Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Hawklore on May 17, 2006, 08:14:53 PM

Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hawklore on May 17, 2006, 08:14:53 PM
Ok, heres something thats got my brain spinning..

My dad seems to think that the P-3 Orion was one of the aircraft that were deemed, low slow and reliable.

Wasn't it the U-1 Oscar that were deemed that?

And what unit had the patch that has Low Slow and Reliable on it?
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Shaky on May 17, 2006, 08:27:52 PM
Check this link......


223rd Combat Support Aviation Battalion (http://www.1stavnbde.com/17cag/223rd_Combat_Aviation_Battalion.htm)

The 18th was the first fixed wing company in Viet Nam - arrived in Nha Trang, Vietnam March 1962 and was part of the 14th Battalion; it remained in country until 1971. A unique attribute of the Otter airplane was its ability to glide long distances very quietly.  It’s planes flew the entire length of the country. There were few aircraft that could do this as well as the U-1 single engine Otter and during the "secret" invasion of Cambodia they were on standby several times to fly night missions of this type.

Looks like they flew Dehavelland (sp) Otters and Beavers.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hawklore on May 17, 2006, 08:31:53 PM
Now, as far as I know.. These U1's didn't have door gunners, correct?

My dad seems to think that they do..

:rolleyes:
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Shaky on May 17, 2006, 08:35:28 PM
Not unless yuo leaned out the window with a Colt 1911 :lol
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hawklore on May 17, 2006, 08:42:40 PM
thought not..

So I guess this guy coverd up his vietnam return story pretty well..
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Shaky on May 17, 2006, 09:07:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Hawklore
thought not..

So I guess this guy coverd up his vietnam return story pretty well..


eh? Gotta fake vet?
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: MrBill on May 17, 2006, 10:00:16 PM
Sounds like someone has the the Bell Model 204 HU-1 Iroquois (huey) mixed up with the Otter U-1, light transport.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hangtime on May 17, 2006, 10:28:00 PM
bzzzzrt.

yer both wrong.

UH-1D's. although spelled that way in the paperwork, we called 'em 'huey' and without a door gun; they wuz called 'slicks'.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Shaky on May 17, 2006, 10:51:18 PM
Eh? Never mentioned helicopters, we wuz talking fixed wing..ya know, zoomie stuff.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hangtime on May 17, 2006, 10:56:24 PM
Oh.

Nevermind.

:aok
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: MrBill on May 17, 2006, 11:20:54 PM
Ummmm ... well ... the UH-1D was a model 205 (first action in 1964) but the nickname, huey, came from the model 204 HU-1, 1959 to 1962, and the nick stuck all the way through the model 205 UH-1H (which became the standard "dustoff") and had the largest production run of all the bell models.

But I would like to hear the story of how they became known as "slicks". ;) hehehe!
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Shaky on May 17, 2006, 11:34:01 PM
Slicks didn't have guns or launchers hanging off the side, so they were "slick".
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hangtime on May 18, 2006, 01:21:12 AM
Quote
Originally posted by MrBill
Ummmm ... well ... the UH-1D was a model 205 (first action in 1964) but the nickname, huey, came from the model 204 HU-1, 1959 to 1962, and the nick stuck all the way through the model 205 UH-1H (which became the standard "dustoff") and had the largest production run of all the bell models.

But I would like to hear the story of how they became known as "slicks". ;) hehehe!


The 'H' had a stretched fuseleage, 2 door mounted M-60's. And a bigger boneshaker. I never saw one till years after the war. All I saw was D's.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: texace on May 18, 2006, 05:37:37 AM
Yer older than I thought, Hang. :aok :D
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: SKBG Seadog on May 18, 2006, 07:29:52 AM
P-3 Orion was used by the Navy for ASW missions and a few Electronic Intel Ops. It is still used today.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hawklore on May 18, 2006, 09:20:24 AM
Ok heres the deal.

A draft dodger, my dad accidently told him out when the gov. came to the door, lol. He was little then, but he ain't smartend up yet, ;) .

Guy returns from vietnam,

Claims he was in Quarter Masters, supply etc. Gives my dad the low slow and reliable patch, reinforcing it..

