Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: AdmRose on August 28, 2005, 01:15:40 AM

Title: Utter Bull
Post by: AdmRose on August 28, 2005, 01:15:40 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/08/27/crawford.rallies/index.html

Wanting an explination for why her son died is going to topple the government and give a rise to the insurgency in Iraq? I seriously want to know what this guy was smoking before he gave that interview. There have been anti-war protests in EVERY major U.S. war from the Revolution to the current situation in Iraq. Not once have they ever toppled the government or caused the enemy's numbers to grow out of the belief that our country no longer supported the war. I actually had to reread that paragraph to make sure I read it correctly. Is that seriously the best argument these Bush supporters could come up with?
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: SuperDud on August 28, 2005, 01:19:40 AM
IN

That's some nice stinky bait!!!:aok :eek:
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Gunslinger on August 28, 2005, 01:22:26 AM
while I don't think it will topple the "administration" I do think that when one of the goals of your enemy is to disrupt you nations intestinal fortitude to continue fighting the war.....well she fits into there goals nicely.

What can you say....free speech. :aok

Side Note"  I read a good book about vietnam a while back, but can't remember the name.  Alot of the big "peace rallies" back in the day were actually organized and sponsered by communist/socialist groups rooting for the NV.  Effective tactic don't ya think?  Can't beat the enemy on the battle field, beat them at there pubilc support.  Even at today's "peace rallies" you see alot of commie propaganda.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Yeager on August 28, 2005, 02:15:53 AM
Her anti war sentiment is protected speech and its inspiring to those killing american soldiers in iraq.  Those who killed her son are getting strength and encouragement from her free speech down in Bush country.

Damn its ironic to me.

The womans right to free speech is paramount, but if I could I would slap her solidly across the face, and probably get the crap beaten out of me by peace protesters as a result but "oh well"....
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Sandman on August 28, 2005, 02:19:44 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
Her anti war sentiment is protected speech and its inspiring to those killing american soldiers in iraq.  Those who killed her son are getting strength and encouragement from her free speech down in Bush country.


Really... you read this on Al Jazeera?

pffft.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Yeager on August 28, 2005, 02:32:06 AM
sandman, follow me through on this and tell me if I am wrong.

====
Sheehan is calling for an immediate and unconditional withdrawl of the US military from Iraq.  

sandman, True or false?


====
Sheehans position of immediate and unconditional withdrawl of US military from Iraq is "extremely" good news to those who are planting roadside bombs and taking sniper shots at american soldiers, just like her son.  

Wouldn't any insurgent worth the salt on his balls be inspired to take extra steps to kill more US soldiers as quickly as possible to take advantage of the political fallout from Sheehans media campain outside the Bush vacation ranch?


sandman, if you disagree with me explain why.  Im open to opposing views here.  Tell me how my thinking as reflected above is flawed.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Sandman on August 28, 2005, 02:34:42 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
sandman, follow me through on this and tell me if I am wrong.

====
Sheehan is calling for an immediate and unconditional withdrawl of the US military from Iraq.  

sandman, True or false?


====
Sheehans position of immediate and unconditional withdrawl of US military from Iraq is "extremely" good news to those who are planting roadside bombs and taking sniper shots at american soldiers, just like her son.


sandman, if you disagree with me explain why.  Im open to opposing views here.  Tell me how my thinking as reflected above is flawed.


I'm okay with the first. I'm just wondering about the second. IMHO, once we pull out they'll just continue shooting each other. I'm all for letting them do it too.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: SkyTex on August 28, 2005, 02:34:56 AM
Well, I belive this.... abomination should be ran over with a pickup truck. Im sick of old cindy sheehand or whatever. she's making my life A ROYAL PAIN IN THE ASS! I guess that's what I get for living within 15 minuts of crawford *sigh* as if bush's ******* pilots wern't enough low alt buzzing my house every 3 hours due to a..... disagreement over at the coffee shop. I told em to atleast go sub-sonic cause some of us had to sleep in thier flight path. now they gotta be pushing mach2 atleast once a night when he's home and flying low enough i could spit on thier shiney jets!

GAH! I will be glad when bush either

A.) Moves the hell away from here

B.) Finally gets another job involving less security and less protesters. Seriously, I can't go to work sometimes because protesters will block the intersection of hwy 84 and 317 in mcgregor and the cops are there to make sure noone gets through traffic wise. While im all for free speech and such, i'm not for damned idiots standing in the middle of the road I help pay for blocking my way to make a living trying to do something that isn't going to happen. Think bush pay's em any attention? hell no. just like everyone else till they get in the way. atleast bush got people with big guns and jets to clear his traffic!
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Sandman on August 28, 2005, 02:37:18 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SkyTex
Well, I belive this.... abomination should be ran over with a pickup truck.


You talking Bush or Sheehan?

