Originally posted by SINNER
Okay, you can start throwing things now...
Originally posted by LePaul
You've said it well. If the La7 was this great in real life, you'd think we'd know of its great fame.
One day, here at the bank, Witko and I drew all kinds of neat things on the whiteboard, trying to figure out how this amazing E-fighter can do things. What stumps us reminds me of the old "one train leaves point a and goes to point B. Train 2 leaves point b and goes to point a" yada yada. In short, we've both had situations were we are at 15k or more in a P-51D, flying straight and level at 325mph. An La7 comes directly at us, passes us. We maintain course and speed. Yet, the La7 does a complete 180, gains on and is within 600 ft of us in no time. How can it do that, without burning up energy?? We're stumped, we've graphed it to the ridicule of coworkers...but they're dorks anyway cuz they play World of War :p
Originally posted by LePaul
You've said it well. If the La7 was this great in real life, you'd think we'd know of its great fame.
One day, here at the bank, Witko and I drew all kinds of neat things on the whiteboard, trying to figure out how this amazing E-fighter can do things. What stumps us reminds me of the old "one train leaves point a and goes to point B. Train 2 leaves point b and goes to point a" yada yada. In short, we've both had situations were we are at 15k or more in a P-51D, flying straight and level at 325mph. An La7 comes directly at us, passes us. We maintain course and speed. Yet, the La7 does a complete 180, gains on and is within 600 ft of us in no time. How can it do that, without burning up energy?? We're stumped, we've graphed it to the ridicule of coworkers...but they're dorks anyway cuz they play World of War :p
Originally posted by mussie
I hated to fly the LA-7 but I started... It was great fun to catch runners in it :)
Now I fly the 152 as my main ride
Originally posted by Bronk
Film or I call BS .
Bronk
Originally posted by SINNER
You must not have much to do today Bronk. I'm a whiner and LePaul is BS.
Do you have an opinion on this, other than everyone discussing it are a bunch of idiots?
But I don't WANT to fly it and I hate sometimes feeling like I have little choice.
Originally posted by Bronk
Slow down big guy.
I put that smiley there for a reason. Was suppose to be light hearted poke not a stab in the back.
As for lepaul yup unless I see film I call bs.
Way to many claims of "This is what happened." with no proof.
You believe everthing people post or just with people who agree with you?
This is bs also you always have a choice. Learn a new AC learn how to fight the Lala. I'm no uber sim pilot and I kill them more than they kill me.
So if I can do it anyone can.
Bronk
Originally posted by SINNER
1. If you think it's B.S. why are so active in monitoring it and posting on it? You can uncheck the Email notification and go back to whatever you were doing before.
Because there is nothing better on TV right now. Also what i do with my time is just that, MY time thank you.
2. Whether or not you can kill them isn't the point of the post, but it is really helpful that you suggested that.
What is the point? Perk them because YOU cant kill them? What please explain.
I think what you've suggested falls under the category of "any plane flown such and such can defeat an LA", which I said I already knew someone would say, but thanks for going ahead and saying it anyway.
Been said before but it needs repeating. FEAR THE PILOT NOT THE PLANE!!!
Thanks for your insight.
Originally posted by Bronk
Been said before but it needs repeating. FEAR THE PILOT NOT THE PLANE!!!
Thanks for your insight.
Your welcome. :D
Bronk [/B]
Originally posted by Apeking
"I'm suggesting that they are more dangerous that other planes that are perked, such as the Ta152 etc."
Hang on a sec, the Ta152 isn't perked. It was perked until a few months ago, but the powers that decided to unperk it. (Checks) And it's still unperked.
Originally posted by Bronk
Your welcome. :D
Bronk
Originally posted by SINNER
The point is that even if LA7's aren't over modeled, they're certainly over represented, and whether or not that's an issue.
I never said I can't kill them, I kill them all the time, they're usually over confident, but that has no bearing on the fact that there are more of them than any other plane flying, in my opinion, and they weren't that prevalent in WWII.
