Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: tatertot on October 10, 2006, 11:43:26 AM

Title: low buff engagement
Post by: tatertot on October 10, 2006, 11:43:26 AM
id like to try a little theory,but need some volunteers.
 as you all know 999000 and myself fly low basicaly to gun but bomb also

here is something id like to try and its going to take help from all sides
id like to get a group of people together lets say 10 sets of buffs maybe(with gunners if possible)then i would like to announce it on 200,say were we are headed and have as many that would like to attack to do it.i wanna do this for numerous reasons 1)cause it would be cool2)to see how many would make it 3)to proove a point! if any one would like to try it respond here and we could set it up this weekend,we currantly are knights but can switch at any time  

if its a bad idea and sorry for the terrible read .
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: FiLtH on October 10, 2006, 12:03:23 PM
Im in!

   PS..when we do little events in the AvA, thats pretty much what we do. Both sides know whats going on, and the emphasis is on the battle, nothing else.

 An example would be a bomb run. We dont try to sneak in, we let everyone know what the target is and keep the sides even. We have a lot of good players in here that make it work.

  Let me know when!
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: BugsBunny on October 10, 2006, 01:08:45 PM
3)  Whats the point you want to prove?
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: B@tfinkV on October 10, 2006, 01:11:48 PM
i think they just want to have fun bugs.....aint that allowed?
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: BugsBunny on October 10, 2006, 01:17:28 PM
Quote
Originally posted by B@tfinkV
i think they just want to have fun bugs.....aint that allowed?


Read again.  #3 said he wants to prove a point, so I figured I'd ask.  Is that allowed?  Please let me know because I would not want to upset you with my posts in the future :lol
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: FiLtH on October 10, 2006, 01:29:14 PM
My guess would be that a close formation of buffs that are well gunned, can penetrate thru to target at low altitude providing the sides arent too out of whack.
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Dichotomy on October 10, 2006, 01:41:37 PM
sounds interesting... do let me know if you get it set up.  If no conflict with BOB I'm in... as an enemy :D
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Kermit de frog on October 10, 2006, 01:43:43 PM
During virtual combat, they will not keep their formations.  Even if all the bombers have gunners, the pilots will tend to want to gun as well and therefore, not stay in their spot of the formation.

The bombers will not survive.  I've done it with my squaddies, and we kick arse as long as they come attack us in 1 or 2 planes at a time.  Anymore than 3 and it gets difficult.  Stay high and that will give you a better chance of defending yourself.
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: llama on October 10, 2006, 02:02:13 PM
And with that many bombers in one small space, launching air to air rockets should be a snap too...

-Llama
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: tatertot on October 10, 2006, 02:13:17 PM
Bugs,Filth is right on the point although,there is a fine point to it but that will be a post after the affect,


im not sure when all the bob and ava are i am usualy on late after wife ack and kids are in bed any preference on times im in the eastern time zone


Kermit,you are probaly correct  but i think some may survive if it is well planned.just my opinion but i have been working on some things with angle attacks and such that will be of value i think might be the only thing i can give to the community on my end but it might make people enjoy gunning buffs and or attacking them a little more



will work on date times etc.
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Dichotomy on October 10, 2006, 02:22:32 PM
BOB is usually over after 5 central standard time.  I'd recommend for maximum participation sometime Saturday night because it conflicts with no events and most of the interesting football games will be over :)
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Chalenge on October 10, 2006, 02:24:15 PM
I would love to attack and kill you all. Can you do this Friday night? :D
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Dichotomy on October 10, 2006, 02:36:39 PM
might interfere with FSO's for some people that would participate and give it the attention it deserves.

I think it's an interesting theory esp if the bombers all have gunners.. Sure to be good film fodder
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: bj229r on October 10, 2006, 04:12:52 PM
My old squad, the Oddcaf/ Karaya/Uknome/47Ronin, did a Ploesti re-enactment one night on the large pac map (with the gv fights in the middle)--- takeoff point to first target (refinery, somethin like that) was about 6 sectors, NOE, about 12 sets B24's---made a Cv flash about 2/3 the way to first target--(Ghi apparently saw it)--- We popped up at the first target/refinery to about 2k, dropped 500 pounders, then split into 2 groups, went east and west, each group to hit one other strat-type target, again NOE--by this time, GHI and a few buds were after us, and it was a running fight for the next 5 sectors back to nearest friendly base--(we had to go around a big island that housed one of their bases) We shot all of them down at least once, as they were having a bad time getting out in front and doing a proper attack--(even WITH a proper attack, deck buffs present a more difficult target, as you cant pass below, gives you less room to avoid the hail of '50s). Were killing one fighter after another after another, and more of B24's were getting shot down--One of our cv's was about one sector from the landing spot, and some of the dead guys upped in fighters to escort back the survivors. who were all about out of ammo..oil, aluminum, etc. Managed to get maybe 2-3 guys of the original 12 back to base---was the coolest experience I've had in 6-7 years of AH (oh yah...I got 1 plane back..2 engines, no gear--landed 8 kills:) )
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: B@tfinkV on October 10, 2006, 04:14:12 PM
Quote
Originally posted by BugsBunny
Read again.  



