Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: skysnipr on September 14, 2006, 11:18:50 AM
-
These are the same planes, right? Except for the tailhook that the Seafire carries and the bomb it can take, they are the same. I think HTC messed up the ENY values in the mid-war arena because the Spit IX has a value of 10 and the Seafire has a value of 15.:huh Oh well, as long as I feel like flying a Spit 9, I think I'll just take the Seafire. The better to get points in, lol.
-
Originally posted by skysnipr
These are the same planes, right?
No.
Spit V and Seafire are.
-
Seafire is a SpitV with more canon rounds.
-
I've always felt that the Seafire was a bit more sluggy at low speed. Dunno if that's due to additional rounds or weight from the folding wing deal. or both.
-
Originally posted by scottydawg
I've always felt that the Seafire was a bit more sluggy at low speed. Dunno if that's due to additional rounds or weight from the folding wing deal. or both.
Both additional ammo and hook add weight to the Seafire. Apart from that its basically a Mk5 (not the downgraded engine power one though, the "old" Spit5 AFAIK)
-
Huh, I always thought that the Seafire and the Spit 9 were the same. It might of had something to do with the fact that in the old MA, the Spit 9 and the Seafire had the same ENY value of 15. I guess that all goes to show how much I know about Spitfires. I still like the Seafire though, regardless of the model of Spitfire it was designed from. While I'm thinking about it, is there a difference between the Spit 9 and the Spit 5, except for the difference with ammo?
-
The Spit V used a 2 speed, single stage supercharger Merlin 40 and 50 series while the Spit IX used a 2 speed, 2 stage supercharger Merlin 60 and 70 series.
Schatzi, how much additional ammo?
-
Best place to look up performance differences in AH2:
http://gonzoville.com/ahcharts/index.php
-
Originally posted by MiloMorai
Schatzi, how much additional ammo?
Double.
With the remodel, the Spit5 got changed to the early war version (weaker engine, dont ask me which one though) and 60 rpg instead of 120 rpg. Seafire still has 120 rpg.
-
Originally posted by Schatzi
Both additional ammo and hook add weight to the Seafire. Apart from that its basically a Mk5 (not the downgraded engine power one though, the "old" Spit5 AFAIK)
No it has the same Merlin as the Vb we have.
Only difference is extra weight, double cannon rounds and tailhook.
I have been asking for some time now for the Seafire to have the more common low alt Merlin 32 instead of the 45/46. AKA Seafire L IIc.
More than twice as many Seafires had the Merlin 32 than the 46, and all early Seafire IIc's with the 46 were refitted with the Merlin 32.
-
now the need would be early RAF CV planes for early war arena, but that arena needs so much planes and veh's.......
anyone knows how much does that foldable wing stuff weights ?
-
Originally posted by MiloMorai
The Spit V used a 2 speed, single stage supercharger Merlin 40 and 50 series while the Spit IX used a 2 speed, 2 stage supercharger Merlin 60 and 70 series.
I don't have Morgan/Shacklady's bible in hand but most Spitfire Vs had a single speed, single stage Merlins. Only some experimental Spitfires got 2 speed, single stage Merlin's (Spitfire IIIs and possibly some others).
gripen
-
Spitfire V used the Merlin 45 and 46.
Merlin 46 had a slightly larger blower (10.25 inch).
Both were single stage.
The Merlin 60 series was a two stage design, on the IX.
-
Well, the point was that the 2 two speed single stage Merlin was not commonly used in the Spitfire (like the Merlin XX in the Hurricane).
Basicly:
Single stage = one blower
Two stage = two blowers in series
Single speed = supercharger run single speed (or constant ratio)
Two speed = supercharger can run two different speed
=>
Merlin III, 45, 50 etc. = single stage, single speed
Merlin XX, 25, 28, V-1650-1 etc. = single stage, two speed
Merlin 60, 100, V-1650-3 etc. = two stage, two speed
In addition there were at least experimental Merlins with three speed system as well as variable speed system.
gripen
-
Would be logical to give the Seafire more performance on the deck, after all it's an aircraft carrier aircraft that needs performance down low.
BTW, Spit V's with full load would take off carriers, - and those were not as big as the US carriers.
Full load means full gas fuel and a slipper tank for 600 miles + of range.
-
Originally posted by Angus
Would be logical to give the Seafire more performance on the deck, after all it's an aircraft carrier aircraft that needs performance down low.
BTW, Spit V's with full load would take off carriers, - and those were not as big as the US carriers.
Full load means full gas fuel and a slipper tank for 600 miles + of range.
Yup the V's that flew into Malta off the CV's used the 90gal tank.
Not strictly slipper as they couldn't be 'dropped', they were bolted on, more often known as ferry tanks. (or I might be thinking of the larger one).
The VC's that flew non stop Gibralter to Malta had an internal 29gal tank plus an external 170gal tank giving a range of over 1100 miles.
BUT they were stripped down to two MG's.
-
Originally posted by Kev367th
Yup the V's that flew into Malta off the CV's used the 90gal tank.
Not strictly slipper as they couldn't be 'dropped', they were bolted on, more often known as ferry tanks. (or I might be thinking of the larger one).
The VC's that flew non stop Gibralter to Malta had an internal 29gal tank plus an external 170gal tank giving a range of over 1100 miles.
BUT they were stripped down to two MG's.
90 gallon tank was droppable and used for Spits flying bomber escort etc. One of the Malta Spits launched off Wasp had the tank fall off. The pilot made a landing on Wasp without a tail hook. USN gave him a set of Navy wings for that effort :)
One of the Wasp Spitfire Vc Trops with 4 cannon and 90 gallon DT
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/169_1105579654_waspspitvc.jpg)
A 91 Squadron Spitfire IX with a 90 gallon DT when they were escorting Lancs and Halifaxes in daylight raids, August 1944
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/169_1091644365_91spitix.jpg)
-
Guppy, as always :aok
And Kev:
Our Icelander Tony Jonsson flew Gibraltar-Malta-Algiers in November 1942.
It was 111 sqn and the aircraft were Spitfire Vb trop (vokes filter).
They were assembled out of the crates at Gibraltar.
The flight involved an escort of VIP's on one leg, which wasted a lot of fuel.
At least one of them made an emergency landing on the African coast, - Mac Gilmour was the name, a Scotsman I think.
My data on this is only the autobiographies of Tony Jonsson and the SQN leader, Anthony Bartley.
Was wondering if you guys have more data on that particular flight, and about the action in the med in november 1942.
I am short of books there.
-
Originally posted by Kev367th
No it has the same Merlin as the Vb we have.
Only difference is extra weight, double cannon rounds and tailhook.
I have been asking for some time now for the Seafire to have the more common low alt Merlin 32 instead of the 45/46. AKA Seafire L IIc.
More than twice as many Seafires had the Merlin 32 than the 46, and all early Seafire IIc's with the 46 were refitted with the Merlin 32.
Thanks for clearing me up Kev!
-
Originally posted by Schatzi
Thanks for clearing me up Kev!
Lol no probs.
If it wasn't for the double cannon load and folding wing, it would almost be an exact fit to the RAF Vb's that were converted to the very first Seafires.
RE: IXc - Despite what happens in other arenas (IIc subbing for the LIII), the IX is actually closer to Seafire L III (at it's best alt), around 5-10mph in it.
Whereas the IIc needs to get to 20k+ to get close to the LIII's low level performance. L III had same motor as our old Vc, Merlin 55M.