I'm suggesting that they are more dangerous than other planes that are perked, such as the Ta152 etc. I'm assuming that those planes are perked, to limit their numbers in the game. I'm also suggesting that this might make a more accurate simulation of WWII if the LA7's were similarly perked.
I think if you post 3 more you'll break 1700 posts!
Originally posted by 1Boner
i (choke) agree 100% Bronk!!
perk the la7 because its over represented?....
then the f4u s
perk it.
then the----and then the----and what about the----
:noid
Originally posted by SINNER
The point is that even if LA7's aren't over modeled, they're certainly over represented, and whether or not that's an issue.
I never said I can't kill them, I kill them all the time, they're usually over confident, but that has no bearing on the fact that there are more of them than any other plane flying, in my opinion, and they weren't that prevalent in WWII.
I'm suggesting that they are more dangerous than other planes that are perked, such as the Ta152 etc. I'm assuming that those planes are perked, to limit their numbers in the game. I'm also suggesting that this might make a more accurate simulation of WWII if the LA7's were similarly perked.
I think if you post 3 more you'll break 1700 posts!
Originally posted by 1Boner
i (choke) agree 100% Bronk!!
perk the la7 because its over represented?
then the p51 will be over repped!!
perk it.
then the typhoon
perk it.
then the f4u s
perk it.
then the----and then the----and what about the----
:noid
there will always be an uber plane that everyone will want to fly.
eliminate or perk it. another will take its place.
Originally posted by Bronk
Well what happens if HT perks it?
You'll start seeing a ton of "HO-N-GO" tiffies.
What then? Perk the tiffie because it's over used?
Ect...ect..ect..
Till we are left flying A6m2's and Hurricane MK I's .
I know Schatzi might be pleased with this but not me.
And It's 1 more post .
:furious :furious :furious :D :D :D
Bronk
Ps the Ta is free now.
Originally posted by 1Boner
i do believe that the russians produced more la7 s than any other russian plane.
Originally posted by Bronk
:noid :noid :noid :noid
Ok I need a shower now. I feel violated in some way.
:aok
Seriously boner we are probably not that far off on other stuff. The BB doesn't convey intent well.
Bronk
Originally posted by Bronk
The only thing I might concede is the 3 gun La7 should have a light perk.
So you don't have a problem with tiffs but a La's do hmm.
I'd bet after a few go around with Kermit you'd want tiffs perked also.
Bronk
Originally posted by Bronk
1702 dang it .:p
Look the reason is so noobs actually have a chance at getting kills. Just like the Mk XVI.
Some make the transition out to other AC some don't.
Pity those who don't but don't begrudge a noob of learning in an easy ac.
Seriously what do you think of perking just the 3 gun version ?
Bronk
Originally posted by SINNER
I'm just talking about the tons of LA's everywhere.
Originally posted by Lusche
Never let perception fool you.
Sometimes the LA 7 just SEEMS to be everywhere, but in truth itīs not more numerous than some other planes.
In the current tour, La7 has approximately 26000 kills, which is less than Spit XVI, P51D and N1K2.
Actually, the 26000 kills amount to just 7% of all fighter kills. And with a K/D rate of 1.23 it is only ranking 21st on the list of most dangerous fighters.
Originally posted by Vudak
Every time I poke my head in the General Forums, nothing's ever changed :D
Grab a Corsair, they'll eat 'em for breakfast and you'll make good perks. Problem solved.
Originally posted by Vudak
Every time I poke my head in the General Forums, nothing's ever changed :D
Grab a Corsair, they'll eat 'em for breakfast and you'll make good perks. Problem solved.
hated to fly the LA-7 but I started... It was great fun to catch runners in it
Originally posted by SINNER
Those stats are definitely worth knowing but they don't tell you how many of them are flying around,
Originally posted by SINNER
WHY CAN'T I SEARCH FOR LA7? Google can. :cry
Originally posted by SteveBailey
I have heard several people say this. Personally I know this to be a lame arsed cop out of an excuse for the speaker/typer to get in a LA7.
