Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Sandman on July 17, 2001, 08:23:00 PM
-
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/07/17/f16.crash/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/07/17/f16.crash/index.html)
-
....and another one today. 30 Million down the drain. At least the pilot survived.
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010718/ts/crash_turkey_dc.html (http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010718/ts/crash_turkey_dc.html)
-
The pilot had ejected before the crash, near the city of Batman
a city named batman??
thank cod the pilot is alright though
-
10 years enforcing the "no-fly zone" in Iraq and covering the Yugoslavian "peace-keeping" forces has put a lot of time on the fighter force airframes and engines. Far more than routine training would during the same decade.
I think we've been lucky so far that we haven't had more engine failures. I also thought that the decision for single engine over multi engine was a mistake back when it was made. That was the old F-100 fighter guys as generals.
An F-18 would have made it back, most likely, after suffering a single engine failure. End cost on an -16 vs -18 isn't all that great. Cost difference gets huge when you lose one due to single engine failure though.
-
Believe me, there is nothing worse inflight to hear nothing but silence. It has happend to a friend of mine once. He was able to set it down at a private airfield (Cessna 140) but the gear collapsed and he ended up breaking the left wing spar.
Engine failure usually doesn't cause a crash if the pilot is able to glide to a base. But in the mountians he couldn't have gone anywhere...