Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: JB88 on August 21, 2006, 12:13:15 PM
-
5,000 perk points.
pretty please.
-
See your signature for my reply.
no comment.
-
okay, okay. 10,000 perkies.
but you get to reset the map if you make it to the target and drop.
-
NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!NO!
-
why no?
they were in the war. they were a MAJOR additon to the war.
10,000 is alooooooooot of perks to get up to so it would take a very long time.
pleeaaaaaaaaaaase.....
-
make it one million perks and a cashiers check to HTC in the amount of 10,000 dollars and a special arena where only the single fool who paid 10k can log in (sparing the rest of us this foolishness).
This seems like a reasonable suggestion to me.
Now remember this, the B29 was a conventional bomber on literally thousands of combat sorties with only two of those sorties involving the use of atomic weapons.
Bring the B29 to AcesHigh :D
-
I dont want a nook, I want a formula 1 racing car that can travel 200mph offroad. That way I can drive onto an enemy field and ram the planes taking off
-
YES Nukes :aok :p
-
YES nuke that can kill all three countries !
err we already have one called Skuzzy :)
-
Perk Skuzzy!
-
NUKE BAD. Even at 10,000 perks it would be point less basicly you would fly in and drop the nuke ok well then right after it blew you would have reset. The frame rate would be like 0.01 per second and it wouldnt be any fun. There is a reason that we like to fly without heat seeking rockets and guided bombs, its because there is a shilveryness in flying in with your squad and friends and mking the other guys work to keep the base as well as you having to work to take it. If people would work as a team more and run more missions it would be the same as any nuke and it would be a lot more fun. IMO.:aok
Anyone agree with me?
-
Besides I like gunning people down rather then shooting them out of the air from 10 miles away with a rocket:p
-
Originally posted by red26
NUKE BAD. Even at 10,000 perks it would be point less basicly you would fly in and drop the nuke ok well then right after it blew you would have reset. The frame rate would be like 0.01 per second and it wouldnt be any fun. There is a reason that we like to fly without heat seeking rockets and guided bombs, its because there is a shilveryness in flying in with your squad and friends and mking the other guys work to keep the base as well as you having to work to take it. If people would work as a team more and run more missions it would be the same as any nuke and it would be a lot more fun. IMO.:aok
Anyone agree with me?
do you think truman would have agreed?
it's a very real part of the event and it has everything to do with flying during the war.
-
Originally posted by red26
Anyone agree with me?
TOTALLY AGREE!
Originally posted by JB88
do you think truman would have agreed?
it's a very real part of the event and it has everything to do with flying during the war.
Geez you suck man! Seriouslly, I mean, the nuke was only used twice. Not even enough times to be recognized here! Think about the V-1 and V-2 Rockets. They were used HUNDREDS of times, and yet we hear no conversation about them here? I say NO!
And stop talking about it, your just making HTC more aggressive towards you!
-
um. what?
did you just say..."And stop talking about it, your just making HTC more aggressive towards you!"
:huh
may i ask just what exactly might that entail as you seem to feel yourself entitled to speak as thier proxy?
you might want lighten up on the gas fumes there flyboy.
:cool:
besides. i would love to see V-1 and V-2 rockets... they were often shot down by fighter planes if i recall correctly.
perhaps we should have a conversation about it.
(sheesh...talk about a strange room)
-
Before you can get a nuke, we need the B-29. Need the right plane to carry it.
Besides, why would you want a Nuke. Kill the HQ, Kill one city, one base, one airfield. In this game a Nuke would be fun, but it would also be silly, so lets keep the Nukes out of this game.
-
well, actually it would best be alloted as a base destroyer.
it would be extremely expensive and would take a very very long time to accumulate enough perks to use it.
it would be used best just like it was. to gain a major strategic tactical advantage.
it would vaporize everything within radius.
all humor aside, its just not that unreasonable for a game that prides itself on historical accuracy, has events based upon real battles and whose fanbase may always be interested in possibility.
could be fun if you look at it from another angle.
no less so than a ride in a 262 come crunch time.
and yes. you would need the 29. maybe that is what you would get out of the hanger and one of its load outs could be the fat man or little boy.
-
Originally posted by JB88
besides. i would love to see V-1 and V-2 rockets... they were often shot down by fighter planes if i recall correctly.
V1 was no rocket
V2 was a rocket, and thus never shot down by a fighter (not that easy to intercept a 3400mph ballistic missile)
EDIT:
an accuracy was so bad that you would not hit anything in this game. Both weapons even had a hard time hitting london...
