/B/07/25/37/image_1137257.jpg)
By JAMES SALZER
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Former Georgia School Superintendent Linda Schrenko, whose groundbreaking political career dissolved into erratic behavior and defeat, was indicted on federal charges that she stole more than $500,000 in taxpayer money and spent part of it on cosmetic surgery.
Schrenko, 54; her close friend and chief assistant Merle Temple, 56; and Alpharetta businessman A. Stephan Botes, 47, were named in an 18-count indictment that alleges they were involved in a scheme to steal federal education funds and secretly funnel about half the money to Schrenko's failed 2002 campaign for governor.
In addition, the indictment charges the Republican school superintendent used $9,300 of the money to pay for cosmetic surgery.
Schrenko acknowledged in November 2002 that she had had a face lift in recent weeks.
The federal funds purportedly were used to purchase computer services for two state schools for the deaf and the Governor's Honors Program, but officials say the services weren't delivered.
"The defendants attempted to cover up the scheme by filing false campaign disclosure forms, creating back-dated contracts, devising false cover stories and lying to state of Georgia auditors and to the public," said Sally Quillian Yates, acting U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia.
Cathy Henson, who was chairwoman of the state Board of Education in 2002 and questioned Schrenko's use of education funds, said she was "delighted" by the indictments.
"I think the taxpayers of Georgia won," said Henson. "The sweet part is that the process worked. Everybody should remember, as trite as it sounds, that nobody is above the law."
Henson said she became suspicious when she discovered Schrenko had directed her staff to issue a series of checks on the same day, July 24, in amounts just under $50,000.
Keeping the checks under $50,000 allowed the money to be doled out without Board of Education approval.
On Wednesday, Rusty Paul, former chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, said "She had a lot of support from the Christian conservatives in the Republican Party, both in her gubernatorial run and in her tenure as school superintendent."
Georgia's former deputy schools superintendent pleaded guilty Monday to charges he conspired to help divert federal education money to finance his boss' failed bid for governor.
-
Still sore over the election I see....
-
On a serious note, if she did take the money like they allege... she should have to give up her face... :D
-
Originally posted by Bodhi
Still sore over the election I see....
No, just GOP bible thumping hypocrites in general.
-
Like it's ok for democrats to steal?
-
Wow RPM, thanks for the heads up. And to think, all this time I thought that only arrogant powerful democrat school admins misapropriated funds for personal gain...
:rolleyes:
I guess this, and that idiotic attempt to challnge the ohio vote certification really shoot down Nash's theory that you leftists would just let the eletion bellybutton whooping go by without crying and raising a fuss.
BTW remember now, all you Dems love the Bible and Jesus too...
-
Not upset about the election, just GOP bible thumping hypocrites in general.
-
Originally posted by rpm
Not upset about the election, just GOP bible thumping hypocrites in general.
And how will you feel with the wave of Democrat bible thumping hypocrates in the next election cycle as they somehow try to connect with middle American values and not get slaughtered in yet another election?
-
Oh no, them evil Republicans at it again. They were probably all behind it! RPM, quit being stupid. Don't make me swat your nose with my newspaper.
-
For the record, (since you are trying to spin this) I hate any bible thumping hypocrite. Republican or democrat. It's just that the republicans try to set themselves upon a higher moral pedistal. But hey, I guess it's OK to steal from deaf kids as long as you use the money for a face lift to help your campaign.
-
Originally posted by rpm
For the record, (since you are trying to spin this) I hate any bible thumping hypocrite.
So that explains the thread title "Republican Hypocrite of the WeeK"
You are the one who was spinning this as a republican issue.
-
Umm, which party did she belong to?
-
Originally posted by rpm
Umm, which party did she belong to?
ummm, republican?
-
What about Conyer's office stealing the turkeys that were earmarked for the poor on Thanksgiving?
It must suck to be so partisan that you can ignore scum just on the other sie of the aisle.
-
So are hypocrites okay if they don't bible thump?
-
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
So are hypocrites okay if they don't bible thump?
no! They have to be repubican......otherwise why post it?
-
Kerry lost.
Take it!
-
Does anyone else realize that we are not yet to the halfway point of the GW Bush administration? 9 days left in the first term.
-
Originally posted by Steve
Kerry lost.
Take it!
What did Kerry lose?
I forgot steve, plese remind me. Mkay?