40 odd years later, he finds out he might be dying, story comes out and he says he was a door gunner..

Can we look up his military record when he's still alive and him not find out?
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Curval on May 18, 2006, 09:44:25 AM
The P-3 Orions flew long after the Vietnam War, as sub hunters for the Navy.  There were a bunch stationed here when the base was open.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hawklore on May 18, 2006, 10:25:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Curval
The P-3 Orions flew long after the Vietnam War, as sub hunters for the Navy.  There were a bunch stationed here when the base was open.


The P-3 was just recently so I hear, de-comissioned/retired.

NAS Jax was a main airstation for repair of them..

I know about the damn P3, lol.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hangtime on May 18, 2006, 11:33:41 AM
hawk.. the hueys we were around were 'field modifed' with respect to armamament. We'd find all kindsa stuff hanging off 'em. Most common was a welded up pivot mount for an M-60 in the right door. None that i saw had 'door gunners'.. the hueys crew chief would bribe the welder for the fab mount and he glomed the gun and the ammo via bribes from the QM and armorer and he manned the gun. Sometimes we'd sell the AV guys base mounts and M-60's recovered from wrecked armor or swift boats.

we (service and evac) did a pretty brisk trade with the guys in the aviation companys since the normal supply chain didn't TO&E m-60's on most hueys.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: VOR on May 18, 2006, 11:46:00 AM
Hey Hangtime, looks like some things never change. I'll never understand the Army supply system or the way Army money works. All I understand is what I have on hand and what I need, which are usually exclusive of each other. Being told we have X dollars in the budget but we can't buy what you need because it is/isn't an MTOE item really gets under my skin.

If you need it, you need it. You shouldn't have to circumvent the supply system to actually get it.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: x0847Marine on May 18, 2006, 12:25:59 PM
Quote
Originally posted by VOR
Hey Hangtime, looks like some things never change. I'll never understand the Army supply system or the way Army money works. All I understand is what I have on hand and what I need, which are usually exclusive of each other. Being told we have X dollars in the budget but we can't buy what you need because it is/isn't an MTOE item really gets under my skin.

If you need it, you need it. You shouldn't have to circumvent the supply system to actually get it.


During my artellery meterology training at Ft. Sill, an Army base, we had our "Met" trucks to train with... but the Army said they had no $$ in the budget to put gas in them. Meanwhile dozens of vehicles buzzed all around us.

Our SSGT instructor had to cyphin gas from another truck so we could leave the parking lot.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: indy007 on May 18, 2006, 12:34:38 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Hangtime
hawk.. the hueys we were around were 'field modifed' with respect to armamament. We'd find all kindsa stuff hanging off 'em. Most common was a welded up pivot mount for an M-60 in the right door. None that i saw had 'door gunners'.. the hueys crew chief would bribe the welder for the fab mount and he glomed the gun and the ammo via bribes from the QM and armorer and he manned the gun. Sometimes we'd sell the AV guys base mounts and M-60's recovered from wrecked armor or swift boats.

we (service and evac) did a pretty brisk trade with the guys in the aviation companys since the normal supply chain didn't TO&E m-60's on most hueys.


Ever hear a story about a guy that mounted a pilfered AF rocket pod to his gunship? According to the story, they took a guess on a 3-position switch on the pod for the firing mode (no manual). Turns out they selected the "all at once" switch, sheared the pod off during the firing (with rockets going in so many directions incoming fire was reported 2 miles away), and got it wedged between the skid & body with 1 rocket still burning away in the big, paper pod. Lucked at with that 1 rocket motor burning out and not detonating.

Same guy, according to the stories, mounted a .50cal in the cargo bay. They used sandbags, which promptly shredded and filled the helo with a sandstorm. Managed to get it back on the ground safely, switched the sandbags for mattresses, and all of a sudden had an evil new toy to chase Charlie with.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: nirvana on May 18, 2006, 12:53:28 PM
Anymore stories?  These are interesting, continue please.
Title: Vietnam Question....
Post by: Hangtime on May 18, 2006, 01:01:08 PM
well.. i did help wire up some duce 'n 1/2's with claymores. Anti-ambush rig. Dunno if they ever used it. wouldn't wanna be within a 1/2 mile of the thing. ;)