Originally posted by Lusche
To my knowledge, the most produced plane is the Po-2, followed by the Il2/Il10 family.
Originally posted by 1Boner
the petlyakov pe-2 was a light bomber.
Originally posted by Lusche
Well, I was mentioning the Po-2, not The Pe-2. The Po-2 (earlier name was U-2) was first built as a training plane, but was also used in combat during WW2, most notably as a light night attack plane used by the female-only 588th Night Bomber Regiment - the infamous Night Witches. Other uses were crop dusting, light transport, recon and many more.
It seems that at least some 40,000 Po-2/U-2 were built
Originally posted by Lusche
Po2 was built and flown during WW2 ;)
Originally posted by mussie
Lame arse excuse....
Check my stats, You will see me in Hurri-1's Spitty-1 TBM's FM2's
Personally I think you comment is a lame arse.... Now go bite a pillow
EDIT: I just love the way you know my comment is an excuse.... How the F*&(& could you know anything about what I say when you dont know me....
Man that gives my the chits
Originally posted by SteveBailey
Blah blah blah .. sniffle cry whine. I don't care what you fly, just have the courage to not invent lame excuse to do so. How do I know your comment is an excuse? Because the very same drones that spout your excuse are the guys I end up chasing as they run away. Like I said, I don't care what you fly, 99% of la7's are easy kills because the pilots of them most often don't have the first clue about throttle management and ACM. When I see an LA7 I practically get Pavlovian
Originally posted by eh
What do you call a late war fighter with:
1. a terrible cockpit view
2. ammo with lousy ballistics
3. hilariously lightweight ordinance
4. lousy gas mileage
5. poor performance above 15 - 20k
6. poor dog fighting characteristics?
?????
An La-7.
Originally posted by Bubbajj
I've never had any luck with the La La but I'm also a knife fighter which may not play to it's strengths. I've shot down a lot of La's in an FM2. Since it was brought up, whats so great about a TA 152?? Never noticed that they were that fast or maneuverable. I've never seen one last long in a dogfight. What's the big deal? I really dislike Yucca and Greebo in their freeking F6s and hogs by the way.
Originally posted by Bubbajj
I've never had any luck with the La La but I'm also a knife fighter which may not play to it's strengths. I've shot down a lot of La's in an FM2. Since it was brought up, whats so great about a TA 152?? Never noticed that they were that fast or maneuverable. I've never seen one last long in a dogfight. What's the big deal? I really dislike Yucca and Greebo in their freeking F6s and hogs by the way.
Originally posted by Lusche
Best 152 altitude is at about 35K and above (service ceiling was around 50K). In MAs, it is more or less a fish out of water most of the time. But it has massive firepower, though.
Originally posted by mussie
I have to disagree Lusche....
I have some films of me knife fighting in the 152 I will post later (I am at work at the moment)...
IMO Its a dam good bird....
Originally posted by Lusche
Hehe, I do know YOU (and some other dam good pilots) can do it
But still it has less power (accel, climb), less top speed, slower roll rate that the D-9. The turn rate is a bit better, but still dismal when compared to most other planes. I would even dare to say itīs a neutered D9 down low . ;)
Add to that some nasty behavior at slow speeds - I would never recommend a 152 for low level fighting. You really have to be a very good pilot to prevail in a knife fight.
Originally posted by mussie
Well buddy if you see the cpid mussie in the MA feel free to call me out for a fight....
BTW what is you CPID
Originally posted by hubsonfire
Mussie, meet Steve. He likes to fly 51s in extremely low risk situations. Think GrmRpr w/o a sense of humor.
Originally posted by SteveBailey
*sigh* the old "Let's duel, I are l33t and you are teh suck."
I much prefer the chaos of the MA. If I win, are you going to say I'm right? What's my motivation for dueling? Beating you won't mean I'm right, or a better pilot and I'm not into chest thumping much. I'll duel ya in any plane you want... when I'm in the mood for the DA, the plane isn't what counts, it's the fun.
