Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Krusher on September 19, 2005, 10:20:18 AM

Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Krusher on September 19, 2005, 10:20:18 AM
Katrina is going to lead to new laws and regulations.  Here are a few that have been floated, what can you add to or subtract from this list?


1.) The repeal of Posse Comitatus

- Its going to happen, if not 75 percent of what we have read about the governments slow reaction is just plain BS.

2.) A law that makes it legal to remove people from their homes prior to natural disasters.  

- If it is for their good and the good of the community, what right do you have to stay when all its going to do is cause problems?

3.) The law that mandates natural disaster insurance, cleanup insurance, rescue insurance, relocation insurance and terrorism insurance

- It cost money to do all that is needed to bail out the victims of disasters, why should the tax payers pay for it?

4.) The evacuation transportation requirement act

- The government can provide only so much public transit. Its pretty obvious that NO didn't have enough why shouldn't the public pay for their own?
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Gunslinger on September 19, 2005, 10:21:30 AM
that's the problem with big clumsey govt.  They think they can legislate all the problems away.
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Krusher on September 19, 2005, 10:28:32 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
that's the problem with big clumsey govt.  They think they can legislate all the problems away.


Not to mention Knee jerk legislation always happens after a disaster or large event.

Patriot act - 9-11
Weapons bans - Sacramento, Columbine
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Hangtime on September 19, 2005, 10:46:08 AM
What I expect to see instead is the creation of federal riot units stationed regionaly. Great big division-sized force concentrations optimized and trained expressly for communications and property protection and designated to move into a threatened area either just prior to or immediately after SHTF.
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: AKS\/\/ulfe on September 19, 2005, 10:50:18 AM
Army and National Guard are already hurting pretty bad in terms of numbers.

They may create a new unit, such as they did with DHS, designed to deploy quickly to disaster stricken areas or about to be disaster stricken areas. Possibly to forcefully remove residents or take control in a police state method until order and peace are restored.
-SW
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Jackal1 on September 19, 2005, 10:58:04 AM
Hang. you just could be correct on that.
I can also see the total power being abused and misused in these situations and non-relating situations just like we do with other government placed agencies.
My view would be when an evacuation is called for that transportation for those unable and wishing to leave to do so.
For those who wished to stay and ride it out for protection of "their" property have it on an "You are on your own" basis with a little more power to the property owners when it came to protection of your property in a disaster area.
  Usualy agencies put in place by the government leaves a lot of "gray area" and in most cases the power is abused.
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Hangtime on September 19, 2005, 10:58:45 AM
Yep. The job will go to a Ninja style acronym acency. Not the National Guard.

And my friends, that is just not a good thing.
Title: Re: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Shamus on September 19, 2005, 12:49:48 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Krusher
Katrina is going to lead to new laws and regulations.  Here are a few that have been floated, what can you add to or subtract from this list?


1.) The repeal of Posse Comitatus

Only lazy thinking morons would be in favor of this.

2.) A law that makes it legal to remove people from their homes prior to natural disasters.  

If you pass this why would #4 be needed?


3.) The law that mandates natural disaster insurance, cleanup insurance, rescue insurance, relocation insurance and terrorism insurance

I think the flood insurance program should be private, however when you mandate buying a service/product from a private entity that enity becomes a quasi government agency and price regulation becomes important.

4.) The evacuation transportation requirement act

- The government can provide only so much public transit. Its pretty obvious that NO didn't have enough why shouldn't the public pay for their own?

See #2

 


shamus

PS: Ooops kinda screwed the quotes up, this has my reply's in Krushers original post
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Ghosth on September 19, 2005, 05:12:19 PM
NO had enough public transit. Didn't you see all those bus's parked in 4 ' of water?

Each and ever one of those should have had a city employee driving it, and a cop to keep order. They should have ALL been on the road instead of parked.

Thats Goverments fault, not the peoples.
Yet people will pay the price yet again.

