Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: IK3 on March 30, 2005, 02:14:23 PM
-
Im curious, i think installing these counters in real life were time consuming and expensive (in 40's standards).
-
Yes...
-
Running out of ammo and losing plane and pilot is a bit more expensive...BTW it was common for other nations to use different colored tracers on last belt to let pilot know he was at the end of his clip....
-
Originally posted by humble
BTW it was common for other nations to use different colored tracers on last belt to let pilot know he was at the end of his clip....
And, it let the enemy know you were running out of ammo.
-
Yup a bit of a two edged sword. I know some pilots didnt use em at all and others varied how far from end they were placed.
-
The ammo counters are probably the cheapest instrument in the 109 and 190. It was a simple mechanical device.
-
How many plane types had ammo counters in WW2?
-
Just those 2 LW Fighters IIRC.
Though some planes had the breeches of guns within the cockpit, I don't know if they could lean and look to see if bullets were still hanging from the breech?
Witch
-
All LW fighters (with a select few exceptions) had the counters.
-
FW 190 A-6
(http://www.virtualpilots.fi/hist/kuvat/Ampumaopas/24at.jpg)
Bf 109 G-5/G-6
(http://www.virtualpilots.fi/hist/kuvat/Ampumaopas/25bt.jpg)
-
If I had no ammo counters I'd use no tracers on the last belt.