My CPID: Steve
Originally posted by mussie
Its only the stats for this year tours 72-81 but I aint going to collect the stats for the year previous
(http://members.optusnet.com.au/vstrom/JG44%20Stats/November%202006/tours%2072-81.jpg)
YEAh I do suck but at least I shot him down ^ :P
Originally posted by hubsonfire
I remember your ID from the "Rat Bastards of America" days (I was still a lowly dweeb named "name" back then), and I think you might have been on a few times when I was flying with Shawk's squads (was probably flying as hub or hub7 then).
Since your return, you have killed me once, and you didn't do it from a disadvantage. I'm not trying to belittle your cartoon skills, but you aren't exactly flying recklessly. You fly "smart", and that's great for you.
Originally posted by hubsonfire
Mussie, meet Steve. He likes to fly 51s in extremely low risk situations. Think GrmRpr w/o a sense of humor.
Originally posted by mussie
I have NEVER EVER in my entire time playing AH said that I was l33t or even good.... Infact In the "Career stats" thread my exact words were "Yeah I Suck"
Originally posted by Lusche
While I would reluctantly agree to most points mentoined , I have to say that #6 is absolutely not true.
People vastly underestimate the dogfighting capabilties of the La7. It turns much better than most people think. Add to this the tremendous power, and you have a plane well able to get into a close brawl. Of course, you have to know to handle your throttle...
Originally posted by Murdr
didnt take long to hijack this one :)
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
The problem starts with relying on russian data. Russians have always been famous for giving fake reports of this and that to please the partyline. The original numbers are probably the least trustworthy.
When the original source of information is nothing short of a fantasy, it's no wonder the plane becomes dominant when simulated.
Originally posted by SINNER
Obviously this can go on to a ridiculous conclusion. The 51 was very prevalent, and f4u's etc. I'm not suggesting that there is a problem with the other planes. I just think when half of every furball is LA7's and they weren't a major factor in WWII, it is a little "inaccurate" if that term can be applied to AH.
Originally posted by straffo
The russian front was not a major factor ?
Are you nuts ?
The russian front was not a major factor ?
Are you nuts ?
Originally posted by bzek74
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La7
Originally posted by MwDogg
I find the la7 not to be a problem in the MA. The plane I think is the problem is the hurri IIC. The plane is way to manuevable at high speeds. I had 1 the other night stay with me doing a spiral dive at over 450mph all the way down to the earth leveling and yet stay with me for a long time. Its only the IIC that I find can do this. Wings should come off at those speeds doing those manevs on the hurri pulling over 7g's.
Originally posted by hubsonfire:rofl
Mussie, meet Steve. He likes to fly 51s in extremely low risk situations. Think GrmRpr w/o a sense of humor.
Originally posted by SkyRock
SkyRock's F4U-1<-----------eats la7's like a hungry weight watcher drop out!
:aok
Originally posted by 1Boner
i do believe that the russians produced more la7 s than any other russian plane.
Originally posted by Masherbrum
Wow. Why do you even bother posting? :rofl
La-5 - 9,920
La-7 - 5,753
Yak-9 - 16,769
Il-2- 36,163
You get the point.
Originally posted by 1Boner
just to annoy you mashmouth.:aok
Originally posted by Masherbrum
Nice attempt. You failed again. Keep trying, MAYBE one day, but I doubt it. You're good at backpedaling though.
Originally posted by 1Boner
he,ll always have something brilliant to say.
why does HE bother?:rolleyes:
Originally posted by Airscrew
Because its fun, and you make it almost too easy :lol
Originally posted by Airscrewconcurr!:aok
Because its fun, and you make it almost too easy :lol
Originally posted by SkyRock
concurr!:aok
Originally posted by 1Boner
very entertaining
like a monkey slingin poop in a zoo!!!
Originally posted by Airscrew
Funny you should use that analogy, makes me think of your posts :lol
Just so you wouldnt be disappointed...
Originally posted by hubsonfire
Hi Steve. :)
I think you mistakenly lump everyone who flies an La into the "just likes to run like a little girl" crowd.