Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Raider179 on November 13, 2005, 01:15:11 AM

Title: Who's next?
Post by: Raider179 on November 13, 2005, 01:15:11 AM
Ok is in need of democracy next?

Ok I vote for Somalia. hahaha

All those damn Pirates. Lets have a sanction on Pirates, oh wait that is a load of bs. Ok How bout we send 3 marines to France to stop that riot and then this is just my opinon but we carpet bomb from Isreal to Chechneya.

Total War.
Title: Re: Who's next?
Post by: Gunslinger on November 13, 2005, 01:18:01 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Raider179
Ok is in need of democracy next?

Ok I vote for Somalia. hahaha

All those damn Pirates. Lets have a sanction on Pirates, oh wait that is a load of bs. Ok How bout we send 3 marines to France to stop that riot and then this is just my opinon but we carpet bomb from Isreal to Chechneya.

Total War.


yea this is just real funny to you huh.
Title: Who's next?
Post by: RAIDER14 on November 13, 2005, 01:22:14 AM
just nuke israel,paris,iraq,north korea and boom world peace
Title: Re: Re: Who's next?
Post by: Raider179 on November 13, 2005, 01:23:40 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
yea this is just real funny to you huh.


No what is funny is when we ignore real problems for make believe ones like Iraq. I love it when mine and everyone else's safety is in jeopardy. It makes my day. Guns, you got me wrong, I just think we are half assing it, not that we shouldnt be fighting.
Title: Who's next?
Post by: Octavius on November 13, 2005, 01:25:07 AM
I just think we are half assing it, not that we shouldnt be fighting.

take cover
Title: Who's next?
Post by: Raider179 on November 13, 2005, 01:25:49 AM
Quote
Originally posted by RAIDER14
just nuke israel,paris,iraq,north korea and boom world peace

Well since you are a troll have fun. Notice though how I use facts and truths to support my point of view. Too bad that the actual beauty of America flies right over your head.
Title: Who's next?
Post by: Raider179 on November 13, 2005, 01:29:12 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Octavius
I just think we are half assing it, not that we shouldnt be fighting.

take cover


200% bro its on, just matter of time
Title: Who's next?
Post by: Raider179 on November 13, 2005, 01:29:47 AM
Quote
Originally posted by RAIDER14
just nuke israel,paris,iraq,north korea and boom world peace


No jerky that the point but thanks for making it.
Title: Who's next?
Post by: lazs2 on November 13, 2005, 09:51:24 AM
does anyone feel that I should move to Texas and raider to kalifornia?  I can sell him a couple of houses for less than a million if he is interested.

lazs
Title: Re: Who's next?
Post by: Masherbrum on November 13, 2005, 10:32:26 AM
I think I'll listen to this CD, it's been awhile anyway.  

Karaya
Title: Who's next?
Post by: DREDIOCK on November 13, 2005, 11:27:44 AM
Since the Nuking of the middle east has been mentioned.
Lets see if we cant turn this into a more meaningful discussion.

What would the effect be of Nukes in the middle east on oil?

As we know Ther is alot of oil in the middle east
Oil as Saddam has showing us is highly flammable.

Also Nukes are sure way to set things afire.

What would the effect be on oil of a few nukes going off there?
IS it possible that they would set off some sort of catastophic internal fire in the earth? and what would that effect have?

Or is there little if no danger of that happening?
Title: Who's next?
Post by: Skilless on November 13, 2005, 11:37:43 AM
Quote
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Since the Nuking of the middle east has been mentioned.
Lets see if we cant turn this into a more meaningful discussion.

What would the effect be of Nukes in the middle east on oil?

As we know Ther is alot of oil in the middle east
Oil as Saddam has showing us is highly flammable.

Also Nukes are sure way to set things afire.

What would the effect be on oil of a few nukes going off there?
IS it possible that they would set off some sort of catastophic internal fire in the earth? and what would that effect have?

Or is there little if no danger of that happening?


That's what the Neutron Bomb is for:  Kills people but doesn't destroy infrastructure.  I think the madmen who designed it had the ME in mind when they dreamed this one up.

(I hope we're all joking about this)
Title: Who's next?
Post by: dmf on November 13, 2005, 11:41:15 AM
Actually a nuke would probally set off a underground oil fire that would cause a chain reaction involveing the conecting oil reserves, thus makeing the woulds largest ever BBQ, and destroying the atmosphere to the point that greenpeace would finally be right about something.
Not to mention that the price of gas, oil, heating fuel , ..etc... would be so high that no one could afford it anymore, and without haveing a workable electric car yet that recharges itself on solar power ( that wouldn't be there any more because of the dark cloud covering the planet ) we'd all be rideing horses until everything on the planet died from a lack of sunlight, or the acid rain, or maybe even the next ice age.

I highly suggest we never find out.
Title: Who's next?
Post by: Gh0stFT on November 13, 2005, 11:41:51 AM
Quote
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Since the Nuking of the middle east has been mentioned.


i doubt we need a 3rd or 4th nuclear destroyed city, 2 are more then enough, dont you think?
Title: Who's next?
Post by: Dago on November 13, 2005, 11:49:47 AM
Yeah, just nuke Iran and Syria, that should calm down the middle east.  :aok
Title: Who's next?
Post by: DREDIOCK on November 13, 2005, 11:50:40 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Gh0stFT
i doubt we need a 3rd or 4th nuclear destroyed city, 2 are more then enough, dont you think?


I would agree. but that wasnt the reason or meaning of my post.

Well..Maybe Paris;)
Title: Who's next?
Post by: J_A_B on November 13, 2005, 02:56:44 PM
Solution to the War on Terror?

Figure out a way to bring Curtis LeMay back to life, then give him full reign to do whatever he feels necessary.  


J_A_B
Title: Who's next?
Post by: GRUNHERZ on November 13, 2005, 03:14:33 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gh0stFT
i doubt we need a 3rd or 4th nuclear destroyed city, 2 are more then enough, dont you think?


Yes Nuking cities is so much worse and painful for all involved than firebobing by hundreds and thousands of conventian bombers repeatedly over severaldays. Nukes are so unique and awful!!!

So yes, I'm for getting back into the firebombing cities business! Roast the mother frakkers, I say. Roast em good like the RAF bomber command did in WW2!
Title: Who's next?
Post by: NUKE on November 13, 2005, 03:18:50 PM
Lol Grun, aint that the truth.

The US firebombed and destroyed every major city in Japan except Hiroshima, Nagasaki and one more that I forget the name of.

Those three cities were declared off limits......I think so that when we nuked them, we could assess the damage accurately.

Killing is killing, war is hell.