-
Originally posted by rpm
For the record, (since you are trying to spin this) I hate any bible thumping hypocrite. Republican or democrat. It's just that the republicans try to set themselves upon a higher moral pedistal. But hey, I guess it's OK to steal from deaf kids as long as you use the money for a face lift to help your campaign.
"Republican Hypocrite of the Week"
Bull****. Your agenda is and has been clear. At least be honest about it. She's a stupid potato, and you despise Republicans...it's OK for you to just come out and make both of these statements.
-
Originally posted by Bodhi
On a serious note, if she did take the money like they allege... she should have to give up her face... :D
Judging from her face.
She wouldnt be giving all that much up.
Hell if thats the after shot I'd HATE to see what she looked like before.
-
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
So are hypocrites okay if they don't bible thump?
No, but it makes them a bit less offensive. The whole glass houses/stones thingy.
Lizzy, I have'nt heard about the Conyer bit. But if it's as you say it sounds pretty disgusting to me.
-
Christians are not the only ones who live in glass houses.
-
Originally posted by Bodhi
Still sore over the election I see....
i cringe at the memories of the all out republican hissyfit when GB1 lost to clinton.
-
Originally posted by SOB
"Republican Hypocrite of the Week"
Bull****. Your agenda is and has been clear. At least be honest about it. She's a stupid potato, and you despise Republicans...it's OK for you to just come out and make both of these statements.
Exactomundo!
And for RPM, here is Kerry's poster for 2008, because the deomcrats now love god!
(http://communistsforkerry.com/images/Kerry_Jesus_thorns.jpg)
-
Originally posted by JB88
i cringe at the memories of the all out republican hissyfit when GB1 lost to clinton.
can you give us a few examples?
Thank Ross Perot for Clinton btw
-
exhibit a.
(http://www.rosecity.net/rush/rushpub6.jpg)
thank nader for iraq.
-
so JB88, you can't list any examples of the "all out republican hissy fit" ? You show a pic of a radio talk show host as evidense? LOL!
-
Quite funny that the ones screaming "get over the election" are the only one bringing up the election. Can't find any new material?
-
Originally posted by rpm
Quite funny that the ones screaming "get over the election" are the only one bringing up the election. Can't find any new material?
give an example.
-
rpm, they are still laughing about kerry.
though i am not a democrat, i think
that he has been quite respectable in his loss (by a low % margin) .
lets not forget all, that bush never would have even been there had the election not been turned over to lawyers. gore won the popular vote.
as far as i can see, there is nothing that i can see to be proud of in that, or in this victory. especially when one goes about rubbing peoples faces in it. that just demonstrates thier level of maturity, and offers grist for the mill of regret.
and nuke. i think a picture is enough. if you cant make the connection, thats your problemo bro. you know what i mean.
-
Originally posted by Bodhi
Still sore over the election I see....
Originally posted by Steve
Kerry lost.
Take it!
-
Originally posted by JB88
lets not forget all, that bush never would have even been there had the election not been turned over to lawyers. gore won the popular vote.
Just a reminder JB88...
Lawsuit Seeks New Election Over `Misleading' Ballot
By Karin Meadows / The Associated Press
Nov 9, 2000 WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — The lawsuit came after hundreds of Gore supporters flooded the Palm Beach County elections office with calls Wednesday, saying they feared they had mistakenly voted for Buchanan. Lawyers for the Democratic Party said that the design of the Palm Beach County ballot is illegal and that they may ask for a re-vote.
So if the lawyers were left out, GWBush would have won Florida, and become the 4th President to be elected by the Electoral College without winning at least a plurality of the popular vote.
-
Originally posted by JB88
lets not forget all, that bush never would have even been there had the election not been turned over to lawyers. gore won the popular vote.
Plese read the US constitution....
-
Originally posted by SOB
"Republican Hypocrite of the Week"
Bull****. Your agenda is and has been clear. At least be honest about it. She's a stupid potato, and you despise Republicans...it's OK for you to just come out and make both of these statements.
SOB, please be easy on the ladies. :D
-
Originally posted by SOB
"Republican Hypocrite of the Week"
Bull****. Your agenda is and has been clear. At least be honest about it. She's a stupid potato, and you despise Republicans...it's OK for you to just come out and make both of these statements.
I thought it was already painfully clear.
-
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Plese read the US constitution....
I think that the US Constitution is not the Bible.
It can be amended with the regard to the procedure of presidential elections. The whole world is laughing at the USA that boasts to be the stronghold of democracy but still uses undemocratic voting procedure (the electoral college).
