Aces High Bulletin Board

Help and Support Forums => Help and Training => Topic started by: TheThang on July 29, 2005, 10:42:22 AM

Title: C-205
Post by: TheThang on July 29, 2005, 10:42:22 AM

In what order should you burn the fuel tanks?

Title: C-205
Post by: Mustaine on July 29, 2005, 10:52:29 AM

wings first, then aux

Title: C-205
Post by: Krusty on July 29, 2005, 11:33:34 AM

I'd personally rather have fuel in the wings and burn off the aux, but that's me. If you're worried about roll rate you burn the wing tanks first (and your roll rate gets better by the time you're in combat), but I don't find myself rollnig a lot in that plane (no more than normal, and it performs all right anyways).

Title: C-205
Post by: Gianlupo on August 04, 2005, 06:22:17 AM

If HTC has modeled the plane as it was in real life, burning the wing fuel first shouldn't make a big difference in roll rate. The C.202 and C.205 had wing tanks in the central part of wing root, really near the fuselage, so they didn't affect much roll rate. The main tank where just in front of the cockpit, under the machine guns complex, basically aligned with the wing, while the auxiliary tank was behind the cockpit, hence behind the center of gravity. So, maybe burning before the auxiliary tank may affect stability along the pitch axis.

Of course, this argument is effective only if this planes were modeled in the game according to their real life equivalent.

Title: C-205
Post by: Oldman731 on August 04, 2005, 07:05:38 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Gianlupo
If HTC has modeled the plane as it was in real life, burning the wing fuel first shouldn't make a big difference in roll rate. The C.202 and C.205 had wing tanks in the central part of wing root, really near the fuselage, so they didn't affect much roll rate. The main tank where just in front of the cockpit, under the machine guns complex, basically aligned with the wing, while the auxiliary tank was behind the cockpit, hence behind the center of gravity. So, maybe burning before the auxiliary tank may affect stability along the pitch axis.

Of course, this argument is effective only if this planes were modeled in the game according to their real life equivalent.

I fly the 202 quite a lot, and, frankly, I've never noticed much difference in its performance regardless of how you distribute the fuel.  I hear people say there's a noticeable difference, but I just don't see it.  I imagine the same is true for the 205.

- oldman

Title: C-205
Post by: Clip121 on August 04, 2005, 06:31:45 PM

I agree with oldman - been flying it a bit lately also and haven't noticed a bit of difference.....

Title: C-205
Post by: weasel4 on August 08, 2005, 08:43:19 AM

First thing Thang is to stay alive long enough to burn your fuel. hahahah:p


 

Quote

how do you spell kfc???

Title: C-205
Post by: Schutt on August 08, 2005, 09:48:15 AM

When i try to burn my fuel the fire usually gets out of hand and the plane blows up.

Title: C-205
Post by: weasel4 on August 08, 2005, 09:50:45 AM

TOOOOOOOO FUNNNNNNYYYYYYY

schutt = 1
Thang = -3


ITS K.E.N.T.U.C.K.Y  F.R.I.E.D.  C.H.I.C.K.E.N.