Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Eagler on October 26, 2005, 12:31:38 PM

Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Eagler on October 26, 2005, 12:31:38 PM: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-10-19-rice-congress_x.htm
(http://images.usatoday.com/news/_photos/2005/10/19/RICE-inside.jpg)

or before their photoshop hatch job:

(http://michellemalkin.com/archives/images/realcondi.jpg)

story (http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003780.htm)
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Sandman on October 26, 2005, 02:38:26 PM: Looks like this to me:

(http://images.usatoday.com/news/_photos/2005/10/26/rice.jpg)
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: lazs2 on October 26, 2005, 02:41:10 PM: hard to believe that they are being mean to that colored lady but then....

nothing worse to a liberal than a colored person who doesn't tow the party line.

lazs
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Eagler on October 26, 2005, 02:43:23 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Looks like this to me:

(http://images.usatoday.com/news/_photos/2005/10/26/rice.jpg)

lol
they changed it .. what a bunch of tards USA Today must have running the show to let the phot out in the first place
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Tarmac on October 26, 2005, 02:47:44 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Looks like this to me:

(http://images.usatoday.com/news/_photos/2005/10/26/rice.jpg)

Editor's note: The photo of Condoleezza Rice that originally accompanied this story was altered in a manner that did not meet USA TODAY's editorial standards. The photo has been replaced by a properly adjusted copy. Photos published online are routinely cropped for size and adjusted for brightness and sharpness to optimize their appearance. In this case, after sharpening the photo for clarity, the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards.
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Mickey1992 on October 26, 2005, 02:47:46 PM: Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
hard to believe that they are being mean to that colored lady but then....

nothing worse to a liberal than a colored person who doesn't tow the party line.

lazs

That has to be the most ignorant thing I have ever read on this BBS.
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Sandman on October 26, 2005, 02:49:12 PM: You sure it wasn't this pic? She's the devil!

(http://dotdoubledot.com/img/stuff/rice.gif)
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: lazs2 on October 26, 2005, 02:52:58 PM: mickey.... you lead a sheltered life and.... you don't read the bb much.

lazs
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Mustaine on October 26, 2005, 02:59:52 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
That has to be the most ignorant thing I have ever read on this BBS.
it is actually quite an accurate comment on liberals from what i have personally witnessed.

i have a sort of co-worker who calls Rice an "uncle tom" and thinks she is a disgrace to african americans. (the person is african american and muslim)
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: oboe on October 26, 2005, 03:07:12 PM: All your base. All your base are belong to us.

(http://dotdoubledot.com/img/stuff/rice.gif)
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: ASTAC on October 26, 2005, 03:10:58 PM: Quote
Originally posted by oboe
All your base. All your base are belong to us.

(http://dotdoubledot.com/img/stuff/rice.gif)

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Skuzzy on October 26, 2005, 03:13:32 PM: Hehe, nice job Sandman. Perfect.
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: lasersailor184 on October 26, 2005, 03:21:31 PM: Apparently, it was done with a filter called "Unsharp Mask."

This is what the photo SHOULD look like with Unsharp Mask.

(http://static.flickr.com/29/56297912_9396aa7f64_o.jpg)
(http://michellemalkin.com/archives/images/condi.jpg)

The second image is what USA Today showed. It clearly shows that they maliciously altered the eyes.
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Skuzzy on October 26, 2005, 03:45:02 PM: Nah, malicious would be penning in the horns and moustache. :D
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Gunslinger on October 26, 2005, 03:57:00 PM: Quote
Editor's note: The photo of Condoleezza Rice that originally accompanied this story was altered in a manner that did not meet USA TODAY's editorial standards. The photo has been replaced by a properly adjusted copy. Photos published online are routinely cropped for size and adjusted for brightness and sharpness to optimize their appearance. In this case, after sharpening the photo for clarity, the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-10-19-rice-congress_x.htm
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: ASTAC on October 26, 2005, 03:58:18 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-10-19-rice-congress_x.htm

So they pussed out? Don't have the nuts to stand by their insults?:rolleyes:
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: straffo on October 26, 2005, 04:03:44 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Skuzzy
Nah, malicious would be penning in the horns and moustache. :D

Actually they removed it.

