Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: cav58d on November 16, 2006, 09:07:36 PM
-
IS A NUTCASE..nuff said...Can't believe what he is doing right now....
-
I'm fresh outta rat's asses.
-
The guy is really stupid.
If he keeps it up he will find out how the double jeopardy laws can be circumvented.
shamus
-
Here is the solution
(http://blogimg.com/docisin/noose.jpg)
-
I think the guy is just provoking the world to pick him off through a scope.
Idiot
-
Originally posted by Sandman
I'm fresh outta rat's asses.
Couldn't agree more.
-
He will eventually break down and confess.
-
His confession will be immaterial as far as criminal prosecution is concerend. Any profits made on his "book" and "film" are likely to be subject to the civil suit judgement he lost. Assuming there is no "statute of limitations" on that judgement.
AFAIAC he is a waste of oxygen.
-
Two words....
Cement
Shoes
Mac
-
Ya know what would be real funny. If he was actually innocent. Not a single person who talks about knows crap about it, it's ALL speculation and reckless assumptions, based on tabloid style media.
There's only 3 people who KNOW if he did it. Not one single person more.
-
Originally posted by FT_Animal
Ya know what would be real funny. If he was actually innocent. Not a single person who talks about knows crap about it, it's ALL speculation and reckless assumptions, based on tabloid style media.
There's only 3 people who KNOW if he did it. Not one single person more.
if you do not believe he did it, you must be as naive as they come
-
Originally posted by Eagler
if you do not believe he did it, you must be as naive as they come
Obviously, you didn't read what I wrote. I never once, ever, said I beleive either way, what I do know is that I wasn't there, so I have no clue.
do you KNOW 100% that he did? or do you speculate 100% that he did?
Now who's more naive? Someone who beleives in speculation, or someone who has no opinion, nor clue and says so? I don't know if he did or didn't, therefore I don't go around saying he did, nor didn't. :) Last I heard there were only three people there, I had no idea all these unknown witnesses were there too, so my bad. :)
One thing I know for sure, no one here knows for sure.
Does the guy have bad taste? Absolutely, that's one thing we know for sure.
Is it most likely he did it, sure, the scale is tilting.
If he's innocent can you imagine what a horrible way to live a life. If you weren't nuts before it, you certainly would be after.
Point being, I'm bored, so I'm slamming down as much text as I can. :)
-
FT_Animal = OJ_Simpson
-
Originally posted by Meatwad
Here is the solution
(http://blogimg.com/docisin/noose.jpg)
Lynch the black guy, oh that's original.
-
Originally posted by Thrawn
Lynch the black guy, oh that's original.
Shows how much you know, that noose is not regulation, it's missing knots. :) it's only got 7
-
is OJ still looking for the real killers? :rolleyes:
-
Originally posted by john9001
is OJ still looking for the real killers? :rolleyes:
sure he is, everytime he goes to the golf course. He looks behind the clubhouse and at each hole he checks around the trees.
-
Originally posted by Thrawn
Lynch the black guy, oh that's original.
I was trying to think of a reply worthy enough for this, but I can't.
So I agree with Thrawn. We should lynch him.
-
Originally posted by Thrawn
FT_Animal = OJ_Simpson
:lol
-
What's the statute of limitations on perjury?
-
Originally posted by Thrawn
Lynch the black guy, oh that's original.
Would you feel better if it was a picture of the electric chair?
-
Simpson beat the system. In the grand scheme of things, whether he was convicted or not, it wouldn't bring back Ron or Nicole.
-
Any money he makes on the book or film will end up in the hands of ron and nicole's family. Or atleast a good size chunk.
-
Originally posted by FT_Animal
Ya know what would be real funny. If he was actually innocent. Not a single person who talks about knows crap about it, it's ALL speculation and reckless assumptions, based on tabloid style media.
There's only 3 people who KNOW if he did it. Not one single person more.
Ok, why did OJ Simpson's trial, turn into Mark Furhman's trial? I suppose the blood jumped into the Bronco as well. Wow are you naive.
-
Corrupt police.
-
What was it that ultimately led to a not guilty verdict? Was it sloppy police work and major evidence being thrown out of court? Or was it more of a racial and star struck jury?
-
Originally posted by Masherbrum
Ok, why did OJ Simpson's trial, turn into Mark Furhman's trial? I suppose the blood jumped into the Bronco as well. Wow are you naive.
I'm not naive, you don't know how to read.
-
And how about that Hitler guy... boy was he ever a jerk huh?