Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: MrCoffee on March 10, 2006, 10:15:38 AM
-
or are they going to strike with cruze missiles? I think they should use the stealth bomber and target the reactor with satellite lasers. That way the smart weapons wont miss.
-
I heard it was going to be sand sharks with frickin' laser beams on their heads.
-
why dont they just zap them with the big sattelite lasers? Or 100 sattelites zaping the same reactor at once.
-
Better yet....
Launch Ballistic Pigs!!! a few pounds of C4 up their arses and a timed detonator.... Now that would be "Shock and Awe!!!"
Flying exploding pink pork piggies over Tehran....
:aok
I should have been a General......
Mac
:D
-
I can hear it now weeng weeng weeng weeng BAM!!! Them sattelites be hitting the reactor with big laser beams. I just hope they hit the right building and not some Mcdonnalds in Oklahoma. Hopefully the intell is correct also and all the scientists and insurgents happen to be in the same building and they have the wmd nearby.
-
The CIA is reseraching technology that causes tsunamis and earthquakes volcanic eruptions and other natural disasters.
http://www.snopes.com/cia_natural_disasters.html
:aok
-
Your bait didnt work on me
-
Originally posted by Meatwad
Your bait didnt work on me
What bait?
-
(http://www.tomsimpson.org/wp-content/plugins/qSimpsons/images/burns.gif)
"Release the robotic Richard Simmons"
-
just get them to plan protests and religious festivals every day.
it seems they cannot organise a festival or protest or any other type of public gathering without people being stampeded, shot, stoned, burnt alive or .
before too long they will all be dead.
-
Send in Quigley with his Sharps!
-
Originally posted by xrtoronto
(http://www.tomsimpson.org/wp-content/plugins/qSimpsons/images/burns.gif)
"Release the robotic Richard Simmons"
OK that is some funny ****
-
I heard they were sending Voss in:eek:
-
Originally posted by SuperDud
I heard they were sending Voss in:eek:
May the farce be with him.
-
"sending troops to die in Iran"
Hmmmmm Interesting title.
Ok I'll bite on this troll.
Exactly when have we ever sent troops anywhere to die?
I'd be against an invasion of Iran.
But should we do so I certainly dont think we would be sending them in there to die.
I've seen brighter statements made here by lesser people then "Sending troops to die in Iran"
-
Originally posted by MrCoffee
or are they going to strike with cruze missiles? I think they should use the stealth bomber and target the reactor with satellite lasers. That way the smart weapons wont miss.
Try Sanka.
Karaya
-
European diplomats say if Iran does not respond to U.N. demands, council measures might start with foreign travel bans and asset freezes aimed at Iranian leaders and their families.
http://reuters.myway.com/article/20060310/2006-03-10T220751Z_01_L10753163_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-NUCLEAR-IRAN-DC.html
I want to encourage our European friends to support their respective gov'ts in these targeted sanctions when they are enforced. Its in our (global) best interest. THank you.
-
Originally posted by MrCoffee
or are they going to strike with cruze missiles? I think they should use the stealth bomber and target the reactor with satellite lasers. That way the smart weapons wont miss.
Thats a great plan... you need to destroy 4 targets in 4 different locations in Iran and each of the 4 targets at their current stage would cause a nuclear catastrophy in the area. 4 Chernobyls in a day.
-
Where did this snopes crap start?
I mean has anyone snoped snopes?
Who made them the know all supreme defenders of truth?:aok :rofl
-
Originally posted by Fishu
Thats a great plan... you need to destroy 4 targets in 4 different locations in Iran and each of the 4 targets at their current stage would cause a nuclear catastrophy in the area. 4 Chernobyls in a day.
your point being?
-
Originally posted by Fishu
Thats a great plan... you need to destroy 4 targets in 4 different locations in Iran and each of the 4 targets at their current stage would cause a nuclear catastrophy in the area. 4 Chernobyls in a day.
Never thought of it that way. Talk about deterrent value! All their little zany friends might think twice about building stuff like that in the future if they see all the little 3 eyed kids in Iran for the next few thousand years. Nothing like a little carbon-14 in yer corn flakes, eh?
-
Originally posted by VOR
Never thought of it that way. Talk about deterrent value! All their little zany friends might think twice about building stuff like that in the future if they see all the little 3 eyed kids in Iran for the next few thousand years. Nothing like a little carbon-14 in yer corn flakes, eh?
Either that or they will seek a way to turn the aggressor silent.
-
Originally posted by Fishu
Either that or they will seek a way to turn the aggressor silent.
We will silence them before they silence us? Hopefully....
-
Try turning someone silent with carbon-14 in yer cornflakes. It won't happen any more than the wishful thinkers wishing we'd get turned silent on some internet BBS will get turned silent. Pleasant thought, but not likely to happen any time soon.
-
Originally posted by Fishu
Either that or they will seek a way to turn the aggressor silent.
they will sugically remove the hot-air,bluster, and fish brains from our Finns?
no the animals!!!
-
Originally posted by Fishu
Either that or they will seek a way to turn the aggressor silent.
the enemy of Iran is the aggressor ... sure