And yes we'll lose a few more personal "rights" in the process.
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Sandman on September 19, 2005, 05:30:56 PM
1.  Congress can repeal Posse Commitatus if needed. I think it's a good idea to keep the military out of civilian affairs. Hell, they don't want to be burdened with it anyway.

2.  Doesn't the government do that already?

3.  Mandated insurance coverage? Hell no. One need to look no further than auto insurance to see how screwed up it can get if the government requires insurance.

4.  State issue. Unfunded mandates from the federal government should be pissed on.
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: DREDIOCK on September 19, 2005, 05:52:04 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
that's the problem with big clumsey govt.  They think they can legislate all the problems away.


Agreed.
and I pesonally am against ANY law designed to protect me from myself
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: GtoRA2 on September 19, 2005, 08:10:31 PM
yeah just great lets let the government who ****ed it all up have even more power over us.

More laws are not needed here. Just politicians without their heads up their ass's.

None of this is a good idea.


Looks like the insurance lobby has some politicians in their pocket.
Title: Re: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: ALF on September 19, 2005, 09:44:41 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Krusher
Katrina is going to lead to new laws and regulations.  Here are a few that have been floated, what can you add to or subtract from this list?


1.) The repeal ................(huge snip)


Spoken like a true big goverment, libral...lets make the government responsible for everything, and keep these peskie freedome crap to a minimum.....sigh

If we learn one thing, learn that governments job is not to protect you from yourself.  BTW, the mayor is in completely over his head, and the governor isnt far behind.
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Lan784 on September 19, 2005, 10:03:17 PM
agreed those laws would be nice to have if somthing like this ever happened again. and i just heard tropical storm rita is excpected to make land fall near Houston(where i live, check out profile to the left) and i live in the section where IF[B/] a catagory 3, hurricane hit my street would be under water. A catagory 4, water would be in my house. A catagory 5 then another katrina disaster happened. So if a disaster like katrina did happen again then this could be all avoided ..... Krusher ur a REAL american
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Holden McGroin on September 19, 2005, 10:17:57 PM
John Stossel of ABC News built a beach house on Long Island.

His parents asked him why he built it there because it woud be destroyed with the first storm.  He said it wasn't even insured.  If it were to be destroyed, FEMA would buy it from him, he couldn't lose.

It was destroyed.  FEMA paid him for it.  He rebuilt it. It was destroyed again. FEMA paid for it again.
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: lazs2 on September 20, 2005, 08:29:21 AM
You guys realize that we are talking about armed U.S. military troops killing civilians right?

This is really really blatatantly a much bigger  step toward a police state than they have ever had the guts to try before.

Aren't our ghettos a disaster area by the way?

lazs
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Eagler on September 20, 2005, 09:02:46 AM
how about a new law which states

if your gov is a retard dem, the mayor of the city cannot be or vise versa
Title: Re: Re: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: Krusher on September 20, 2005, 09:16:02 AM
Quote
Originally posted by ALF
Spoken like a true big goverment, libral...lets make the government responsible for everything, and keep these peskie freedome crap to a minimum.....sigh

If we learn one thing, learn that governments job is not to protect you from yourself.  BTW, the mayor is in completely over his head, and the governor isnt far behind.


Thats me alright, Mr. Liberal
:rofl

If you noticed one of my other replies it was pointing out how gov has a tendency towards Knee jerk reactions.  I in no way support any new laws, the repeal of Posse Comitatus may very well happen though and I doubt the public in general will give a damn.
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: mietla on September 20, 2005, 11:05:08 AM
Didn't Caesar cross the Rubicon with his legions to bring Rome piece and tranquility?


An ancient Roman law forbade any general from crossing the Rubicon River and entering Italy proper with a standing army. To do so was treason.
Title: Should we change our laws because of Katrina
Post by: lazs2 on September 20, 2005, 02:25:24 PM
As far as government helping us in a disaster goes...

the appropriate quote is....  

"government is a disease masquerading as it's own cure"

lazs