Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: tapakeg on January 16, 2006, 05:29:17 AM
-
In case you missed it
hard to be in a liberal audience (http://us.video.netscape.com/video.full.adp?mode=0&pmmsid=1450450&guideContext=1151.115&floc=ns-tos-vido-b-01&restartUrl=http%3a%2f%2fus%2evideo%2enetscape%2ecom%2fvideo%2eindex%2eadp%3fmode%3d2%26pmmsid%3d1450450%26guideContext%3d1151%2e115%26floc%3dns%2dtos%2dvido%2db%2d01&mode=2)
-
Reminded me of the O'club
Conversation between two of the worlds largest anal orifices went well untill Letterman ran out of points to make and had to throw insults instead.
"Im not smart enough to debate this point to point with you. But I have the feeling that 60% of what you say is crap"
-
Yeah I loved that comment plus his "I've never seen your show but people have told me things".
I like Dave but he is getting caught up in the MSM's BS.
Now don't get me wrong I watch his show but I believe probably 30% of O'Reilly is BS. Sometimes I have to turn him off when he gets to self righteous.
-
"welll how do you know its 60% crap if you don't watch it?"
"Well, bill, because of things that I've read..."
Game, Set, Match to O'Reilly.
-
Yea boy! That reading will screw you up every darn time!
-
Originally posted by midnight Target
Yea boy! That reading will screw you up every darn time!
His sources were probably things such as New York Times, Washington Post...you get my point ;)
-
there was a time, when i was younger, that i really enjoyed Dave Letterman.
for some reason, he never used to be on such a political soap box, he was just funny, and set himself away from all that...
i just hate it when he gets like this. really makes me bummed out.
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
His sources were probably things such as New York Times, Washington Post...you get my point ;)
The point is... you don't know his sources.
-
Point is he never even made the attempt to watch his show so how can he honestly say he is 60% crap?
It doesn't matter what his "source" is.
-
I used to love Letterman. Now it seems like more and more he simply seems annoyed having to be there. Sometimes it seems like maybe he is having a bad day, then others it seems like he is just content with coming off as being an bellybutton and he doesn't care.
I remember Carson being like this in the couple of years before he retired. It was like he was on autopilot and if anything did not go exactly to his liking he became a jerk.
-
Regardless of the accuracy or bias of his sources, he's apparently let others make his mind up for him.
On a related note, I'd rather get a prostate exam with a rake than watch Letterman or O'Reilly, so I guess that makes me unqualified to determine what percentage of their talking points may or may not be crap.
-
I saw that.. reminded me of the South Park episode where the kids choices were limited to a giant sweetheart or a terd sandwich.
-
Originally posted by midnight Target
The point is... you don't know his sources.
When I want to decide if Letterman is funny, I read what other people write rather than watch Letterman.
-
o'reilly ran over letterman like a M1 tank runs over a donkey cart.
I felt really bad for letterman :aok
-
Dave should stick to comedy.
-
Originally posted by SOB
Dave should stick to comedy.
:aok And O'Reilly should stick to crap-stirring, but not on what is supposed to be an entertainment show.....
-
Originally posted by midnight Target
The point is... you don't know his sources.
I have read several things that says Letterman is a commie. Of course I believe about 70% is true. Which would explain why he hasn't watched the O'reily factor but believes that alot of it is crap. Of course I never watch Letterman...who wants to listen to a bunch of commie crap.
-
Originally posted by SOB
Dave should stick to comedy.
you mean people consider him funny? other than funny lookin I mean.
-
Letterman chose to go for the cheap laughs and didn't even bother to try to be credible, knowing that it would be sufficient for the MT type of viewer. It was cheap, like some frat boy in school surrounded by a group of his friends putting someone down for the way they look. I was neutral on Letterman before, but now I know he is a lightweight.
-
Letterman was great, 20 years ago.
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
:aok And O'Reilly should stick to crap-stirring, but not on what is supposed to be an entertainment show.....
Letterman must be pretty stupid indeed if he thought Bill wasn't going to mention the Christmas 'War'.
It seemed to me that Bill eased into it, letting Letterman deny the discussion or proceed and ask him why he had a Winter Soltice rather than Christmas. Letterman could of difused the whole situation by chuckling and changing the subject.
Letterman wanted the debate, its obvious...
-
Originally posted by RedDg
Letterman was great, 20 years ago.
:aok
-
Dave is comedy for the thinking man.
O' Reilly is news for those who want others to think for them.
I wonder who has more viewers?
-
Originally posted by midnight Target
The point is... you don't know his sources.
Doesnt matter his sources. pointof the matter is he in his own words "read about" the show rather then saw for himself.
And anytime you read about something rather then witnissing it for yourself.
Reguardless the subject, you are at the mercy of the author and subject to the authors views and opinions rather then being able to form your own.
I've seen the OReilly show and seen him in interviews on other shows and I'd say that about 50% of what he says is indeed crap.
And I think the man is by and large an ass
I''ve also seen letterman on his show as well as in interviews on other shows and I'd say he also is full of crap about 50% of the time and is also by and large an ass.
But I am able to base my opinion on personal observations and not second hand through someone elses writings.
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
:aok And O'Reilly should stick to crap-stirring, but not on what is supposed to be an entertainment show.....
Agreed.
Unfortunaely Lettermans people probaly invited OReilly
and Letterman probably loved the idea thinking he would be able to easily slam Oreilly on National TV.