In my opinion, in the USA the so-called "democracy" has outlived itself. The political mechanism of this country needs some adjustment, may be some fine tuning, but not in the direction of widening of the use of the democracy principles. "Democracy" seems to be a nice word, but it can't and should't be applied for everything. I would rather see the USA not being clinched onto democracy principles per se but paying more attention to what is really applicable and good for the country and its people. Maybe right now you guys just need a limited term of military dictatorship. The ancient Romans were more flexible in these matters and more outspoken about it than the modern Americans.
-
Originally posted by genozaur
Maybe right now you guys just need a limited term of military dictatorship.
Oh yeah great idea... thanks for the input. :rolleyes:
-
grunz, ive been studying living under that constitution since i was born. i think that ive got a pretty good grasp of it thank you.
my father and his fathers father since the revolutionary war have been involved in the preservation of that document.
perhaps you wouldnt mind sending me your personal info. im sure that my brother in law would love to review that citizenship that you so rightly cherish.
pickin up what im layin down bro?
and as for the idea of limited dictatorship...yah, that worked over there pretty well.
americans do not believe in kings in any shape form or title.
period.
-
holden,
ya, i know.
and i think that it was right that they challenged it.
the lawyers for the democrats wanted votes counted. the republicans didnt.
the supreme court ultimately decided it, but under shakey circumstances and less than honorable means.
there was this amazing vanity fair article about the whole process from beginning to end...best ive seen yet. it blew my mind.
pretty dirty stuff.
fact is, when all was said and done, several independent organizations have done counts and have determined that gore actually won florida by a very narrow margin. the republicans were trying to keep the votes from being recounted and spared no expense laying logs on the road to prohibit this from happening.
nothing to be proud of on either side, but i would say that the republican leadership is going to have a pretty rough go going into the next term. lots and lots o questions...its not going to be as easy as so many of the die hards think.
theres alot owed by the republicans at this point. alot of checks they wont be able to cash.
-
Originally posted by JB88
grunz, ive been studying living under that constitution since i was born. i think that ive got a pretty good grasp of it thank you.
my father and his fathers father since the revolutionary war have been involved in the preservation of that document.
perhaps you wouldnt mind sending me your personal info. im sure that my brother in law would love to review that citizenship that you so rightly cherish.
pickin up what im layin down bro?
and as for the idea of limited dictatorship...yah, that worked over there pretty well.
americans do not believe in kings in any shape form or title.
period.
In all that time youwoutld think some of your ancestors migh have taken a moment to read it - especially the pars regarding something called the electoral college and how it relates to electing the president. You seem to be confused about that jb88.
In fact pretty much all of your above post is very confused...
-
Originally posted by JB88
holden,
ya, i know.
and i think that it was right that they challenged it.
the lawyers for the democrats wanted votes counted. the republicans didnt.
the supreme court ultimately decided it, but under shakey circumstances and less than honorable means.
there was this amazing vanity fair article about the whole process from beginning to end...best ive seen yet. it blew my mind.
pretty dirty stuff.
nothing to be proud of on either side, but i would say that the republican leadership is going to have a pretty rough go going into the next term. lots and lots o questions...its not going to be as easy as so many of the die hards think.
theres alot owed by the republicans at this point. alot of checks they wont be able to cash.
Not to mention whatever W owes to Rumsefeld so he can keep his mouth shut about the flight 93 conspiracy....
:lol
BTW major news organizations did a full recount of every vote in florida after the election, this process took several months and guess what Bush still won. The SC just ended the endless recounts the dems were demanding one after the other after every counting scheme of their failed to give enough votes to win...
So suck it up Jb...
-
send me your info.
really.
and.
reread my post.
-
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Oh yeah great idea... thanks for the input. :rolleyes:
Let me paraphrase it.
Maybe right now you guys have to admit frankly that the country is under a limited term of military dictatorship.
If you won't admit that, the limited term can be prolonged unlimitedly.
-
Ohhh no sir plese I cantsend you it, Plese dont kick me out of the country, I have not even my goats back in tje homeland where the secret police took it all..
Damn you are loosing it JB....
And reread what about your post? The part where you mention that gore won the popular vote and that somehow that makes him the legal president?
Like I said, read the consitituion - it will clear it all up 4 ya...
-
Originally posted by genozaur
Let me paraphrase it.
Maybe right now you guys have to admit frankly that the country is under a limited term of military dictatorship.
