Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: Krusty on July 24, 2006, 05:47:31 PM
-
Question to HTC, for an official answer (others feel free to chime in, this is a public forum).
How hard is it to take an existing plane, without changing the plane itself, and adding an ordnance option? As in, adding a bomb load to a plane that doesn't have one. If the visual library was already there (in this case, the bomb), you could hold off on building the bomb rack and so forth until that aircraft is upgraded to modern AH2 standards, right?
I wonder if it's a matter of cut-and-paste, change the drag, change the weight, the position it appears, and all that.
-
I agree. this would be a great addition.
now when do i get my free 2 week trial?
GRR
-
What would the purpose of that be? Im curious...
-
Purpose of what? He's asking how hard it is for HTC to design and program an ord option for an already existing plane.
-
Oh, i thought he was asking him to modify some already existing plane... lost of long, confusing words in there...
-
Your question can not be answered with out knowing the specific plane and bomb.
HiTecjh
-
I was more thinking of a plane without bombs being given bombs, if it didn't have them already, or if a plane without DTs was given DTs, etc. I was thinking up situations where you'd add an ord option to a plane that doesn't have it.
-
Okay, another stupid question as to the above. Is there not a reason planes without droptanks and bombs, dont have have them?
-
Sometimes yes, sometimes a decision was made (as on the 109E4) to leave certain options off.
One specific I was thinking of was adding small (100KG I think?) bombs and DTs to C202/C205. Another I was thinking about was P38s with all the field-rigged mods hanging underneath them.
I'm not asking for anything in this post, I'm more asking if it's a simple thing or if there's more at work behind the scenes than we realize.
-
Okay, well if you end up doing that, give me my Emil options first please! :D