Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: meerlin on January 09, 2007, 01:42:01 PM

Title: new cargo plane
Post by: meerlin on January 09, 2007, 01:42:01 PM
the ju 352 was a better cargo plane than the c-47 at least when some cherry pickers come to attack it it could fight back with its tail gun
accual ww2 specs ar below

Year deployed -1943
Wing span, m 34.2
Lenght, m 24.6
Height, m 5.75
Wings area, m2 128.30
Weight, kg
- empty aircraft  13500
- maximum take-off 19600
Engine  3pe bmw bramo 323r -2
Power, hp 3 y 1200
Maximum speed, km/h 370
Cruising speed, km/h 300
Range, km 3000
Combat range, km 1800
Rate of climb, m/min 315
Service ceiling, m 6000
Crew 4-5 (5 rear gunner)
Useful load: 4300kg freight
Armament: - 1 cannon MG-151/20 in HD-151/2


http://www.airwar.ru/enc_e/cww2/ju352.html
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: Yoshimbo on January 09, 2007, 01:49:28 PM
Junkers Ju 352 Herkules

Ugly-As-Sin

damn:
(http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/images/lrg0079.jpg)

atleast it can defend itself though!!!

I say yes, it wold be a fun alternative to the C47:aok

EDIT: i've found other sources that say it was not only armed with the tail gun metioned above, but also two MG 131s mounted in beam windows.
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: meerlin on January 10, 2007, 12:21:38 AM
there r also the earlier versions that had guns as well ..1933 and 1942 versions those planes not quit as ugly as this one heheh but this one had the better guns to def with:lol :O  :rofl ..but like would make for interesting bit of action attack it
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: Spikes on January 10, 2007, 04:30:45 PM
if we get that, maybe when you come within 6K, it could say, "Cargo"


then maybe within 2.5k, it  says the actual plane type, that way, say a spit 1 woul;d go for a c47, but maybe not a junkers cause of the tail gun



my opinion
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: Wes14 on January 10, 2007, 04:45:32 PM
:rofl  that plane looks like crap,but the guns will help..but heres my lil tactic in a c-47
(NOT RECOMENDED)
-If a enemy plane is on ur butt and ur going slow slam the flaps down/anything else that will slow u down and let them crash into u:D  most of the time with my luck i take a lil damage (or explode/die)
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: Spikes on January 10, 2007, 04:59:18 PM
ur crazy wes, we need a very early verson if a AC-47, but cram all those guns in t3h back, i'd be klike a 130mm gun, lol
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: Wes14 on January 10, 2007, 05:29:28 PM
130mm..on the tail...dam the M1Abrams tank doesn't have a 130mm on it

what u wanna use a 130mm to rocket into a tree on take off? :rofl

and the weight on the tail would make it a pain in the butt to fly(not to mention evasion maeuvering:huh
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: Spikes on January 10, 2007, 08:31:36 PM
lol
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: OOZ662 on January 10, 2007, 09:58:32 PM
Balance is an issue in the cases of "better" planes. Any cargo plane that gets added will carry exactly what the C-47 does to keep the current troop/supply balance in check.
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: RAIDER14 on January 10, 2007, 10:23:30 PM
troop transport facts (http://youtube.com/watch?v=FhfcdqMTtU4)
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: OOZ662 on January 10, 2007, 11:14:44 PM
No, that's a retarded Quizno's commercial from forever ago. :D
Title: new cargo plane
Post by: Spikes on January 11, 2007, 06:16:04 AM
it would carry the same, but maybe junkers could be a bit slow, but have a tail gun, would that even it out?