Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: spitfiremkv on June 24, 2005, 06:08:35 PM
-
which look do you prefer:
new skinny blonde lohan(ugh):
(http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/he/photo/movie_pix/movieline/young_hollywood_2005_photos/lindsay_lohan/hollywood05v2.jpg)
or 2004ish still nicely rounded lohan:
(http://www.forvitni.net/myndir/Lindsay_Lohan_Sunbathing_01.jpg)
-
The real issue is if she is a good and decent person or not. Looks doesnt matter at all.
-
Nice boobage in #2. Can we mate the hair and chest from the brunette version with the overall body of the blonde version?
-
so u want a skeleton with boobs????
-
Hehe, you said: "poll" on lindsay lohan.
eskimo
-
Originally posted by spitfiremkv
so u want a skeleton with boobs????
Doesnt everyone?
-
Perhaps more to the point--did she develop a new attitude with the hair change, or is she still a notorious jerk?
J_A_B
-
I'd poll either of 'em, but my preference would be for the second.
-
I prefer no. 2 compared to the plastic surgeryied crack potato look of no. 1.
It's said that a good looking person has to result to such measures because of hollywood.
-
Am I supposed to be aware of this person? Did she invent a cure for cancer or at least the heartbreak of psoriasis?
-
Alright, I'm probably going to get into trouble for this, but one of the most personally disturbing trends I've seen in Hollywood and the fashion industry is to insist that all women look as androgenous as possible in order to be taken seriously.
In other words, if they are blessed to have an ample chest and nice curves, then they probably aren't going to get the A movie roles. Several actresses including Kate Winslett have complained bitterly about this (producers called her agent asking not whether she was available but "is she still fat?"), and it has led in recent years to a rash of breast reductions, insane diets, and doing everything they can to look like prepubescent boys instead of real women. Lohan is one example, others like Christina Ricci abound, but to my mind one the worst tragedies was Jennifer Connelly who went through a breast reduction and other plastic surgeries and diets in order to move from the incredibly curvy beauty of the Rocketeer to the thin and angular stick figure of the Hulk...
What gives? Who decided that the "Heroin Chic" look of the fashion industry (which it should be noted is set largely by Gay men) should be our popular standard for female beauty? Why must every actress look like she was just liberated from a concentration camp in order to succeed?
I say this with a vested interest. I have a daughter, and I'm sure many of you do to. I lament the fact that they are pushed towards eating disorders or made to feel fat or "bimboish" just because they look like real women and not Kate Moss. Frankly it makes me sick.
And yes, Lohan looks normal in picture #2 and vaguely malnourished in #1.
- SEAGOON
-
actually what is more disturbing is that LL is only 19 and she's probably taking advice from other people.
-
Seagoon--
Good post. I agree. Hollywood has certainly lost sight of what beauty is; when I watch films from the 40's-60's I'm almost always surprised at how much better the actresses typically look than those featured in newer productions.
J_A_B
-
Originally posted by Seagoon
Alright, I'm probably going to get into trouble for this, but one of the most personally disturbing trends I've seen in Hollywood and the fashion industry is to insist that all women look as androgenous as possible in order to be taken seriously.
In other words, if they are blessed to have an ample chest and nice curves, then they probably aren't going to get the A movie roles. Several actresses including Kate Winslett have complained bitterly about this (producers called her agent asking not whether she was available but "is she still fat?"), and it has led in recent years to a rash of breast reductions, insane diets, and doing everything they can to look like prepubescent boys instead of real women. Lohan is one example, others like Christina Ricci abound, but to my mind one the worst tragedies was Jennifer Connelly who went through a breast reduction and other plastic surgeries and diets in order to move from the incredibly curvy beauty of the Rocketeer to the thin and angular stick figure of the Hulk...
What gives? Who decided that the "Heroin Chic" look of the fashion industry (which it should be noted is set largely by Gay men) should be our popular standard for female beauty? Why must every actress look like she was just liberated from a concentration camp in order to succeed?
I say this with a vested interest. I have a daughter, and I'm sure many of you do to. I lament the fact that they are pushed towards eating disorders or made to feel fat or "bimboish" just because they look like real women and not Kate Moss. Frankly it makes me sick.
And yes, Lohan looks normal in picture #2 and vaguely malnourished in #1.
- SEAGOON
amen brother :aok
-
Originally posted by J_A_B
Seagoon--
Good post. I agree. Hollywood has certainly lost sight of what beauty is; when I watch films from the 40's-60's I'm almost always surprised at how much better the actresses typically look than those featured in newer productions.
