Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Eagler on November 18, 2005, 03:08:41 PM

Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: Eagler on November 18, 2005, 03:08:41 PM
$30,000,000 worth of guilt anyway...

think he'll play any less golf than OJ does?
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: fartwinkle on November 18, 2005, 05:35:38 PM
Gotta love it.
Found not guilty in the criminal case yet in the civil guilty LOL.


Hows that work ok your free to go no murder on your rap sheet no prison time.
But ok here you must pay 30million for a crime you where found innocent of.
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: Tarmac on November 18, 2005, 05:59:28 PM
Quote
Originally posted by fartwinkle
Gotta love it.
Found not guilty in the criminal case yet in the civil guilty LOL.


Hows that work ok your free to go no murder on your rap sheet no prison time.
But ok here you must pay 30million for a crime you where found innocent of.


Are you stupid or just ignorant?
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: AWMac on November 18, 2005, 06:12:28 PM
Guess OJ and He joins the "Ted Kennedys inner circle Celebs of unwanted Murderer's"

(http://license-plate-world.com/CURRENT_TED-KENNEDY'S-CAR.jpg)

Shame, Justice may be Blind...But Money Talks...

Mac
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: fartwinkle on November 18, 2005, 07:03:46 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Tarmac
Are you stupid or just ignorant?


It must be the one your not using .

Think about it for a minute he is either guilty or not and I remember he was found not guilty in the murder trial.

I know that criminal and civil cases are tried differently but in these cases I dont know why that is.

Now is that really the best way to show you intelligence or lack there of.
Someone ask a question and you sling insults:rolleyes:

We can both do that you know and prove what?

Yo mamma is so ugly that they used to have to tie porkchops aound her kneck to get the dogs to play with her.

I feel better now and maybe after class I will challenge you to a spitball shooting contest:p
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: ASTAC on November 18, 2005, 07:22:24 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Tarmac
Are you stupid or just ignorant?


Come on...It's a valid question...If you are innocent..then how can you be guilty of wrongful death?
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: -tronski- on November 18, 2005, 07:29:42 PM
I've never really understood it...in OJ's case, the Goldman family called it justice..but it's not at all...but to me it's (loosley) like having a car crash, being found not liable - but still having to pay for the damages, and the other side claiming because I was forced to pay, the accident was my fault after all?!?

I still don't get how you can be found not guilty criminally but still liable?

 Tronsky
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: rpm on November 18, 2005, 07:41:28 PM
Quote
Originally posted by ASTAC
Come on...It's a valid question...If you are innocent..then how can you be guilty of wrongful death?
Criminal court and civil court have different rules of evidence.
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: RightF00T on November 18, 2005, 08:06:11 PM
Criminal: Innocent until proven guilty
Civil: Guilty until proven innocent


Simple. :)
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: StarOfAfrica2 on November 18, 2005, 08:26:10 PM
Quote
Originally posted by rpm
Criminal court and civil court have different rules of evidence.


Exactly.  They are allowed to introduce reams of evidence that were inadmissable in the stricter rules of the Criminal case, but are perfectly admissable in the Civil case.  The extra evidence, whatever it was, obviously made a difference.
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: rpm on November 18, 2005, 10:39:02 PM
Quote
Originally posted by StarOfAfrica2
Exactly.  They are allowed to introduce reams of evidence that were inadmissable in the stricter rules of the Criminal case, but are perfectly admissable in the Civil case.  The extra evidence, whatever it was, obviously made a difference.
Not quite. In criminal court you are judged by reasonable doubt. In civil it's by preponderance of the evidence.

In other words, you only have to show more evidence than the defense.
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: ASTAC on November 19, 2005, 07:56:07 AM
I understand how it works. I just don't understand why it is allowed

Is it right? Granted I feel that both OJ and Blake were guilty, but a jury thought otherwise. Is it right to have been exonerated and then still have to pay in another court? Maybe there should be a ban on that sort of thing.
Title: Blake Guilty!!
Post by: DREDIOCK on November 19, 2005, 08:51:15 AM
Also.

Heard it being talked about last night that in Cali
In the criminal case they needed a 100% majority in favor of guilty to convict.

In Civil they only need a majority in favor of guilty