lol oh yeah i see that now.  let me go brush up on my reading comprehenshion skills. my bad :)
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Dichotomy on October 10, 2006, 04:18:01 PM
geez B@t ;)
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: bagrat on October 10, 2006, 04:21:17 PM
yup
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Husky01 on October 10, 2006, 06:13:40 PM
Ok ron he is the deal you give me a nickle!!!!!! and I do it and Im sure i can get a few 613th to do it as well probly around 5 or so, but member I want a nickle!!!:aok  

O btw how does the video card and video ipod working out?
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: BugsBunny on October 11, 2006, 07:56:30 AM
Quote
Originally posted by B@tfinkV
lol oh yeah i see that now.  let me go brush up on my reading comprehenshion skills. my bad :)


Bah, dont wory about that.  Just stop trying to play the BBS ethics police man.  It was a simple question (not directed at you).  I don't see why you had a problem with it.
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: SkyRock on October 11, 2006, 12:36:20 PM
Quote
Originally posted by BugsBunny
Bah, dont wory about that.  Just stop trying to play the BBS ethics police man.  It was a simple question (not directed at you).  I don't see why you had a problem with it.
Maybe some "read" into your replies for what they are.  Yours being the only reply that didn't foresee what tater's point might be.  No reply in the la7 thread huh?  All mouth and much of that is not believable at best!  Maybe you need more vitamin A, Wabbit!:aok
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: BugsBunny on October 11, 2006, 12:57:59 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SkyRock
Maybe some "read" into your replies for what they are.  Yours being the only reply that didn't foresee what tater's point might be.  No reply in the la7 thread huh?  All mouth and much of that is not believable at best!  Maybe you need more vitamin A, Wabbit!:aok


Ohhhh, the wabbit has a job too.  Let me check the thread.  i might have ignored you by mistake.
Title: Re: low buff engagement
Post by: EagleDNY on October 11, 2006, 02:14:17 PM
Quote
Originally posted by tatertot
id like to try a little theory,but need some volunteers.
 as you all know 999000 and myself fly low basicaly to gun but bomb also

here is something id like to try and its going to take help from all sides
id like to get a group of people together lets say 10 sets of buffs maybe(with gunners if possible)then i would like to announce it on 200,say were we are headed and have as many that would like to attack to do it.i wanna do this for numerous reasons 1)cause it would be cool2)to see how many would make it 3)to proove a point! if any one would like to try it respond here and we could set it up this weekend,we currantly are knights but can switch at any time  

if its a bad idea and sorry for the terrible read .


You can sign me up as a buff driver - most of the time I like to fight my way in at 5K so I can be sure that every bomb hits its target ;)  Let me know when & where and I'll be there :aok

EagleDNY
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: BugsBunny on October 12, 2006, 08:47:44 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SkyRock
Maybe some "read" into your replies for what they are.  Yours being the only reply that didn't foresee what tater's point might be.  No reply in the la7 thread huh?  All mouth and much of that is not believable at best!  Maybe you need more vitamin A, Wabbit!:aok


Yep, tater did and he gave me an answer.  Bat, was just being himself.  I'd be surprised if he did not say anything. :lol
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: B@tfinkV on October 12, 2006, 08:59:53 AM
Quote
Originally posted by BugsBunny
Bah, dont wory about that.  Just stop trying to play the BBS ethics police man.  It was a simple question (not directed at you).  I don't see why you had a problem with it.



i didnt have a problem, just mistook the situation. i dont think i showed any personal offence or personal attack. if i see anything (misread or otherwise) that makes me feel like replying then i usualy do.  saying im ethics police is silly cos i dont have any power over what others say or do......yet, the mind probe control pad is under developement. :t
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: doc1kelley on October 15, 2006, 10:11:43 AM
Quote
Originally posted by B@tfinkV
i think they just want to have fun bugs.....aint that allowed?


Not if it were to employ the views of some of the BK's in that if it ain't a fair fighter on fighter fight, it ain't good and shouldn't be allowed.  ROFLOL!