If you won't admit that, the limited term can be prolonged unlimitedly.
Apparently you have not heard on congress or the judicial branch.
-
Originally posted by genozaur
Let me paraphrase it.
Maybe right now you guys have to admit frankly that the country is under a limited term of military dictatorship.
If you won't admit that, the limited term can be prolonged unlimitedly.
:lol :lol :lol :rofl :rofl :rofl
What a lunatic! They just all dont read the consitution do they...\
BTW they are coming for yoy JB and genozaur. THEY ARE
They will take your info and learn all your secrets about how u found the real truth behind 911...
Your guys' crazy posts really have me hoping that you are trolling and just having some fun...
-
like i said. reread my post. clarified it for you.
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
I'm an American, just as american as anyone born here. Sorry to bust your bubble but you really have no clue about how this nation and this beutiful society we have created really works...
yes. i am glad that you are a part of what WE built...um...now.
i used to know this italian architect. he was brutal in his design...i understood why when i realized that he was learning architecture at the same time as mussellini was learning fascism.
-
try me grunz. send it.
really.
-
Your post is just as dumb as always, you actually seem to think that the popular vote has any relevance on the election of the president. You can look up how its really done by reading the constitution..
BTW what info do you want me to send and what would you do with it?
-
it is not a military dictatorship in that, though the commander in chief is in charge of the military, he is for all intents and purposed an elected civilian with the power to direct the military.
i might be mistaken, but i believe that he holds no military rank and has less top secret clearance than some in the military.
it is also not the military which is policing the united states, though that has become a danger with some of the provisions of the patriot act.
-
But it is a dictatorship, right JB?
-
no. it is not.
-
Originally posted by JB88
no. it is not.
Phew, the booze must be waering off.. :)
-
and if you were to have reread my post you will note that in response to holdens observation, i clarified it by explaining that it was the lawyers who blocked the recount at every avenue and took it to the supreme court to decide it rather than face an actual tally.
several independent organizations have done thier own recounts of the 2k florida vote and gore had more votes...
ergo....
gore would have won under the electoral college vote.
-
and yes. i do believe that flight 93 over pennsylvania was shot down.
and yes, i do believe that rumsfeld knew about it.
do i think that is why he is still in power?
no. i think daddy has alot to do with that.
-
though he'd probably like it to be.
"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier,
just so long as I'm the dictator."
- George W. Bush Dec 18, 2000
-
Originally posted by JB88
and if you were to have reread my post you will note that in response to holdens observation, i clarified it by explaining that it was the lawyers who blocked the recount at every avenue and took it to the supreme court to decide it rather than face an actual tally.
several independent organizations have done thier own recounts of the 2k florida vote and gore had more votes...
ergo....
gore would have won under the electoral college vote.
Nope, recounts done by major news organizations show bush winning...
Here, the evil right wing rag known as the New York Times sums it up nicely..
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/politics/12VOTE.html?ex=1105592400&en=2cc4e9dd902fc018&ei=5070&oref=login
They only say that gore "might" have won if all sorts of bizzare rejected and unclear duble votes were counted in the whole state...
And the article is expressly clear that the recount stopped by the SC eventually showed Bush the winner.
So to sum up.
Bush won in every reasobale recount scenario that was fully completed and in every such scenario that was eventually completed. Gore "might" have won if an extremly loose and subjective method was used to count - but even then only "might."
Sorry to bust your bubble JB...
-
Originally posted by JB88
and yes. i do believe that flight 93 over pennsylvania was shot down.
and yes, i do believe that rumsfeld knew about it.
do i think that is why he is still in power?
no. i think daddy has alot to do with that.
OK.
BTW what did Santa Claus bring you for christmas?
-
not burst.
but i disagree. read the vanity fair article.
i'll have to find the date for you. a few months ago.
your link was written in 2001. several organizations have done counts since that one and if i recall, there were problems with the initial media recount.
none the less. one way or the other. it aint a mandate.
sorry to burst yours.
:cool:
-
Ohh the Vanity Fair article about the SC, sourced from no other more credible sources than the very unbiased and impartital clerks to the courts most liberal judges... Geez you think they are arent upset that tyheir hero goron lost and lloking to throw some mud?
Hillarious.. Dont you have some militarly looking unmarked plane to track down?
-
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
OK.
BTW what did Santa Claus bring you for christmas?
well, i dont believe in santa for starters.
but if i did, i would be looking at the lump of poop that we got for a leader and rethinking what i have done wrong to have deserved it.
lol.