LMAO.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Yeager on August 28, 2005, 02:39:56 AM
I'm okay with the first. I'm just wondering about the second. IMHO, once we pull out they'll just continue shooting each other. I'm all for letting them do it too.
====
Ok, that works for me.

Heres something to ponder, and follow me here.

I was wondering about this earlier.  Lets suppose that civil war in Iraq is unavoidable.  If it happens then we should probably take sides, to offer support.  Who does Bush choose?  The Sunnis?

The *****es?  The Kurds?

Lets say old George and Dick choose the *****es.

Who should the democrats choose to support in response?

Im thinking the dems, Kennedy and Clinton mainly, choose the Sunnis, just because they are opposed to the neocon choice, the *****es.

What say you?

Sorry for the stupid profanity filter taking out what I think is the correct spelling for the majority Islamic sect in Iraq.

How is it spelled?
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: SkyTex on August 28, 2005, 02:42:32 AM
dude i don't care who as long as it gets all this bull**** out of my back yard!
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Sandman on August 28, 2005, 02:46:41 AM
I'm thinking... stay the **** out of civil wars.

That said... what's the real difference between the Kurds, Sunni, or Shia, or whatever the hell else is in Iraq?


I have to wonder why I even ask, because I truly don't give a **** if they off each other from the face of the planet. Same goes for Israel and Palestine. I mean hell... can you remember a time during your decades long existence where there wasn't fighting in the middle east over **** knows what all? I certainly can't.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Sandman on August 28, 2005, 02:47:30 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SkyTex
dude i don't care who as long as it gets all this bull**** out of my back yard!


I can't find fault with your position. Truly. :D
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Vulcan on August 28, 2005, 02:52:24 AM
Bulls don't have utter's sorry, cows do though.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: SkyTex on August 28, 2005, 02:57:27 AM
My place to Buish's (http://www.mapquest.com/directions/main.adp?go=1&do=nw&rmm=1&un=m&cl=EN&ct=NA&rsres=1&1a=&1c=Moody&1s=TX&1z=76557&2a=&2c=Crawford&2s=TX&2z=)


Edit: Not my actual adress but general area. Live a tad north of Moody.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Yeager on August 28, 2005, 02:59:33 AM
I agree with you Sandman.  Perhaps I have had too much to drink.....
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Sandman on August 28, 2005, 03:01:08 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
I agree with you Sandman.  Perhaps I have had too much to drink.....


Here's the scary part... I haven't been drinking. :rofl
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Silat on August 28, 2005, 04:02:41 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
Her anti war sentiment is protected speech and its inspiring to those killing american soldiers in iraq.  Those who killed her son are getting strength and encouragement from her free speech down in Bush country.

Damn its ironic to me.

The womans right to free speech is paramount, but if I could I would slap her solidly across the face, and probably get the crap beaten out of me by peace protesters as a result but "oh well"....



Yes just like conservative Bushman Pat R's assassination comment is fire for our enemies also.
Pot and Kettle.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Krusher on August 28, 2005, 09:13:30 AM
I did not know bulls had utters !
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: lasersailor184 on August 28, 2005, 11:46:52 AM
Quote
The womans right to free speech is paramount, but if I could I would slap her solidly across the face, and probably get the crap beaten out of me by peace protesters as a result but "oh well"....


You honestly think that a bunch of peace activists can take you down?
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: VOR on August 28, 2005, 11:56:24 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Silat
Yes just like conservative Bushman Pat R's assassination comment is fire for our enemies also.
Pot and Kettle.


It's not pot and kettle. They both need a good slapping.
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: Gunslinger on August 28, 2005, 11:58:06 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Silat
Yes just like conservative Bushman Pat R's assassination comment is fire for our enemies also.
Pot and Kettle.


sniff sniff sniff....oh looky here a nice shiney hook!
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: SirLoin on August 28, 2005, 12:24:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
sandman, follow me through on this and tell me if I am wrong.

====
"Sheehan is calling for an immediate and unconditional withdrawl of the US military from Iraq."


I think she is calling for the immediate and unconditional withdrawl of GWB and his cronies from the White House.

God bless her.


Title: Utter Bull
Post by: capt. apathy on August 28, 2005, 12:26:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
Ok, that works for me.

Heres something to ponder, and follow me here.

I was wondering about this earlier.  Lets suppose that civil war in Iraq is unavoidable.  If it happens then we should probably take sides, to offer support.  Who does Bush choose?  The Sunnis?

The *****es?  The Kurds?

 


why should we do that?
Title: Utter Bull
Post by: whels on August 28, 2005, 12:44:31 PM
i look at it this way.  her son chose to join the military, and serve his country. it is sad that he gave his life in that duty, and i him and his family, and others in the same situation. But  what she is doing and saying now is making a political mockery of his death, by calling for  a complete and unconditional immediate withdrawal of our troops, means her son would have  died for nothing.


she has made his death a "look at me im special and demand special treatment 3 ring circus", being used by both sides of the
political right/left wing fence.