All the Best...
Jay
awDoc1

PS.. It really sounds interesting
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Toad on October 15, 2006, 10:35:35 AM
On my computer even one formation of buffs stutters. I'd hate to see what 12 would do to framerates.
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Bruv119 on October 15, 2006, 10:42:23 AM
When Kazaa used to do some BFM's (Big ***** mission) as knights some months back

think we used to get about 20 guys in b24's  and yea it killed FR's to teen figures for me.   20 ppl + 40 drones   60 buffs in the same vicinity.

Add about -5-10 fighter escorts.   Was great fun smashing about 3 different bases shooting down any enemy fighters that dared engage.

You could sense the location of the group when your FR's took a hit like a storm brewing  lol


Bruv
~S~
Title: Re: low buff engagement
Post by: Donzo on October 15, 2006, 04:24:11 PM
Quote
Originally posted by tatertot
...then i would like to announce it on 200,say were we are headed and have as many that would like to attack to do it.


I'm sorry but this would constitute a "horde" coming to attack you and those are not good things to have in any arena these days.

Sorry.
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: bj229r on October 15, 2006, 05:12:45 PM
Boy, are all you 'mega-squad' guys this thin-skinned? LCA was like that too, as I recall
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: hubsonfire on October 15, 2006, 09:04:58 PM
They used to be this vocal, too. ;)
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Grits on October 15, 2006, 09:22:35 PM
Yeah, what happened to the LCA anyway? I thought they were going to revolutionise AH with their new and cutting edge mishun technology?
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: kamilyun on October 15, 2006, 09:28:11 PM
They did...we have a new arena format now ;)
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: SkyRock on October 16, 2006, 06:10:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by kamilyun
They did...we have a new arena format now ;)
:rofl :lol
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: SlapShot on October 16, 2006, 07:15:17 AM
Quote
Originally posted by doc1kelley
Not if it were to employ the views of some of the BK's in that if it ain't a fair fighter on fighter fight, it ain't good and shouldn't be allowed.  ROFLOL!

All the Best...
Jay
awDoc1

PS.. It really sounds interesting


You really are becoming an "ankle humper" extraordinaire ... you must have something else in life more important than trying to ding the BKs in every thread you read ... then again ... maybe not.
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: storch on October 16, 2006, 08:52:41 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SlapShot
You really are becoming an "ankle humper" extraordinaire ... you must have something else in life more important than trying to ding the BKs in every thread you read ... then again ... maybe not.
here, take the hook outta your mouth  dang, you swallowed that one deeply. that's gonna leave a scar.
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: tatertot on October 16, 2006, 09:07:56 AM
yes it would kill fr  to death,yes it nwould send the horde to us,but thats the point if you read up earlier  i have been working on some things id like to try.

anyway if history is correct wasnt buffs attacked in hordes aka squadrons??/ JUST 1 FIGHTER HITTING AT A TIME DOESNT WORK AS MANY KNOW POINT IS ID LIKE TO SEE IF THE THEORY I HAVE WORKS


PROBLEM IS IM HAVING HOME CONNECTION ISSUES AS OF NOW SO I DONT WANT TO SET THIS UP UNTIL I THOSE RESOLVED
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: SlapShot on October 16, 2006, 12:44:37 PM
Quote
Originally posted by storch
here, take the hook outta your mouth  dang, you swallowed that one deeply. that's gonna leave a scar.


(http://img124.echo.cx/img124/3829/sc1093ss.gif)
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: storch on October 16, 2006, 12:46:52 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SlapShot
(http://img124.echo.cx/img124/3829/sc1093ss.gif)
a kitten just spawned on lazs' lap
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: FiLtH on October 16, 2006, 03:10:48 PM
When are we gonna try this? Im itchin to try it :)
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: tatertot on October 17, 2006, 03:36:16 PM
Filth if i can get my comp running by Sat will that work?If so and you see me around and or 999000 maybe we should do a test run ??let me know tatertot
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: 999000 on October 17, 2006, 09:09:45 PM
your going to get us killed again tatertot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
999000
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: hubsonfire on October 17, 2006, 10:52:00 PM
If Savvis isn't losing all my packets when you do this, I'd like to reserve a Deathstar spot.
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: tatertot on October 18, 2006, 09:31:38 AM
noted,slot saved you wanna be the lead:D or middle of pack,

biggest  question do we have everyone have gunners or only people who want to gun,either way works i would think alot would prefer to gun them selves what else do we need to add to this
Title: low buff engagement
Post by: Shamus on October 18, 2006, 09:58:42 AM
Hmmm, now where did I put that 110g?

shamus