-
Originally posted by JB88
well, i dont believe in santa for starters.
WHAT? How can you not belive in santa? NORAD, NORAD even has a website ever christmas that thrackshis flight!!! Thats one might big slip up of info they release..
SANTA IS REAL, I SAW IT TEH INTARDENT
(Just like unmarked militarly looking jets that shot down flight 93!)
-
Originally posted by JB88
several independent organizations have done thier own recounts of the 2k florida vote and gore had more votes...
gore would have won under the electoral college vote.
Several organizations independent to your independent organizations have done their own fact finding and determined that your independent organizations AND Michael Moore are full of chit.
Originally posted by JB88
i would be looking at the lump of poop that we got for a leader and rethinking what i have done wrong to have deserved it.
It isn't about deserving..you've been victimized! :lol
-
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Ohh the Vanity Fair article about the SC, sourced from no other more credible sources than the very unbiased and impartital clerks to the courts most liberal judges... Geez you think they are arent upset that tyheir hero goron lost and lloking to throw some mud?
Hillarious.. Dont you have some militarly looking unmarked plane to track down?
actually, that isnt true. if i recall correctly they had clerks from conservative judges represented as well.
again, ill have to find the article.
i am assuming that you have tracked it down on the web as i am doubting very much that you have a subscription to vanity fair.
ill have to try that.
or did you just google it for a review perhaps?
i am not personally upset that gore lost.
i am however disappointed in the republican party (i once was one) because i feel that it has become loathsome and prideful. that it has strayed way beyond the things that made it good in the first place.
that it has lost track of the basics and replaced them with gooseschtepping monkey boys like yourself.
a pity really. i think reagan would have pooped himself...then again, maybe not considering that he was complicite in the iran contra affair which was wholly illegal by the standards of the constitution that you keep railing on about.
and nixon...oh yes....thats right, a pattern of duplicity? hmmmm.
you might appreciate this one though...
i have an autographed copy of Machiavelli's "the prince" signed by none other then colonel oliver north.
you should have seen the look on his face when he closed the book.
priceless.
as far as the white jet and my opinions on flight 93. i am not sure why you would think that i might feel insulted by your taunts about that. i just happen to think that it was shot down. and i sadly agree that it would have been neccessary. there are good arguements for it. i doubt that youve read them, not to mention the possibility that you might schtep out of the party line long enough to actually use your newfound freedom to question what you percieve as mighty authority.
its what americans do.
it just doesnt bother me.
-
Originally posted by JB88
the lawyers for the democrats wanted votes counted. the republicans didnt.
Not to argue the whole thing over again, but your statement is an oversimplification.
The Demos wanted some votes counted. They did not ask for a statewide recount, only some counties. They sought to have some oversea absentees disallowed.
The truth is that both sides wanted the votes counted that were thought to be advantagous to their side.
-
Originally posted by VOR
Several organizations independent to your independent organizations have done their own fact finding and determined that your independent organizations AND Michael Moore are full of chit.
:rofl
pretty powerful watermelon appearantly. dragged the sumbich tru plenty of it.
-
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Not to argue the whole thing over again, but your statement is an oversimplification.
The Demos wanted some votes counted. They did not ask for a statewide recount, only some counties. They sought to have some oversea absentees disallowed.
The truth is that both sides wanted the votes counted that were thought to be advantagous to their side.
i agree holden. it really did come down to lawyers.
i think that i was overstressing to remind our fair readers that it twernt a mandate.
and that many folks still dont buy into it.
-
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
WHAT? How can you not belive in santa? NORAD, NORAD even has a website ever christmas that thrackshis flight!!! Thats one might big slip up of info they release..
SANTA IS REAL, I SAW IT TEH INTARDENT
(Just like unmarked militarly looking jets that shot down flight 93!)
INTARDNET?
i think you mean
on the "INTERNETS"
-
Wow your obession with Dubya is fascinating, you must litearrly hang on every single one of his words so you can find something to fuel your hatred...
Oh well JB, good night you crazy coot. Dont let the NSA implanted nanotechnlogy robotic spy bed bugs bite (it itches in the morning you know..)
-
um. what did you call gore again?
i dont hate brother. sorry.
i just happen to think that bush is an embarrassment to the grand tradition of the office. i think that were his daddy not the pres. (i happen to like GW1, but am dissappointed that he hasnt taken that boy to his knee) he never, ever would have come even remotely close. not in a million years.
nor do i hang, but its not like its hard to catch the idiot sounding like one.