Hey Eagler not happy with left propaganda ?
You prefer your I guess ?

what a pity.
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Meatwad on October 26, 2005, 04:18:06 PM: Good photoshop thread if I knew how to use photoshop
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Gunslinger on October 26, 2005, 04:29:45 PM: I guess it could be worse

(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/210_1130362147_realcondi[1].jpg)
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: ASTAC on October 26, 2005, 04:37:23 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
I guess it could be worse

(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/210_1130362147_realcondi[1].jpg)

She realated to Mikey Jackson in that pic? :lol
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Pooh21 on October 26, 2005, 05:00:01 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
That has to be the most ignorant thing I have ever read on this BBS.

Dumbtrucks are about the most ignorent thing I have ever read about on this BBS.

What Laz said is about the truth.
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Chairboy on October 26, 2005, 05:00:01 PM: Here's one of the original pages about it:

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003780.htm
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Nilsen on October 26, 2005, 05:20:14 PM: ROFL Sandy and Guns :D

Someone spend the time and work those two into MJ's thriller video

(http://popstar2000.tripod.com/thriller.jpg)(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/210_1130362147_realcondi[1].jpg)
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Eagler on October 26, 2005, 07:00:07 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Skuzzy
Nah, malicious would be penning in the horns and moustache. :D

stop suppressing the sexual attraction, she'll probably answer your email :)
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: rpm on October 26, 2005, 07:40:52 PM: I'm just amazed her image can be captured on film.
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Ripsnort on October 26, 2005, 07:46:51 PM: Quote
Originally posted by lasersailor184
Apparently, it was done with a filter called "Unsharp Mask."

This is what the photo SHOULD look like with Unsharp Mask.

(http://static.flickr.com/29/56297912_9396aa7f64_o.jpg)
(http://michellemalkin.com/archives/images/condi.jpg)

The second image is what USA Today showed. It clearly shows that they maliciously altered the eyes.

The real problem lies in the gentleman behind her, they forgot to stuff a big mac in his mouth with a sign that signs "REPUBLICANS ARE EEEEEEEEE-VILLLLLLLLL"
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: FuBaR on October 27, 2005, 12:21:02 AM: I love being young, really I do. :)
Title: Re: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Karnak on October 27, 2005, 02:06:42 AM: Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
USA Today - just another left rag

:rofl
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Clifra Jones on October 27, 2005, 01:19:44 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
That has to be the most ignorant thing I have ever read on this BBS.

Is it? Then how do you justify this?

Simple Sambo wants to move to the big house
(http://www.bbri.com/images/other/mantan.jpg)

http://stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2005/10/simple-sambo-wants-to-move-to-big.html

Just because he's a black man running as a Republican it's OK for Liberals to treat him this way, right?

How many Blacks were in prominent positions in the Clinton Whitehouse? Answer: NONE

Why was a well qualified African-American passed over twice for chairmanship of the DNC? Passed over for who? The crook Terry McAuliffe and the nut Howard Dean.

I've said for years that there is nothing more racist in America than Rich White Liberals.
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Westy on October 27, 2005, 01:26:57 PM: Good cod awlmighty I swear Rice and ex-SC nominee Meirs make Teresa Heinz look downright beautiful.
Title: USA Today - just another left rag
Post by: Sandman on October 27, 2005, 02:32:41 PM: Quote
Originally posted by Clifra Jones

How many Blacks were in prominent positions in the Clinton Whitehouse? Answer: NONE

The Surgeon General (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jocelyn_Elders), Jocelyn Elders.
The Secretary of Commerce (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Brown_(U.S._politician)), Ron Brown.
The Secretary of Agriculture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Espy), Mike Espy.
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_brown), Jesse Brown.
The Secretary of Energy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazel_O%27Leary), Hazel O'Leary.
The Deputy Secretary of State (http://www.msu.edu/unit/msuaa/magazine/s93/wharton.htm), Clifton Wharton Jr.

Care to try again?