Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: agent 009 on February 03, 2006, 10:52:24 PM

Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: agent 009 on February 03, 2006, 10:52:24 PM
My P-38 neighbor said merlin threw oil. even showed me recent photos from an air show where a current Stang threw oil all over the front. But have not heard this same problem with Spit & it had merlin as well. Plumbing problem for Stang?
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Saxman on February 04, 2006, 12:48:55 AM
Sure it wasn't just that particular aircraft?
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: agent 009 on February 04, 2006, 01:47:23 PM
Yes.
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Bodhi on February 04, 2006, 08:38:55 PM
I want to see the specifics.... ie time and date, and aircraft.

Picture would be nice.
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: TankBstr on February 04, 2006, 10:22:35 PM
I would venture to say that all piston aircraft engines leak oil to a certain extent, especially radials (in which you check the fuel and fill the oil).  I know that the Merlin is a V-12, not a radial, but there will always be some oil blowby past the piston rings out the exhaust.  It could possibly be that it's more evident on unpainted bare aluminum on Mustangs than on camoflagued Spitties.  Just two cents from an A&P.
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: agent 009 on February 04, 2006, 10:38:08 PM
There were big differences between the American Merlin & the British one. My neighbor flew 38 & p-40. said Stang & P-40 threw oil & motors blew up. Not heard this same prob for Spits.
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Masherbrum on February 05, 2006, 02:51:50 AM
Quote
Originally posted by agent 009
There were big differences between the American Merlin & the British one. My neighbor flew 38 & p-40. said Stang & P-40 threw oil & motors blew up. Not heard this same prob for Spits.


So yer talking about Packard (License built) Merlins and NOT the Rolls-Royce Merlins?   Or are you talking about Allisons (Stang as well and P-40)?

Karaya
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: RTO on February 05, 2006, 09:30:59 AM
went to Oshkosh Wisconsin for the EAA Airventure few years back.  IL-16 was present at that one,  checked her out before her flight and then went back after flight,  was amazed at the amount of oil puddled under her cowling on the ground post-flight.

has nothing to do with pony - spit merlin but had to share observation
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: agent 009 on February 05, 2006, 03:26:42 PM
Packard merlins yes.
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: agent 009 on February 05, 2006, 03:33:21 PM
Some big differences between Brit merlin & Packard one.

The Packard Motor Car Company undertook the latter and it was this version that was to power the legendary North American Mustang. However, unrecognized by many are the huge differences in the Packard built version. Packard manufactured some 57,000 Merlin engines, over a third of all Merlin production. From its earliest version the Merlin was clearly a precision, hand built work of engineering art constructed by some of the best British engineers. Even in its infancy the powerplant was built in small lots and had a string of design changes incorporated in an effort to squeeze performance and increase reliability in combat situations. The setback was this was not an engine designed for mass production, so in 1940, when the British Government turned to Packard for help with production of the Merlin some provisions had to be made.
In June 1940, Packard was requested to undertake the production of some 9000 Merlin XX engines. It took just three days for the company to respond positively but on that proviso that some modifications would be made to the powerplant to enable American accessories such as carburetors, fuel and vacuum pumps to be utilized. Packard then began the monumental task of organizing an engineering group to handle drawings and redesign for American production. In parallel Packard organized U.S. sources for carburetors, magnetos, spark plugs, and other accessories. Packard assigned some 200 personnel to the project and this included the draughtsmen who would undertake complete revisions of production drawings. At the outset the Packard engineers ran into problems, generally due to the fact that the engine was not designed for mass production. That the project was completed at all is testament to the determination and skill of those assigned the task.
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: agent 009 on February 05, 2006, 03:38:36 PM
February 29, 1944 - Mechanical problems plagued the new Mustangs again. The P-51's ugly side reared its head. Mills' prop began to throw oil and his wing tanks wouldn't feed, Biel's cooling system and radio went out, Rafalovich couldn't get enough manifold pressure and his radio also quit, France, Chatterley and Smith couldn't catch up to the Group. All six had to abort. After finishing the uneventful mission, a bunch of disgruntled pilots met in the briefing room to hear a 354th FG pilot talk about the P-51's mechanical problems.
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Bodhi on February 05, 2006, 10:10:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by agent 009
In June 1940, Packard was requested to undertake the production of some 9000 Merlin XX engines.


That is not the same as the V-1650-7 which powers the 51-D.

Learn to do better than cut and paste.
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Guppy35 on February 05, 2006, 11:19:06 PM
Gotta do a bit of digging :)

Lots of photos of early Spits with oil collector rings added to the nose to keep the oil from streaking back to the canopy.

This Spit, which does have a Griffon in it, sure seems to have been leaking something that looks like oil on occasion.

Visit any warbird hanger and you'll generally find a pan under the engine somewhere to collect oil and other stuff leaking from it.

(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/861_1139203025_dp845.jpg)
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Masherbrum on February 06, 2006, 12:57:21 AM
Flyable F6F Hellcat at the AirZoo in Kalamazoo.  notice the SQUARE OIL CATCH PAN ON THE FLOOR.  

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c62/Masherbrum/DSCF0048.jpg)

Karaya
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: agent 009 on February 06, 2006, 01:23:31 AM
See Rule #4
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Bodhi on February 06, 2006, 09:17:13 AM
See Rule #4
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Masherbrum on February 06, 2006, 09:36:13 AM
Quote
Originally posted by agent 009
See Rule #4


Bodhi's not an ass, he restores WWII aircraft for a LIVING.

Karaya
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Furball on February 06, 2006, 12:35:08 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: agent 009 on February 06, 2006, 03:26:44 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Charge on February 07, 2006, 05:00:46 AM
"Lots of photos of early Spits with oil collector rings added to the nose to keep the oil from streaking back to the canopy."

Never seen them on Spits but many Hurris had them.

What was leaking? The gearbox or the prop control?

-C+
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Furball on February 07, 2006, 07:06:11 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
See Rule #4


need a new rule: "banter between squaddies is not allowed" :D
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Skuzzy on February 07, 2006, 07:32:02 AM
No added rule needed.  Private banter between squad members have a place (i.e. private squad forums).
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Guppy35 on February 07, 2006, 09:42:08 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Charge
"Lots of photos of early Spits with oil collector rings added to the nose to keep the oil from streaking back to the canopy."

Never seen them on Spits but many Hurris had them.

What was leaking? The gearbox or the prop control?

-C+


"Oil slinging from the constant speed propeller" is how it's described.

Image of the installation
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/861_1139326832_spitring.jpg)
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: TimRas on February 07, 2006, 10:28:32 AM
Oil breather vent below and behind  the exhaust stack:

(http://www.littlefriends.co.uk/gallery/353g/sx-dbar.jpg)
Title: Merlin threw with Stang, but Spit?
Post by: Guppy35 on February 07, 2006, 10:43:06 AM
That one, reminded me of this one :)

Just a bit of oil leaking on that 51 just down from a flight with the 359th FG
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/861_1139330516_oilleak.jpg)