-
well, i thought that i had heard something...not what i had remembered but they were intercepted none the less.
v1 yes. v2 no. call it a draw. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Spitfire_Tipping_V-1_Flying_Bomb.jpg)
-
Originally posted by JB88
well, i thought that i had heard something...not what i had remembered but they were intercepted none the less.
v1 yes. v2 no. call it a draw. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Spitfire_Tipping_V-1_Flying_Bomb.jpg)
I never said that V1 was not intercepted
-
that is true.
you win.
: )
but i still want nukes.
-
Originally posted by JB88
its just not that unreasonable for a game that prides itself on historical accuracy
Whoever said this game was based on historical accuracy? It has historical models, its not based on historical accuracy. Otherwise they wouldn't have allowed us H2H porkies to use the Terrain Editor!
-
is it just me or does this room need a little air.
(opening window...air comes pouring in)
phew!
aha! who's pile of dirty socks are lying over there next to the skuzzy in a speedo poster.
that's just twisted man.
anywho...yes, in regards to planes, there is a strict code of historical accuracy, down to not allowing non authentic schemes or planes which were not used in combat during the war.
that was my meaning anyhow.
so rather than sitting here and cherry picking every little thing that i say, how bout we play nice and stay on topic.
please and thank you.
nukes. just a suggestion. we can make it through this conversation. i just know it.
peace and love fellas.
88
-
I believe this conversation should be terminated!
(http://www.bbc.co.uk/hindi/images/pics/arnold_terminatior3_300.jpg)
-
Ending a request for a nuclear weapon with "peace and love" :huh
That's some of that there irony, ain't it?
No Nooks!
-
Just Say No ......................
to Nuclear proliferation, not to mention no radiation affects, no blinding flash that would blind any pilot in the vicinity, no lingering dust cloud..............Somone try to model a bomb with a 2 mile blast radius and more than just my PC are gonna crap out...
OH yeah, bring the B-29 into the fold,,and perk the absolute snot out of it.:aok
-
you are wayyyyyyy to close to me mr. stephen of panama city.
tick tick tick....
-
(http://static.flickr.com/56/115390603_022122c396.jpg)
-
if not a nuke how about a FAE or a MOAB? I mean come on.. let one plane decimate a base ;)
-
(http://www.augustradio.com/norris.jpg)
-
okay now 88 that made me spit beer out my nose and that's just wrong :lol
-
shshshshsh. that's not supposed to happen in this forum.
wishes are serious and serious people do not go blowing beer out of thier noses. i don't want to get in trouble so you just behave yourself mister.
geesh.
;)
---
thank you hitech and skuzzy for allowing me the experience of nuking chuck norris (which was awesome...and was something that really just had to be done.)
----
-
Give me a nuke, PLEASE give me a nuke, and a reason.
-
I'd have to consider playing flight sims again if AH adds nukes.
-
Yeah, theres something especially intresting that just came out. Flight sim X. I heard it's got a multiplayer feature built in better than Aces High. I guess HTC would have to lose my business if the nuke is added!
-
i am sure the Hitech will be happy to note that you are not only threatening others with his "aggression" but that you are equally happy to announce publicly that you will jump ship if he does'nt follow your bidding.
bright boy.
maybe hitech would be better off without you then.
-----
i have to admit that i am pretty shocked by the response that this idea has recieved.
it's not like i am talking about some massive change to the gameplay that it would remove dogfights and groundwars and everything would suddenly go nuclear.
and i was kidding about the map reset...i should have been clear on that from the git go. most who know me elsewhere have aquired a better understanding of my approach.
i was merely suggesting that the nuclear bomb, which was dropped from a bomber, be added but at such a massive price that it would take an individual player an extremely long time to aquire one. just like in real life.
they would cost so much that they would be rare.
but that they would be available.
that said, there are some who would try to aquire one. (just like real life)
and it would probably be an incentive for some to play more. i have talked to some who would like to see it done in a manner that is reasonable.
i can also imagine a degree of interest from former players who would come back for a new feature.
and write ups in magazines about a game with nukes.
and conversations about why some think that it is acceptable to kill fake people in planes with conventional fake weapons but not fake nuclear weapons.
IMHO it's a war game not a flight sim.
there are sides and they fight to win.
call it what you want, but it happened and it is a part of the era and the arena that we are playing in historically and i think it's a fine idea.
all 88
-
I have to post in every B29/nook thread so... here I am!
-
Maybe, HTC can develope the Nuke, and ONCE A YEAR hve a single scenario receating that mission? the two bomber pilots who have proved themselves best fly the Enola Gay, and that other one, and I think there were other conventional bombers there as well (I dont know jack ***** about that mission, im more a fan of the conventional war), and whoever is on the japanese side tries to intercept the nukes? This way, it wouldnt be ridiculous in the MA, but all the little kiddies who want nukes can get them and shut up!
