Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Ball on November 02, 2006, 02:07:16 AM

Title: I like the arena change.
Post by: Ball on November 02, 2006, 02:07:16 AM
It means that if you cannot find a fight in one arena, there are two others to try - i really like the change.  I like the variation in planeset too.

I do not like the milkrunning attitude in the EW/MW though, be nice if it was set to 20 troops to take a base instead of 10.  Too often i log on to see one team with 5 players, and one with 30, and the 30 are just hording the smaller teams bases.
Title: I like the arena change.
Post by: The Fugitive on November 02, 2006, 06:25:37 AM
awwww...your limiting yourself Ball !!!

With 3 teams in each of the 4 arenas, there are 12 possible starting points to look for fights !!! :aok

"I love dis game!"
Title: I like the arena change.
Post by: jokeri on November 02, 2006, 07:10:06 AM
I'm possible getting my self shot here with this so please do it quickly.

Yesterday there was in MW 38 players divided to tree countrys. The divide was something like Bishops 18 Knights 11 and Rooks 9. So "good" fights were little hard to find. One time Knights and Bishops were concetrated to eachother in their front so was quite sporadic encouters with enemy.

Would it be impossible idea to have only 2 sides per arena? Then there would more action per fight? I know many players and squad are attached to their side for many years and this would mean that new side should have to be chosen.

Of course two sides per arena could make numbers balance even more bigger problem than now. Otherside is that the fights would be concentrated to smaller areas with more population.

-jokeri
Title: I like the arena change.
Post by: Major Biggles on November 02, 2006, 09:12:10 AM
hehe, good one furby :D
Title: I like the arena change.
Post by: Mr No Name on November 02, 2006, 10:23:53 AM
the name says it all.
Title: I like the arena change.
Post by: Kuhn on November 02, 2006, 10:30:55 AM
I like the new setup too. The thought of two sides and one front does sound interesting. The AVA is already like that and its a great time when there is a number of players there.
Title: I like the arena change.
Post by: The Fugitive on November 02, 2006, 04:28:57 PM
Quote
Originally posted by jokeri
I'm possible getting my self shot here with this so please do it quickly.

Yesterday there was in MW 38 players divided to tree countrys. The divide was something like Bishops 18 Knights 11 and Rooks 9. So "good" fights were little hard to find. One time Knights and Bishops were concetrated to eachother in their front so was quite sporadic encouters with enemy.

Would it be impossible idea to have only 2 sides per arena? Then there would more action per fight? I know many players and squad are attached to their side for many years and this would mean that new side should have to be chosen.

Of course two sides per arena could make numbers balance even more bigger problem than now. Otherside is that the fights would be concentrated to smaller areas with more population.

-jokeri


HT has said they tried 2,3,4, and I think even 5 countrys, and 3 worked the best, and that is were it is going to stay.

Jokeri, if the fighting was only going on between knights and bish, join either of those countries and have some fun! After an hour you can switch back to your "favorite" country if you want.
Title: I like the arena change.
Post by: Ball on November 02, 2006, 04:38:03 PM
Quote
Originally posted by The Fugitive
With 3 teams in each of the 4 arenas, there are 12 possible starting points to look for fights !!! :aok

"I love dis game!"


precisely, it is great!