-
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Wow your obession with Dubya is fascinating, you must litearrly hang on every single one of his words so you can find something to fuel your hatred...
Oh well JB, good night you crazy coot. Dont let the NSA implanted nanotechnlogy robotic spy bed bugs bite (it itches in the morning you know..)
goodnight grun. i wont.
dont forget to turn on your W nitelight,.
there could be a liberal under your bed.
-
Sounds like the former Dallas ISD leader Yvonne Gonzalez. She bought bedroom furniture with school money.
-
Originally posted by rpm
U.S. indicts Schrenko
Former top school official accused of skimming $500,000, including $9,300 for face-lift
(http://img.coxnewsweb.com/B/07/25/37/image_1137257.jpg)
Dustin Hoffman?
-
Originally posted by JB88
holden,
ya, i know.
and i think that it was right that they challenged it.
the lawyers for the democrats wanted votes counted. the republicans didnt.
the supreme court ultimately decided it, but under shakey circumstances and less than honorable means.
What a crock of chit. The democrats demanded recounts in ONLY the heavily democratic counties where they thought they could pick up some votes for themselves. They didn't give a damn about any other county or the mailed in ballots from the military, which they wanted to have thrown out.
The whole incident was a democratic pile of horse watermelon from day one. "Every vote must count" they were saying......while trying to get ballots tossed out.
And then they tried to IGNORE Florida's election laws regarding recounts. They tried to scratch and claw, lie, cheat, and say or do anything top steal a win.......laws didn't matter to them.
In the end, after every recount, Bush won every one.
-
What's important to remember is that for both Democrats and Republicans, the idiots represent the norm... not the 99% that stay out of the news.
-
Originally posted by JB88
my father and his fathers father since the revolutionary war have been involved in the preservation of that document.
perhaps you wouldnt mind sending me your personal info. im sure that my brother in law would love to review that citizenship that you so rightly cherish.
pickin up what im layin down bro?
Real tough guy there JB88...
You think because your father or bother in law is some narc of some sort that you can use a veiled threat to try and threaten a man's citizenship?
That goes beyond being low, and just exemplifies the type of man you are.... a POS. A POS that should be banned for his little veiled threat.
LMAO... you are a small person, a really small person who needs to someday sit down and read the constitution before touting your ignorance of it.
Grunherz, if POS ever screws with you like that again, I suggest you contact your local FBI office and suggest that JB88 is threatening your citizenship rights with favors from his "all mighty brother in law". I bet they can get the IP and go have a nice chat with him and his favor wielding brother in law.
-
This has been a very gay thread.
-
I printed this thread out and used it for toilet paper.
-SW
-
(http://www.sacredcowburgers.com/parodies/trolling_moby_style.jpg)
You guys are too easy.
-
A thief is a thief - whether they be a republican or democratic Hypocrite, dont you think?
-
Yep.
-
Originally posted by rpm
(http://www.sacredcowburgers.com/parodies/trolling_moby_style.jpg)
You guys are too easy.
Nice try to call this a troll... we really know you belive it...
-
Were it posted outside of your normal M.O., it might be considered a troll. As it stands, it's just more of the same from you.
-
Oh c'mon Bohdi. All I have to do is use Moore or a scummy republican and you guys swallow the hook. Yer too predictable.
-
Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
I printed this thread out and used it for toilet paper.
-SW
I bet the water soluble ink turned your cheeks black.
-
Originally posted by rpm
Oh c'mon Bohdi. All I have to do is use Moore or a scummy republican and you guys swallow the hook. Yer too predictable.
LOL, I am predictable? Ok POT!
:rofl
-
http://www.p-e-s-t.com/
-
Originally posted by Toad
I bet the water soluble ink turned your cheeks black.
Racist!
-SW
-
admittedly, my john gotti voice dont translate too well in dis format ya putz.
-
Originally posted by JB88
admittedly, my john gotti voice dont translate too well in dis format ya putz.
You're a class A-1 jack arse... nothing funny about threatening someone with regards to their citizenship.
-
Inappropriate/Personal Attack.
-
JB88, whether you are joking or not, you need to refrain from goading people about getting personal information. It really lends nothing to the bulletin board discussions and is just completely inappropriate, as well as none of your business (not sure why no one has picked up on that?).
And with that, we shall close the JB88 and Grunherz show for the moment.