Downside is Letterman came off looking like an even bigger jerk then Oreilly. If thats possible
-
Looked to me like he was pissed off about O'Reilly disrespecting Sheehan (true or perceived), and let it get to him. He's probably kicking himself for acting like a retard.
-
Originally posted by Gunthr
Letterman chose to go for the cheap laughs and didn't even bother to try to be credible, knowing that it would be sufficient for the MT type of viewer. It was cheap, like some frat boy in school surrounded by a group of his friends putting someone down for the way they look. I was neutral on Letterman before, but now I know he is a lightweight.
Agreed.
I dont know why but
This reminds me of my Brother in law who called looking for my wife the other night and finding she wasnt home asked if my son had regestered for the draft yet.
Then he remembered he wouldnt be 18 till june.
so he says his son just turned 18 and had to register and reminded my that so would my son.
I was like. "yea I know"
His next line was classic idiot
"Yep thats our president for ya"
So I reminded him that its been that way for quite some time now and said
"I had to do it and so did you, or you were supposed to"
So he says "No I couldnt register I'm a convicted criminal"
I just couldnt resist.
"Well then I guess that there life of crime really paid off for you then huh"
::click::
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
"No I couldnt register I'm a convicted criminal"
I just couldnt resist.
"Well then I guess that there life of crime really paid off for you then huh"
::click::
:rofl :rofl :rofl
Now why I laughed at that I have no Idea.......but that was funny to me for some reason. I might add that Vermont Maple Coffee doesn't taste as good in the nose as Coca Cola does when you laugh at the wrong time.
-
Originally posted by rpm
Dave is comedy for the thinking man.
O' Reilly is news for those who want others to think for them.
yeah ok:rolleyes:
-
I wonder how much of the audience was induced by a "applause" light?
They did applaude for O'Reilley at the end
-
It's worth noting that nearly 2.7 million people -- about 200,000 above last year's average -- tuned in to watch "The O'Reilly Factor" the night after he went toe-to-toe with Letterman, according to Nielsen Media Research. O'Reilly's younger viewership was up 20 percent over his December numbers.
CNN
-
Originally posted by rpm
Dave is comedy for the thinking man.
O' Reilly is news for those who want others to think for them.
I wonder who has more viewers?
Riiiiight!
Just because you don't understand Dave's comedy doesn't mean it's for the thinking man.
:rofl
-
Agreed.
I dont know why but
This reminds me of my Brother in law who called looking for my wife the other night and finding she wasnt home asked if my son had regestered for the draft yet.
Then he remembered he wouldnt be 18 till june.
so he says his son just turned 18 and had to register and reminded my that so would my son.
I was like. "yea I know"
His next line was classic idiot
"Yep thats our president for ya"
So I reminded him that its been that way for quite some time now and said
"I had to do it and so did you, or you were supposed to"
So he says "No I couldnt register I'm a convicted criminal"
I just couldnt resist.
"Well then I guess that there life of crime really paid off for you then huh"
::click::
:D don't want to start a family argument, Drediock, but try asking him if he would agree that most criminals, Nambla members, welfare recipients, homosexuals, transexuals, incarcerated felons, drug addicts and socialists favor the democratic party, and if so, why?
-
Originally posted by Mighty1
Riiiiight!
Just because you don't understand Dave's comedy doesn't mean it's for the thinking man.
:rofl
No he's right. Daves comedy is for the thinking man.
That is. if the thinking man in question has an IQ of about 10;)
-
Originally posted by Gunthr
:D don't want to start a family argument, Drediock, but try asking him if he would agree that most criminals, Nambla members, welfare recipients, homosexuals, transexuals, incarcerated felons, drug addicts and socialists favor the democratic party, and if so, why?
LOL the man is a piece of..garbage (expletive omitted). Always has been.
I've more respect for a bum living in a cardboard box then I ever have for that man and he knows it.
He insists on talking his nonsensical garbage to me as though he has a valid point to make.
Problem is he never has the right facts to back him up.
Yet time after time at gathering after gathering and on the rare occasion I speak with him on the phone. He insists on making idiotic statements such as the one I just talked about.
And time after time I prove him not only wrong but stupidly wrong.
His only defense against this is to not let anyone finish their rebuttal and change the subject to something just as idiotic at which point the cycle starts all over again.
I know what part of his answer would be. And that is Yes. As to why? I dont know. I will make a point of asking him though.
With him LITERALLY everything wrong in the world is either Bush's fault or his parents fault. Regardless of what the facts are.
I dont mind starting a family argument with this clown.
This is one baby seal I take great pleasure in clubbing every opportunity he gives me. Which usually almost just about every time I see him:)
-
I iliked alot of the older stars of today at one time. But slowly they change and take their own opinions on things too seriously. They think of themselves as kings under glass.
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Doesnt matter his sources. pointof the matter is he in his own words "read about" the show rather then saw for himself.
And anytime you read about something rather then witnissing it for yourself.
Reguardless the subject, you are at the mercy of the author and subject to the authors views and opinions rather then being able to form your own.
I've seen the OReilly show and seen him in interviews on other shows and I'd say that about 50% of what he says is indeed crap.
And I think the man is by and large an ass
I''ve also seen letterman on his show as well as in interviews on other shows and I'd say he also is full of crap about 50% of the time and is also by and large an ass.
But I am able to base my opinion on personal observations and not second hand through someone elses writings.
Finally, a crap expert to settle this thing.
-
Sailed right on by 'em, Toad.
-
Sheehan supporter? Yeesh
Hello Leno.
-
Why punish yourself?
-
'cause it hurts so good.