Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Lizking on January 21, 2005, 10:49:09 PM
-
I am bored and ready to argue. You go first.
-
Well... uhm... watermelon you brought the fight - you pick it. I'm in.
-
If I could of thought of something, I would have led with it. I was hoping that you were pissed off at something already.
-
Originally posted by Lizking
I was hoping that you were pissed off at something already.
Ya know it pisses me off.... People jumping to conclusions. Based on stereotypes combined with a world vision in miniature.
What, really, do you know?
-
Personally, I think sterotypes are valid. Not only are they based in truth, but statistically they usually bear out. Of course, only an idiot would bring them down to the level of personal interaction, but still, as an easy way to classify things, they work.
-
Yeah, much like rock.
Look in the rock section of yer local record store and pick something, and you basically have no idea what yer bringing home.
Are these the kind of statistics yer talking about?
Categories are useful, no doubt. They help put things into a tidy context. They turn a 10 minute story into a 2 minute story.
I wanna hear the 10 minute version - just me.
-
glad i got home in time to watch.
:aok
cocktails help in these matters.
-
I mean it more basically than that. For instance, to use a racial stereotype, black people like watermelon and fried chicken. there is a historical basis for that, but does it hold true now?
-
No... or maybe...
I like steak.
Friend of mine likes chicken.
Another likes seafood.
This watermelon bullchit is stuff passed onto you.
You cannot ever truly grow if you clutch onto this kinda crap. Because in the end? Maybe they really DO eat that watermelon alla time. But...
'cares?
At the end of the day, the only thing that truly sucks is that yer basically just critisizing someone else's diet. Whooopty shrecking doo.
-
Who doesnt like fried chicken and watermellon?
Only peeps I can think of is winey liberys concerned about there health!:D
-
That is an example, Nash, and it is historically based, but I certainly don't think it is valid. Another similar one would be Chinese operating laundries. That is historically based as well.
In both examples, however, the sterotype was not voluntary to their race, it was forced upon them by their circumstances. Yet today, both are considered to be stereotypes.
-
liberals are the people who in the moment of truth, see the guy in the watchtower with the rifle and the little cause that he holds and know its time to take him out.
lawrence of arabia, in the end it was the diplomats.
-
Ok well, at this point you must be feeling like you just got sucked into an argument that you didn't want to be having.
Same here....
'Cuz who cares?
So what else... 'bortion? The Ceee Peee?
I'm easy.
-
Those are no fun. Are you afraid to discuss stereotyping or do you just have no interest?
-
I'm sure there is lots to be eked out of 'stereotyping'...
...but I guess it depends on what level you want to talk about it on.
-
Ah, it is boring and it is hard to argue for something you don't believe in, but since you are being obstinate and refuse to say something stupid, what's a guy to do?
-
Wait a second...
You said: "hard to argue for something you don't believe in"
What does that mean?
-
-
It means that only idiots think there is any validiy to stereotypes.
-
You stereotype. You are not an idiot.
So?
-
I sterotype in the full knowledge that I am doing so, and with the historical basis of how they came about. That is different than using a stereotype as your sole basis of consideration of a particular person or class of persons. Big difference.
-
Originally posted by Lizking
I sterotype in the full knowledge that I am doing so
Well congratulations! And I'm so sure that they're so witty that the wedding party calls for an ambulance.
What are you saying?
-
This is no fun, either you are too drunk or I am not drunk enough. I think I will go read Howard Cosell's autobiography.
-
Good idea.
-
im jist too draunk. But, i wil tryd and talk bedst i can.
italsked to nash once, it was fun. checksxi chat thingy.
-
:confused:
sigh.
i thought this was goINg to be a great battle of the minds.
turns OUT i was wrong.
-
There would have had to have been 2 minds present. Only 1 showed up.
-
Originally posted by rpm
There would have had to have been 2 minds present. Only 1 showed up.
your too kind.
:)
-
Dont bang your chest to hard JB, I think he meant Estes... :lol
-
Originally posted by patrone
Dont bang your chest to hard JB, I think he meant Estes... :lol [/QUOTE
oh god was i banging my chest again?
bad 88. bad. bad.
i know. my comment was relative.
an most definately stoopid.
:)
-
Your both wrong.
-
Originally posted by rpm
Your both wrong.
let's debate that.
:p
-
I think he means Nash but im not gonna tell anyone.
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
I think he means Nash but im not gonna tell anyone.
of the two. yes. definately.
-
Originally posted by JB88
of the two. yes. definately.
I am not really sure about that, rpm is a pretty clever fellow himself
-
Originally posted by patrone
I am not really sure about that, rpm is a pretty clever fellow himself
i would agree with that. but of the two posters...nash.
id lay money on it.
-
Originally posted by JB88
i would agree with that. but of the two posters...nash.
id lay money on it.
yep, me to, if its between thoose two posters, lol
-
Was'nt me... I entered the thread to late. Had I been here earlyer then it would be harder to make a choise.
Well, not really :)
-
Very true Nils. :)
-
Thx rpm.. makes me feel all warm inside :)
Dinner and drinks?
;)
-
As long as it's not lutefish and aquavit. ;)
-
don't worry ;)