J_A_B
Amen to that. All I have to say is: Jane Russell, The Outlaw. Now before I get into trouble with my Presbytery or my wife, I'm going to beat a hasty retreat.
- SEAGOON
-
Originally posted by Toad
Am I supposed to be aware of this person? Did she invent a cure for cancer or at least the heartbreak of psoriasis?
toad she's a young actress that's basically known for being a hottie. I've heard she is a royal B*t*h in real life but that could be just a rumor.
pre crack potato look:
(http://www.meangirls.com/downloads/wallpapers/cady800.jpg)
-
Or, if you really wanna feel like a perv, you can remember that she was the twins in the remake of the parent trap. That was 1998.
-
Originally posted by Seagoon
Alright, I'm probably going to get into trouble for this, but one of the most personally disturbing trends I've seen in Hollywood and the fashion industry is to insist that all women look as androgenous as possible in order to be taken seriously.
In other words, if they are blessed to have an ample chest and nice curves, then they probably aren't going to get the A movie roles. Several actresses including Kate Winslett have complained bitterly about this (producers called her agent asking not whether she was available but "is she still fat?"), and it has led in recent years to a rash of breast reductions, insane diets, and doing everything they can to look like prepubescent boys instead of real women. Lohan is one example, others like Christina Ricci abound, but to my mind one the worst tragedies was Jennifer Connelly who went through a breast reduction and other plastic surgeries and diets in order to move from the incredibly curvy beauty of the Rocketeer to the thin and angular stick figure of the Hulk...
What gives? Who decided that the "Heroin Chic" look of the fashion industry (which it should be noted is set largely by Gay men) should be our popular standard for female beauty? Why must every actress look like she was just liberated from a concentration camp in order to succeed?
I say this with a vested interest. I have a daughter, and I'm sure many of you do to. I lament the fact that they are pushed towards eating disorders or made to feel fat or "bimboish" just because they look like real women and not Kate Moss. Frankly it makes me sick.
And yes, Lohan looks normal in picture #2 and vaguely malnourished in #1.
- SEAGOON
It's not just hollywood, it's society in general. Cig ads took advantage this, they would make it seem that if you smoked you would be skinny. The world is full of shallow people.
And yeah, #2, no doubt
-
Originally posted by SOB
Or, if you really wanna feel like a perv, you can remember that she was the twins in the remake of the parent trap. That was 1998.
you really know how to spoil the fun don't ya? ;)
(http://www.geocities.com/we_love_lindsay/movie-pt.jpg)
-
It kinda spoiled my own fun when I thought of it, and I just couldn't help but share. :)
-
Originally posted by SOB
It kinda spoiled my own fun when I thought of it, and I just couldn't help but share. :)
it is kinda gross when you think about it. She was a "cute" kid but grew into a major hottie. Even if she was only 18 she looked (notice the past tense) very good for her age.
I think she looks like a crack potato as a skinney.
-
The original Lindsay Lohan is so much better.
Plus, no matter how much you dye your hair, some people just aren't blond.
-
I'm still trying to figure out what's wrong with red hair and freckles.
-
Due to peer pressure, I wish to change my vote to #2.
BRB, smoke break.
-
What Seagoon said.
-
Originally posted by Seagoon
Alright, I'm probably going to get into trouble for this, but one of the most personally disturbing trends I've seen in Hollywood and the fashion industry is to insist that all women look as androgenous as possible in order to be taken seriously.
In other words, if they are blessed to have an ample chest and nice curves, then they probably aren't going to get the A movie roles. Several actresses including Kate Winslett have complained bitterly about this (producers called her agent asking not whether she was available but "is she still fat?"), and it has led in recent years to a rash of breast reductions, insane diets, and doing everything they can to look like prepubescent boys instead of real women. Lohan is one example, others like Christina Ricci abound, but to my mind one the worst tragedies was Jennifer Connelly who went through a breast reduction and other plastic surgeries and diets in order to move from the incredibly curvy beauty of the Rocketeer to the thin and angular stick figure of the Hulk...
What gives? Who decided that the "Heroin Chic" look of the fashion industry (which it should be noted is set largely by Gay men) should be our popular standard for female beauty? Why must every actress look like she was just liberated from a concentration camp in order to succeed?
I say this with a vested interest. I have a daughter, and I'm sure many of you do to. I lament the fact that they are pushed towards eating disorders or made to feel fat or "bimboish" just because they look like real women and not Kate Moss. Frankly it makes me sick.
And yes, Lohan looks normal in picture #2 and vaguely malnourished in #1.
- SEAGOON
Man, this guy is sharp. Saves me a lot of typing too.
-
I prefer #2. The pre bulimia, anorexia, $1000 a day coke habit version.