-
And a Nuke as an incentive would get LOTS of people joining bomber squads!
-
[\ but all the little kiddies who want nukes can get them and shut up! [/B][/QUOTE]
:huh
you type to your momma with that mouth?
:cool:
a scenario might be interesting. most certainly. it would be quite an event wouldnt it?
it could only be on only one map too.
the gameplay here is awesome, bit still lacks some diversity of schema.
i think that some of that some of this could be overcome with maps that
had variety of weather or climate changes, or objectives.
a nuch smaller map that has a night function or a winter function. so that it doesnt last long but goes a long way over the larger maps.
i think that i have just come to appreciate what these guys must be going through to get this thing to make us all happy so they can make a buck and do what they can to provide for others.
just wishes.
not demands.
-
Originally posted by JB88
[\ but all the little kiddies who want nukes can get them and shut up! :huh
you type to your momma with that mouth?
:cool:
Not you. But all the other kids whose 1st post ever on the BBs is asking for nuke. Look at most of the people who ask for nukes. You are the first ive seen who have more 15 posts before begging for nukes.
-
what you call begging i call lobbying for wishes.
: )
has anyone ever seen a period game with nukes?
shall we play a game joshua? _
a reinactment. i like that idea alot.
i am more for enhancing the graphical environment.
but i have stated that many times before.
still love the game. it's great to fly.
-
I've seen a game with a nuke, and it really killed the frame rate! And by the way, if we get a nuke, santa claus won't be coming to Aces High anymore!
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/77_1104012675_santa7.jpg)
SHAME ON YOU!:lol
-
Um, they better move, that 38 is lookin real anxious to land!
-
nice nuke video here
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3105197211596464745&q=explosion&hl=en (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3105197211596464745&q=explosion&hl=en)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-585716941089093304&q=explosion&hl=en (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-585716941089093304&q=explosion&hl=en)
-
#2 proves the frame rate theory.
-
how so?
just curious.
:confused:
-
(http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g284/Michael75229/nook.gif)
-
The Grand and Glorious Hitech, has pronounced that there will be no NUKES!!
The largest bomb will be the 4000Lb, "Cookie".
So Sayeth Hitech, so say we all.
-
ahhh i love that pic
btw in the second nuke video it looks like a ship is standing straight up in the cloud
-
Originally posted by Bogie603rd
I guess HTC would have to lose my business if the nuke is added!
Err... not to be picky or such... arent you a H2H player only? Or have you subscribed now?
-
Originally posted by JB88
(http://www.augustradio.com/norris.jpg)
OMFG!!!!!!!!! you blew up my cousin!!!!!!!!!!!!
(finally someone figured out how to kill him)
roflmao
-
They didn' kill him, they just peed him off:eek: That and now he is radioactive. Nice going guys:mad:
-
I was there at the 2006 convention when HiTech said no nukes. And he also said that the B-29 I might be here but it would be a wile before it gets here and that the CT was the biggest thing going right now.:aok :noid
SIZE=3]NO NUKES!!![/SIZE]
-
Originally posted by red26
SIZE=3]NO NUKES!!![/SIZE]
Here:
NO NUKES!!!
-
And for those of you who all say "Nukes werent THAT important, we had the war won long before..." Well, does anyone know what happened they day they had planned the Japan invasion? Image if that had happened in the heat of battle...
-
Thank you there Reynolds
I dont know why this computer dose that on the sizeing of the font but it dose. WORK (COMPUTER GO FIG.)
:aok :rofl
-
Originally posted by Reynolds
And for those of you who all say "Nukes werent THAT important, we had the war won long before..." Well, does anyone know what happened they day they had planned the Japan invasion? Image if that had happened in the heat of battle...
?
what happened on the day that they were planning the invasion?
-
Originally posted by JB88
?
what happened on the day that they were planning the invasion?
HUGE storm. Sunk 3-4 ships. killed hundreds. Destroyed aircraft... Katrina in the pacific, in the middle of our occupation fleet. It hit the very beacj we were going to land on on the very day we were going to invade. I beleive the Japanese have a legend about it. How the gods would never let an enemy set foot on japan. They had a name for that kind of storm, called, I beleive, the Kaze. It killed enough Americans as is. If it had happened in the heat of battle...
-
I would throw this at any HELL HAWK/LCA HORDE that would try to up...BRING DEH N00k
in quah!
(http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d8/viper215/nuke.jpg)
-
:huh
-
Sorry got cought up in the moment;)
Hell Hawks: ex bops.