Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: xrtoronto on July 22, 2006, 05:48:34 PM
-
Does anyone have any thoughts about who will be the first to use nuclear weapons this century? The countries that have'm are:
(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/1959/nukescv2.gif)
Will it be a country OR will it be an organiziation? Delivery by land, sea or air?
Where or what is the target?
-
Something missing from the list eh?
-
Im guessing either russia or usa. Not by intent but one of those accidents that cant happen because "its so safe". There are no systems so safe that accidents cant happen.
Just a matter of time
-
Pakistan or India
-
I'll take Israel for $100. Alex.
Oops, it's not on the list. And all the previous Soviet devices are lumped together without consideration for religious and political differences by the current independent states?
The only thing predictable is that the time and energy of this thread will be lost forever. ;)
-
I'll take a peaceful Islamic group with access to an old Soviet bloc nuke that they smuggle into the US for $200 Alex.
-
Pakistan.
-
Whoever it is, the guy pushing the button will have to remove his turban first...
My $.02
-
Originally posted by Toad
I'll take a peaceful Islamic group with access to an old Soviet bloc nuke that they smuggle into the US for $200 Alex.
Soviet block nukes are all in Russian Federation now, guarded above any imagination.
I'll be really unhappy if it will be Russia to use it first, but our military doctrine supposes using nuclear weapons first against an aggressor who threatens Russia or it's allies. "Allies" here means (as I think) united countries like Belorussia, as well as Ukraine and Kazakhstan.
-
Iceland.
-
Originally posted by mora
Something missing from the list eh?
Israel?
I thought Israel had nukes. (that graph I posted is from wikipedia)
-
Didnt we (The U.S.) accidently leave some weapons grade plutonium on a ship out in the Medd. awhile back so that Israel could accidently find it?
-
Russian Officials Deny Claims Of Missing Nuclear Weapons (http://www.armscontrol.org/act/1997_09/lebedsept.asp)
THE CONTINUING debate over Russia's command and control of its nuclear arsenal intensified on September 7 when retired General Alexander Lebed, former secretary of the Russian Security Council, told the CBS news program "60 Minutes" that he believes more than 100 "suitcase sized" nuclear weapons are unaccounted for. Lebed's charge elicited an immediate response from several senior Russian government officials, including Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, who denied the existence of these weapons
-
Originally posted by Toad
Russian Officials Deny Claims Of Missing Nuclear Weapons (http://www.armscontrol.org/act/1997_09/lebedsept.asp)
Wow...written and reported 10 years ago.
-
I'll take Isreal #1, India #2, and non-listed terrorists using an "aftermarket" #3 personally
-
Bozo the Clown.
Never did like him, he had shifty eyes!
Mac
-
Muslims
Israel
Russia-China
U.S.
or scenario 2
India-Pakistan no big loss. global warming:rofl is averted 2 developing:rofl nations are wiped out
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
Im guessing either russia or usa. Not by intent but one of those accidents that cant happen because "its so safe". There are no systems so safe that accidents cant happen.
Just a matter of time
I used to deal with tactical nuclear weapons. American nukes are very safe. There is a set sequence of events that HAVE to happen in the correct order for a nuclear detonation to take place. I can't say anything more about that sequence of events. Chances of an American nuke *accidentally* going off is nil imo.
I cant speak for the nukes that were built by other countries though.
-
Originally posted by xrtoronto
Israel?
I thought Israel had nukes. (that graph I posted is from wikipedia)
It's rumored and suspected that Israel has nukes. I dont think that has been confirmed though. Could be wrong, but I dont think Israel has ever admitted to having nukes either.
-
Originally posted by Elfie
I used to deal with tactical nuclear weapons. American nukes are very safe. There is a set sequence of events that HAVE to happen in the correct order for a nuclear detonation to take place. I can't say anything more about that sequence of events. Chances of an American nuke *accidentally* going off is nil imo.
I cant speak for the nukes that were built by other countries though.
Hmm...
I know they are very safe, but sooner or later something will fail. It always does and I dont think nukes are any different. There are alot of warheads too.
If something can fail, it eventually will.
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
Hmm...
I know they are very safe, but sooner or later something will fail. It always does and I dont think nukes are any different. There are alot of warheads too.
If something can fail, it eventually will.
Tell me how to turn on my PM's Nilsen.
*edit* I figured it out, check your PM's. :)
-
Who's gonna use NUKES first?
I hope no one.
another interesting question:
Who would counterstrike a Nuke attack with Nukes?
-
Originally posted by Gh0stFT
snip
Who would counterstrike a Nuke attack with Nukes?
One of the few things about GW Bush I'm happy about at this point is my faith he'd not hesitate an instant to overwhelmingly obliterate the source of a nuclear attack on the US.
culero
-
Originally posted by Elfie
Chances of an American nuke *accidentally* going off is nil imo.
Apparently, your clearance wasn't as high as mine, I have no such faith:
(http://www.dur.ac.uk/assassins.society/images/WOPR.jpg)
-
Here is an very interesting movie TRINITY AND BEYOND (http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5448816068117684403&q=trinity+and+beyond)
declassified not long time ago about history of nuclear wepons
-
Originally posted by Elfie
It's rumored and suspected that Israel has nukes. I dont think that has been confirmed though. Could be wrong, but I dont think Israel has ever admitted to having nukes either.
They never admitted to haveing nukes, but them Clinton never admited to inhaleing too.
My vote goes to a few, (1) some terrorist group if they ever get one (2) Isreal, if they feel like another holocost is happening (3) N Korea, if they ever get a missle that'll make it to the US (4) the US, fireing back at N Korea, or anybody else that pops one off (5) Iran, trying to "wipe Isreal off the face of the earth"
-
Israel against Syria/Damascus.
Damascus is the oldest city ever mentioned in the books, and was continualy inhabited, the prophecies against Damascus were not yet fulfilled
Isaiah 17:--- "Damascus will cease to be a city, and will become a heap of ruins."
Jeremiah 49--"Therefore her (Damascus') young men shall fall in her streets, and all her soldiers shall be silenced in that day, .."
-
Mmmhmm. sho is sum good times. sho is. If N Korea ever gets that stupid rocket working...theyll hit us. we will completely turn everything north of the 38th into a giant glowing glass parking lot. china will get pissed. probly try and hit us. hopefullt hey wont, it would suck to be the guy to order the deaths of a 10th of the global population. If any arab coalition with more than 2 countries tries to wip israel out...i dont think that they would hesitate to stragetically glass every major city/military facility in the region...:confused:
-
Originally posted by BlueJ1
Iceland.
Hehe, yeah. We're gonna nook Newfoundland unless we get it back from the USA :D
-
Why would Iceland want it back? You like the name "Newfie"?? :D
-
The US will use nukes first.
-
Originally posted by Elfie
It's rumored and suspected that Israel has nukes. I dont think that has been confirmed though. Could be wrong, but I dont think Israel has ever admitted to having nukes either.
They have the third biggest stockpile.
-
I think those numbers may be a little low: http://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/nudb/datab11.asp
Will find other sources.
-
The first group of Allah-Akbaring monkeys to get their hands on a device.
Yield: doesn't matter.
Target: Wherever there isn't a preponderance of Allah-Akbaring monkeys.
Date: The day after they get the device.
-
Originally posted by DiabloTX
Why would Iceland want it back? You like the name "Newfie"?? :D
Sorry, it's a terrible mistake. We should nook Denmark and force them to give Greenland back. They just found a lot of oil there you see.
Would you call us "greenhorns" then :D ??