-
You guys are brutal!
ps I'll go for #2
-
In defense of #1 I have to say that some chicks manage to be skinny, blonde and VERY attractive. especially if they have blue or green eyes.
but that means that 1: they're natural blondes
2: they have a petite body that fits well with a slim figure
Seeing Lohan's bones sticking out through her skin is utterly unattractive.
-
Another actress that has undergone the loose-all-the-body-fat mutation is one of my favourites: Jennifer Connelly. She still looks hot, but I preferred the way she was before.
One thing that surprised me in a positive way was Liv Tyler in that infamous movie "Women and Dr. T" where she appeared slightly overweight. In LOTR she was skinny, but I don't think she went through the Lohan transformation...
Daniel
-
who?
BTW you photoshot geeks .. take that pic, the second one in ummmm...spitfire's post, and move the person on the left about 30 pixels up, and 50 pixels right
-
Originally posted by Seagoon
Alright, I'm probably going to get into trouble for this, but one of the most personally disturbing trends I've seen in Hollywood and the fashion industry is to insist that all women look as androgenous as possible in order to be taken seriously.
In other words, if they are blessed to have an ample chest and nice curves, then they probably aren't going to get the A movie roles. Several actresses including Kate Winslett have complained bitterly about this (producers called her agent asking not whether she was available but "is she still fat?"), and it has led in recent years to a rash of breast reductions, insane diets, and doing everything they can to look like prepubescent boys instead of real women. Lohan is one example, others like Christina Ricci abound,
you have mentioned 2 of the loves of my life in this one eloquent post ; )
you are SO on the money there is no reason to state a "rebuttal" you have made the pont perfecly clear!! ; )
it is saddenign though 99% of america and the world will not see this viewpoint
-
Originally posted by spitfiremkv
so u want a skeleton with boobs????
those aint boobs. those are silicon
-
Whats the name of the brunette actress in "Becker" that played the waitress in the first few seasons?
She used to be cute but now looks like she hasnt eaten a solid meal in years.
They are all too totally tubular skinny, unless the show calls for a "fat character" in the script.
-
don't even know who she is but she could sure use a few pounds... cute girl tho.
lazs
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
those aint boobs. those are silicon
they're 100% natural. she's been big-titted for a while.
this is about as much you're allowed to see here without getting banned :P
(http://members.fortunecity.com/noops108/lindsay_lohan180504007.jpg)
-
yeah squire... I agree.. when they show the poor fat girl that is supposed to be some kind of lonley troll... I get wood.
lazs
-
I was getting turned on the redhead in "Less than perfect-I think that's the one"
huuge boobies and red hair, kinda goes well with a few extra pounds.
-
she was prettier when she was a husky brunette. The crack really messed her up. That and her getting raped by Fez. I would like to see her and hillary duff mud wrestle. Lohan needs a Tan though.
-
Originally posted by Seagoon
Alright, I'm probably going to get into trouble for this, but one of the most personally disturbing trends I've seen in Hollywood and the fashion industry is to insist that all women look as androgenous as possible in order to be taken seriously.
In other words, if they are blessed to have an ample chest and nice curves, then they probably aren't going to get the A movie roles. Several actresses including Kate Winslett have complained bitterly about this (producers called her agent asking not whether she was available but "is she still fat?"), and it has led in recent years to a rash of breast reductions, insane diets, and doing everything they can to look like prepubescent boys instead of real women. Lohan is one example, others like Christina Ricci abound, but to my mind one the worst tragedies was Jennifer Connelly who went through a breast reduction and other plastic surgeries and diets in order to move from the incredibly curvy beauty of the Rocketeer to the thin and angular stick figure of the Hulk...
What gives? Who decided that the "Heroin Chic" look of the fashion industry (which it should be noted is set largely by Gay men) should be our popular standard for female beauty? Why must every actress look like she was just liberated from a concentration camp in order to succeed?
I say this with a vested interest. I have a daughter, and I'm sure many of you do to. I lament the fact that they are pushed towards eating disorders or made to feel fat or "bimboish" just because they look like real women and not Kate Moss. Frankly it makes me sick.
And yes, Lohan looks normal in picture #2 and vaguely malnourished in #1.
- SEAGOON
Kate Winslett is slammin'. :)
Oh.. and Jennifer Connelly put some of the weight back on. Could it be that she was very quietly ill? Oh... and FWIW, she looked incredible in "Inventing the Abbots". :D
-
seagoon.... If anyone at any time in my life woulda told me that I would be agreeing with allmost everything that an ex brit minister said I woulda laughed in their face.
It is refreshing when I am surprised.
lazs
-
seagoon - completly and utterly agree...